Chapter 6: Haloalkanes and Haloarenes

In the late 1920s, chemists were asked to solve a dangerous problem. The refrigerators of the time ran on ammonia, methyl chloride and sulphur dioxide — gases that were toxic, and in some cases flammable. A leaking fridge could kill a family in its sleep. The American chemist Thomas Midgley Jr. and his team set out to design a gas that would do the same cooling job but refuse to burn, refuse to react and refuse to poison anyone. What they arrived at was a small carbon compound wearing a coat of chlorine and fluorine atoms — a chlorofluorocarbon, later sold under the name Freon. It was so unreactive that Midgley famously demonstrated its safety by inhaling a lungful and blowing out a candle flame with it.

For forty years the compound looked like a triumph. Then, in the 1970s, Mario Molina and F. Sherwood Rowland asked an uncomfortable question: if this molecule reacts with nothing, what finally becomes of it? Their answer — that it drifts intact into the stratosphere, where ultraviolet light snaps off chlorine atoms that go on to destroy ozone — earned them a share of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1995, and changed international law.

The same feature that made the molecule safe made it permanent. To understand how a halogen atom can do this, we must first understand the bond it forms with carbon.

Fig. 6.0

Fig. 6.0 – The escaping Freon molecule and ozone destruction.

NoteCuriosity Corner

Q1. Chloromethane boils at a much higher temperature than methane, and iodomethane boils higher still. What is the halogen atom adding to the molecule that makes it so much harder to boil? Q2. Chloroethane gives up its chlorine to hot alkali quite readily, but chlorobenzene barely reacts at all under the same conditions. Both contain a C–Cl bond — so why the enormous difference? Q3. A tertiary alkyl halide is the fastest of all halides in one substitution mechanism and the slowest in the other. How can crowding around a carbon atom help one route and block the other? Q4. If a single, pure, optically active alkyl halide is hydrolysed, the product sometimes shows no optical rotation at all. How can a reaction destroy optical activity? Q5. Freon was chosen precisely because it reacts with nothing on the ground. Why should a compound that is chemically “safe” turn out to be environmentally dangerous?

Keep these questions in mind. Each of them will be answered as you work through this chapter.

6.1 Classification

What Organohalogen Compounds Are

Take any hydrocarbon — aliphatic (an open-chain compound such as ethane) or aromatic (a ring compound such as benzene) — and replace one or more of its hydrogen atoms with a halogen atom. What you get is an organohalogen compound. If the parent was an aliphatic hydrocarbon, the product is an alkyl halide, also called a haloalkane. If the parent was an aromatic hydrocarbon, the product is an aryl halide, also called a haloarene.

The difference between the two families lies in the carbon that carries the halogen. In a haloalkane, the halogen is attached to an \(sp^3\) hybridised carbon atom of an alkyl group. In a haloarene, it is attached to an \(sp^2\) hybridised carbon atom of an aryl group. Recall from Class XI that an \(sp^3\) carbon has formed four single bonds and is tetrahedral, while an \(sp^2\) carbon is part of a double bond or an aromatic ring and is trigonal planar. This single structural difference is responsible for almost every difference in behaviour you will meet later in this chapter, so it is worth fixing firmly in mind now.

NoteDefinition

A haloalkane (alkyl halide) is a compound in which one or more halogen atoms are bonded to \(sp^3\) hybridised carbon atom(s) of an alkyl group. A haloarene (aryl halide) is a compound in which one or more halogen atoms are bonded to \(sp^2\) hybridised carbon atom(s) of an aryl group.

Many halogen-containing organic compounds occur in nature, and several of them are clinically useful. Chloramphenicol, a chlorine-containing antibiotic produced by microorganisms, is very effective in the treatment of typhoid fever. Our own body manufactures thyroxine, an iodine-containing hormone whose deficiency causes the disease goitre. Among synthetic halogen compounds, chloroquine is used to treat malaria, and halothane is used as an anaesthetic during surgery. Certain fully fluorinated compounds are even being considered as potential blood substitutes in surgery.

Beyond medicine, these compounds are of great industrial and everyday importance. They dissolve relatively non-polar substances well, so they are widely used as solvents, and they serve as starting materials for the synthesis of a very wide range of organic compounds. In this Chapter you will study the important methods of preparation, the physical and chemical properties, and the uses of organohalogen compounds.

The word halogen comes from the Greek hals (salt) and gennan (to produce) — literally “salt-former”, because these elements combine directly with metals to give salts such as common salt, sodium chloride. The name is a reminder that fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine are unusually eager to accept an electron, which is exactly why they pull electron density away from carbon in every compound in this chapter.

Once a halogen atom is fixed to a carbon skeleton, the molecule becomes remarkably difficult for nature to take apart. Soil bacteria, which readily break down ordinary hydrocarbons, struggle to attack carbon–halogen bonds, so halogenated compounds tend to persist in soil and water long after they have served their purpose. This persistence is the reason many organohalogen compounds — useful as they are — are also treated as environmental pollutants, a theme you will return to in Section 6.8.

Haloalkanes and haloarenes may be classified in the following ways.

6.1.1 On the Basis of Number of Halogen Atoms

The simplest classification asks only one question: how many halogen atoms does the molecule carry? On this basis, compounds are called mono-, di- or polyhalogen (tri-, tetra-, and so on) compounds, depending on whether they contain one, two, or more halogen atoms in their structures.

Among the haloalkanes, \(\\mathrm{C\_2H\_5X}\) is a monohaloalkane; a molecule carrying \(-\\mathrm{CH\_2X}\) groups on two adjacent carbons is a dihaloalkane; and one carrying three halogen atoms is a trihaloalkane. The same idea applies to the aromatic family, giving monohaloarenes, dihaloarenes and trihaloarenes, as shown in Fig. 6.1.

Fig. 6.1

Fig. 6.1 – Classification of haloalkanes and haloarenes by halogen count.

Monohalocompounds can be classified further, and the basis of that finer classification is the hybridisation of the carbon atom to which the halogen is bonded. This is taken up in the next two subsections.

6.1.2 Compounds Containing \(sp^3\) C—X Bond (X = F, Cl, Br, I)

In this class, the halogen always sits on a tetrahedral, \(sp^3\) hybridised carbon. What varies is what that carbon is attached to. This class includes the following three types.

(a) Alkyl Halides or Haloalkanes (R—X)

In alkyl halides, the halogen atom is bonded to an alkyl group (R). They form a homologous series represented by the general formula \(\\mathrm{C\_nH\_{2n+1}X}\) — that is, each member differs from the next by a \(-\\mathrm{CH\_2}-\) unit.

Alkyl halides are further classified as primary, secondary or tertiary according to the nature of the carbon atom to which the halogen is attached. If the halogen is attached to a primary carbon atom — a carbon joined to only one other carbon — the compound is called a primary alkyl halide, or 1° alkyl halide. If the halogen sits on a secondary carbon (joined to two other carbons), it is a secondary alkyl halide (2°); if it sits on a tertiary carbon (joined to three other carbons), it is a tertiary alkyl halide (3°). The three arrangements are compared in Fig. 6.2.

