Chapter 6: Plant Water Relation

On the foggy northern coast of California stand the tallest living things on Earth — the coast redwoods, Sequoia sempervirens. The tallest of them rise well over 100 metres, taller than a thirty-storey building. Every one of their topmost leaves is alive, and every one of them needs water.

Now think about what that means. The water those leaves use is drawn from the soil, at ground level. It has to travel the entire height of the trunk, straight up, against gravity, all day, every day. A fire engine pumping water to the top of a tall building needs a powerful motor. The redwood has no motor, no muscle, no beating heart, and not a single moving part. Yet it lifts hundreds of litres of water each day from its roots to its crown — silently, and without spending much energy at all.

Even more surprising: most of that water is not “used” by the tree in any obvious way. It simply escapes into the air through tiny pores on the leaves. So the tree spends enormous effort lifting water it then lets go of. That sounds wasteful. It is not.

The redwood is an extreme example, but the same machinery is at work in a mango tree in your street and in a tomato plant in a pot on a balcony.

Diagram

Fig. 6.0 – A tall coast redwood beside a multi-storey building for scale, with an arrow tracing the path of water from soil → root → trunk → branch → leaf → water vapour escaping to air

NoteCuriosity Corner

Q1. How does a tall tree lift water all the way to its topmost leaf without any pump? Q2. Rain water, soil water, dew — is every drop of water in the soil actually available to a root, or only some of it? Q3. Why does a dried raisin swell up in water, and why do wooden doors jam in the rainy season? Q4. If a plant absorbs so much water, how much of it does it actually keep — and where does the rest go? Q5. Why do scientists call transpiration “a necessary evil” if it makes the plant lose water?

This chapter will help you answer each of these questions.

6.1 Properties of Water

A plant cannot walk to its food. Everything it needs — water, dissolved minerals, nutrients, and gases such as \(O_2\) and \(CO_2\) — must be taken in from the surroundings in which it is rooted. Of all these, water is the one that decides most. When water is short, growth slows and yield falls; productivity in plants is affected mainly by the non-availability of water.

Before you begin, recall from your earlier classes: What are the main parts of a plant body? What does each part do? Which plant tissues carry water and minerals from one part to another?

Water has long been called the elixir of life, and in plants this is close to literal. Water makes up nearly 90 to 95% of most plant cells and tissues. It is the water inside a cell that keeps the cell swollen and firm, which is what gives a soft herb its shape and keeps a leaf held out flat to the sun. This firmness is called turgidity, and you will meet it again and again in this chapter.

water in the plant (Zoom in: water is a single small molecule, \(H_2O\). Zoom out: it fills the vacuole of every cell, keeps tissues turgid, holds the whole herbaceous plant upright, and finally escapes from the leaf into the atmosphere.)

What makes water so useful

Water is a liquid at room temperature, and this alone matters — a substance that is gaseous or solid at 25 °C could never flow through a root. It is a chemically inert inorganic compound, and in the pure state it has a neutral pH. Being inert, it can carry substances about without reacting with them and destroying them.

Water is also the best solvent for most solutes. Because it dissolves so much and reacts with so little, it is the ideal transporting medium for dissolved minerals and food molecules — the sap moving through xylem and phloem is essentially water carrying cargo. Inside the cell, water is the aqueous medium in which practically every biochemical reaction takes place.

Water is not only a medium; it is also a raw material. In photosynthesis, water is one of the two starting substances the plant actually consumes:

\[6CO_2 + 12H_2O \xrightarrow{\text{light, chlorophyll}} C_6H_{12}O_6 + 6O_2 + 6H_2O\]

Here \(CO_2\) is carbon dioxide, \(H_2O\) is water, \(C_6H_{12}O_6\) is glucose and \(O_2\) is oxygen. Without a steady water supply, this reaction — and therefore the plant’s entire food supply — simply stops.

Water as a thermal buffer

Water has high specific heat, high heat of vaporization and high heat of fusion. These three terms describe how much heat water must gain or lose before its temperature or its physical state changes.

  • High specific heat: a large amount of heat must be added to raise the temperature of water even slightly.
  • High heat of vaporization: a large amount of heat must be absorbed to convert liquid water into vapour.
  • High heat of fusion: a large amount of heat must be removed before water freezes into ice.

Together these mean that a tissue full of water heats up slowly and cools down slowly. Water therefore acts as a thermal buffer, protecting the delicate enzymes and membranes of the cell from sudden swings of temperature between a hot afternoon and a cold night.

NoteDefinition

Thermal buffer — a substance that resists rapid change in temperature, so it keeps the temperature of its surroundings steady. Because of its high specific heat, high heat of vaporization and high heat of fusion, water acts as a thermal buffer in living tissue.

Growers in frost-prone orchards sometimes deliberately spray or irrigate their crop on a night when temperature is expected to fall below freezing. As the water on the plants cools and begins to freeze, it releases heat (its high heat of fusion), and this released heat keeps the tissue around it from dropping to a lethal temperature. The very property that makes water a thermal buffer inside a cell is being used, on a farm scale, to save a crop.

Hydrogen bonds — the reason behind the properties

All of these unusual properties trace back to one thing: hydrogen bonds between water molecules. In a water molecule, oxygen pulls the shared electrons towards itself, so the oxygen end carries a slight negative charge and the hydrogen ends a slight positive charge. The slightly positive hydrogen of one molecule is attracted to the slightly negative oxygen of a neighbouring molecule, and this weak attraction is a hydrogen bond, as shown in Fig. 6.1.1.

Diagram

Fig. 6.1.1 – Two or three water molecules showing partial negative charge on O, partial positive on H, and dotted hydrogen bonds linking H of one molecule to O of the next

Because millions of these bonds must be broken before water molecules can move apart, water resists heating, resists evaporating, and resists freezing. Hydrogen bonding is the single explanation behind the whole list of properties above.

Q. If hydrogen bonds are individually weak, how can they matter so much?

A. Because there are so many of them. A single hydrogen bond is easily broken, but a drop of water contains an enormous number of them, and every one must be dealt with before the molecules can separate. Strength in numbers is what gives water its high specific heat, high heat of vaporization and high heat of fusion.

Cohesion, adhesion and the rise of water

Hydrogen bonds also make water molecules cling to one another and to other surfaces. Water molecules show good cohesive and adhesive forces of attraction.

NoteDefinition

Cohesive force — the force of attraction between molecules of the same kind, i.e. between one water molecule and another.

NoteDefinition

Adhesive force — the force of attraction between molecules of different kinds, i.e. between water molecules and the molecules of the surface they touch, such as a glass wall or the wall of a xylem vessel.

Cohesion vs Adhesion (Cohesion is water sticking to water — like molecules. Adhesion is water sticking to something else — unlike molecules. A useful check: water beading on a leaf shows cohesion; water creeping up the inside of a narrow glass tube shows adhesion.)

Cohesion also gives water a high surface tension — the surface of water behaves like a stretched skin, because the molecules at the surface are held tightly to one another. Because of high surface tension together with strong adhesive and cohesive forces, water can rise easily in fine capillaries — narrow tubes — without anything pushing it.

the water molecule (Polar molecule with slightly charged ends → forms hydrogen bonds with other water molecules and with charged surfaces → gives cohesion, adhesion, surface tension and thermal buffering → allows water to dissolve minerals, resist temperature change, and rise in narrow tubes such as xylem.)

Hold on to this last point. A xylem vessel is, in effect, an extremely fine capillary running from the root to the leaf. Water is therefore a molecule that connects the physical world — forces, pressures, surface tension — with biological processes such as absorption, transport and photosynthesis. The rest of this chapter is really the story of how a plant puts these ordinary physical properties of water to extraordinary use.

the three “high” thermal properties of water (Three highs, one buffer — high specific heat, high heat of vaporization, high heat of fusion → water is a thermal buffer. All three come from hydrogen bonding.)

6.2 Water Absorbing Organ: Root

If water is to be lifted to the top of a plant, it must first get into the plant. The root is the main organ of water and mineral absorption. It is the only part of most plants in permanent, intimate contact with the soil, and it is built for exactly this job.

In terrestrial plants — the ordinary land plants growing in soil — water is absorbed in the liquid form, drawn from the film of water clinging around the soil particles. But not every plant has soil to draw from.

Roots that drink from the air

Epiphytic plants, such as orchids, grow perched on the branches of other trees, with their roots hanging free in the air. They cannot pull liquid water from soil, because there is no soil. Instead, their epiphytic roots absorb water vapour directly from moist air, using a special spongy tissue called velamen that covers the root.

This is why orchids sold in nurseries are grown in open baskets or in a loose mixture of bark chips rather than in ordinary garden soil. Their thick, silvery-white aerial roots are coated with velamen, which soaks up moisture from humid air and from the water that trickles over the bark. Pack such a root into dense wet soil and it suffocates and rots — the very tissue that helps it absorb water in air becomes a liability underground.

The regions of a root tip

A typical root is divisible into four different regions, and they lie one above the other in a fixed order from the tip upwards, as shown in Fig. 6.1 a.

Diagram

Fig. 6.1 a – Root tip showing, from the tip upwards, root cap, meristematic region, zone of elongation, root hair zone and maturation zone, with root hairs labelled

The order is not accidental: cells are first produced at the tip, then stretched, then matured, and only the matured cells develop root hairs. The sequence is summarised in FC 6.1.

Flowchart

FC 6.1 – Regions of a root tip, from the tip upwards: root cap (protects the tip) → meristematic region (cells divide) → zone of elongation (cells stretch) → zone of maturation / root hair zone, also called the zone of absorption (cells mature and form root hairs)

It is the zone of absorption that concerns us here. In this region, the epidermal cells of the root — called epiblema cells — push out fine, unicellular, hair-like extensions called root hairs. These are the true points of entry for water.

the root hair (Zoom in: a root hair is not a separate organ but merely an outgrowth of one single epiblema cell. Zoom out: thousands of such epiblema cells make up the epiblema, the outermost tissue of the root, which is one tissue of the root — an organ.)

Structure of root hair

A root hair is a cytoplasmic extension, or prolongation, of an epiblema cell — the cell simply stretches a finger of itself out into the soil. Each root hair may be approximately 1 to 10 mm long, and is a tube-like structure. Being a mere extension, it shares the cytoplasm and the nucleus of the parent epiblema cell rather than owning a separate set.

Root hairs are colourless, unbranched and very delicate. They are also short-lived, or ephemeral — an individual root hair survives only a few days before dying, while new ones are constantly formed just behind the growing tip. The plant therefore keeps a fresh absorbing surface always in contact with fresh soil.

Look closely at the internal structure of a root hair in Fig. 6.1 b. It has a large central vacuole, which stores a concentrated cell sap. The vacuole is surrounded by a thin film of cytoplasm, containing the nucleus and mitochondria, and this cytoplasm is bounded on the outside by the plasma membrane.

Diagram

Fig. 6.1 b – Structure of a root hair: root epithelial (epiblemal) cell drawn out into a tube-like root hair, labelled with cell wall, cell membrane, cytoplasm, large central vacuole, nucleus and mitochondria

Outside the plasma membrane lies a thin cell wall, and this wall is two layered. The outer layer is composed of pectin and the inner layer is made up of cellulose. Both pectin and cellulose matter greatly for absorption, as the next section will show.

Now note the single most important structural fact about a root hair: the cell wall is freely permeable, but the plasma membrane is selectively permeable. The wall lets water and dissolved substances pass through without discrimination. The membrane, in contrast, chooses — it allows water through freely but controls which solutes may enter. Every step of water absorption you will study depends on this difference.

freely permeable cell wall vs selectively permeable plasma membrane (The cell wall is a mesh — it stops nothing and simply lets water and solutes soak through. The plasma membrane is a gatekeeper — water crosses easily, but solutes are admitted selectively. So water can reach the outside of the membrane by simply soaking through the wall, but it enters the cytoplasm only on the membrane’s terms.)

root hair (Long, thin, tube-like and present in thousands → enormously increases the surface area of root in contact with soil water → more water can be absorbed per second. Thin, two-layered, freely permeable wall of pectin and cellulose → water soaks in with almost no resistance. Large central vacuole with concentrated cell sap → keeps the cell “thirstier” than the surrounding soil water, so water keeps flowing in. Mitochondria in the cytoplasm → supply the ATP needed when the cell must take up material actively.)

Q. Why is a root hair unicellular and unbranched rather than a large, branched, multicellular structure?

A. Because thinness, not bulk, is what helps absorption. A fine unicellular hair can push between soil particles into the tiny water-filled pores where a thick branched structure could never reach, and it presents a very large surface for a very small volume. Being simple and cheap to build, it can also be discarded and replaced constantly as the root grows into new soil.

Root hairs are so delicate that they are torn away the moment a seedling is pulled out of the ground. This is exactly why a transplanted sapling wilts for the first few days even when the soil is well watered — its absorbing surface has been destroyed and must be rebuilt. Careful gardeners lift seedlings with a ball of soil around the roots, and shade and water them afterwards, precisely to protect and give time for the regrowth of root hairs.

6.3 Water Available to Roots for Absorption

A root hair does not absorb water from “the soil” in general. It absorbs from a thin, busy shell of soil that immediately surrounds the root, called the rhizosphere. This is the microenvironment where root, soil particles, soil water and soil microbes all meet, and it is the only region a root ever actually deals with.

NoteDefinition

Rhizosphere — the microenvironment of soil immediately surrounding the root, from which the plant draws its water and minerals.

Now comes a fact that surprises most students. Soil may be damp to the touch and still leave a plant thirsty. Water is present in the soil in four different forms, and a root can absorb only one of them.

Diagram

Fig. 6.3.1 – A cluster of soil particles showing the four forms of soil water: gravitational water draining down between large pores, capillary water held in the narrow pores between particles, a tightly held hygroscopic film on the particle surface, and combined water locked chemically inside the particle

Gravitational water

When it rains, or when a field is heavily irrigated, a large amount of water enters the soil. Much of it does not stay. It percolates deep down through the wide spaces between the soil particles, pulled by gravity, and drains away below the reach of the roots. This is gravitational water, also called free water.

Because it has already sunk past the root zone, gravitational water is not available to plants for absorption. It is water the plant sees for only a few hours and then loses.

Hygroscopic water

Fine soil particles — especially clay — behave like tiny sponges. They imbibe or adsorb water and hold it as an extremely thin film tightly bound to their surfaces. This tightly held film is hygroscopic water.

The word “tightly” is the whole point. The particle grips this water with a force far greater than the suction a root hair can generate. Roots cannot absorb it. The water is physically there, but it is out of reach.

Combined water

Some water is not even present as water any longer. It is chemically locked into the soil minerals themselves, in the form of hydrated oxides of silicon, aluminium and similar elements. This is combined water.

Since it forms part of the chemical structure of the mineral, it can be released only by chemical change, not by suction. It too is not available to plants for absorption.

Capillary water

That leaves the fourth form. Between neighbouring soil particles there are fine pores, no wider than narrow tubes. Water is held in these pores by capillarity — the same combination of surface tension, cohesion and adhesion you met in Section 6.1. This is capillary water.

Capillary water is held firmly enough not to drain away under gravity, yet loosely enough that a root hair can pull it in. It is the only form of soil water that is available for absorption, and therefore it is, in practice, the plant’s entire water supply.

NoteDefinition

Capillary water — the water held by capillarity in the fine pores between neighbouring soil particles; it is the only form of soil water available to the plant for absorption.

The four forms of soil water | Form of soil water | Where and how it is held | Available to the plant? | |—|—|—| | Gravitational (free) water | Drains deep down through large soil spaces under gravity | No — it has moved below the root zone | | Hygroscopic water | Adsorbed as a very thin film, held tightly on the surface of fine soil particles | No — held too tightly for the root to pull away | | Combined water | Chemically bound in hydrated oxides of silicon, aluminium, etc. | No — it is part of the mineral, not free water | | Capillary water | Held by capillarity in the fine pores between neighbouring soil particles | Yes — this is the water the root absorbs |

which soil water can a root use? (Of Gravitational, Hygroscopic, Combined and Capillary — only Capillary water Can be Consumed. The other three are present but unavailable.)

Q. Hygroscopic water and capillary water are both held by the soil. Why can the root take one and not the other?

A. The difference is how strongly it is held. Hygroscopic water is adsorbed directly onto the particle surface with very great force, so the pull a root hair can exert is simply not strong enough. Capillary water sits in the pore spaces between particles, held by the much gentler forces of surface tension and adhesion — weak enough for the root’s suction to overcome, but strong enough to resist gravity. Availability is a tug-of-war, and the root wins only against capillary water.

A potted plant can wilt and die in soil that still feels distinctly moist. What has happened is that the capillary water has all been drawn out, and what remains is hygroscopic and combined water, which the roots cannot touch. The same idea explains why sandy soil dries out so fast — its particles are coarse, the pores between them are wide, so most rain water simply drains through as gravitational water and very little is retained as capillary water. Clay-rich soils hold far more, which is one reason farmers add organic matter to sandy fields: it improves the soil’s ability to retain capillary water within reach of the roots.