Fig. 6.2

Fig. 6.2 – Primary, secondary and tertiary alkyl halides.

Q. Is the count of 1°, 2° or 3° about the halogen or about the carbon?

A. Always about the carbon that carries the halogen. Count how many other carbon atoms are directly bonded to that one carbon: one → primary, two → secondary, three → tertiary. The identity of the halogen (F, Cl, Br or I) has nothing to do with this label.

(b) Allylic Halides

These are the compounds in which the halogen atom is bonded to an \(sp^3\) hybridised carbon atom that is adjacent to a carbon–carbon double bond (C=C) — that is, to an allylic carbon. Note carefully that the halogen is not on the double bond itself; it is one carbon away from it, as marked in Fig. 6.3.

Fig. 6.3

Fig. 6.3 – Allylic halides.

(c) Benzylic Halides

These are the compounds in which the halogen atom is bonded to an \(sp^3\) hybridised carbon atom that is attached to an aromatic ring. Again, the halogen is not on the ring — it is on the carbon just outside it. Like ordinary alkyl halides, benzylic halides may be primary, secondary or tertiary, depending on what else that benzylic carbon carries: \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH\_2X}\) is 1°; if the carbon also bears one methyl group and a hydrogen it is 2°; and if it bears two methyl groups it is 3°. These are drawn in Fig. 6.4.

Fig. 6.4

Fig. 6.4 – Primary, secondary and tertiary benzylic halides.

6.1.3 Compounds Containing \(sp^2\) C—X Bond

Here the halogen is attached to a trigonal planar, \(sp^2\) hybridised carbon — a carbon that is part of a double bond or of an aromatic ring. This class includes the following two types.

(a) Vinylic Halides

These are the compounds in which the halogen atom is bonded to an \(sp^2\) hybridised carbon atom of a carbon–carbon double bond (C=C). The halogen is now on the double bond, not next to it, as Fig. 6.5 shows.

Fig. 6.5

Fig. 6.5 – Vinylic halides.

(b) Aryl Halides

These are the compounds in which the halogen atom is directly bonded to an \(sp^2\) hybridised carbon atom of an aromatic ring, as in Fig. 6.6.

Fig. 6.6

Fig. 6.6 – Aryl halides.

The five structural types you have now met — alkyl, allylic, benzylic, vinylic and aryl halides — look deceptively similar on paper, and telling them apart quickly is a standard first step in examination questions on this chapter. The essential test is always the same: identify the carbon that carries the halogen, and ask what its hybridisation is and what surrounds it.

Alkyl vs Allylic vs Benzylic vs Vinylic vs Aryl halides

Type Hybridisation of C bearing X Where the halogen sits Example
Alkyl halide \(sp^3\) On a plain saturated carbon of an alkyl group \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2Br}\)
Allylic halide \(sp^3\) On the carbon next to a C=C \(\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CH{-}CH\_2Br}\)
Benzylic halide \(sp^3\) On the carbon attached to an aromatic ring \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH\_2Cl}\)
Vinylic halide \(sp^2\) On a doubly bonded carbon of C=C \(\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CHCl}\)
Aryl halide \(sp^2\) On a carbon of the aromatic ring \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Cl}\)

Classify each of the following as an alkyl (1°, 2° or 3°), allylic, benzylic, vinylic or aryl halide:

(i) \(\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CH{-}CH\_2{-}Br}\) (ii) \(\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CH{-}Br}\) (iii) \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}CH(CH\_3){-}Cl}\) (iv) \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}Cl}\) (v) \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3C{-}Br}\)

In every case, first locate the carbon bearing the halogen and decide its hybridisation.

  1. The Br is on a \(-\\mathrm{CH\_2}-\) carbon, which forms only single bonds, so it is \(sp^3\). That carbon lies immediately next to a C=C. Hence it is an allylic halide.

  2. The Br is on a carbon that is itself part of the C=C, so that carbon is \(sp^2\). Hence it is a vinylic halide.

  3. The Cl is on an \(sp^3\) carbon that is directly attached to the benzene ring, so it is a benzylic halide. That carbon carries one methyl group, one hydrogen and the ring, i.e. two carbon atoms are attached to it, so it is a secondary (2°) benzylic halide.

  4. The Cl is bonded straight to a ring carbon, which is \(sp^2\). Hence it is an aryl halide.

  5. The Br is on a carbon bonded to three methyl groups. That carbon is \(sp^3\) and is a tertiary carbon, so this is a tertiary (3°) alkyl halide.

(question only — no solution)

Classify each of the following, giving the hybridisation of the carbon that bears the halogen:

(i) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(Cl)CH\_3}\) (ii) \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH\_2CH\_2Br}\) (iii) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}CH{=}CH{-}Cl}\) (iv) 3-bromocyclohexene (v) \(p\)-bromotoluene (4-bromo-1-methylbenzene). For any alkyl or benzylic halide among them, also state whether it is 1°, 2° or 3°.

6.2 Nomenclature

Having learnt how halogenated compounds are classified, let us now learn how they are named. Two naming systems run side by side in this chapter: the older common system, which you will still see on reagent bottles and in industry, and the IUPAC system, which is the one examinations expect.

Naming Alkyl Halides

The common name of an alkyl halide is built by naming the alkyl group first and following it with the name of the halide. Thus \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2Br}\) is n-propyl bromide — the alkyl group is n-propyl and the halide is bromide.

In the IUPAC system, alkyl halides are named as halosubstituted hydrocarbons. The halogen is treated as a substituent (fluoro-, chloro-, bromo-, iodo-) on the longest carbon chain, and its position is given by a number chosen so that the substituents get the lowest possible locants. By this system the same compound, \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2Br}\), becomes 1-bromopropane.

The two systems are placed side by side below for a set of typical compounds, as shown in Fig. 6.7.

Fig. 6.7

Fig. 6.7 – Common and IUPAC names of some alkyl halides.

Naming Haloarenes

For mono halogen substituted derivatives of benzene, the common name and the IUPAC name are the same — \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Br}\) is bromobenzene in both systems, because there is only one possible position for the substituent and so no number is needed.

For dihalogen derivatives, the two systems part company. The common system uses the prefixes o- (ortho), m- (meta) and p- (para) to indicate whether the two halogens are on adjacent carbons, one carbon apart, or directly opposite each other. The IUPAC system, as you have learnt in Class XI, uses the numerals 1,2; 1,3 and 1,4 instead. Thus m-dibromobenzene is named 1,3-dibromobenzene, and sym-tribromobenzene is named 1,3,5-tribromobenzene. These are drawn in Fig. 6.8.

Fig. 6.8

Fig. 6.8 – Nomenclature of mono-, di- and trihaloarenes.

Q. Why does bromobenzene need no number, while dibromobenzene does?

A. All six carbons of the benzene ring are equivalent, so a single substituent can only go in one kind of position — there is nothing to distinguish. The moment a second substituent enters, its position relative to the first matters, and three distinct arrangements become possible. That is exactly what the numbers 1,2; 1,3; 1,4 (or o-, m-, p-) record.