Q2. Rain water, soil water, dew — is every drop of water in the soil actually available to a root, or only some of it?

A. Only some of it. Of the four forms in which water occurs in soil, gravitational water drains away below the root zone, hygroscopic water is gripped too tightly by the soil particles, and combined water is chemically locked inside the minerals. Only capillary water — held in the fine pores between soil particles — can actually be absorbed by the root.

Having settled which water the root can take, the next question is how it takes it — and that is the subject of the section that follows.

6.4 Absorption of Water by Roots from Soil

We now know that a root hair sits in the rhizosphere, that its wall is freely permeable and its plasma membrane selectively permeable, and that the only water it can use is capillary water clinging in the soil pores. How does that water actually get from the soil pore into the cytoplasm?

The root hair does not use a single trick. It absorbs water by employing three physical processes that occur sequentially — imbibition, diffusion and osmosis. The order matters, because each one delivers the water a little further in, and hands it over to the next.

Flowchart

FC 6.2 – Sequence of water entry into a root hair cell: capillary water in soil → imbibition (water adsorbed by the pectin–cellulose cell wall) → diffusion (water moves through the freely permeable wall, along the concentration gradient, up to the outer surface of the plasma membrane) → osmosis (water crosses the selectively permeable plasma membrane into the cytoplasm) → water inside the root hair cell

Notice that all three are physical processes. None of them needs the cell to spend energy. The plant is simply letting the ordinary properties of water do its work for it.

a. Imbibition

The very first contact between soil water and the plant is with the cell wall, and the cell wall does something rather like a sponge does: it soaks the water up.

Imbibition is the swelling up of hydrophilic colloids due to the adsorption of water. “Hydrophilic” means water-loving, and a colloid is a substance whose particles are large but still dispersed — the sort of material that attracts water molecules onto its surface and holds them there.

NoteDefinition

Imbibition — the swelling up of hydrophilic colloids as a result of the adsorption of water onto their surfaces.

Two terms go with it. The substance that adsorbs the water or liquid is called the imbibant, and the water or liquid that gets imbibed is called the imbibate.

imbibant vs imbibate (The imbibant is the solid that does the soaking — the dry seed coat, the wooden door, the root hair cell wall. The imbibate is the liquid that gets soaked up — usually water. Imbibant absorbs; imbibate is absorbed.)

Recall the structure of the root hair cell wall from Section 6.2: its outer layer is pectin and its inner layer is cellulose. Pectic compounds and cellulose are both hydrophilic colloids. The wall of a root hair is therefore, by its very chemistry, a natural imbibant sitting in contact with soil water.

During imbibition, the water molecules get tightly adsorbed on to these colloids. This is the key difference from ordinary dissolving — no solution is formed. The water is held on the surface of the imbibant, not mixed into it as a solute in a solvent. The wall simply swells.

Imbibition does not go on forever. It continues till an equilibrium is reached — that is, until the imbibant has taken up as much water as its colloids can hold. In other words, water moves along the concentration gradient, from where water molecules are more crowded to where they are less crowded, and stops when the two sides are balanced.

Q. If imbibition just makes the wall swell, how does it help the plant absorb water?

A. It creates the starting condition for everything that follows. By soaking water into the freely permeable wall, imbibition brings soil water right up against the plasma membrane, the true gateway of the cell. Without this first step, the water would still be out in the soil pore, several micrometres away, with no continuous liquid path to the membrane.

Imbibition is not a laboratory curiosity — it is going on all around you. It is what happens in the soaking of seeds, the swelling up of dried raisins, and the kneading of flour, where dry flour particles imbibe water and the dough swells into a soft mass.

Every kitchen relies on imbibition. Dry rajma or chana is hard enough to chip a tooth, but leave it in water overnight and it swells to more than double its size and becomes soft — the hydrophilic colloids of the seed have imbibed water and expanded. The same process, working in the soil, is what makes a sown seed swell, split its seed coat and germinate. The force generated during imbibition is astonishingly large: swelling seeds and swelling wooden wedges have been used for centuries to split rock and stone.

Why do wooden doors and window frames become very hard to open and close in the rainy season? Think about what wood is made of, and what the moist air is doing to it.

Wood is largely cellulose — a hydrophilic colloid, and therefore a good imbibant. In the rainy season the air and the wood are damp, the cellulose imbibes water, and the door swells. A door that fitted its frame in summer is now slightly too large for it, and it jams. In the dry season the water is lost again and the door shrinks back.

Q3. Why does a dried raisin swell up in water, and why do wooden doors jam in the rainy season?

A. Both are examples of imbibition. A raisin and a wooden door are both made largely of hydrophilic colloids — pectin, cellulose and similar substances. When water is available, these colloids adsorb water molecules tightly on to their surfaces without forming a solution, and the material swells. The raisin plumps up; the door expands and no longer fits its frame.

Try this at home. A. Take 10 ml of pure water in a suitable glass vessel and put 2–3 raisins in it. Watch the raisins from the moment you put them in until they are fully swollen, that is, turgid. Why did the raisins become turgid? B. Take 10 ml of pure water and dissolve 5 g of either sugar or salt in it. Now put the same turgid raisins into this solution and observe them. What change occurs in the raisins this time, and why? Discuss your observations with your teacher.

b. Diffusion

Diffusion means, quite simply, to disperse — to spread out.

NoteDefinition

Diffusion — the movement of ions, atoms or molecules of a substance from a region of their higher concentration to a region of their lower concentration.

What drives this movement? Nothing pushes the molecules. They are already in constant random motion because of their own kinetic energy, and this random motion, on average, carries more of them away from a crowded region than into it. The net result looks purposeful even though every individual molecule is simply wandering.

Diffusion continues till an equilibrium is reached — that is, until the concentration is the same everywhere and there is no longer any net movement in either direction. Molecules keep moving after that, but as many go one way as the other.

Now apply this to the root hair. Water has been imbibed into the wall, and the wall is freely permeable. So water passes into the cell by diffusion through the freely permeable cell wall, moving inward because the concentration of water molecules is higher in the wet wall than deeper inside. Water is now at the interface of the cell wall and the plasma membrane, as shown in Fig. 6.2 — right at the doorstep of the cytoplasm, but not yet inside it.

Diagram

Fig. 6.2 – Diffusion of water into a plant cell across the plasma membrane: water molecules outside the cell, the membrane bilayer, a water-selective pore (aquaporin) with water passing through it, and the cytoplasm within

  1. When you burn an incense stick in one corner of a room, its fragrance spreads all over the room within a short time. How does that happen? (ii) How does water come out through the surface of a porous earthen pot?
Diffusion pressure and diffusion pressure deficit

Diffusing particles exert a pressure, called the diffusion pressure (D.P.). It is directly proportional to the number of diffusing particles present — the more crowded the molecules of a substance, the harder they push to spread out.

This has an immediate consequence. Pure water contains nothing but water molecules, so its water molecules are as crowded as they can possibly be. Add a solute, and some of that space is now taken by solute particles. Therefore the diffusion pressure of a pure solvent (pure water) is always more than the diffusion pressure of the solvent in a solution.

The gap between the two has a name. The difference in the diffusion pressures of a pure solvent and of the solvent in a solution is called the Diffusion Pressure Deficit (DPD), also known as Suction Pressure (SP). The term was coined by B. S. Meyer (1938). In modern usage the term water potential has replaced DPD, and we shall come to it in Section 6.5.

NoteDefinition

Diffusion Pressure Deficit (DPD), or Suction Pressure (SP) — the amount by which the diffusion pressure of the solvent in a solution falls short of the diffusion pressure of the pure solvent.

In colloquial language, DPD is the thirst of a cell — the eagerness with which it absorbs water from its surroundings. A cell with a high DPD is very thirsty; a cell with zero DPD wants no more water at all. This one idea will explain almost everything about water movement in the rest of the chapter, so it is worth fixing firmly in mind.

Return to our root hair. The water around the cell wall is nearly pure, so it has a more diffusion pressure. The cell sap inside is full of minerals and sugars, so it has a less diffusion pressure. Because of this difference, water moves into the cell by diffusion — down the diffusion pressure gradient, from where the diffusion pressure is higher to where it is lower.

Q. A cell has a high DPD. Does that mean it contains a lot of water or very little?

A. Very little — or at least, its sap is highly concentrated. High DPD means the diffusion pressure of water inside is far below that of pure water, so the cell is “thirsty” and will pull water in. A fully turgid cell, packed with water, has a DPD of zero and absorbs no more.

Diffusion is not used by the plant only for absorbing water. It is significant in plants in the absorption of water, in the absorption of minerals, in the conduction of water against gravity, in the exchange of gases, and in the transport and distribution of food. It is one of the workhorse processes of plant life.

c. Osmosis

Water now stands at the interface of the cell wall and the plasma membrane. The wall let it through without objection. The membrane will not.

Osmosis is the process by which water finally enters into the cytoplasm of the root hair cell. It is a special type of diffusion — the diffusion of a solvent through a semipermeable membrane.

NoteDefinition

Osmosis — the movement (migration) of solvent molecules from a weaker (more dilute) solution to a stronger (more concentrated) solution through a semipermeable membrane.

Diffusion vs Osmosis (Diffusion is the movement of any particles — solute or solvent, gas or liquid — down their own concentration gradient, and it needs no membrane. Osmosis is the movement of the solvent only, and it must occur across a semipermeable membrane. Every osmosis is a diffusion, but not every diffusion is an osmosis.)

Why does osmosis happen in the root hair at all? Because of what is inside it. The cytoplasm of the root hair cell contains minerals, sugars and other dissolved substances. In other words, the solution inside the cell is more concentrated — stronger — than the soil solution outside the cell, which is weaker. So the solvent from the weaker solution outside enters the cytoplasm — the stronger solution — through the semipermeable plasma membrane. This migration of solvent is osmosis.

Thus water sitting at the interface of the cell wall and the plasma membrane enters the cytoplasm of the root hair cell by osmosis. The journey from soil to cytoplasm is complete.

a molecule of water travelling from a soil pore into the cytoplasm of a root hair 1. The water molecule is held by capillarity in a fine pore between two soil particles. 2. It comes in contact with the pectin–cellulose wall of the root hair, a hydrophilic colloid, and is adsorbed on to it — imbibition. The wall swells. 3. From the wet, freely permeable wall, it moves inward down the concentration gradient by diffusion, encountering no barrier, and arrives at the outer surface of the plasma membrane. 4. Here it meets the selectively permeable plasma membrane. Because the cell sap inside is a stronger solution than the water outside, the molecule crosses the membrane by osmosis — helped through by water-selective pores called aquaporins. 5. It is now part of the cytoplasm and the cell sap. The cell swells slightly and becomes more turgid.

Types of solutions

Whether water enters a cell or leaves it depends entirely on how the outside solution compares with the cell sap. With respect to concentration and osmotic migration, three types of solutions are recognised.

  1. Hypotonic — a weak solution, or a strong solvent, having low osmotic concentration.

  2. Hypertonic — a strong solution, or a weak solvent, having high osmotic concentration.

  3. Isotonic — a solution of such a concentration that there is neither gain nor loss of water in an osmotic system. In other words, the concentration outside and inside the cell is the same.

Hypotonic vs Hypertonic vs Isotonic (compared with the cell sap) | Feature | Hypotonic | Hypertonic | Isotonic | |—|—|—|—| | Solute concentration outside the cell | Lower than in cell sap | Higher than in cell sap | Same as in cell sap | | Osmotic concentration | Low | High | Equal on both sides | | Direction of net water movement | Water enters the cell (endosmosis) | Water leaves the cell (exosmosis) | No net movement | | Effect on the cell | Becomes turgid | Becomes flaccid | Remains unchanged |

hypo, hyper, iso (Hypo- means under — under-loaded with solute, so water goes in. Hyper- means over — over-loaded with solute, so water comes out. Iso- means equal — nothing happens. Read the prefix as describing the solution, never the cell.)

Endosmosis and exosmosis

Osmosis is of two types, viz., exosmosis and endosmosis, depending on which way the solvent goes.

Exosmosis is the diffusion of solvent from the cell to the outside. It causes flaccidity of the cell — the cell loses water, its contents shrink away from being pressed against the wall, and it goes limp.

Endosmosis is the diffusion of the solvent into the cell. It causes turgidity of the cell, that is, the cytoplasm becomes turgid, swollen and firm. This is what happens in a root hair standing in moist soil.

Endosmosis vs Exosmosis | Feature | Endosmosis | Exosmosis | |—|—|—| | Direction of solvent movement | Into the cell | Out of the cell | | Surrounding solution | Hypotonic | Hypertonic | | Effect on the cell | Cell becomes turgid | Cell becomes flaccid | | Turgor pressure | Increases | Falls towards zero | | Where you see it | Root hair absorbing soil water; raisin swelling in pure water | Raisin shrivelling in strong sugar solution; plasmolysis |

Turgor pressure and wall pressure

Endosmosis fills the cell with water, and this water has to go somewhere. It pushes outward. Turgidity increases the turgor pressure (T.P.) of the cell.

NoteDefinition

Turgor pressure (T.P.) — the pressure exerted by the turgid cell sap on to the cell membrane and the cell wall.

As the cell becomes more and more turgid, it becomes less and less thirsty. In a fully turgid cell, DPD is zero — it can hold no more water and will absorb none.

The cell wall does not simply give way. Being thick and rigid, the wall exerts a counter pressure on the cell sap, pushing inward exactly as hard as the sap pushes outward. This counter pressure is called wall pressure (W.P.).

NoteDefinition

Wall pressure (W.P.) — the inward counter pressure exerted by the rigid cell wall on the turgid cell sap, equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the turgor pressure.

In a fully turgid cell, therefore, \(T.P. = W.P.\), but the two operate in opposite directions. They are a balanced pair, like a stretched balloon pressing on the wall of a box and the box pressing back.

Importance of turgor pressure. Turgor pressure keeps cells and organelles stretched; it provides support to the non-woody tissues, so that a herb stands upright without any wood at all; it is essential for cell enlargement during growth, since a growing cell must first be inflated before its wall can extend; it maintains the shape of the cell; and it facilitates the opening and closing of stomata, as you will see in Section 6.13.

Osmotic pressure

There is one more pressure to name, and it belongs to the solution rather than to the cell.

Osmotic pressure (O.P.) is the pressure exerted due to osmosis. Think of it this way: if solvent is entering a solution across a semipermeable membrane, you could stop it by pressing on the solution hard enough from the other side. The pressure you would need is its osmotic pressure.

NoteDefinition

Osmotic pressure (O.P.) — the pressure of a solution which must be applied in the opposite direction so as to just stop the entry of solvent molecules into the cell; equivalently, the pressure which must be exerted upon a solution to prevent the flow of solvent into it across a semipermeable membrane.

The more concentrated the solution, the greater its osmotic pressure. A cell with very concentrated sap has a high O.P.

Osmotic pressure vs Turgor pressure (Osmotic pressure is a property of the solution — it depends only on how concentrated the cell sap is, and it pulls water in. Turgor pressure is a property of the cell as a whole — it is the outward push of that water once it is inside, and it resists further entry. O.P. invites water in; T.P. pushes it back out.)

Now we can put the three pressures together. The thirst of a cell is not simply its osmotic pressure, because part of that pull is already being cancelled by the outward turgor pressure. What is left over is the DPD:

\[D.P.D. = O.P. - T.P.\]

And since, in a turgid cell, the turgor pressure and the wall pressure are equal (\(\because T.P. = W.P.\)):

\[\therefore \; D.P.D. = O.P. - W.P.\]

Here D.P.D. is the diffusion pressure deficit, O.P. the osmotic pressure, T.P. the turgor pressure and W.P. the wall pressure — all of them pressures, measured in the SI unit pascal (Pa), though bars and atmospheres are also commonly used in plant physiology.

Two special cases follow directly, and both are favourites in examinations.

In a flaccid cell, the cell has lost its water, so there is no outward push at all: T.P. is zero. \[\therefore \; DPD = OP\]

In a fully turgid cell, the cell is full and cannot take more, so its thirst has vanished: DPD is zero. \[\therefore \; TP = OP\]

Q. Why does a fully turgid cell stop absorbing water even though its sap is still a concentrated solution with a high O.P.?

A. Because absorption depends on DPD, not on O.P. alone. In a fully turgid cell the turgor pressure has risen until it exactly balances the osmotic pressure, so \(DPD = OP - TP = 0\). The pull inward and the push outward are equal, and there is no net entry of water. The sap is still concentrated — but the cell is, in effect, already full.

how DPD, O.P. and T.P. change as a cell takes up water (Imagine following a single cell from flaccid to fully turgid. At the start, T.P. = 0, so DPD is at its maximum and equals O.P. — the cell is at its thirstiest. As water enters, the sap is slightly diluted so O.P. falls a little, while T.P. rises steeply. Because \(DPD = OP - TP\), the DPD falls rapidly to zero. The moment DPD reaches zero, absorption stops and T.P. = O.P. The lesson: a cell’s ability to absorb water is set not by how concentrated it is, but by how far its turgor pressure still falls short of its osmotic pressure.)

Importance of osmosis. Osmosis is responsible for the absorption of water into the root; it maintains the turgidity of cells; it facilitates cell-to-cell movement of water; it offers resistance to drought, frost and similar stresses; and it is behind the sudden drooping of the leaflets and leaves of the “touch me not” plant when it is touched, where a rapid loss of water from certain cells makes them go flaccid within seconds.

Facilitated diffusion

Water crosses the plasma membrane easily. Many solutes do not, and for them the cell provides a shortcut.

The passive absorption of solutes when mediated by a carrier is called facilitated diffusion. Particles that are lipid soluble can easily diffuse straight through the lipoproteinous cell membrane, because the membrane is itself largely lipid — like dissolves in like. But the diffusion of hydrophilic (water-loving) solutes has to be facilitated, because such particles find it very difficult to cross the oily interior of the membrane on their own.

Membrane proteins provide the sites for facilitated diffusion. These proteins are the aquaporins and the ion channels — the water-selective pore you saw labelled in Fig. 6.2 is an aquaporin. They form a hydrophilic passage straight through the membrane, so that the particle never has to enter the lipid layer at all.

NoteDefinition

Facilitated diffusion — the passive absorption of solutes across a membrane when mediated by a carrier or channel protein, without any expenditure of energy, and only along an existing concentration gradient.

Two conditions must be understood clearly, because both are commonly tested. First, these proteins help move substances across the membrane without the expenditure of energy — no ATP is spent. Second, a concentration gradient must be present for the molecules to be diffused through facilitated diffusion; the carrier can speed a particle along a gradient, but it cannot push it uphill against one.

aquaporin (A protein channel with a narrow, water-lined pore running through the membrane → water molecules slip through single file without touching the lipid core → water crosses the membrane far faster than by squeezing between the lipid molecules, and the cell can still control the rate by controlling how many aquaporins are open.)

facilitated diffusion vs active transport (Both use membrane proteins. Facilitated diffusion is passive — no ATP, and it works only down the concentration gradient. Active transport spends ATP and can move a substance against its gradient. If a question mentions a carrier protein, do not assume energy is being used; check the direction of movement.)

6.5 Water Potential

Everything you learnt in the last section was written in the language of pressures — diffusion pressure, DPD, osmotic pressure, turgor pressure. That is the older language of plant physiology. Modern plant science describes exactly the same events in the language of energy. Both descriptions are correct; you need to be fluent in both.

Free energy and chemical potential

According to the principles of thermodynamics, every component of a system possesses a definite amount of free energy — energy that is available to do work. The osmotic movement of water is, at bottom, a movement driven by free energy: water moves from where its free energy is greater to where it is less, just as a ball rolls from a higher shelf to a lower one.

The free energy per molecule in a chemical system is called its chemical potential. Every substance in a system has one.

Water potential (ψ)

The chemical potential of water is called the water potential. It is represented by the Greek letter psi, written ψ.

NoteDefinition

Water potential (ψ) — the chemical potential of water, that is, the free energy possessed per molecule of water in a system. It is measured in bars, pascals or atmospheres.

Water potential and DPD are two ways of saying the same thing, with the sign reversed. The water potential of the protoplasm is equal in magnitude but opposite in sign to its DPD. A cell whose DPD is high (very thirsty) has a strongly negative ψ.

\[\psi = - \, D.P.D.\]

This immediately tells you something important: water potential has a negative value in living cells.

Why ψ is negative

Start from the reference point. The water potential of pure water is always zero. Pure water has the maximum possible free energy per molecule, and by convention we call that zero.

Now add any solute to it. The solute particles attract and hold water molecules around themselves, which lowers the free energy of the water. So the addition of any solute decreases the ψ value of water. Since we began at zero and went down, any solution must have a ψ below zero — that is, a negative value. The more concentrated the solution, the more negative its ψ.

Diagram

Fig. 6.5.1 – A vertical scale of water potential with pure water at 0 bar at the top, a dilute solution slightly below zero, a concentrated cell sap far below zero, and an arrow showing that water always moves downwards along this scale

the sign of ψ (Pure water = zero. Anything added can only take you down. So in a living cell, ψ is never positive — it is zero at best and negative in practice. If your answer gives a cell a positive water potential, you have made a sign error.)

The new terminology

The three old pressure terms have been renamed, and the renaming is not merely cosmetic — it also carries a sign.

D.P.D. is now termed water potential. O.P. is now termed osmotic potential. T.P. is now termed pressure potential, and it always has a positive value.

Old pressure terms vs new potential terms | Old term (pressure language) | New term (energy language) | Symbol | Sign in a living cell | |—|—|—|—| | Diffusion Pressure Deficit (DPD) | Water potential | \(\psi_w\) | Negative (zero in a fully turgid cell) | | Osmotic Pressure (O.P.) | Osmotic potential | \(\psi_s\) | Negative | | Turgor Pressure (T.P.) | Pressure potential | \(\psi_p\) | Always positive |

Because of the sign reversal, the old equation \(D.P.D. = O.P. - T.P.\) becomes, in the new language, a simple sum:

\[\psi_w = \psi_s + \psi_p\]

where \(\psi_w\) is the water potential of the cell, \(\psi_s\) its osmotic (solute) potential — a negative quantity — and \(\psi_p\) its pressure potential — a positive quantity. All three are measured in the SI unit pascal (Pa), though bars and atmospheres remain in common use.

Q. The old equation had a minus sign and the new one has a plus sign. Have the biology or the arithmetic changed?

A. Neither. Only the signs of the terms have. Osmotic potential is simply osmotic pressure written with a negative sign (\(\psi_s = -O.P.\)), and water potential is DPD written with a negative sign. Substituting these into \(DPD = OP - TP\) and reversing the signs of both sides gives \(\psi_w = \psi_s + \psi_p\). The same cell, the same numbers, a different convention.

A plant cell has an osmotic potential of \(-15\) bars and a pressure potential of \(+6\) bars. Calculate its water potential, and state its DPD. Would this cell absorb water from a solution whose water potential is \(-4\) bars? Give a reason.

Which way does water move?

Here is the single rule that governs every drop of water in a plant:

NotePrinciple / Law

Water always flows from a less negative water potential to a more negative water potential — that is, from a region of higher (less negative) water potential to a region of lower (more negative) water potential.

Note carefully what this does not say. It does not say water flows from where there is more water to where there is less. It flows down the ψ gradient, and nothing else.

This rule applies from cell to cell as much as it does from soil to root. The difference between the water potentials of two adjacent cells decides the movement of water between them, and this cell-to-cell movement occurs through the plasmodesmata — the fine cytoplasmic threads that pass through the walls and connect the living contents of neighbouring cells.

“high” water potential vs “high” DPD (These are opposites. A cell with a high water potential is close to zero, well supplied, and gives water away. A cell with a high DPD is very negative in ψ, thirsty, and pulls water in. When a question says water moves towards “lower water potential,” it means the same thing as moving towards “higher DPD.”)

Factors affecting water absorption

The rate at which a root actually takes up water is not fixed. Five conditions influence it.

  1. The presence of capillary water is essential. As Section 6.3 established, this is the only form of soil water a root can absorb; when the capillary water is exhausted, absorption stops however damp the soil may appear.

  2. The rate of water absorption is maximum at a soil temperature between 20 °C and 30 °C. Below this range, membranes become less permeable and the cell’s metabolic activity slows; well above it, the root’s functioning is disturbed. There is an optimum, not a “hotter is faster” rule.

  3. A high concentration of solutes in the soil water reduces the rate of absorption of water. This follows directly from the ψ rule: a concentrated soil solution has a strongly negative water potential of its own, so the gap between soil and root narrows, and the root can no longer pull water in.

  4. Poorly aerated soil shows a poor absorption rate. Roots respire, and respiration needs oxygen. In waterlogged or compacted soil, the air spaces are filled with water, the root cells are starved of oxygen, their metabolism slows, and absorption suffers — which is why a plant standing in a flooded pot can wilt.

  5. Increased transpiration accelerates the rate of absorption of water in irrigated soil. The faster water is lost from the leaves, the more strongly water is pulled up from below — provided, of course, that soil water is available to replace it. You will see the mechanism behind this in Section 6.9.

Farmers know that adding too much fertilizer to a field can scorch the very crop it was meant to feed — a condition called fertilizer burn. The reason is exactly factor (iii). A heavy dose of soluble fertilizer makes the soil solution highly concentrated, so its water potential becomes strongly negative — sometimes more negative than that of the root cells themselves. Water then flows out of the roots into the soil instead of in. The plant wilts and its leaf margins dry and brown, even though the field has just been watered. The same physics makes most crop plants fail on saline soils near the coast: the salt does not poison the plant so much as make the soil water impossible to drink.

6.6 Plasmolysis

So far we have watched water move into a cell. Now reverse the situation. Put a living plant cell into a hypertonic solution — one more concentrated than its own cell sap — and everything runs backwards.

Exo-osmosis occurring in a living cell when it is placed in a hypertonic solution is called plasmolysis.

NoteDefinition

Plasmolysis — the shrinkage of the protoplast away from the cell wall, caused by exo-osmosis when a living plant cell is placed in a hypertonic solution.

What happens inside a plasmolysing cell

Because the outside solution is stronger, water leaves the cell sap by exo-osmosis across the selectively permeable plasma membrane. The protoplast — the entire living content of the cell, bounded by its plasma membrane — loses volume, shrinks, and recedes from the cell wall. The cell thus becomes flaccid.

The first point at which the protoplast just begins to pull away from the wall is called incipient plasmolysis. Beyond this point, shrinkage continues and the protoplast collapses towards the centre of the cell, until the cell is fully plasmolysed. Follow the stages in Fig. 6.6.1.

Diagram

Fig. 6.6.1 – Three plant cells side by side: (a) turgid cell with protoplast pressed against the wall, (b) incipient plasmolysis with the protoplast just beginning to pull away at the corners, (c) fully plasmolysed cell with the shrunken protoplast in the centre and the gap between wall and protoplast filled by the outer solution

In a plasmolysed cell, a gap is developed between the cell wall and the protoplast. This gap does not stay empty — remember from Section 6.2 that the cell wall is freely permeable. The outer solution therefore seeps straight through the wall and fills the gap.

Since the protoplast has shrunk away from the wall, it is no longer pressing on it at all. Therefore, in a plasmolysed cell, T.P. is always zero.

Q. Why can plasmolysis occur only in a living cell?

A. Because plasmolysis depends on the plasma membrane being selectively permeable, and that selectivity exists only while the membrane is alive. In a dead cell the membrane loses its selective nature and behaves like the freely permeable wall, so solutes simply pass in and out and no osmotic shrinkage of the protoplast can occur. This is why plasmolysis is used as a simple, reliable test of whether a plant cell is alive.

Deplasmolysis — putting it back

Plasmolysis is reversible, provided the cell has not been damaged. When a plasmolysed cell is placed in a hypotonic solution, endo-osmosis occurs, water re-enters the cell sap, the protoplast swells out again and presses once more against the wall, making the cell turgid. This recovery is called deplasmolysis.

NoteDefinition

Deplasmolysis — the re-entry of water into a plasmolysed cell by endo-osmosis when it is transferred to a hypotonic solution, restoring the protoplast to the cell wall and making the cell turgid again.

Flowchart

FC 6.3 – Plasmolysis and deplasmolysis: turgid cell → placed in hypertonic solution → exo-osmosis → protoplast begins to shrink (incipient plasmolysis) → protoplast fully recedes from wall, gap filled by outer solution (plasmolysis, T.P. = 0) → cell transferred to hypotonic solution → endo-osmosis → protoplast expands back against wall (deplasmolysis) → back to turgid cell (DPD = 0, T.P. = O.P.)

Once the cell is fully turgid again, we are back to the condition already met in Section 6.4: in a fully turgid cell \(T.P. = O.P.\), and hence DPD is always zero.

Plasmolysis vs Deplasmolysis | Feature | Plasmolysis | Deplasmolysis | |—|—|—| | Surrounding solution | Hypertonic | Hypotonic | | Type of osmosis | Exo-osmosis | Endo-osmosis | | Movement of water | Out of the cell | Into the cell | | Effect on protoplast | Shrinks and recedes from the cell wall | Swells and presses back against the cell wall | | Condition of cell | Flaccid | Turgid | | Turgor pressure | Zero | Rises until T.P. = O.P. | | DPD of the cell | Equal to O.P. (maximum) | Falls to zero |

Look back at part B of the raisin activity in Section 6.4 — the turgid raisins placed in strong sugar or salt solution. Using the terms of this section, describe exactly what happened to the cells of those raisins, and name the process. What would you do to bring them back to their swollen state?

Plasmolysis is the reason salt and sugar preserve food. When mango or lemon pieces are packed in salt to make pickle, or fruit is boiled in heavy sugar syrup to make jam, the surrounding solution becomes strongly hypertonic. Any bacterial or fungal cell that lands in it immediately loses water by exo-osmosis, its protoplast shrinks, and the microbe becomes flaccid and cannot grow or divide. The food is not sterilised — the spoilage organisms are simply left too dehydrated to function. The very same effect explains why sprinkling salt over chopped onion or cucumber draws water out of the pieces within minutes, and why spilling a heavy load of salt on garden soil can kill the plants growing in it.

6.7 Path of Water Across the Root

Water is inside the root hair. But the root hair is on the outside of the root, and the xylem — the pipeline that will carry water up the stem — lies at the very centre, in the stele. Between the two lie the cortex, the endodermis and the pericycle. This section follows water across that gap, from the epiblema up to the xylem in the stelar region.

The suction pressure gradient

Recall the sequence from Section 6.4: water is absorbed by the root hair cell through imbibition → diffusion → osmosis, in that order. Consequently the cell becomes turgid. Its turgor pressure increases — and therefore, since \(DPD = OP - TP\), its DPD value decreases. The root hair cell is now full, and no longer thirsty.

But the cortical cell lying immediately adjacent to it, one step further in, is thirsty. That inner cortical cell has a more DPD value, because its O.P. is more — its sap is more concentrated than that of the root hair cell.

Water therefore obeys the rule established in Section 6.5 and moves towards the greater DPD. The cortical cell sucks water out of the turgid root hair cell. The cortical cell now becomes turgid; the root hair cell, having given its water away, becomes flaccid — and a flaccid cell has a high DPD again, so it promptly absorbs a fresh supply of water from the soil.

Q. If the root hair is constantly absorbing water, why does it not simply fill up and stop?

A. Because it keeps handing its water on. The moment it becomes turgid its DPD falls to nearly zero and absorption would indeed stop — but the cortical cell inside it, with a higher DPD, immediately draws that water away. The root hair becomes flaccid, its DPD rises, and it absorbs again. Absorption continues only because the water is being continuously removed from behind.

The same handover is repeated inward, cell by cell. Water from the turgid cortical cell is sucked by the next inner cortical cell, and the process goes on. In this way a gradient of suction pressure (DPD) is developed from the cells of the epiblema right through to the inner cortex of the root — lowest DPD at the outside, highest at the inside.

Consequently, water moves rapidly across the root through the loosely arranged living cells of the cortex — “loosely arranged” matters, because the wide intercellular spaces between cortical cells offer very little resistance. From the cortex, water passes through the passage cells of the endodermis (in monocot roots) and finally into the cells of the pericycle. And the pericycle is exactly where it needs to be, because the protoxylem lies in close proximity with the pericycle.

Flowchart

FC 6.4 – Cell-to-cell route of water across the root, along the DPD gradient: soil water → root hair (epiblema cell) → cortical cells (one after another, through the loosely arranged cortex) → passage cells of endodermis (in monocot roots) → pericycle → protoxylem in the stele → xylem

a drop of water crossing the root 1. It is absorbed by a root hair cell by imbibition, then diffusion, then osmosis. The cell becomes turgid, its T.P. rises and its DPD falls. 2. The adjacent cortical cell has a higher O.P., and therefore a higher DPD. It sucks the water inward. The root hair cell turns flaccid and refills from the soil. 3. The water is passed inward from cortical cell to cortical cell, always moving towards the cell with the greater DPD, and travelling quickly through the loosely packed cortex. 4. At the endodermis it passes through the passage cells (in monocot roots), the only cells of that layer left unthickened. 5. It enters a cell of the pericycle, the layer just inside the endodermis. 6. Since the protoxylem lies immediately next to the pericycle, the water is delivered straight into the xylem — and its journey up the plant can begin.

Root pressure

Absorption of water is a continuous process — water keeps arriving at the root hair, and keeps being pushed inward. Water accumulating in the living cells of the root therefore builds up a sort of hydrostatic pressure in them. This is called root pressure.

NoteDefinition

Root pressure — the hydrostatic pressure developed in the living cells of the root as a result of the continuous absorption of water, which forces water from the pericycle into the xylem.

It is due to root pressure that water from the pericycle is not only forced into the xylem, but is also conducted upwards against gravity. This is the plant’s first, gentle push upward; you will study it in more detail as the root pressure theory in Section 6.9.