Dihaloalkanes: gem- and vic-

The dihaloalkanes having the same type of halogen atoms are named as alkylidene or alkylene dihalides in the common system. These dihalo-compounds are further classified according to where the two halogen atoms sit. They are called geminal halides, or gem-dihalides, when both the halogen atoms are present on the same carbon atom of the chain, and vicinal halides, or vic-dihalides, when the halogen atoms are present on adjacent carbon atoms.

In the common name system, gem-dihalides are named as alkylidene halides and vic-dihalides are named as alkylene dihalides. In the IUPAC system, both are simply named as dihaloalkanes, with numbers doing the work of the prefixes. Thus \(\\mathrm{H\_3C{-}CHCl\_2}\) is ethylidene chloride (a gem-dihalide) in the common system and 1,1-dichloroethane in IUPAC; while \(\\mathrm{ClCH\_2{-}CH\_2Cl}\) is ethylene dichloride (a vic-dihalide) and 1,2-dichloroethane in IUPAC.

The two prefixes come straight from Latin. Geminus means “twin” — the two halogens are twins on one and the same carbon. Vicinus means “neighbour” — the two halogens are neighbours on adjacent carbons. Once the Latin is known, the terms stop being arbitrary and the IUPAC numbers (1,1- versus 1,2-) simply confirm what the prefix already told you.

gem-dihalide vs vic-dihalide

Feature gem-Dihalide (geminal) vic-Dihalide (vicinal)
Position of the two halogens Both on the same carbon atom On adjacent carbon atoms
Common-system name Alkylidene halide Alkylene dihalide
Example (common name) Ethylidene chloride Ethylene dichloride
Structure \(\\mathrm{H\_3C{-}CHCl\_2}\) \(\\mathrm{ClCH\_2{-}CH\_2Cl}\)
IUPAC name 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane

Some common examples of halocompounds are mentioned in Table 6.1.

Table 6.1: Common and IUPAC Names of some Halides

Structure Common name IUPAC name
\(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(Cl)CH\_3}\) sec-Butyl chloride 2-Chlorobutane
\(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CCH\_2Br}\) neo-Pentyl bromide 1-Bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane
\(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CBr}\) tert-Butyl bromide 2-Bromo-2-methylpropane
\(\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CHCl}\) Vinyl chloride Chloroethene
\(\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CHCH\_2Br}\) Allyl bromide 3-Bromopropene
Benzene ring with Cl and \(\\mathrm{CH\_3}\) on adjacent carbons o-Chlorotoluene 1-Chloro-2-methylbenzene or 2-Chlorotoluene
Benzene ring with \(-\\mathrm{CH\_2Cl}\) Benzyl chloride Chlorophenylmethane
\(\\mathrm{CH\_2Cl\_2}\) Methylene chloride Dichloromethane
\(\\mathrm{CHCl\_3}\) Chloroform Trichloromethane
\(\\mathrm{CHBr\_3}\) Bromoform Tribromomethane
\(\\mathrm{CCl\_4}\) Carbon tetrachloride Tetrachloromethane
\(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2F}\) n-Propyl fluoride 1-Fluoropropane

Both name systems survive in real laboratories, and confusing them can be costly. A paint-stripping tin is labelled “methylene chloride”, a bottle of degreasing solvent may say “carbon tetrachloride”, and a hospital record may name “chloroform” — yet the safety data sheet, the transport documents and your examination paper will use dichloromethane, tetrachloromethane and trichloromethane. Before you open any bottle in a laboratory, make sure you can translate its label into the IUPAC name, because that is the name under which its hazards are listed.

Draw the structures of all the eight structural isomers that have the molecular formula \(\\mathrm{C\_5H\_{11}Br}\). Name each isomer according to the IUPAC system and classify them as primary, secondary or tertiary bromide.

Begin with the straight five-carbon chain, moving the bromine along it; then branch the chain and repeat.

|Structure|IUPAC name|Class|

|-|-|-|

|\(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH\_2CH\_2Br}\)|1-Bromopentane|1°|

|\(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH(Br)CH\_3}\)|2-Bromopentane|2°|

|\(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(Br)CH\_2CH\_3}\)|3-Bromopentane|2°|

|\(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCH\_2CH\_2Br}\)|1-Bromo-3-methylbutane|1°|

|\(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCHBrCH\_3}\)|2-Bromo-3-methylbutane|2°|

|\(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CBrCH\_2CH\_3}\)|2-Bromo-2-methylbutane|3°|

|\(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(CH\_3)CH\_2Br}\)|1-Bromo-2-methylbutane|1°|

|\(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CCH\_2Br}\)|1-Bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane|1°|

Write IUPAC names of the compounds (i) to (vi) shown in Fig. 6.9.

Fig. 6.9

[Caption:] Fig. 6.9 – Skeletal structures of isomeric bromoalkenes. [/Caption:]

In each case, choose the longest chain that contains the double bond, number so that the double bond gets the lowest locant, and cite bromo as a substituent.

  1. 4-Bromopent-2-ene

  2. 3-Bromo-2-methylbut-1-ene

  3. 4-Bromo-3-methylpent-2-ene

  4. 1-Bromo-2-methylbut-2-ene

  5. 1-Bromobut-2-ene

  6. 3-Bromo-2-methylpropene

Give the IUPAC name of \(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}CH(Cl){-}CH\_2{-}CH(CH\_3){-}CH\_3}\) and state whether it is a primary, secondary or tertiary chloride.

Step 1 — Find the longest chain. Counting through the molecule gives a continuous chain of five carbon atoms, so the parent hydrocarbon is pentane.

Step 2 — Identify the substituents. There is a chlorine atom and a methyl group.

Step 3 — Number the chain. Numbering from the left puts Cl at C-2 and the methyl at C-4, giving the locant set {2, 4}. Numbering from the right puts the methyl at C-2 and Cl at C-4, again giving {2, 4}. When the locant sets tie, the lowest locant is given to the substituent that comes first in alphabetical order. “Chloro” comes before “methyl”, so chlorine must be C-2.

Step 4 — Assemble the name, citing substituents alphabetically:

2-Chloro-4-methylpentane

Step 5 — Classify. The carbon carrying the chlorine (C-2) is bonded to two other carbon atoms, C-1 and C-3. Hence it is a secondary (2°) chloride.

6.1 Write structures of the following compounds: (i) 2-Chloro-3-methylpentane (ii) 1-Chloro-4-ethylcyclohexane (iii) 4-tert-Butyl-3-iodoheptane (iv) 1,4-Dibromobut-2-ene (v) 1-Bromo-4-sec-butyl-2-methylbenzene

(question only — no solution)

(i) Give the IUPAC name of \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CH{-}CH\_2{-}CH\_2Br}\) and classify it as 1°, 2° or 3°.

(ii) Write the structure of p-chlorotoluene and give its IUPAC name.

(iii) Which of these is a gem-dihalide and which a vic-dihalide: \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CHBr\_2}\) and \(\\mathrm{BrCH\_2CH\_2Br}\)? Give the IUPAC name of each.