Two pathways across the root

The cell-to-cell account above is not the whole story, because water does not have to pass through the living contents of every cell it meets. The pathway of water across the root essentially occurs in two ways, viz., the apoplast and the symplast, as shown in Fig. 6.3.

Diagram

Fig. 6.3 – Pathways for water uptake by the root: a transverse strip from root hair through cortex, endodermis (with Casparian strip), pericycle to xylem and phloem, with the apoplastic path traced along the cell walls and the symplastic path traced through the cell interiors via plasmodesmata

Flowchart

FC 6.5 – Pathways of water across the root: Pathways → branch into Apoplast and Symplast; Symplast → further branches into Vacuolar and Transmembrane

Apoplast pathway

When some amount of water passes across the root through the cell wall and the intercellular spaces of the cortical cells of the root, it is called the apoplast pathway. This pathway occurs up to the endodermis, and no further.

NoteDefinition

Apoplast pathway — the movement of water across the root through the non-living parts, that is, through the free spaces, the cell walls and the intercellular spaces, without entering the cytoplasm of any cell.

The apoplast is the “outside lane” of the root — fast, unobstructed, and entirely non-living. The apoplastic (non-living) pathway provides a route towards the vascular stele through the free spaces and the cell walls of the epidermis and the cortex. Because it never crosses a plasma membrane, water in the apoplast meets almost no resistance and moves quickly.

But this fast lane comes to an abrupt end at the endodermis. The endodermis is characterised by the Casparian strip, a suberised layer in its cell walls. Suberin is waxy and waterproof, so the strip acts as a seal that forces all water and solutes to move into the symplast in order to enter the vascular system. Nothing enters the stele through the apoplast; everything must first pass through a living membrane.

the Casparian strip (A band of waterproof suberin embedded in the radial walls of the endodermal cells → seals off the apoplastic route into the stele → every drop of water and every dissolved ion must cross the plasma membrane of a living endodermal cell → the endodermis becomes a checkpoint at which the plant can select what enters the xylem and reject what it does not want.)

This checkpoint is why plants are not simply at the mercy of whatever is dissolved in the soil. Mangroves growing in salt-laden coastal mud, for example, exclude a very large fraction of the salt at the root itself: the Casparian strip forces the incoming solution through living membranes, and those membranes refuse most of the sodium and chloride. The plant thus drinks something far closer to fresh water than the mud around it. A root without a Casparian strip would be a pipe, not a filter.

There is, however, one leak in the seal. An additional apoplastic route that allows direct access to the xylem and phloem exists along the margins of the secondary roots. Secondary roots develop from the pericycle — a cell layer just inside the endodermis — and as they grow outward they must push their way through the endodermis. Since secondary roots grow through the endodermis, a direct pathway to the xylem and phloem is available at these points that bypasses the Casparian strip and allows entry into the vascular system without moving into the symplast (the living tissue).

Symplast pathway

When water passes across from one living cell to another living cell through the plasmodesmata, it is called the symplast pathway. It is also called the transmembrane pathway.

NoteDefinition

Symplast pathway — the movement of water across the root from the cytoplasm of one living cell to the cytoplasm of the next, through the plasmodesmata connecting them.

The symplast is a single continuous mass of living cytoplasm, stitched together by plasmodesmata, running from the epiblema all the way to the stele. Once water is inside the symplast it never has to cross another membrane to keep moving inward — which is precisely why the Casparian strip can afford to insist on it.

Apoplast pathway vs Symplast pathway | Feature | Apoplast pathway | Symplast pathway | |—|—|—| | Route taken | Cell walls, free spaces and intercellular spaces | Cytoplasm of living cells, via plasmodesmata | | Living or non-living parts | Non-living | Living | | Plasma membrane crossed? | No | Yes | | Resistance to flow | Low — water moves fast | Higher — water moves more slowly | | How far does it go? | Only up to the endodermis (blocked by the Casparian strip) | All the way from epiblema to the stele | | Other name | — | Transmembrane pathway |

apoplast vs symplast (A useful check: ask whether the water is inside a living cell or not. In the apoplast, water is always outside the plasma membrane, soaking through walls — non-living. In the symplast, water is always inside the plasma membrane, moving from cytoplasm to cytoplasm through plasmodesmata — living. The Casparian strip is the point at which the first is forced to become the second.)

6.8 Mechanism of Absorption of Water

We have followed water from the soil pore to the xylem, and we have named the pressures and potentials that move it. One question remains: who does the work? Is the root actively pulling water in, or is the water arriving on its own?

The answer is: both, but not equally. Mainly, there are two ways or modes of absorption of water, viz., passive absorption and active absorption.

Flowchart

FC 6.6 – Modes of water absorption: Absorption of water → branches into Passive absorption (driving force: transpiration pull; no ATP; ~98% of total) and Active absorption (driving force: root pressure; ATP used); Active absorption → further branches into Osmotic absorption and Non-osmotic absorption

a. Passive absorption

This is the main way in which water is absorbed. Note the careful wording used by plant physiologists: in passive absorption, water is absorbed through the roots and not by the roots. The root is behaving like a length of pipe, not like a pump. The pulling is being done somewhere else entirely — up in the leaves.

The driving force of passive absorption is the transpiration pull, and it proceeds along the DPD gradient. Because water is simply moving in accordance with the concentration gradient — from higher water potential to lower — there is no expenditure of energy (ATP). That is precisely what makes it passive.

NoteDefinition

Passive absorption — the absorption of water through the roots under the driving force of transpiration pull, along the DPD gradient, without any expenditure of ATP by the root cells.

How much water enters this way? About 98% of the total water absorbed in plants occurs passively. In other words, almost everything a plant drinks is drawn in without the root spending a single molecule of ATP on it.

Passive absorption follows the daily rhythm of transpiration. It occurs during the day time, when transpiration is in progress, and it stops at night, when transpiration stops.

How the pull is generated

Rapid transpiration removes water from the leaf. This creates a tension in the xylem vessels, because the water potential there becomes strongly negative. Water under tension is water being stretched, not pushed.

This tension is transmitted downwards, from the xylem of the leaf, through the xylem of the stem, all the way to the xylem in the roots. Consequently water is pulled upwards — passively. The root does not push it; the leaf pulls it, and the root merely supplies.

Since no ATP is utilised during passive absorption, the rate of respiration of the root is obviously not affected by it. A root can be respiring slowly and still be delivering large volumes of water, so long as the leaves above are transpiring. In plants, water is mainly absorbed passively.

Q. If 98% of absorption is passive, why does the plant bother with an active mechanism at all?

A. Because transpiration is not always available. At night the stomata close, transpiration stops, and the pull from above disappears. Yet the plant still needs water — for cell enlargement, for maintaining turgidity, and for pushing minerals into the xylem. Active absorption is the small, energy-expensive backup that keeps water moving when the free ride is unavailable.

b. Active absorption

Here, water is absorbed due to the activity of the roots themselves. The root cells play an active role, and it is a genuine effort on their part.

The driving force is the root pressure developed in the living cells of the root, the hydrostatic pressure you met at the end of Section 6.7. Active absorption occurs usually at night, when transpiration stops due to the closure of stomata and the transpiration pull is no longer available.

Since water absorption here occurs against the DPD gradient, it cannot happen for free. There is an expenditure of ATP (energy), generated through the respiratory activity of the root cells.

NoteDefinition

Active absorption — the absorption of water due to the activity of the living root cells themselves, driven by root pressure, occurring against the DPD gradient and requiring the expenditure of ATP generated by respiration.

Active absorption may be of two kinds, viz., osmotic and non-osmotic.

1. Osmotic absorption

Atkins and Priestly (1922) proposed that water is absorbed from the soil into the xylem of the root according to the osmotic gradient.

There is a subtlety here that students often miss. To create the osmotic conditions in the first place — that is, to accumulate salts and sugars in the root cells so that their sap stays concentrated — there is an expenditure of energy. But once those conditions exist, the water itself flows in osmotically. So such absorption does not directly require an expenditure of energy. The ATP is spent on setting up the gradient, not on moving the water.

Because of the activity of the living cells of the root, a gradient of DPD develops from the cell of the epiblema right through to the pericycle. As the process is continuous, a hydrostatic pressure — the root pressure — is developed in the root cells. This root pressure forces water from the pericycle into the xylem, and then upwards into the stem.

2. Non-osmotic absorption

Kramer and Thimann (1959) proposed this theory. Sometimes water is absorbed from the soil against the concentration gradient — that is, the water moves into the root even though the osmotic gradient does not favour it.

Such absorption requires an expenditure of the energy released during respiration, directly. Here the ATP is not merely setting the stage; it is doing the lifting itself.

This direct dependence on respiration gives the theory its strongest evidence — three separate lines of it, all pointing the same way:

  • A poor supply of oxygen retards water absorption. Without oxygen there is little respiration, and without respiration there is no ATP.
  • Low temperature retards water uptake, because of the decrease in the rate of respiration at low temperatures.
  • The use of metabolic inhibitors also retards the rate of respiration, and thus the water uptake, in step with it.

In each case, anything that damages respiration damages water uptake — which would be inexplicable if no energy were being spent.

osmotic vs non-osmotic active absorption (Both are active, and both ultimately depend on respiration. The difference is what the ATP is spent on. In osmotic absorption, ATP is used to build up the solute gradient; the water then follows that gradient on its own, so energy is not used directly on the water. In non-osmotic absorption, water moves against the gradient, so respiratory energy is used directly to bring it in.)

Passive absorption vs Active absorption | Feature | Passive absorption | Active absorption | |—|—|—| | Driving force | Transpiration pull, generated in the leaves | Root pressure, generated in the living root cells | | Role of the root | Water moves through the root; the root is not the pump | Water is absorbed by the root; root cells act | | Direction with respect to DPD gradient | Along the gradient | Against the gradient | | ATP used? | No | Yes, generated by respiration | | Effect on rate of respiration | Not affected | Directly dependent on it | | When does it occur? | Day time, while transpiration is going on; stops at night | Usually at night, when stomata are closed and transpiration stops | | Share of total water absorbed | About 98% | The small remainder |

what does the figure “98% passive” really tell us? (It tells us that a plant’s water supply is not controlled from below but from above. If almost all absorption is driven by transpiration pull, then anything that changes the rate of transpiration — sunlight, wind, humidity, the opening of stomata — will immediately change the rate at which the root absorbs water, while anything that changes the root’s own metabolism will barely affect it. This is why a plant in still, humid air absorbs little water even from a well-watered pot, and why a windy sunny day empties the soil so fast.)

Farmers and gardeners routinely hoe or loosen the topsoil around a standing crop — an operation called inter-cultivation. Part of the benefit is weed removal, but part of it is directly relevant here: loosening the soil restores its air spaces, oxygen reaches the roots, respiration continues, ATP is available, and active absorption is not choked off. The same reasoning explains why a plant in a heavy, compacted, waterlogged pot may fail to take up water at night even though it is standing in mud. There is plenty of water; there is no oxygen to pay for it.

6.9 Translocation of Water

Water has reached the xylem in the root. Everything up to this point has been horizontal — a journey of a few millimetres across the root. Now the water must go up, sometimes for tens of metres, against gravity, and it must keep going up for as long as the plant lives.

The transport of water, along with dissolved minerals, from the root to the other aerial parts such as the stem and the leaves, against the gravity, is called translocation of water or ascent of sap.

NoteDefinition

Ascent of sap (translocation of water) — the upward transport of water together with dissolved minerals, from the root to the aerial parts of the plant, against the force of gravity.

The route: xylem

Translocation of water occurs through the lumen — the hollow central cavity — of the conducting elements of the xylem, namely the tracheids and the vessels, in all vascular plants. These are dead, hollow, lignified cells stacked end to end, forming continuous pipes running from root to leaf.

That the xylem, and not the phloem, is the path of the ascent of sap has been proved by the ringing experiment. In this experiment a ring of bark — which carries the phloem — is stripped away from all round a stem, leaving the xylem intact. The plant continues to conduct water and stays fresh above the ring, showing that the removed tissue was not the water pipeline. The xylem is.

Q. Why does it make sense that the water-conducting cells of the xylem are dead?

A. Because a dead cell is an empty cell. Once the protoplast has broken down, the lumen is a clear, hollow tube offering almost no resistance to flow. A living cell, stuffed with cytoplasm, vacuole and membranes, would be a very poor pipe. The plant has, in effect, sacrificed the cell’s life to obtain its plumbing.

The theories

Several mechanisms or theories have been put forth to explain how water is lifted. These include the vital force theory, the relay pump theory, the physical force theory, the root pressure theory, and others. We shall consider three of them in detail — and, importantly, we shall look at what is wrong with each, because no single theory explains everything.

a. Root Pressure Theory (Vital Theory)

According to this theory, the activity of the living cells of the root is responsible for the translocation of water. Because it depends on living activity, it is classed as a vital theory. J. Pristley proposed this theory.

The evidence is simple and can be seen with the naked eye. If the stem of a potted plant is cut a few inches above the soil with a sharp knife, xylem sap is seen flowing out — oozing out — through the cut end. Nobody is pulling the sap from above; the leaves are gone. Something below must be pushing it. This exudation at the cut end of the stem is good proof for the existence of root pressure.

Where does the push come from? As the absorption of water by the roots is a constant and continuous process, a hydrostatic pressure is developed in the living cells of the cortex of the root. This is termed root pressure by S. Hales. Due to root pressure, water along with the dissolved minerals is not only forced into the xylem, but is also conducted upwards against gravity.

In the early eighteenth century, an English clergyman named Stephen Hales set out to measure what plants were doing rather than merely describe it. Among his experiments, he cut plants down to a stump and fixed a glass tube to the cut stem, then watched how far the sap climbed inside the tube. Sap rose — by itself, with no leaves left to pull it. Hales was measuring, for the first time, the pressure we now call root pressure. The apparatus shown in Fig. 6.4, in which a manometer is attached to a cut stump to measure the exudation pressure, is a direct descendant of his experiments.

Diagram

Fig. 6.4 – Experiment to demonstrate root pressure: a potted plant cut down to a stump, with a manometer attached to the stump to measure exudation pressure, showing the initial level and the raised final level of liquid in the manometer

Root pressure seems to be largely an osmotic phenomenon, and its development is an active process — it depends on the living, respiring cells of the root, exactly as active absorption did in Section 6.8.

How strong is it? The value of root pressure is +1 to +2 bars, which is enough to pump water to a height of 10 to 20 metres. Note the plus sign: root pressure is a genuine positive push. The factors that influence root pressure are oxygen, moisture, temperature of the soil, and salt contents — the same conditions that govern the respiratory activity of the root.

Gardeners who prune grapevines in late winter often see the cut ends “weep” — clear sap dripping steadily from the wound for days, at a season when the vine has not a single leaf on it. This spring bleeding is root pressure made visible. With no leaves, there can be no pull from above; the sap is being pushed up from below by the living root cells, which have already resumed absorbing water while the shoot is still bare.

Objections and limitations of root pressure theory

Although the ascent of sap does take place due to root pressure, certain objections are raised, such as:

  1. It is not applicable to plants taller than 20 metres. A pressure of +1 to +2 bars simply cannot lift water higher than that, and many trees are far taller.

  2. The ascent of sap can also occur even in the absence of the root system. A cut shoot standing in water still conducts water to its leaves — yet it has no roots at all, and therefore no root pressure.

  3. The root pressure value is almost nearly zero in taller gymnosperm trees — precisely the plants that would need it most.

  4. In actively transpiring plants, no root pressure is developed. This is the most awkward objection of all: the theory fails exactly when the plant is moving the most water.

  5. Xylem sap under normal conditions is under tension — that is, it shows a negative hydrostatic pressure, or a high osmotic pressure. It is being pulled, not pushed. A positive pressure at the base cannot be the main explanation for sap that is under negative pressure.

To sum up, therefore, root pressure is not the sole mechanism explaining the ascent of sap in all plants of varying heights.

b. Capillarity Theory (Physical Force Theory)

According to this theory, physical forces and dead cells are responsible for the ascent of sap. No living activity is invoked at all. This theory was put forth by Bohem in 1863.

The everyday evidence is familiar. A wick dipped in an oil lamp shows capillarity, and the oil is raised upwards along the wick without anything pushing it. In the same way, water in a straw dipped in water rises to a certain height because of capillarity. And the height to which the water is raised depends on the diameter of the straw — the narrower the tube, the higher the rise.

Capillarity is a consequence of properties you already know from Section 6.1: surface tension, together with the forces of cohesion (attraction between like molecules) and adhesion (attraction between unlike molecules).

Now make the comparison the theory rests on. A xylem vessel or tracheid, with its narrow lumen, is comparable to a straw. A continuous water column exists inside it because of the combined cohesive and adhesive forces between the water molecules themselves and between the water and the xylem wall — that is, because of capillarity. It is because of capillarity that water is raised, or conducted upwards against gravity, in the xylem.

But note the last words carefully: to a few centimetres only. Capillarity is real, but it is small.

Objections and limitations of capillarity theory

A few important objections are:

  1. A capillary tube must be continuously and completely hollow from one end to the other for capillarity to lift a column. But the tracheids in the xylem show closed end-walls, which interrupt the tube.