6.3 Nature of C–X Bond

Halogen atoms are more electronegative than carbon. Electronegativity, as you learnt in Class XI, is the tendency of an atom to pull the shared pair of electrons in a covalent bond towards itself. Since the halogen pulls harder than carbon does, the shared electron pair of the carbon–halogen bond does not sit midway between the two atoms; it lies closer to the halogen.

The result is that the carbon–halogen bond of an alkyl halide is polarised: the carbon atom bears a partial positive charge (\(\\delta+\)) whereas the halogen atom bears a partial negative charge (\(\\delta-\)). This is shown in Fig. 6.10.

Fig. 6.10

Fig. 6.10 – Polarisation of the carbon–halogen bond.

This small, permanent charge separation is the single most important structural fact in the whole chapter. An electron-deficient carbon is an open invitation to any electron-rich species, and that is precisely why haloalkanes are attacked by nucleophiles, as you will see in Section 6.7.

dipole moment (\(\\mu\)) (Unit: debye, D — 1 D \(\\approx 3.336\\times10^{-30}\) C m; the SI unit is coulomb metre, C m. The dipole moment is the product of the magnitude of the separated charge and the distance between the charges, \(\\mu = q \\times d\), and it is a vector pointing from the positive to the negative end. A larger \(\\mu\) means a more polar molecule.)

Size, Bond Length and Bond Strength

As we go down the group in the periodic table, the size of the halogen atom increases. Fluorine is the smallest halogen atom and iodine is the largest, because each successive element has an extra shell of electrons. Consequently the carbon–halogen bond length also increases steadily from C—F to C—I: the bigger the halogen, the further its bonding electrons are from the nucleus, and the further apart the two nuclei must sit.

A longer bond is also a weaker bond, because the shared electron pair is held less firmly between the two nuclei. This is why the C—X bond enthalpy — the energy needed to break one mole of that bond — falls sharply from C—F to C—I. Some typical bond lengths, bond enthalpies and dipole moments are given in Table 6.2.

Table 6.2: Carbon-Halogen (C—X) Bond Lengths, Bond Enthalpies and Dipole Moments

Bond Bond length/pm C-X Bond enthalpies/ kJ mol\(^{-1}\) Dipole moment/Debye
\(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}F}\) 139 452 1.847
\(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}Cl}\) 178 351 1.860
\(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}Br}\) 193 293 1.830
\(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}I}\) 214 234 1.636

the C—X bond from F to I (down group 17 ↓: halogen size increases → C—X bond length increases (139 → 214 pm) → the bond becomes weaker, so bond enthalpy falls (452 → 234 kJ mol⁻¹) → the C—I bond is the easiest of all to break and the C—F bond the hardest. Dipole moment does not follow this trend simply, because it depends on both the charge separation and the bond length.)

Q. Fluorine is the most electronegative halogen, so why is the dipole moment of \(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}F}\) (1.847 D) slightly less than that of \(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}Cl}\) (1.860 D)?

A. Because \(\\mu = q \\times d\) depends on two things, not one. Fluorine certainly creates the larger charge separation, \(q\), but the C—F bond is also the shortest of all (139 pm), so the distance \(d\) is small. The two factors work against each other, and in chlorine’s case the longer bond more than makes up for its slightly smaller charge separation. From C—Cl onwards, electronegativity falls faster than bond length rises, so the dipole moment then decreases steadily to iodine.

bond length and bond enthalpy of the C—X bond (Study the plot in Fig. 6.11, drawn from the data of Table 6.2. (a) Describe in one sentence the relationship between C—X bond length and C—X bond enthalpy. (b) Which single C—X bond would you expect to break most readily during a chemical reaction, and which least readily? (c) On the basis of your answer to (b) alone, predict the order of reactivity of \(\\mathrm{CH\_3F}\), \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl}\), \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Br}\) and \(\\mathrm{CH\_3I}\) in a reaction whose slow step is the breaking of the C—X bond.)

Fig. 6.11

Fig. 6.11 – C—X bond length versus bond enthalpy.

The debye, the unit in which chemists still quote dipole moments, is named after Peter Debye, the Dutch physical chemist who worked out how the dipole moments of molecules could be measured and what they reveal about molecular shape and bonding. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1936 for this work on molecular structure.

Look again at the C—F bond enthalpy in Table 6.2 — 452 kJ mol\(^{-1}\), far above the rest. This exceptional strength is why heavily fluorinated materials such as PTFE (the non-stick coating on cookware) are so chemically unreactive and so heat-resistant: there is simply very little in an ordinary kitchen, or in an ordinary chemical plant, energetic enough to break that bond. The same strength, of course, is what makes such compounds hard to destroy once they are released, an issue you will meet again in Section 6.8.

Using the data in Table 6.2, answer the following:

(i) Which of \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl}\) and \(\\mathrm{CH\_3I}\) will undergo cleavage of the C—X bond more readily, and why?

(ii) Account for the fact that \(\\mathrm{CH\_3I}\) has the lowest dipole moment of the four halomethanes listed.

  1. Compare the bond enthalpies. Breaking the C—Cl bond of \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl}\) requires 351 kJ mol\(^{-1}\), whereas breaking the C—I bond of \(\\mathrm{CH\_3I}\) requires only 234 kJ mol\(^{-1}\). Less energy is needed in the second case, so \(\\mathrm{CH\_3I}\) cleaves its C—X bond more readily. The underlying reason is size: iodine is much larger than chlorine, so the C—I bond is longer (214 pm against 178 pm), the shared electron pair is held less tightly, and the bond is therefore weaker.

  2. The dipole moment is \(\\mu = q \\times d\). Iodine is the least electronegative of the four halogens, so the charge separation \(q\) across the C—I bond is the smallest of the set. Although the C—I bond is the longest (largest \(d\)), the fall in \(q\) from Cl to Br to I outweighs the rise in \(d\), and the product \(q \\times d\) therefore reaches its minimum at \(\\mathrm{CH\_3I}\) (1.636 D).

(question only — no solution)

(i) Arrange \(\\mathrm{CH\_3F}\), \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl}\), \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Br}\) and \(\\mathrm{CH\_3I}\) in increasing order of C—X bond length, and state what happens to the bond enthalpy along that order.

(ii) In a reaction in which the halogen leaves as a halide ion, which of the four halomethanes above would you expect to react fastest? Justify your choice using Table 6.2.

(iii) Explain why the carbon of a C—X bond, and not the halogen, is the site attacked by an electron-rich species.

Alkyl halides are best prepared from alcohols, which are easily accessible — and that is where the next section begins.

6.4 Methods of Preparation of Haloalkanes

There are three practical ways of putting a halogen atom on to an \(sp^3\) carbon: start from an alcohol and swap its \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) group for a halogen; start from a hydrocarbon (an alkane or an alkene); or start from a haloalkane you already have and exchange one halogen for another. All three routes are summarised in FC 6.1 and taken up one by one below.