  2. The lower end of a capillary tube — here, the xylem — must be in direct contact with the soil water. However, there exists a barrier of the root cortex between the xylem and the soil water, as Section 6.7 showed in detail. The xylem never touches the soil.

  3. The narrower the capillary tube, the greater is the height to which the water column is raised. Thus, taller trees ought to have xylem vessels with a very narrow bore. However, in nature, tall trees show xylem vessels having a wider bore — the exact opposite of what the theory predicts.

Hence, to sum up, capillarity cannot be the sole mechanism to explain the ascent of sap in all the plants of varying heights.

c. Cohesion–Tension Theory (Transpiration Pull Theory)

This is presently the widely accepted theory explaining the ascent of sap in plants. It was put forth by Dixon and Jolly in 1894. The theory is based on two principles.

Cohesion and adhesion — the unbroken water column

A strong force of attraction between water molecules is called the cohesive force. A strong force of attraction between water molecules and the lignified wall of the lumen of the xylem vessel is called the adhesive force.

Due to the combined cohesive and adhesive forces, a continuous water column is developed in the xylem, running right from the root up to the tip of the topmost leaf in the plant. This is the first principle, and it is a remarkable one: the water in a tree is not a series of separate drops being passed along, but a single, unbroken thread of liquid, kilometres long in total, held together by hydrogen bonds.

Diagram

Fig. 6.9.1 – A whole plant in outline, with an unbroken column of water shown inside the xylem from root through stem to the topmost leaf, cohesive forces marked between water molecules and adhesive forces marked between water and the lignified xylem wall

the xylem water column (Water molecules attract one another strongly by hydrogen bonding → cohesion holds the column together so it does not snap when pulled; water also adheres to the lignified xylem walls → adhesion stops the column slipping down; the narrow lumen of the vessel or tracheid → keeps the column thin, so both forces act over a large wall area relative to volume. Result: a rope of water that can be pulled from the top without breaking.)

Transpiration pull — the force at the top

The second principle supplies the pull. The transpiration pull developed in the leaf vessel is transmitted down to the root, and thus accounts for the ascent of sap.

Follow the chain of events in the leaf. Excess water is lost in the form of vapour, mainly through the stomata found on the leaf. This water loss increases the DPD of the mesophyll cells — they have lost water, so they have become thirsty. These mesophyll cells then withdraw water from the neighbouring cells, and ultimately from the xylem in the leaf.

In other words, due to continuous transpiration, a gradient of suction pressure (that is, of DPD) is developed right from the guard cells up to the xylem in the leaf. Every cell in the chain is thirstier than the one below it.

This creates a tension in the xylem — called the negative pull, or the transpiration pull. Consequently, the water column is pulled out of the xylem at the top. And because the column is continuous and cohesive, pulling at the top pulls the entire column. Thus water is pulled upwards passively against gravity, leading to the ascent of sap.

Flowchart

FC 6.7 – Transpiration pull: water evaporates from mesophyll cell surfaces → escapes through stomata → DPD of mesophyll cells increases → mesophyll cells withdraw water from the leaf xylem → tension (negative pressure) develops in the xylem of the leaf → tension is transmitted down the continuous, cohesive water column through stem xylem → water column is pulled up from the root xylem → root xylem draws water from pericycle and cortex → root hair absorbs fresh water from soil → ascent of sap

Q. The theory says water is pulled up, not pushed. Is it possible to pull a liquid?

A. Yes — provided it holds together. You cannot pull a chain of loose beads, but you can pull a rope. Hydrogen bonding gives water enough cohesion to behave like a rope: the molecules at the top, as they leave, drag the ones below along with them. This is exactly why cohesion is not an optional extra in this theory but one of its two founding principles. Break the column, and the pull transmits nothing.

Q1. How does a tall tree lift water all the way to its topmost leaf without any pump?

A. It does not push the water up — it pulls it. Water evaporating from the leaves raises the DPD of the mesophyll cells, which withdraw water from the leaf xylem and create a tension there. Because cohesion between water molecules and adhesion to the lignified xylem walls hold the water in the xylem as one continuous, unbroken column from root to leaf tip, this tension is transmitted all the way down, and the whole column is drawn upwards. The “pump” is the sun evaporating water from the leaves; the “rope” is the cohesive water column itself.

the three theories in one line each (Root pressure pushes — from below, but only 10–20 m. Capillarity climbs — by itself, but only a few centimetres. Cohesion–tension pulls — from above, and it works all the way to the top.)

Objections and limitations of transpiration pull theory

Even the widely accepted theory is not free of difficulties:

  1. For the transpiration pull to operate, the water column should be unbroken and continuous. However, due to temperature fluctuations during day and night, gas bubbles may enter the water column, breaking its continuity.

  2. The mechanism assumes that tracheids are more efficient than vessels, since their end walls support the water column. However, vessels are more evolved than tracheids and are, in fact, more efficient.

  3. If the plant leaves are smeared with vaseline in order to stop transpiration, even then the ascent of sap occurs — although, by the theory, there should be no pull at all.

  4. The ascent of sap also occurs in deciduous plants that have shed all of their leaves — plants with no transpiring surface whatever.

These last two observations point to an important fact: besides the physical forces, the activity of living cells seems to be necessary for lifting the water column up. No purely physical theory is complete on its own.

Objection (i) is not merely theoretical, and you can meet it on your own kitchen table. Florists advise that the stems of cut flowers should be trimmed again under water before being placed in a vase. The reason is precisely the break in the water column: when a stem is cut in air, air is sucked into the open xylem and forms bubbles, and a column with a bubble in it cannot transmit tension. The flower then wilts even while standing in water. Cutting under water keeps the column continuous. The same problem, on a larger scale, troubles real trees in hot dry weather, when bubbles form in the xylem and individual vessels stop conducting.

The three theories of ascent of sap | Feature | Root pressure theory | Capillarity theory | Cohesion–tension theory | |—|—|—|—| | Proposed by | J. Pristley (root pressure termed by S. Hales) | Bohem (1863) | Dixon and Jolly (1894) | | Also called | Vital theory | Physical force theory | Transpiration pull theory | | Force involved | Hydrostatic root pressure, +1 to +2 bars | Surface tension, cohesion and adhesion in a narrow tube | Cohesion, adhesion and transpiration pull | | Living or non-living cells? | Living cells of the root | Dead cells and physical forces | Dead xylem elements, driven by living leaf cells | | Water is… | Pushed from below | Drawn up a fine tube | Pulled from above | | Height it can account for | 10 to 20 metres | A few centimetres only | The full height of the tallest trees | | Status | Not the sole mechanism | Not the sole mechanism | Presently the widely accepted theory |

6.10 Transport of Mineral Ions

Water never travels alone. The sap climbing the xylem carries dissolved substances with it, and the most important of these are the mineral ions. A plant that had water but no minerals could not build a single protein, a single chlorophyll molecule, or a single nucleic acid.

The soil serves as the main source of minerals for the plant. Minerals are the most commonly occurring solid, crystalline inorganic materials obtained from the earth’s crust — the weathered rock fragments that make up the mineral part of any soil. They play an important role in the day-to-day life of the plant.

A crucial point about how they enter: minerals are absorbed by plants in the ionic (dissolved) form, mainly through the roots, and are then transported. A crystal of a salt lying in the soil is of no use to a root; it must first dissolve, so that its ions are free in the soil solution.

Q. Why must a mineral be dissolved before a root can take it in?

A. Because a root hair absorbs from the soil solution, not from soil particles. Only ions moving freely in the film of capillary water can reach the plasma membrane and pass through its channels and carriers. This is also why minerals become unavailable in a dry soil even when they are abundantly present — with no water, there is no solution, and with no solution, there is no uptake.

Essential elements: macro and micro

Minerals that play an important role in the day-to-day life of the plant are called essential elements. About 36 to 40 elements are incorporated in the plant’s life. Some minerals, like C, H, O, P, N, S, Mg, are required in large quantity and are called macro elements. Minerals like Cu, Co, Mn, B, Zn, required in small quantity, are called micro elements.

NoteDefinition

Essential element — a mineral element that plays an indispensable role in the day-to-day life of the plant, so that the plant cannot complete its life normally without it.

The words “large” and “small” here refer only to quantity, never to importance. A plant deprived of boron, which it needs in traces, dies just as surely as one deprived of nitrogen, which it needs in bulk.

Macro elements vs Micro elements | Feature | Macro elements | Micro elements | |—|—|—| | Quantity required | Large | Small (traces) | | Examples given | C, H, O, P, N, S, Mg | Cu, Co, Mn, B, Zn | | Importance to the plant | Essential | Equally essential | | Effect of absence | Plant cannot complete its life normally | Plant cannot complete its life normally |

the macro elements (Read C, H, O, P, N, S as the word “CHOPNS” — then add Mg at the end. C-H-O-P-N-S + Mg. The micro elements Cu, Co, Mn, B, Zn need only be remembered as the “small five”.)

How do we know minerals come from the soil?

The evidence is old and elegant: the analysis of plant ash. Burn a plant and the carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen escape as gases, but the mineral elements remain behind in the ash. Analysing that ash demonstrates that minerals are absorbed by plants from the soil and the surroundings, and it tells us which elements, and roughly how much of each.

There is one fact here that surprises most students. The absorption of minerals is independent of that of water. The two happen in the same root, often at the same moment, but they are not linked: a root may absorb a great deal of water and very few ions, or take up ions vigorously while absorbing little water. Water largely enters passively, down a gradient; ions are frequently taken in actively, against one.

The upward journey

Once inside the xylem, the absorbed mineral ions are pulled in the upward direction along with the xylem sap, because of transpiration pull — the same pull, described in Section 6.9, that lifts the water. The ions are simply passengers on a stream that is going up anyway. This can be verified directly: when the ascending sap is analysed, the mineral ions are found in it.

Where are they needed? Mineral ions are required in the actively growing and metabolically busy regions of the plant — the apical and lateral growing points, the young leaves, the developing flowers, fruits and seeds, and the storage organs. All of these are places where new tissue is being built or reserves are being laid down.

So, from the source — the root — the ions are pulled and transported ascendingly through the sap, and they get unloaded by the fine veins through the process of diffusion in the vicinity of the cells that need them. Once outside the vein, the cells take them up actively, spending energy to pull them in.

Flowchart

FC 6.8 – Journey of a mineral ion: mineral salt dissolves in soil water → ion enters root hair (largely by active uptake) → crosses cortex and endodermis → loaded into xylem → carried upward in the xylem sap by transpiration pull → unloaded from the fine veins by diffusion in the vicinity of the target cells → actively taken up by cells of the apex, young leaves, developing flowers, fruits, seeds and storage organs

Find out and make short notes on: (i) the general roles of minerals in the life of plants, and (ii) the role of essential minerals in the day-to-day life of plants. Present your findings as a table of element against function.

Remobilisation: the plant’s own recycling

The soil would not be the only source for mineral uptake. Mineral ions can be remobilised within the parts of the plant — moved out of one organ and sent to another.

The most striking example is a deciduous tree in autumn. Before shedding its leaves, the plant does not simply throw them away with everything in them. Older parts, like the leaves of deciduous plants, export their ions to the younger leaves before the fall. What drops to the ground is, in a sense, a leaf that has already been emptied of its most valuable contents.

Not everything can be recovered. The most readily mobilised ions are those of phosphorus, sulphur, nitrogen and potassium — ions that remain free or loosely held in the cell. But the ions locked into structural components, like calcium, are not remobilised. Calcium has been built into the cell wall itself; it cannot be pulled back out.

Diagram

Fig. 6.10.1 – A plant outline with arrows showing mobile ions (P, S, N, K) being withdrawn from older lower leaves and sent up to the young growing leaves, while calcium is shown fixed in place in the walls of the older leaves with no arrow leaving them

mobile ions vs immobile ions — and where deficiency shows (When a mobile ion such as nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur or potassium runs short, the plant strips it out of the older leaves and sends it to the young ones. The deficiency symptom therefore appears first in the older, lower leaves. When an immobile ion such as calcium runs short, the older leaves cannot give up what they hold, so the young growing tissue starves and the symptom appears first in the young leaves and growing tips. In an examination, “where does the symptom appear first?” is really the question “is the ion mobile?”)

A gardener can read a plant’s mineral state from the pattern of its yellowing. A nitrogen-starved crop yellows from the bottom upwards, because the plant is dismantling its old leaves to feed its new ones. A calcium-starved tomato, in contrast, shows its trouble at the newest tissue — the growing tip dies back, and the fruits develop the dark, sunken, leathery patch at their lower end known as blossom-end rot, because calcium never reached the rapidly expanding fruit and could not be borrowed from anywhere else. Same soil, same plant, opposite symptoms — and the whole difference is remobilisation.

What the xylem actually carries

One long-standing belief needs correcting. Analysis of the xylem exudate shows that some nitrogen travels as inorganic ions, whereas much of it is carried in the organic form, as amino acids and related compounds. Small amounts of inorganic molecules of phosphorus and sulphur are also carried.

It was a belief earlier that the xylem transports only inorganic substances and the phloem only organic ones. However, this is not correct, because some exchange of materials also occurs between the xylem and the phloem. The two tissues run side by side in every vascular bundle, and they trade with one another. It is more accurate to say that the xylem is mainly an upward stream and the phloem mainly a distributing one, rather than to divide them by chemistry.

Explore and write a short note on (i) the different modes of passive absorption and active absorption of minerals in plants, and (ii) the carrier concept of active absorption.

6.11 Transport of Food

Water moves up. Food moves out. This section deals with the second stream — the traffic of sugar through the plant — and it runs in a different tissue, in a different direction, and by a different mechanism.

Source and sink

All the plant parts require a continuous supply of food (photosynthate) for their nutrition and development. Every living cell, whether in a root tip, a flower or a seed, must respire, grow and build.

But in higher plants there is a great differentiation and division of labour. Chloroplasts are confined to the green cells of the leaves, and it is there that food is synthesised. The non-green parts, such as the root and the stem, cannot make any food of their own; they must receive it from the leaves.

The part where food is synthesised is called the source, and the part where it is utilised is called the sink. Food therefore has to travel from source to sink, and this movement of food from one part of the plant to another is called the translocation of food.

NoteDefinition

Source — the plant part where food is synthesised (typically the green leaf). Sink — the plant part where food is utilised (typically the root, stem, flower, fruit or seed). Translocation of food — the movement of food from source to sink.

source vs sink (These are roles, not fixed identities, and the same organ can change roles. A potato tuber is a sink all through the growing season, receiving sugar and storing it as starch. But when it sprouts, it becomes the source, feeding the growing shoot until that shoot has leaves of its own. Always ask what an organ is doing at that moment, never what it “is”.)

Path of translocation

Food has to be translocated over long distances in higher plants — from the topmost leaf to the deepest root tip. Hence plants must have adequate channels for the transport of food. Sieve tubes and vessels are structurally ideally suited for longitudinal (vertical) translocation, being elongated cells joined end to end into continuous tubes.

Four independent lines of evidence — the ringing experiment, the structure and distribution of phloem, the chemical analysis of phloem sap, and the use of the isotope \(^{14}C\) — clearly point out that the phloem tissue is primarily responsible for the flow of food in the longitudinal, downward direction. When a plant is allowed to photosynthesise in air containing radioactive \(^{14}CO_2\), the labelled sugar that appears later can be traced, and it is found travelling in the phloem.

One of the neatest ways of sampling phloem sap uses an insect. Aphids feed by driving a needle-like mouthpart, the stylet, straight into a single sieve tube; the pressure inside the tube then pushes sap into the insect without its having to suck. Researchers realised they could let the aphid do the difficult work of finding and piercing a sieve tube, then anaesthetise the insect and cut its body away, leaving the stylet in place as a fine natural pipette. Sap continues to well out of the cut stylet, and this pure phloem sap can be collected and analysed. It is one of the main reasons we know with such confidence what phloem sap actually contains.

The horizontal or lateral translocation occurs from the phloem to the pith, or from the phloem to the cortex, via the medullary rays in the stem. The medullary rays are the radial strips of living tissue that run like spokes across a stem, and they are the plant’s side-roads.

What travels, and in which direction

Food is always translocated in the form of sucrose — the soluble form — and always along the concentration gradient, from source to sink. Sucrose is a disaccharide, \(C_{12}H_{22}O_{11}\), and it is highly soluble in water, so a great deal of it can be carried in a small volume of sap.

The transport of food occurs in two directions, vertical and lateral.

Q. The leaf makes glucose. Why is the sugar exported as sucrose rather than as glucose?

A. Because sucrose is a chemically quiet molecule. It is a non-reducing sugar, so it does not readily take part in reactions on the way, and it is not easily seized upon and used up by the cells it passes through. It is also very soluble, so the sap can be concentrated. Glucose, being reactive, would be consumed en route. Sucrose is, in effect, sugar packed for shipping.

Vertical translocation

In vertical (longitudinal) transport, food is translocated in the downward direction from the leaves (source) to the stem and the root (sink). This is the everyday direction of flow in a mature, leafy plant.

But it is not the only one. Vertical translocation also occurs in the upward direction during the germination of a seed, and from bulbils, corms and similar storage organs — here the store is the source, and the growing shoot is the sink. Upward translocation also occurs from the leaves to the growing point of the stem, and to the developing flowers and fruits situated near the ends of the branches of the stem. In every case, food is going towards the sink, whichever way that happens to lie.

Lateral translocation

Lateral translocation occurs horizontally, or laterally, across the root and the stem. It has two named forms. When food is translocated from the phloem to the pith, it is called radial translocation. When it is translocated from the phloem to the cortex, it is called tangential translocation.

The phloem and its contents

Because food can travel both up and down, the transport of food through the phloem is bidirectional — and this single fact separates the phloem sharply from the xylem, in which the sap moves only upward.

The phloem sap contains mainly water and food in the form of sucrose. But sugars, amino acids and hormones are also transported through the phloem. The phloem is therefore not only a food line but also a signalling line, carrying chemical messages between the parts of the plant.

The conducting element itself is the sieve tube, a file of elongated living cells — the sieve tube elements — placed end to end. Their end walls are perforated into sieve plates, so that the cytoplasm of one element is continuous with that of the next. Alongside each sieve tube element lies a companion cell, as seen in Fig. 6.5.

Diagram

Fig. 6.5 – L. S. of a sieve tube, labelled with sieve tube element, sieve plate, companion cell and cytoplasm, with a surface view of a sieve plate showing its pores

the sieve tube element and its companion cell (The sieve tube element is a living cell but has lost its nucleus and most of its organelles → the lumen is left largely clear, so the sugary sap can stream through with little obstruction. Its end walls are perforated as sieve plates → the sap flows from one element into the next without crossing a membrane. It cannot, however, run its own affairs without a nucleus → so a companion cell, packed with cytoplasm, a nucleus and mitochondria, lies alongside and is connected to it by many plasmodesmata, supplying the ATP and the proteins the sieve tube element needs, and doing the work of loading sugar into it.)

Transport in xylem vs transport in phloem | Feature | Xylem | Phloem | |—|—|—| | What is transported | Water with dissolved minerals | Food, mainly as sucrose; also amino acids and hormones | | Conducting elements | Tracheids and vessels | Sieve tubes (with companion cells) | | Living or dead conducting cells | Dead | Living | | Direction of flow | Upward only (root to shoot) | Bidirectional (source to sink, up or down) | | Driving force | Transpiration pull (mainly) | Turgor pressure gradient between source and sink | | Name of the process | Ascent of sap | Translocation of food |

Mechanism of sugar transport through phloem

Several mechanisms or theories have been put forth to explain how sugar actually moves through the sieve tubes — diffusion, activated diffusion, protoplasmic streaming, electro-osmosis, pressure-flow, and others. Of these, the most convincing theory is Munch’s pressure flow theory, also called the mass flow hypothesis.

Ernst Munch proposed the theory, and its logic is beautifully simple: make one end of a tube turgid and the other end flaccid, and the contents will flow from the first to the second, all by themselves.

At the source end — loading of the vein

A photosynthetic cell in the leaf synthesises glucose. Hence its osmotic concentration increases — the cell sap is now crowded with sugar.

Because of this, water is absorbed into it by endo-osmosis from the surrounding cells and from the xylem. The cell becomes turgid, and its turgor pressure rises.

Due to this increase in turgor pressure, sugar from the photosynthetic cell is forced, ultimately, into the sieve tube of the vein. This is called the loading of the vein.

At the sink end — unloading of the vein

At the sink end, the root cell utilises the sugar for its own respiration and growth, and also polymerises the excess sugar into starch — an insoluble store that is osmotically inactive and so no longer counts as dissolved sugar at all.

Consequently the osmotic concentration of the root cell is lowered. Exo-osmosis occurs: water in the root cell is lost to the surrounding cells, thereby decreasing the turgidity of the cell, and its turgor pressure is lowered.

Hence a turgor pressure gradient is developed, running from the sieve tube in the leaf — high pressure — down to the root cell — low pressure. Consequently, food is translocated along the concentration gradient, passively, pushed by that pressure difference. This is vein unloading. At the sink end the sugar is used, and the excess water exudes into the xylem — where it is free to be carried up to the leaves once again.

Flowchart

FC 6.9 – Munch’s pressure flow (mass flow) hypothesis: photosynthetic cell makes glucose → osmotic concentration of the cell rises → endo-osmosis of water from surrounding cells and xylem → cell becomes turgid, turgor pressure rises → sugar forced into the sieve tube of the vein (vein loading) → high turgor pressure at the source end → mass flow of sugary sap through the sieve tubes down the pressure gradient → at the sink, sugar is used up and excess sugar polymerised into starch → osmotic concentration of sink cell falls → exo-osmosis, water leaves the cell → turgor pressure at the sink end falls (vein unloading) → pressure gradient from source to sink is maintained → excess water exudes into the xylem and returns to the leaf

Q. Why is converting the arriving sugar into starch so important at the sink?

A. Because starch is insoluble, and an insoluble store exerts no osmotic effect. By locking sugar away as starch, the sink cell keeps its own sugar concentration low, so its turgor pressure stays low and the pressure gradient from source to sink is maintained. If the sugar simply accumulated in solution, the sink would soon become as concentrated as the source, the gradient would vanish, and the flow would stop. The sink must keep emptying itself in order to keep receiving.

Objection to the theory

The main objection to this theory is that the mechanism does not explain the bidirectional transport of food. A single pressure gradient can drive flow in one direction only, yet phloem transport is known to be bidirectional. Moreover, according to Munch, the pressure flow is purely a physical process, with no active role for the living sieve tube — which is difficult to reconcile with the fact that the sieve tubes must remain alive for translocation to occur at all.

Rats, rabbits and deer sometimes gnaw a complete ring of bark from around the trunk of a young tree. The tree does not die at once — it may leaf out and look healthy for a whole season — but it is doomed. The bark carries the phloem, and with the ring gone, sugar made in the leaves can no longer travel down to the roots. The leaves above the ring are supplied by the xylem, which is untouched, so the top stays green while the roots slowly starve and finally fail. This is the ringing experiment performed by accident, and it is one of the clearest demonstrations that food travels downward in the phloem.

6.12 Transpiration

Plants absorb water constantly and continuously. It is fair to ask what becomes of it all — and the answer is startling.

Hardly 5% of the total water absorbed by the roots is actually utilised for cell expansion and plant growth. The remaining 95% becomes surplus, and is lost into the atmosphere through the aerial parts of the plant. A plant, in other words, throws away nineteen-twentieths of everything it so carefully absorbs.

That surplus leaves the plant in two different forms. Hardly 1% of the surplus water is lost in the form of liquid, while 99% of the surplus water is lost in the form of vapour.

Flowchart

FC 6.10 – Fate of the water absorbed by a plant: total water absorbed → 5% used for cell expansion and growth; 95% surplus → of the surplus, 1% lost as liquid (guttation, through hydathodes) and 99% lost as vapour (transpiration) → transpiration occurs at three sites: cuticle (cuticular, 8–10%), stomata (stomatal, 90–93%), lenticels (lenticular, 0.1–1.0%)

Guttation — losing water as liquid

The loss of water in the form of liquid is called guttation. It occurs through special structures called water stomata, or hydathodes, which are usually found at the margins and tips of leaves.

NoteDefinition

Guttation — the loss of water from the plant in the liquid form, through special structures called water stomata or hydathodes.

Walk across a lawn on a still, humid morning and you will find droplets of water sitting at the very tips of the grass blades — one perfect bead on each. It is tempting to call it dew, but dew condenses out of the air and settles anywhere on a cool surface. These droplets are placed too precisely for that: they mark the position of the hydathodes. Overnight, the stomata were shut, transpiration had stopped, and root pressure kept pushing water into the xylem with nowhere for it to go. It was forced out, as liquid, at the leaf tips. Guttation is root pressure made visible on a leaf.

Transpiration — losing water as vapour

The loss of water in the form of vapour is called transpiration. It occurs through the leaves, the stem, the flowers and the fruits — through any aerial surface at all. But most of the transpiration occurs through the leaves, and this is given a special name: foliar transpiration, as shown in Fig. 6.6.

NoteDefinition

Transpiration — the loss of water from the aerial parts of the plant in the form of water vapour.

Diagram

Fig. 6.6 – Transpiration in a whole plant: roots taking up water from the soil, water drawn up the stem, veins carrying water into the leaves, and water evaporating from the leaves into the air

Guttation vs Transpiration | Feature | Guttation | Transpiration | |—|—|—| | Form in which water is lost | Liquid (droplets) | Vapour | | Structures involved | Hydathodes (water stomata) | Cuticle, stomata and lenticels | | Share of the surplus water | About 1% | About 99% | | When it mainly occurs | At night / early morning, when transpiration has stopped | During the day | | Driving force | Root pressure | Evaporation, giving rise to transpiration pull | | Does it carry solutes out? | Yes — the drops contain dissolved salts and sugars | No — pure water vapour leaves |

Q4. If a plant absorbs so much water, how much of it does it actually keep — and where does the rest go?

A. It keeps very little. Hardly 5% of the absorbed water is used for cell expansion and growth. The other 95% is surplus and is released to the atmosphere from the aerial parts — about 1% of it as liquid droplets by guttation through the hydathodes, and about 99% of it as water vapour by transpiration, mostly through the stomata of the leaves.

The three sites of transpiration

The actual water loss during transpiration occurs through three main sites — the cuticle, the stomata and the lenticels. Accordingly, three types of transpiration are recognised: cuticular, stomatal and lenticular.

i. Cuticular transpiration

The cuticle is a layer of a waxy substance called cutin, present on the outer surface of the epidermal cells of the leaves and the stem. It is a raincoat worn on the outside of the plant — but no raincoat is perfect, and a small amount of water escapes straight through it.

Cuticular transpiration occurs by simple diffusion, and it contributes 8–10% of the total transpiration. Since it needs no pore to open and no cell to act, it occurs throughout the day — and its rate is inversely proportional to the thickness of the cuticle. The thicker the waxy layer, the less water gets through.

the cuticle (A continuous waxy layer of cutin over the epidermis → water, being polar, cannot easily pass through a non-polar wax → water loss by diffusion is strongly reduced. Thicken the layer and you reduce the loss further, which is exactly what xerophytes growing in dry habitats do; thin it, and cuticular transpiration rises.)

ii. Lenticular transpiration

Lenticels are small raised structures composed of loosely arranged complementary cells. Each lenticel is a porous tissue consisting of cells with large intercellular spaces, present in the periderm of the secondarily thickened organs, and in the bark of the woody stems and roots of dicotyledonous flowering plants. Look at their structure in Fig. 6.7.

Diagram

Fig. 6.7 – Structure of a lenticel: a raised break in the periderm, labelled with the lenticular pore and the loose complementary cells beneath it, with the underlying cortex

Where are they found, and where not? Lenticels are present in the bark of an old stem and in the pericarp of woody fruits, but they are absent in leaves. A leaf has no periderm, and therefore no lenticels.

Lenticular transpiration contributes only about 0.1–1.0% of the total transpiration. The rate of lenticular transpiration is very slow, and, like cuticular transpiration, it also occurs throughout the day — the lenticel has no mechanism for closing itself.

Q. Cuticular and lenticular transpiration both go on all day and all night. Is that not dangerous for the plant?

A. It would be, if they were large. But together they account for less than about 11% of the total, and lenticular transpiration for barely 1%. The plant has, in effect, accepted a small continuous leak that it cannot control, while keeping tight control over the large one — the stomata, which it can close at will. Regulation is applied where it matters most.

iii. Stomatal transpiration

Stomata are minute apertures formed of two guard cells and accessory cells. They are located in the epidermis of the young stem and the leaves. Leaves generally show a greater number of stomata on the lower surface.

Depending upon the distribution of stomata on the leaves, leaves are categorised into three types:

  • Epistomatic — stomata on the upper epidermis. Found in hydrophytes, e.g. Lotus.
  • Hypostomatic — stomata on the lower epidermis. Found in xerophytes, e.g. Nerium.
  • Amphistomatic — stomata on both surfaces. Found in mesophytes, e.g. Grass.

epi, hypo, amphi (Epi- = upon/above → upper epidermis → the floating lotus leaf, whose lower surface lies on the water and could not open a stoma there even if it wanted to. Hypo- = under → lower epidermis → the xerophyte, hiding its stomata from the burning sun. Amphi- = both → both surfaces → the ordinary mesophyte, which lives in neither extreme.)

Notice how neatly the arrangement matches the habitat. This is a favourite question pattern: given a habitat, predict the stomatal distribution — or given the distribution, deduce the habitat.

Q. Why do most land plants keep the majority of their stomata on the lower surface of the leaf?

A. Because the lower surface is the shaded, cooler, more humid side. The upper surface faces the direct sun and heats up, so vapour would be lost from it far faster. Placing the pores underneath allows the plant to take in \(CO_2\) while losing as little water as it can — the whole compromise of the leaf, in one design decision.

Stomatal transpiration occurs only during the daytime — the stomata being closed at night — with the exception of desert plants, which open their stomata at night instead.

And it is by far the largest of the three. 90 to 93% of the total transpiration occurs through the stomata, and that too during the day time only.

The three types of transpiration | Feature | Cuticular | Lenticular | Stomatal | |—|—|—|—| | Site of water loss | Cuticle (cutin layer) of leaf and stem | Lenticels in bark of old stem and pericarp of woody fruits | Stomata of leaves and young stems | | Share of total transpiration | 8–10% | 0.1–1.0% | 90–93% | | When it occurs | Throughout the day | Throughout the day; very slow | Only during the daytime (exception: desert plants) | | Can the plant regulate it? | Only by altering the thickness of the cuticle | Not at all | Yes — by opening and closing the stomata | | Present in leaves? | Yes | No | Yes |

what the percentages are telling you (Set the three figures side by side — 90–93%, 8–10%, 0.1–1.0% — and one conclusion follows immediately: whatever controls the stomata controls the plant’s water balance. The cuticle and the lenticels leak steadily and cannot be adjusted from moment to moment, but they leak very little. The stomata leak enormously — and can be shut. This is why the next section is devoted entirely to the structure and working of the stomatal apparatus: it is the only tap the plant can actually turn.)

The number of stomata per unit area of a leaf is called the stomatal frequency. The correlation between the number of stomata and the number of epidermal cells per unit area is called the stomatal index (I).

Prepare a stomatal frequency chart for any six angiospermic plants growing in your area. For each plant, record the plant’s name and the details you observe — whether it is epistomatic, hypostomatic or amphistomatic, and the number of stomata you can count per unit area. Do the plants growing in the driest, sunniest spots differ from those in shaded, moist spots?

6.13 Structure of Stomatal Apparatus

Since 90 to 93% of all transpiration passes through the stomata, the stoma is the one place where the plant can genuinely control its water loss. It is worth looking at it closely.

A typical stomatal apparatus consists of three parts: two guard cells, the stoma itself, and the accessory cells.

Diagram

Fig. 6.8 (a) – Structure of the guard cell in surface view: two kidney-shaped guard cells enclosing the stoma pore, labelled with inner thick wall, nucleus, chloroplasts, guard cell, stoma pore, subsidiary cell and the surrounding epidermal cells

Guard cells

Stomata are minute, elliptical pores bounded by two kidney-shaped or dumb-bell-shaped guard cells. A guard cell is a type of epidermal tissue, and may be called a modified epidermal parenchyma cell — an ordinary epidermal cell that has been rebuilt for a special job.

Their shape depends on the group of plants. Guard cells are kidney-shaped in dicotyledons and dumb-bell-shaped in grasses (monocotyledons, or monocots). In Cyperus, unusually, both kidney-shaped and dumb-bell-shaped guard cells are present in the same plant.

Diagram

Fig. 6.9 – Types of guard cells: (A) kidney-shaped guard cells in surface view with epidermal cells, subsidiary cells, chloroplasts and the stomatal aperture labelled; (B) dumb-bell-shaped guard cells of a grass, similarly labelled

Kidney-shaped vs Dumb-bell-shaped guard cells | Feature | Kidney-shaped | Dumb-bell-shaped | |—|—|—| | Found in | Dicotyledons | Grasses (monocotyledons) | | Shape | Curved, bean-like | Narrow in the middle, swollen at both ends | | Both types together | — | Both types occur together in Cyperus |

Now the details that make the mechanism work. Guard cells are living, nucleated cells with unevenly thick walls. The inner wall — the wall facing the stoma — is thick and inelastic. The lateral, or outer, wall is thin and elastic. Remember this asymmetry; it is the whole secret of stomatal movement.

Guard cells also contain a few chloroplasts, which are capable of only poor photosynthesis. They are not there to feed the plant; their significance lies elsewhere, as the theories below will show.

Above all, guard cells have the ability to change their size and form, and because of this the stoma opens (widens) or closes (narrows).

the guard cell (Inner wall facing the pore is thick and inelastic, while the outer lateral wall is thin and elastic → when water enters and turgor pressure rises, only the thin outer wall can stretch → the guard cell bulges outward and, because of its curved kidney or dumb-bell shape, drags the rigid inner wall away from its partner → the pore between them is pulled open. A cell with uniformly thick walls would simply swell and the pore would stay shut.)