Flowchart

FC 6.1 – Routes to haloalkanes: Alcohol (R–OH) → with conc. HX / PX₃ / PCl₅ / SOCl₂ → R–X | Alkane → free radical halogenation with X₂ and UV light or heat → mixture of mono- and polyhaloalkanes | Alkene → addition of HX (Markovnikov) → alkyl halide; addition of X₂ in CCl₄ → vic-dihalide | R–Cl or R–Br → NaI in dry acetone (Finkelstein) → R–I; → metallic fluoride AgF/Hg₂F₂/CoF₂/SbF₃ (Swarts) → R–F

6.4.1 From Alcohols

The hydroxyl group of an alcohol is replaced by a halogen on reaction with concentrated halogen acids, phosphorus halides, or thionyl chloride.

Of these three reagents, thionyl chloride is preferred. The reason is one of purity rather than chemistry: in this reaction the alkyl halide is formed along with the gases \(\\mathrm{SO\_2}\) and \(\\mathrm{HCl}\). The two gaseous products simply escape from the reaction mixture, so nothing is left behind to contaminate the product, and the reaction gives pure alkyl halides.

\[\\mathrm{R{-}OH} + \\mathrm{SOCl\_2} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{R{-}Cl} + \\mathrm{SO\_2} + \\mathrm{HCl}\]

thionyl chloride, \(\\mathrm{SOCl\_2}\) (What it does → replaces the \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) of an alcohol by \(-\\mathrm{Cl}\). The conditions it needs → simply warming with the alcohol; no catalyst required. What it is typically used for → preparing a pure alkyl chloride, because both by-products, \(\\mathrm{SO\_2}\) and \(\\mathrm{HCl}\), are gases and leave the flask on their own, so no tedious separation is needed. This is why examination questions asking for the “best” reagent to convert an alcohol into a chloroalkane expect \(\\mathrm{SOCl\_2}\).)

Reaction with Halogen Acids

The reactions of primary and secondary alcohols with \(\\mathrm{HCl}\) require the presence of a catalyst, \(\\mathrm{ZnCl\_2}\).

\[\\mathrm{R{-}OH} + \\mathrm{HCl} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{ZnCl\_2}\\ } \\mathrm{R{-}Cl} + \\mathrm{H\_2O}\]

With tertiary alcohols, no catalyst is needed at all: the reaction is conducted by simply shaking the alcohol with concentrated \(\\mathrm{HCl}\) at room temperature.

For preparing an alkyl bromide, constant boiling \(\\mathrm{HBr}\) (48%) is used. The hydrogen bromide may also be generated in the flask itself from sodium bromide and sulphuric acid:

\[\\mathrm{R{-}OH} + \\mathrm{NaBr} + \\mathrm{H\_2SO\_4} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{R{-}Br} + \\mathrm{NaHSO\_4} + \\mathrm{H\_2O}\]

Good yields of R—I may be obtained by heating alcohols with sodium or potassium iodide in 95% orthophosphoric acid.

The order of reactivity of alcohols with a given haloacid is 3° > 2° > 1°. Notice that this order is the exact opposite of the one you will meet for \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions later — a tertiary alcohol reacts fastest here because the reaction proceeds through a carbocation, and a tertiary carbocation is the most stable of the three.

Q. Why does a tertiary alcohol react with concentrated \(\\mathrm{HCl}\) at room temperature, while a primary alcohol needs \(\\mathrm{ZnCl\_2}\) as well?

A. The \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) group must first be protonated and then leave as water. From a tertiary alcohol this produces a tertiary carbocation, which is stable enough to form easily, so the reaction goes on its own. A primary alcohol would have to form a very unstable primary carbocation, so it needs the help of anhydrous \(\\mathrm{ZnCl\_2}\), a Lewis acid that grips the oxygen and makes the water molecule a much better leaving group.

Reaction with Phosphorus Halides

Phosphorus halides convert alcohols to alkyl halides cleanly:

\[3,\\mathrm{R{-}OH} + \\mathrm{PX\_3} \\rightarrow 3,\\mathrm{R{-}X} + \\mathrm{H\_3PO\_3} \\qquad (\\mathrm{X} = \\mathrm{Cl},\\ \\mathrm{Br})\]

\[\\mathrm{R{-}OH} + \\mathrm{PCl\_5} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{R{-}Cl} + \\mathrm{POCl\_3} + \\mathrm{HCl}\]

Phosphorus tribromide and triiodide are usually generated in situ — that is, produced in the reaction mixture itself — by the reaction of red phosphorus with bromine and iodine respectively. The alcohol is therefore simply heated with red phosphorus and the halogen:

\[\\mathrm{R{-}OH} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{red } \\mathrm{P}/\\mathrm{X\_2},\\ \\mathrm{X\_2} = \\mathrm{Br\_2},\\ \\mathrm{I\_2}\\ } \\mathrm{R{-}X}\]

NoteDefinition

A reagent is said to be generated in situ when it is produced inside the reaction mixture at the moment it is needed, instead of being prepared, stored and added separately.

Generating \(\\mathrm{PBr\_3}\) and \(\\mathrm{PI\_3}\) in situ is not a chemist’s whim — it is a safety and handling decision. Both compounds are corrosive, fume in moist air and decompose on storage. By adding only red phosphorus (a stable, easily stored solid) and the halogen to the flask, the chemist never has to bottle, transport or measure out the dangerous reagent at all. It is made and consumed within the same vessel. The same reasoning drives many “generate-and-use” procedures in the modern chemical industry, where the most hazardous intermediate in a route is deliberately never isolated.

Preparing Alkyl Chlorides in the Laboratory

The preparation of an alkyl chloride is carried out either by passing dry hydrogen chloride gas through a solution of the alcohol, or by heating a mixture of the alcohol and the concentrated aqueous halogen acid.

One limitation must be noted at once. The above methods are not applicable for the preparation of aryl halides. The reason lies in the structure of phenols: the carbon–oxygen bond in phenols has a partial double bond character because of the delocalisation of the oxygen lone pair into the ring. Being stronger than an ordinary single bond, this C—O bond is difficult to break, so phenol does not give chlorobenzene with \(\\mathrm{HCl}\). Aryl halides must therefore be made by an entirely different route, which is the subject of Section 6.5.

6.4.2 From Hydrocarbons

(I) From Alkanes by Free Radical Halogenation

Free radical chlorination or bromination of alkanes gives a complex mixture of isomeric mono- and polyhaloalkanes, which is difficult to separate as pure compounds. Consequently, the yield of any single compound is low.

\[\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH\_3} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{or heat}]{\\ \\mathrm{Cl\_2}/\\text{UV light}\\ } \\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH\_2Cl} + \\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CHClCH\_3}\]

The reason for the mess is easy to see. Ultraviolet light splits \(\\mathrm{Cl\_2}\) into chlorine radicals, and a chlorine radical is not fussy — it will pull a hydrogen atom from whichever C—H bond it happens to collide with. Butane has two different kinds of hydrogen atoms, so two different monochlorides form, and once a monochloride has formed it too has C—H bonds available for a second attack, giving di- and polychlorinated products as well.