The stoma

The stoma is the elliptical pore formed by the specific arrangement of the two guard cells. It is through this pore that excess water is lost in the form of vapour — and, equally importantly, through which \(CO_2\) enters and \(O_2\) leaves. Fig. 6.8 (b) shows the same stoma in its open and closed states.

Diagram

Fig. 6.8 (b) – Open and closed stoma: two drawings side by side, one with turgid, bulging guard cells and a wide pore, the other with flaccid guard cells and the pore almost closed; chloroplasts labelled in both

Accessory cells

Accessory cells are specialised epidermal cells surrounding the guard cells. Their number is variable from plant to plant, and they are also called subsidiary cells.

Their most important property, for our purposes, is chemical rather than structural: they are the reservoirs of \(K^{+}\) ions. The guard cells will borrow potassium from them to open, and return it to them to close.

guard cells vs accessory (subsidiary) cells (Guard cells are the two cells that actually bound the pore. They are nucleated, chloroplast-containing, unevenly thickened, and they move. Accessory cells merely surround the guard cells; they do not touch the pore, they do not change shape, and their job is to act as a store of \(K^{+}\) ions for the guard cells to draw on. The pore is opened by the guard cells; it is supplied by the accessory cells.)

Opening and closing of stoma

The opening and closing of the stoma is controlled by the turgor of the guard cells — by nothing else.

During the day time, the guard cells become turgid due to endosmosis. Turgor pressure is then exerted on the thin walls of the guard cells. Being elastic and thin, the lateral walls are stretched out. And because of the kidney-like or dumb-bell-like shape of the cells, this stretching pulls the inner thick walls apart from one another, so that the stoma opens and widens.

During the night time, the guard cells become flaccid due to exosmosis. This flaccidity closes the stoma almost completely — the guard cells relax back against each other and the pore all but disappears.

Flowchart

FC 6.11 – Opening of the stoma: osmotic potential of guard cells changes → endosmosis → guard cells become turgid → turgor pressure rises → thin, elastic outer walls stretch → curved shape pulls the thick, inelastic inner walls apart → stoma opens. Closing: exosmosis → guard cells become flaccid → turgor pressure falls → walls relax → inner walls come together → stoma closes almost completely

But this only pushes the question one step back. Endosmosis and exosmosis occur due to diurnal changes in the osmotic potential of the guard cells — that is, the guard cells become osmotically stronger by day and weaker by night. Why does their osmotic potential change with the time of day? Different theories are proposed to explain it, and we shall look at two.

The starch–sugar interconversion theory

This theory was proposed by Steward (1964).

During the day time, the enzyme phosphorylase converts starch into sugar in the guard cells. Starch is insoluble and osmotically inactive; sugar is soluble and osmotically very active. The osmotic concentration of the guard cells therefore rises sharply. Water enters by endosmosis, the guard cells are stretched, and the stoma widens.

The reverse reaction occurs at night: sugar is converted back into starch, the osmotic concentration falls, water leaves, and the stoma closes.

\[\underset{\text{(Stoma closes)}}{\text{Starch}} \;\; \xrightleftharpoons[\;\text{Night}\;]{\;\text{Phosphorylase (Day)}\;} \;\; \underset{\text{(Stoma opens)}}{\text{Sugar}}\]

Q. Why does converting starch into sugar draw water in, when no water has been added and no water removed?

A. Because osmosis responds to the number of dissolved particles, not to the total mass of material. A large starch molecule sitting in the cell as an insoluble grain contributes nothing to the osmotic concentration. Break it into many small, soluble sugar molecules and the number of dissolved particles jumps, the water potential of the sap becomes more negative, and water is pulled in. The cell has not gained matter — it has merely made its matter osmotically visible.

The theory of proton transport

According to the theory of proton transport (Levitt, 1974), stomatal movement occurs due to the transport of protons (\(H^{+}\)) and \(K^{+}\) ions.

During the day time, starch is converted into malic acid. The malic acid then dissociates to form malate and protons:

\[\text{Malic acid} \rightarrow \text{Malate} + H^{+}\]

The protons are transported out of the guard cells into the subsidiary cells, and in exchange, \(K^{+}\) ions are imported from them — remember that the subsidiary cells are precisely the reservoirs of \(K^{+}\). Inside the guard cell, the imported potassium joins the malate left behind, and potassium malate is formed.

Potassium malate is a soluble salt, so it increases the osmolarity of the guard cell sap, and this causes endosmosis. Water floods in, the guard cells swell, and the stoma opens. The uptake of \(K^{+}\) ions is always accompanied by \(Cl^{-}\) ions, which enter alongside to balance the charge.

At night, the uptake of \(K^{+}\) and \(Cl^{-}\) ions is prevented by abscisic acid, which changes the permeability of the guard cells. Deprived of the ions that made them osmotically strong, the guard cells become hypotonic with respect to their surroundings, water leaves them, and they become flaccid — closing the stoma.

Flowchart

FC 6.12 – Proton transport theory (day): starch → malic acid → dissociates into malate + \(H^{+}\) → \(H^{+}\) pumped out into subsidiary cells → \(K^{+}\) imported from subsidiary cells (with \(Cl^{-}\) following) → potassium malate formed in guard cell → osmolarity rises → endosmosis → guard cells turgid → stoma opens. At night: abscisic acid alters guard cell permeability → uptake of \(K^{+}\) and \(Cl^{-}\) prevented → guard cells become hypotonic → exosmosis → guard cells flaccid → stoma closes

Starch–sugar interconversion theory vs Proton transport theory | Feature | Starch–sugar interconversion theory | Proton transport theory | |—|—|—| | Proposed by | Steward (1964) | Levitt (1974) | | Substance formed by day | Sugar (from starch, by phosphorylase) | Malic acid from starch, then potassium malate | | Ions involved | None specified | \(H^{+}\) exported; \(K^{+}\) imported, accompanied by \(Cl^{-}\) | | Role of subsidiary cells | Not involved | Act as the reservoir of \(K^{+}\) ions | | Cause of opening | Rise in osmotic concentration due to sugar → endosmosis | Rise in osmolarity due to potassium malate → endosmosis | | Cause of closing at night | Sugar reconverted to starch | Abscisic acid prevents \(K^{+}\) and \(Cl^{-}\) uptake |

a stoma opening at dawn, on the proton transport theory 1. Light falls on the leaf. In the guard cell, starch is converted into malic acid. 2. The malic acid dissociates, giving malate and protons (\(H^{+}\)). 3. The protons are pumped out of the guard cell into the neighbouring subsidiary cells. 4. In exchange, \(K^{+}\) ions move in from the subsidiary cells, with \(Cl^{-}\) ions following to keep the charge balanced. 5. Inside the guard cell, \(K^{+}\) and malate together form potassium malate. The sap is now far more concentrated. 6. The water potential of the guard cell becomes strongly negative, and water enters by endosmosis from the surrounding cells. 7. Turgor pressure rises. The thin outer wall stretches; the thick inner wall is dragged aside. 8. The pore opens. \(CO_2\) enters the leaf — and water vapour begins to leave it.

The last step of the proton transport theory has become a serious tool in agriculture. Abscisic acid is the plant’s own drought alarm: when the root senses that the soil is drying, it produces abscisic acid, which travels to the leaves and shuts the stomata before the plant has lost dangerous amounts of water. Plant breeders and crop scientists now work directly on this signal — selecting varieties whose stomata respond more promptly to abscisic acid, so that a crop survives a break in the monsoon rather than wilting. A hormone that changes the permeability of two microscopic cells decides whether a field of grain lives or dies.

Significance of transpiration

We have called transpiration a loss. But a process that removes 95% of everything the plant absorbs, and has been retained through hundreds of millions of years of evolution, is unlikely to be a simple accident. What does the plant get in return?

Advantages
  1. It removes the excess of water that the plant has absorbed but does not need.

  2. It helps in the passive absorption of water and minerals from the soil — recall from Section 6.8 that transpiration pull is the driving force behind roughly 98% of all water absorption.

  3. It helps in the ascent of sap, as the cohesion–tension theory of Section 6.9 explained.

  4. Since the stomata are open, the gaseous exchange required for photosynthesis and respiration is facilitated — \(CO_2\) can enter and \(O_2\) can leave.

  5. It maintains the turgor (turgidity) of the cells, by keeping water moving steadily through the plant.

  6. Transpiration helps in reducing the temperature of the leaf, imparting a cooling effect. Evaporating water carries away a great deal of heat — this is water’s high heat of vaporization, met in Section 6.1, put to work on a hot afternoon.

Disadvantages

Excessive transpiration leads to wilting and injury in the plant. If the leaves lose water faster than the roots can replace it, the cells go flaccid, the plant droops, and — if the imbalance continues — it may even lead to the death of the plant.

Transpiration is ‘a necessary evil’

Here, then, is the plant’s dilemma, and it cannot be escaped.

For stomatal transpiration to occur, the stoma must remain open during the day time. But the stoma is not a water valve only — it is also the only doorway for gases. When the stomata are open, then and only then will the gaseous exchange needed for respiration and photosynthesis take place.

If stomatal transpiration were to stop — that is, if the plant kept its stomata firmly shut — it would directly affect the productivity of the plant, through the loss of photosynthetic and respiratory activity. No open stoma means no \(CO_2\); no \(CO_2\) means no food.

Hence, for productivity, the stomata must remain open. And consequently, transpiration cannot be avoided. The plant loses water not because it is careless, but because the same door it must open to eat is the door through which water escapes.

For this reason, Curtis (1926) regarded transpiration as ‘a necessary evil’.

NoteDefinition

Transpiration as ‘a necessary evil’ — transpiration is harmful in that it causes an enormous loss of water and may lead to wilting, yet it is unavoidable, because the stomata must remain open for the gaseous exchange required by photosynthesis and respiration.

Q5. Why do scientists call transpiration “a necessary evil” if it makes the plant lose water?

A. Because the plant has no way of separating the two. Water vapour escapes through the same stomata that must be open to let carbon dioxide in for photosynthesis and to allow gaseous exchange for respiration. Closing the stomata would save the water — and stop the plant from making food. So the loss is an “evil”, but it is a “necessary” one; and the plant even gains from it, since transpiration pull drives water absorption and the ascent of sap, and evaporation cools the leaf.

Q. If transpiration is so useful — driving absorption, lifting sap, cooling the leaf — why call it an “evil” at all?

A. Because the plant would take those benefits far more cheaply if it could. A plant does not need to lose 95% of its water to lift the small amount it uses, and it can be killed outright by excessive transpiration on a hot, dry, windy day. The benefits are real, but they are consequences the plant makes the best of, not the reason the water is lost. The reason is simply that an open stoma leaks. That is why “necessary” and “evil” both belong in the phrase.

Prepare a short presentation on the different types of transpiration — cuticular, lenticular and stomatal. For each, show the site, the approximate percentage of the total, the time of day at which it occurs, and whether the plant can control it.

6.14 Summary

  1. Plants take in water, minerals, nutrients and gases such as \(O_2\) and \(CO_2\) from their surroundings. Productivity is affected mainly by the non-availability of water. Water, the ‘elixir of life’, makes up 90 to 95% of most plant cells and tissues and keeps them turgid.

  2. Water is liquid at room temperature, is an inert inorganic compound of neutral pH when pure, is the best solvent for most solutes, is the medium for all biochemical reactions, and is a raw material of photosynthesis. Its high specific heat, high heat of vaporization and high heat of fusion make it a thermal buffer. All these properties, along with cohesion, adhesion and high surface tension, arise from hydrogen bonding between water molecules.

  3. The root is the main organ of water absorption. Terrestrial plants absorb liquid water from soil; epiphytes such as orchids absorb water vapour through epiphytic roots bearing velamen. A typical root has four regions, and in the zone of absorption the epidermal (epiblema) cells form unicellular root hairs.

  4. A root hair is a cytoplasmic extension of an epiblema cell, 1 to 10 mm long, colourless, unbranched, delicate and ephemeral. Its two-layered wall (outer pectin, inner cellulose) is freely permeable; its plasma membrane is selectively permeable.

  5. Soil water occurs in four forms — gravitational, hygroscopic, combined and capillary. Only capillary water, held in the pores between soil particles, is available for absorption. Plants absorb it from the rhizosphere.

  6. Root hairs absorb water by three physical processes occurring in sequence: imbibition → diffusion → osmosis.

Flowchart

FC 6.13 – The whole chapter in one line: capillary water in soil → imbibition into the pectin–cellulose wall → diffusion through the freely permeable wall → osmosis across the selectively permeable plasma membrane → cortex (apoplast and symplast pathways) → endodermis with Casparian strip → pericycle → xylem → ascent of sap by cohesion–tension (transpiration pull) → mesophyll of leaf → water vapour lost through stomata (transpiration)

  1. Imbibition is the swelling of hydrophilic colloids by adsorption of water; the solid is the imbibant and the liquid the imbibate. Seen in soaking of seeds, swelling of raisins and kneading of flour.

  2. Diffusion is the movement of ions, atoms or molecules from a region of higher concentration to one of lower concentration, due to their kinetic energy, continuing till equilibrium. Diffusion pressure is proportional to the number of diffusing particles, and is always greater in pure solvent than in a solution. The difference between them is the Diffusion Pressure Deficit (DPD) or Suction Pressure, coined by B. S. Meyer (1938) — colloquially, the “thirst” of a cell.

  3. Facilitated diffusion is the passive, carrier-mediated absorption of solutes through membrane proteins such as aquaporins and ion channels. It needs no ATP, but requires a concentration gradient.

  4. Osmosis is the diffusion of solvent from a weaker to a stronger solution through a semipermeable membrane. Solutions are hypotonic, hypertonic or isotonic with respect to the cell. Endosmosis makes a cell turgid; exosmosis makes it flaccid.

  5. Turgidity raises the turgor pressure (T.P.), against which the rigid wall exerts an equal and opposite wall pressure (W.P.). Osmotic pressure (O.P.) is the pressure that must be applied to a solution to prevent solvent from entering it. These are related as: \[D.P.D. = O.P. - T.P. \quad ; \quad \therefore \; D.P.D. = O.P. - W.P.\] In a flaccid cell T.P. is zero, so \(DPD = OP\). In a fully turgid cell DPD is zero, so \(TP = OP\).

  6. Water potential (ψ) is the chemical potential (free energy per molecule) of water. It is equal but opposite in sign to DPD, and is measured in bars, pascals or atmospheres. Pure water has ψ = 0; adding solute makes ψ negative. DPD is now called water potential, O.P. is called osmotic potential, and T.P. is called pressure potential (always positive). Water always flows from a less negative to a more negative water potential, and the difference between adjacent cells decides movement through plasmodesmata.

  7. Water absorption is favoured by capillary water, a soil temperature of 20 °C to 30 °C, low solute concentration in soil water, good soil aeration, and increased transpiration in irrigated soil.

  8. Plasmolysis is exo-osmosis in a living cell placed in a hypertonic solution: the protoplast shrinks and recedes from the wall, the gap filling with the outer solution, and T.P. becomes zero. In a hypotonic solution the cell recovers by endo-osmosis — deplasmolysis.

  9. Across the root, a DPD gradient runs from epiblema to pericycle, so water passes from root hair → cortical cells → passage cells of endodermis (in monocots) → pericycle → protoxylem. Continuous absorption builds a hydrostatic root pressure.

  10. Water crosses the root by two pathways: the apoplast (non-living — cell walls and intercellular spaces, only up to the endodermis, where the suberised Casparian strip blocks it) and the symplast (living — cytoplasm to cytoplasm through plasmodesmata; also called the transmembrane pathway). Symplast is further divided into vacuolar and transmembrane routes. Secondary roots growing out through the endodermis provide an apoplastic bypass to the stele.

  11. Absorption is of two modes. Passive absorption is driven by transpiration pull, follows the DPD gradient, uses no ATP, occurs by day, and accounts for about 98% of the water absorbed. Active absorption is driven by root pressure, occurs against the DPD gradient at night, and needs ATP from respiration. It is osmotic (Atkins and Priestly, 1922 — energy sets up the gradient but is not used directly) or non-osmotic (Kramer and Thimann, 1959 — respiratory energy used directly; hence poor oxygen supply, low temperature and metabolic inhibitors all reduce uptake).

  12. Ascent of sap is the upward transport of water with minerals against gravity, through the lumen of tracheids and vessels. The ringing experiment proves the xylem is the path. Three theories:

  • Root pressure theory (vital theory) — J. Pristley; root pressure termed by S. Hales; value +1 to +2 bars, enough for 10 to 20 metres. Fails for taller plants, for plants without roots, for tall gymnosperms, for actively transpiring plants, and because xylem sap is normally under tension.
  • Capillarity theory (physical force theory) — Bohem (1863); based on surface tension, cohesion and adhesion; raises water a few centimetres only. Fails because tracheids have closed end-walls, xylem is not in direct contact with soil water, and tall trees have wider (not narrower) vessels.
  • Cohesion–tension theory (transpiration pull theory) — Dixon and Jolly (1894); the presently accepted theory. Cohesion between water molecules and adhesion to the lignified xylem wall maintain a continuous water column from root to topmost leaf; transpiration raises the DPD of mesophyll cells, creating a tension that is transmitted down and pulls the column up. Objections: bubbles may break the column; vessels are in fact more efficient than tracheids; ascent occurs even when leaves are vaselined or shed — so the activity of living cells also seems necessary.
  1. Soil is the main source of minerals, absorbed in the ionic (dissolved) form, independently of water absorption, as shown by plant ash analysis. Essential elements number about 36 to 40; macro elements (C, H, O, P, N, S, Mg) are needed in large quantity and micro elements (Cu, Co, Mn, B, Zn) in small quantity. Ions are carried up in the xylem sap by transpiration pull, unloaded from fine veins by diffusion, and taken up actively by cells. Ions such as P, S, N and K are readily remobilised — older leaves export them to younger leaves before falling — but structural ions like calcium are not. Xylem also carries nitrogen in organic forms, and materials are exchanged between xylem and phloem.

  2. Translocation of food runs from source (where food is made) to sink (where it is used). The phloem is the path — proved by ringing, phloem structure and distribution, analysis of phloem sap, and the use of \(^{14}C\). Food travels as sucrose, along the concentration gradient. Transport is vertical (downward to stem and root; upward during germination of seeds, bulbils and corms, and to growing points, flowers and fruits) and lateral (radial, phloem to pith; tangential, phloem to cortex, via medullary rays). Phloem transport is bidirectional, and the sap also carries amino acids and hormones.

  3. Munch’s pressure flow (mass flow) hypothesis is the most convincing mechanism: sugar made in the photosynthetic cell raises its osmotic concentration → endo-osmosis → turgidity → sugar forced into the sieve tube (vein loading); at the sink, sugar is used or polymerised to starch → osmotic concentration falls → exo-osmosis → turgor falls (vein unloading). The resulting turgor pressure gradient drives food passively from source to sink. Its main objection is that it does not explain bidirectional transport.

  4. Of the water absorbed, hardly 5% is used in growth; 95% is surplus. Of that surplus, 1% is lost as liquid — guttation, through hydathodes (water stomata) — and 99% as vapour — transpiration.

  5. Transpiration occurs at three sites: the cuticle (cuticular, 8–10%, all day, rate inversely proportional to cuticle thickness), the lenticels (lenticular, 0.1–1.0%, very slow, all day, absent in leaves) and the stomata (stomatal, 90–93%, day time only, except in desert plants).

  6. Leaves are epistomatic (upper surface; hydrophytes, e.g. Lotus), hypostomatic (lower surface; xerophytes, e.g. Nerium) or amphistomatic (both surfaces; mesophytes, e.g. Grass). Stomatal frequency is the number of stomata per unit area; stomatal index (I) relates stomatal number to epidermal cell number.

  7. The stomatal apparatus consists of two guard cells, the stoma and the accessory (subsidiary) cells. Guard cells are living, nucleated, modified epidermal parenchyma cells with a thick inelastic inner wall and a thin elastic outer wall, and a few chloroplasts. They are kidney-shaped in dicots and dumb-bell-shaped in grasses; both types occur in Cyperus. Accessory cells are reservoirs of \(K^{+}\) ions.

  8. Stomatal movement is controlled by the turgor of guard cells: endosmosis by day makes them turgid and opens the pore; exosmosis by night makes them flaccid and closes it. Two theories explain the diurnal change in osmotic potential:

  • Starch–sugar interconversion theory (Steward, 1964): by day, phosphorylase converts starch to sugar, raising osmotic concentration, so water enters and the stoma opens; the reverse occurs at night. \[\underset{\text{(Stoma closes)}}{\text{Starch}} \;\; \xrightleftharpoons[\;\text{Night}\;]{\;\text{Phosphorylase (Day)}\;} \;\; \underset{\text{(Stoma opens)}}{\text{Sugar}}\]
  • Proton transport theory (Levitt, 1974): by day, starch → malic acid → malate + \(H^{+}\); protons pass to the subsidiary cells and \(K^{+}\) (with \(Cl^{-}\)) is imported; potassium malate raises osmolarity, causing endosmosis and opening. At night, abscisic acid prevents \(K^{+}\) and \(Cl^{-}\) uptake, the guard cells become hypotonic and flaccid, and the stoma closes.
  1. Significance of transpiration. Advantages: removes excess water; helps passive absorption of water and minerals; helps the ascent of sap; permits gaseous exchange for photosynthesis and respiration through the open stomata; maintains cell turgidity; cools the leaf. Disadvantage: excessive transpiration causes wilting, injury and even death of the plant.

  2. Because the stomata must stay open by day for the gaseous exchange that photosynthesis and respiration require, transpiration cannot be avoided without losing productivity. Hence Curtis (1926) called transpiration ‘a necessary evil’.

6.15 Points to Ponder

  1. Water makes up 90 to 95% of a plant’s cells, yet a plant keeps hardly 5% of what it absorbs. Is it fair to call the rest “wasted”? What would change in a plant that had found a way to keep it all?

  2. Nearly every remarkable property of water — its high specific heat, its surface tension, its ability to be pulled up a hundred metres without snapping — traces back to a single weak attraction between molecules. What does this tell you about how large biological effects can arise from small physical causes?

  3. The cell wall lets everything through; the plasma membrane chooses. What would happen to a root hair if this were reversed?

  4. A soil can be visibly damp and still leave a plant dying of thirst. What does this suggest about the difference between what is present in an environment and what is available in it? Can you think of the same distinction elsewhere in biology?

  5. Root hairs are delicate, unbranched and live only a few days. Why might a short-lived, disposable structure be a better design here than a strong, permanent one?

  6. Root pressure can lift water only 10 to 20 metres, and capillarity only a few centimetres — yet trees far taller than this existed long before either theory was proposed. What does the history of these three theories tell you about how science replaces an explanation that is partly right?

  7. The cohesion–tension theory is the accepted explanation, and yet sap still ascends in a plant whose leaves have been sealed with vaseline or shed entirely. Should a theory be abandoned when it cannot explain every observation, or held while the exceptions are investigated?

  8. The Casparian strip forces everything entering the stele to pass through a living membrane. What is the plant gaining by insisting on this, and what is it paying for it?

  9. Water absorption is passive and needs no ATP, while mineral absorption is often active and expensive. Why should a plant be willing to pay for one and not the other?

  10. A potato tuber is a sink for most of the year and a source when it sprouts. What other structures in a plant do you think change roles like this, and what decides which role an organ plays at a given moment?

  11. Deficiency of nitrogen shows first in the old leaves, deficiency of calcium first in the young ones. What does this pattern reveal about the plant’s priorities when a resource runs short?

  12. Transpiration is called ‘a necessary evil’. If you could engineer a plant that lost far less water, which of the six advantages of transpiration would you have to replace, and how would you replace them? Would such a plant still be a plant as we know it?

6.16 Objective Questions

  1. In soil, the water available for absorption by the root is ……………….
    1. gravitational water
    2. capillary water
    3. hygroscopic water
    4. combined water
  2. The most widely accepted theory for the ascent of sap is ……………
    1. capillarity theory
    2. root pressure theory
    3. diffusion
    4. transpiration pull theory
  3. Water movement between the cells is due to ………….
    1. T. P.
    2. W. P.
    3. D. P. D.
    4. incipient plasmolysis
  4. In guard cells, when sugar is converted into starch, the stomatal pore ………….
    1. closes almost completely
    2. opens partially
    3. opens fully
    4. remains unchanged
  5. Surface tension is due to …………..
    1. diffusion
    2. osmosis
    3. gravitational force
    4. cohesion
  6. Which of the following types of solution has a lower level of solutes than the solution?
    1. Isotonic
    2. Hypotonic
    3. Hypertonic
    4. Anisotonic
  7. During the rainy season, wooden doors warp and become difficult to open or to close because of ……………
    1. plasmolysis
    2. imbibition
    3. osmosis
    4. diffusion
  8. Water absorption takes place through ………….
    1. lateral roots
    2. root cap
    3. root hair
    4. primary root
  9. Due to low atmospheric pressure, the rate of transpiration will ………….
    1. increase
    2. decrease rapidly
    3. decrease slowly
    4. remain unaffected
  10. Osmosis is a property of ………………
  1. solute
  2. solvent
  3. solution
  4. membrane

6.17 Check Your Concepts

  1. A field is irrigated heavily and the soil is visibly moist, yet the crop wilts within two days. Give two possible reasons, based on what you have learnt about the forms of soil water and about soil aeration.

  2. Assertion (A): Water present in the soil as hygroscopic water is not available to the plant. Reason (R): Hygroscopic water is chemically bound inside the hydrated oxides of silicon and aluminium. Choose whether both A and R are true and R explains A; both are true but R does not explain A; A is true and R is false; or A is false and R is true. Justify your choice.

  3. Why is the cell wall of the root hair freely permeable while its plasma membrane is selectively permeable? What would happen to absorption if the plasma membrane also became freely permeable?

  4. Arrange in the correct sequence the events by which water enters a root hair cell from the soil: osmosis, imbibition, diffusion. Explain in one line what each step achieves that the previous one could not.

  5. Distinguish between an imbibant and an imbibate, giving one example of each from everyday life.

  6. A fully turgid cell has a very concentrated cell sap and therefore a high osmotic pressure, yet it absorbs no more water. Explain why, using the relation between DPD, O. P. and T. P.

  7. What happens to the DPD, T. P. and O. P. of a root hair cell (a) as it absorbs water from the soil, and (b) as the adjacent cortical cell draws water away from it?

  8. Why is the water potential of pure water taken as zero, and why can the water potential of a cell never be positive? What is the sign of pressure potential, and why?

  9. Assertion (A): Water flows from a cell with a water potential of \(-5\) bars to a cell with a water potential of \(-12\) bars. Reason (R): Water always flows from a less negative to a more negative water potential. State whether A and R are true, and whether R correctly explains A.

  10. Why does adding a heavy dose of soluble fertilizer to a field sometimes cause the crop to wilt, even though the field has just been watered?

  11. Why is plasmolysis used as a test of whether a plant cell is living? What result would you expect with a dead cell, and why?

  12. A plasmolysed cell is transferred to distilled water. Describe, step by step, what happens to its protoplast, its turgor pressure and its DPD.

  13. Explain how a gradient of suction pressure develops from the epiblema to the pericycle, and why this gradient is essential for the continuous absorption of water by the root hair.

  14. What is the Casparian strip made of, and what does it force water and dissolved ions to do? Suggest one advantage the plant gains from this arrangement.

  15. Draw a simple diagram of a transverse section of a root from the root hair to the xylem, and label: epiblema, cortex, endodermis, Casparian strip, pericycle, xylem. On the same diagram, mark the apoplast and symplast pathways with arrows of different styles.

  16. “In passive absorption, water is absorbed through the roots and not by the roots.” Explain what this statement means, and name the force actually responsible.

  17. Both osmotic and non-osmotic active absorption ultimately depend on respiration, yet only one of them uses energy directly. Explain the difference. Also state why a poorly aerated soil reduces water uptake.

  18. Root pressure can pump water to a height of 10 to 20 metres. Give three separate observations that show root pressure cannot be the sole mechanism for the ascent of sap.

  19. Capillarity predicts that the narrower the tube, the higher the water rises. What do we actually observe in the xylem vessels of tall trees, and why is this a problem for the capillarity theory?

  20. Arrange the following events of the transpiration pull in their correct sequence: tension is transmitted down the xylem; water vapour escapes through the stomata; the water column is pulled up from the root; the DPD of the mesophyll cells increases; the mesophyll cells withdraw water from the leaf xylem.

  21. Why must cohesion and adhesion both be present for the transpiration pull theory to work? What happens to the pull if a gas bubble enters the xylem?

  22. Match the following:

Column A Column B
a. J. Pristley i. Diffusion Pressure Deficit (1938)
b. Bohem ii. Root pressure theory
c. Dixon and Jolly iii. Capillarity theory (1863)
d. B. S. Meyer iv. Starch–sugar interconversion theory (1964)
e. Steward v. Cohesion–tension theory (1894)
f. Levitt vi. Theory of proton transport (1974)
g. Ernst Munch vii. Pressure flow hypothesis
h. Curtis viii. Transpiration as ‘a necessary evil’
  1. Why does a deficiency of nitrogen show first in the older leaves of a plant, while a deficiency of calcium shows first in the young leaves and growing tips?

  2. Assertion (A): The absorption of minerals by a root is independent of its absorption of water. Reason (R): Minerals are absorbed in the ionic form and are often taken in actively, while most water enters passively along a gradient. Evaluate A and R.

  3. Why is food translocated in the phloem as sucrose rather than as glucose? Give two reasons.

  4. A potato tuber acts as a sink during the growing season but as a source when it sprouts. Explain, and give one more example of an organ that changes its role in this way.

  5. In Munch’s pressure flow hypothesis, why is it essential that the sink cell converts the arriving sugar into starch? What would happen to the flow if it did not?

  6. State the main objection to Munch’s pressure flow hypothesis, and explain why the bidirectional nature of phloem transport creates a difficulty for it.

  7. A complete ring of bark is removed from around the trunk of a young tree. The leaves stay green for the whole season, but the tree eventually dies. Explain both observations.

  8. Distinguish between guttation and transpiration with respect to the form in which water is lost, the structure involved, the time of occurrence and the driving force.

  9. What happens if a plant’s stomata are kept permanently closed? Discuss the consequences for water balance, gaseous exchange and productivity, and relate your answer to the phrase ‘a necessary evil’.

  10. A lotus leaf floats on water and a Nerium leaf grows in a dry, exposed habitat. Predict the stomatal distribution of each, name the category it belongs to, and justify the arrangement in terms of the plant’s habitat.

  11. Why is the rate of cuticular transpiration inversely proportional to the thickness of the cuticle? Which category of plants would you expect to have the thickest cuticle, and why?

  12. Lenticular transpiration accounts for only about 0.1–1.0% of the total, yet it goes on all day and all night. Why can the plant not control it, and why is this acceptable to the plant?

  13. Draw a labelled diagram of the stomatal apparatus of a dicot leaf in surface view. Label: guard cells, stoma pore, inner thick wall, chloroplast, nucleus, subsidiary (accessory) cells and epidermal cells.

  14. Explain why the uneven thickening of the guard cell wall is essential for the opening of the stoma. What would happen if both walls of the guard cell were equally thick and elastic?

  15. Compare the starch–sugar interconversion theory and the theory of proton transport with respect to: the substance formed by day, the ions involved, the role of the subsidiary cells, and the cause of closure at night.

  16. Arrange in sequence the events of stomatal opening according to the proton transport theory: potassium malate is formed; starch is converted into malic acid; the guard cells become turgid and the stoma opens; \(H^{+}\) ions are transported to the subsidiary cells; endosmosis occurs; \(K^{+}\) ions are imported along with \(Cl^{-}\); malic acid dissociates into malate and protons.

  17. What is the role of abscisic acid in the closing of stomata at night, and why does this cause the guard cells to become hypotonic?

  18. List the six advantages of transpiration, and then explain why, despite all of them, transpiration is still described as an “evil”.

  19. What is osmotic pressure? (30–40 words)

  20. Name the condition in which the protoplast of the plant cell shrinks. (30–40 words)

  21. What happens when a pressure greater than the atmospheric pressure is applied to pure water or a solution? (30–40 words)

  22. Which type of solution will bring about deplasmolysis? (30–40 words)

  23. Which type of plants have negative root pressure? (30–40 words)

  24. In which conditions will the transpiration pull be affected? (30–40 words)

  25. Mention the shape of guard cells in Cyperus. (30–40 words)

  26. Why do diurnal changes occur in the osmotic potential of guard cells? (30–40 words)

  27. What is symplast pathway? (30–40 words)

  28. Describe the mechanism of absorption of water.

  29. Discuss the theories of water translocation.

  30. What is transpiration? Describe the mechanism of opening and closing of stomata.

  31. What is transpiration? Explain the role of transpiration.

  32. What is the significance of transpiration? Explain the root pressure theory and its limitations.

  33. Explain the capillarity theory of water translocation.

  34. Why is transpiration called ‘a necessary evil’?

  35. Explain the movement of water in the root.

  36. Define and/or explain the terms: osmosis, diffusion, plasmolysis, imbibition, guttation, transpiration, ascent of sap, active absorption, DPD, turgor pressure, water potential, wall pressure, root pressure.

  37. Distinguish between: (a) osmotic pressure and turgor pressure; (b) diffusion and osmosis.

  38. Describe the structure of root hair. (150–200 words)

  39. Write on the journey of water from soil to xylem in roots. (150–200 words)

  40. Explain the cohesion theory for the translocation of water. (150–200 words)

  41. Write on the mechanism of opening and closing of stoma. (150–200 words)

  42. Explain the active absorption of minerals. (150–200 words)