This is a textbook example of poor atom economy and poor selectivity. Every gram of the desired chloride comes with grams of unwanted isomers and polychlorinated by-products, and separating them consumes energy and solvent. Industrially, free radical halogenation is used only where the alkane is symmetrical enough to give essentially one product — for example, chlorination of methane, or of an alkane in which all the hydrogen atoms are equivalent. Where a specific isomer is wanted, chemists go back to the alcohol route, which places the halogen exactly where the \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) group was.

Identify all the possible monochloro structural isomers expected to be formed on free radical monochlorination of \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCH\_2CH\_3}\).

In the given molecule, there are four different types of hydrogen atoms. Replacement of these hydrogen atoms will give the following:

\[\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCH\_2CH\_2Cl} \\qquad \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCH(Cl)CH\_3}\]

\[\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2C(Cl)CH\_2CH\_3} \\qquad \\mathrm{CH\_3CH(CH\_2Cl)CH\_2CH\_3}\]

(II) From Alkenes

(i) Addition of hydrogen halides. An alkene is converted to the corresponding alkyl halide by reaction with hydrogen chloride, hydrogen bromide or hydrogen iodide. The \(\\pi\) electrons of the double bond attack the hydrogen of H—X, and the halide ion then adds to the carbon, as shown in Fig. 6.12.

Fig. 6.12

Fig. 6.12 – Addition of a hydrogen halide to an alkene.

\[\\mathrm{C{=}C} + \\mathrm{HX} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{H{-}C{-}C{-}X}\]

When the alkene is unsymmetrical, the halogen has a choice of two carbons, and one product predominates. Propene yields two products, however only one predominates as per Markovnikov’s rule (Chapter 13, Class XI).

\[\\mathrm{CH\_3CH{=}CH\_2} + \\mathrm{H{-}I} \\rightarrow \\underset{\\text{minor}}{\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2I}} + \\underset{\\text{major}}{\\mathrm{CH\_3CHICH\_3}}\]

NotePrinciple / Law

Markovnikov’s rule: when an unsymmetrical reagent H—X adds to an unsymmetrical alkene, the negative part of the reagent (the halogen) attaches itself to that doubly bonded carbon atom which carries the smaller number of hydrogen atoms.

The rule is not an arbitrary recipe. The proton adds first, and it adds in whichever way produces the more stable carbocation; the halide ion then simply captures that carbocation. In propene, adding \(\\mathrm{H^+}\) to the terminal \(\\mathrm{CH\_2}\) gives a secondary carbocation, which is more stable than the primary one formed the other way round. The iodide therefore ends up on the middle carbon, giving 2-iodopropane as the major product.

(ii) Addition of halogens. In the laboratory, addition of bromine in \(\\mathrm{CCl\_4}\) to an alkene resulting in discharge of the reddish brown colour of bromine constitutes an important method for the detection of a double bond in a molecule. The addition results in the synthesis of vic-dibromides, which are colourless (Chapter 9, Class XI).

\[\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CH\_2} + \\mathrm{Br\_2} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{CCl\_4}\\ } \\underset{\\textit{vic}\\text{-Dibromide}}{\\mathrm{BrCH\_2{-}CH\_2Br}}\]

Q. Why is the disappearance of colour, rather than the appearance of one, taken as the positive test here?

A. Because bromine itself is reddish brown, while the vic-dibromide it forms is colourless. As long as unsaturation is present, every drop of bromine added is consumed and the colour vanishes. The moment the colour persists, all the double bonds have reacted — so the test is both qualitative and, in careful hands, quantitative.

6.4.3 Halogen Exchange

Alkyl iodides are often prepared by the reaction of alkyl chlorides or bromides with \(\\mathrm{NaI}\) in dry acetone. This reaction is known as the Finkelstein reaction.

\[\\mathrm{R{-}X} + \\mathrm{NaI} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{R{-}I} + \\mathrm{NaX} \\qquad (\\mathrm{X} = \\mathrm{Cl},\\ \\mathrm{Br})\]

At first sight this looks like a reaction that should not work: iodide is being asked to displace chloride, and the C—I bond formed is weaker than the C—Cl bond broken. The trick lies in the solvent. \(\\mathrm{NaI}\) dissolves in dry acetone, but the \(\\mathrm{NaCl}\) or \(\\mathrm{NaBr}\) thus formed is precipitated in dry acetone. Removing a product from the solution facilitates the forward reaction according to Le Chatelier’s principle.

NotePrinciple / Law

Le Chatelier’s principle: if a system at equilibrium is disturbed, the equilibrium shifts in the direction that tends to undo the disturbance. Here, continuous removal of the product \(\\mathrm{NaX}\) as a precipitate keeps pulling the equilibrium towards the alkyl iodide.

The synthesis of alkyl fluorides is best accomplished by heating an alkyl chloride or bromide in the presence of a metallic fluoride such as \(\\mathrm{AgF}\), \(\\mathrm{Hg\_2F\_2}\), \(\\mathrm{CoF\_2}\) or \(\\mathrm{SbF\_3}\). The reaction is termed the Swarts reaction.

\[\\mathrm{H\_3C{-}Br} + \\mathrm{AgF} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{H\_3C{-}F} + \\mathrm{AgBr}\]

Both these reactions carry the names of the chemists who first reported them. Hans Finkelstein, a German chemist, described the acetone-mediated exchange in the early years of the twentieth century, and the method still bears his name in every organic laboratory. Frédéric Swarts, a Belgian chemist working in the late nineteenth century, developed the antimony-fluoride method of introducing fluorine into organic molecules; his work laid the groundwork for the entire field of organofluorine chemistry, and it is by his reaction that the chlorofluorocarbons of Section 6.8 are manufactured.

Finkelstein vs Swarts reaction

Feature Finkelstein reaction Swarts reaction
Product made Alkyl iodide, R—I Alkyl fluoride, R—F
Starting halide R—Cl or R—Br R—Cl or R—Br
Reagent \(\\mathrm{NaI}\) \(\\mathrm{AgF}\), \(\\mathrm{Hg\_2F\_2}\), \(\\mathrm{CoF\_2}\) or \(\\mathrm{SbF\_3}\)
Conditions Dry acetone Heating with the metallic fluoride
Why it works Insoluble \(\\mathrm{NaCl}\)/\(\\mathrm{NaBr}\) precipitates, shifting the equilibrium forward The metal forms a very stable halide (e.g. \(\\mathrm{AgBr}\)), driving the exchange

Starting from propan-2-ol, write balanced equations to prepare (i) 2-chloropropane, (ii) 2-bromopropane and (iii) 2-iodopropane, naming the reagent used in each case.

The \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) group of propan-2-ol sits on the middle carbon, so whichever halogen replaces it will also land on the middle carbon. The problem is therefore only about choosing the right reagent for each halogen.

  1. For the chloride, use concentrated \(\\mathrm{HCl}\). Propan-2-ol is a secondary alcohol, so the catalyst \(\\mathrm{ZnCl\_2}\) is required:

\[\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHOH} + \\mathrm{HCl} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{ZnCl\_2}\\ } \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCl} + \\mathrm{H\_2O}\]

(Thionyl chloride would serve equally well, and more cleanly: \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHOH} + \\mathrm{SOCl\_2} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCl} + \\mathrm{SO\_2} + \\mathrm{HCl}\).)

  1. For the bromide, use red phosphorus and bromine, which generate \(\\mathrm{PBr\_3}\) in situ:

\[3,\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHOH} + \\mathrm{PBr\_3} \\rightarrow 3,\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHBr} + \\mathrm{H\_3PO\_3}\]

  1. For the iodide, heat the alcohol with potassium iodide in 95% orthophosphoric acid:

\[\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHOH} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{KI},\\ 95%\\ \\mathrm{H\_3PO\_4}\\ } \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHI} + \\mathrm{H\_2O}\]

Note that \(\\mathrm{H\_2SO\_4}\) is deliberately avoided in step (iii): being an oxidising acid, it would oxidise the iodide to iodine instead of letting it act as a nucleophile.

(question only — no solution)

(i) Write the equation for the conversion of 1-chlorobutane into 1-iodobutane, and name the reaction and the solvent used.

(ii) 2-Methylbut-2-ene is treated with \(\\mathrm{HBr}\). Write the structure of the major product and justify it using Markovnikov’s rule.

(iii) 2,2-Dimethylpropane, \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_4C}\), is subjected to free radical monochlorination. How many monochloro structural isomers are possible? Give a reason for your answer.

(iv) Name the reagent you would choose to obtain a pure sample of 1-chloropropane from propan-1-ol, and explain why it gives a purer product than concentrated \(\\mathrm{HCl}\).

6.5 Preparation of Haloarenes

In a haloarene the halogen sits on an \(sp^2\) carbon of the ring, and Section 6.4 has already told us that the alcohol route is closed to us here. Two routes remain: attack the ring directly with a halogen, or build the halide in from an amino group already present on the ring.

(i) From Hydrocarbons by Electrophilic Substitution

Aryl chlorides and bromides can be easily prepared by electrophilic substitution of arenes with chlorine and bromine respectively, in the presence of Lewis acid catalysts like iron or iron(III) chloride. A Lewis acid is an electron-pair acceptor; here its job is to polarise the \(\\mathrm{X\_2}\) molecule so strongly that it can act as the electrophile \(\\mathrm{X^+}\), which the electron-rich benzene ring then attacks.

With toluene, substitution occurs at the positions ortho and para to the methyl group, giving a mixture of the two products shown in Fig. 6.13.

Fig. 6.13

Fig. 6.13 – Electrophilic halogenation of toluene.

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH\_3} + \\mathrm{X\_2} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{dark}]{\\ \\mathrm{Fe}\\ } o\\text{-Halotoluene} + p\\text{-Halotoluene}\]

The ortho and para isomers can be easily separated due to the large difference in their melting points. (You will see in Section 6.6 why the para isomer melts so much higher: its symmetry lets it pack into a crystal lattice far better than the ortho isomer can.)

Two limitations of this method must be remembered.

Reactions with iodine are reversible in nature. As iodobenzene forms, hydrogen iodide is also produced, and the \(\\mathrm{HI}\) attacks the product and pushes the reaction backwards. The reaction therefore requires the presence of an oxidising agent (\(\\mathrm{HNO\_3}\), \(\\mathrm{HIO\_4}\)) to oxidise the \(\\mathrm{HI}\) formed during iodination, thereby removing it and driving the equilibrium forward.

Fluoro compounds are not prepared by this method due to the high reactivity of fluorine. Fluorine attacks the ring so violently that substitution cannot be controlled, and mixtures and even ring destruction result.

iron / anhydrous iron(III) chloride, \(\\mathrm{FeCl\_3}\) (What it does → acts as a Lewis acid, accepting an electron pair from \(\\mathrm{X\_2}\) and polarising the X—X bond so that one end becomes a powerful electrophile. The conditions it needs → strictly anhydrous; any moisture hydrolyses the catalyst and stops the reaction. What it is typically used for → ring halogenation of arenes. Iron filings work equally well because they react with the halogen in the flask to make the iron(III) halide in situ.)

Q. Why is “dark” written under the arrow along with Fe?

A. Light would change the mechanism completely. In the presence of ultraviolet light and in the absence of a Lewis acid, chlorine forms free radicals and attacks the \(-\\mathrm{CH\_3}\) side chain of toluene instead of the ring, giving benzyl chloride. Fe in the dark gives an ionic, electrophilic reaction on the ring; light gives a free radical reaction on the side chain. The same two reactants, two entirely different products — decided by the conditions.

(ii) From Amines by Sandmeyer’s Reaction

When a primary aromatic amine, dissolved or suspended in cold aqueous mineral acid, is treated with sodium nitrite, a diazonium salt is formed. This step is called diazotisation and is carried out at 273–278 K.

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5NH\_2} \\xrightarrow\[273\\text{–}278\\ \\text{K}]{\\ \\mathrm{NaNO\_2} + \\mathrm{HX}\\ } \\underset{\\text{Benzene diazonium halide}}{\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5N\_2^{+}X^{-}}}\]

Mixing the solution of the freshly prepared diazonium salt with cuprous chloride or cuprous bromide results in the replacement of the diazonium group by \(-\\mathrm{Cl}\) or \(-\\mathrm{Br}\). The leaving group here is nitrogen gas itself — which is why the reaction is essentially irreversible.

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5N\_2^{+}X^{-}} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{Cu\_2X\_2}\\ } \\underset{\\text{Aryl halide}}{\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5X}} + \\mathrm{N\_2} \\qquad (\\mathrm{X} = \\mathrm{Cl},\\ \\mathrm{Br})\]

Replacement of the diazonium group by iodine does not require the presence of a cuprous halide and is done simply by shaking the diazonium salt with potassium iodide.

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5N\_2^{+}X^{-}} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{KI}\\ } \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5I} + \\mathrm{N\_2}\]

The whole sequence is set out in FC 6.2.

Flowchart

FC 6.2 – Sandmeyer route to haloarenes: Aniline (C₆H₅NH₂) in cold aqueous mineral acid → NaNO₂ + HX at 273–278 K → benzene diazonium halide (C₆H₅N₂⁺X⁻) → branch A: Cu₂Cl₂ → chlorobenzene + N₂; branch B: Cu₂Br₂ → bromobenzene + N₂; branch C: KI (no cuprous halide needed) → iodobenzene + N₂

Q. Why must diazotisation be carried out at 273–278 K and the salt used at once?

A. Benzene diazonium salts are unstable. On warming, they decompose, losing nitrogen gas and reacting with water to give phenol. Keeping the mixture in an ice bath at 273–278 K holds the salt together long enough for it to be used in the next step, which is why the text insists on a freshly prepared solution.

The reaction is named after Traugott Sandmeyer, a Swiss chemist who discovered it in the 1880s while working with copper salts and diazonium compounds. It solved a problem that direct halogenation could not: since the diazonium group can only be where the amino group was, the halogen ends up in one precisely known position on the ring. Sandmeyer’s method turned aryl halides from a mixture-producing nuisance into compounds that could be made to order.

Electrophilic substitution vs Sandmeyer’s reaction

Feature Electrophilic substitution Sandmeyer’s reaction
Starting material Arene (e.g. benzene, toluene) Primary aromatic amine (e.g. aniline)
Reagent and conditions \(\\mathrm{X\_2}\) with Fe or \(\\mathrm{FeCl\_3}\), in the dark \(\\mathrm{NaNO\_2}\)/\(\\mathrm{HX}\) at 273–278 K, then \(\\mathrm{Cu\_2X\_2}\) (or KI)
Halogens that work well Cl, Br (I needs an oxidising agent; F fails) Cl, Br and I all work
Position of the halogen Governed by the groups already on the ring; usually gives an o/p mixture Exactly where the \(-\\mathrm{NH\_2}\) group stood
By-product \(\\mathrm{HX}\) \(\\mathrm{N\_2}\) gas

The ortho/para mixture produced by direct halogenation is not thrown away in industry — it is separated and both isomers are sold. Because the two isomers differ widely in melting point, they can be parted by fractional crystallisation, chilling the mixture until the higher-melting para isomer crystallises out while the ortho isomer stays in the liquid. This is one of the commonest ways a chemical plant turns an “unwanted mixture” into two saleable products, and it is worth remembering that a difference in a physical property, not a chemical one, is doing the work.

(i) Aniline is to be converted into iodobenzene. Write the reactions involved, with conditions.

(ii) Explain why fluorobenzene cannot be prepared by treating benzene with \(\\mathrm{F\_2}\) in the presence of \(\\mathrm{FeCl\_3}\).

  1. Direct iodination of benzene is troublesome, so the diazonium route is used. First diazotise the aniline in cold mineral acid:

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5NH\_2} \\xrightarrow\[273\\text{–}278\\ \\text{K}]{\\ \\mathrm{NaNO\_2} + \\mathrm{HCl}\\ } \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5N\_2^{+}Cl^{-}}\]

Then simply shake the freshly prepared diazonium salt with potassium iodide. No cuprous halide is needed for iodine:

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5N\_2^{+}Cl^{-}} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{KI}\\ } \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5I} + \\mathrm{N\_2}\]

The nitrogen escapes as a gas, so the reaction cannot reverse, and the iodine occupies precisely the position vacated by the \(-\\mathrm{NH\_2}\) group.

  1. Fluorine is far too reactive. Its reaction with the arene is violent and impossible to control, giving polysubstituted products and destroying the ring, so a clean monofluoro product cannot be isolated. This is why the direct electrophilic method is restricted to chlorine and bromine, and why aryl and alkyl fluorides are instead made by halogen exchange — the Swarts reaction of Section 6.4.3.

Write the products of the following reactions:

(i) \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}CH{=}CH\_2} + \\mathrm{HBr} \\rightarrow\)

(ii) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}CH\_2{-}CH{=}CH\_2} + \\mathrm{HCl} \\rightarrow\)

(iii) \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}CH\_2{-}CH{=}CH\_2} + \\mathrm{HBr} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{Peroxide}\\ }\)

  1. Markovnikov addition. The proton adds to the terminal \(\\mathrm{CH\_2}\), generating the benzylic carbocation, which is resonance-stabilised by the ring, and bromide then attaches to that carbon:

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}CHBr{-}CH\_3}\]

  1. Markovnikov addition again. Chlorine goes to the doubly bonded carbon carrying fewer hydrogen atoms, i.e. C-2 of the chain:

\[\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}CH\_2{-}CHCl{-}CH\_3}\]

  1. In the presence of a peroxide, addition of \(\\mathrm{HBr}\) takes place by a free radical mechanism and follows the anti-Markovnikov (peroxide) effect, so the bromine goes to the terminal carbon:

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}CH\_2{-}CH\_2{-}CH\_2Br}\]

6.2 Why is sulphuric acid not used during the reaction of alcohols with KI?

6.3 Write structures of different dihalogen derivatives of propane.

6.4 Among the isomeric alkanes of molecular formula \(\\mathrm{C\_5H\_{12}}\), identify the one that on photochemical chlorination yields (i) A single monochloride. (ii) Three isomeric monochlorides. (iii) Four isomeric monochlorides.

6.5 Draw the structures of major monohalo products in each of the following reactions: (i) Cyclohexanol \(+\\ \\mathrm{SOCl\_2} \\rightarrow\) (ii) 4-Nitro-substituted ethylbenzene (\(\\mathrm{O\_2N{-}C\_6H\_4{-}CH\_2CH\_3}\)) \(\\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{Br\_2},\\ \\text{heat or UV light}\\ }\) (iii) 4-Hydroxy-substituted benzyl alcohol (\(\\mathrm{HO{-}C\_6H\_4{-}CH\_2OH}\)) \(+\\ \\mathrm{HCl} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{heat}\\ }\) (iv) 1-Methylcyclohexene \(+\\ \\mathrm{HI} \\rightarrow\) (v) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2Br} + \\mathrm{NaI} \\rightarrow\) (vi) Cyclohexene \(+\\ \\mathrm{Br\_2} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{UV light}]{\\ \\text{heat}\\ }\)

(question only — no solution)

(i) Write the equations for the conversion of aniline into chlorobenzene, naming each step.

(ii) Why is an oxidising agent such as \(\\mathrm{HNO\_3}\) added when benzene is iodinated directly?

(iii) Toluene is treated with \(\\mathrm{Cl\_2}\) (a) in the presence of Fe in the dark, and (b) in the presence of UV light. Name the organic product formed in each case and explain the difference.

(iv) Give one reason why Sandmeyer’s reaction is preferred over direct halogenation when a halogen must be introduced at one specific position on a ring.

6.6 Physical Properties

Alkyl halides are colourless when pure. However, bromides and iodides develop colour when exposed to light, because light slowly breaks the weak C—Br and C—I bonds and liberates traces of free bromine or iodine. Many volatile halogen compounds have a sweet smell.

This is why alkyl bromides and iodides are supplied in dark amber bottles and kept away from sunlight — a bottle of iodoethane that has turned brown on the shelf has already begun to decompose and is no longer pure. The sweet smell mentioned above is also a warning rather than a pleasure: it means the compound is volatile, and volatile organohalogen vapours are readily inhaled. Such compounds should always be handled in a fume cupboard, with bottles stoppered when not in use.

Melting and Boiling Points

Methyl chloride, methyl bromide, ethyl chloride and some chlorofluoromethanes are gases at room temperature. Higher members are liquids or solids.

As we have already learnt, molecules of organic halogen compounds are generally polar, because of the polarised C—X bond of Section 6.3. Due to greater polarity as well as higher molecular mass as compared to the parent hydrocarbon, the intermolecular forces of attraction (dipole-dipole and van der Waals) are stronger in the halogen derivatives. That is why the boiling points of chlorides, bromides and iodides are considerably higher than those of the hydrocarbons of comparable molecular mass. Boiling means pulling molecules apart from one another, so the stronger these attractions, the more heat must be supplied, and the higher the boiling point.

The attractions get stronger as the molecules get bigger in size and have more electrons. A large, electron-rich cloud is loosely held and easily distorted, so momentary dipoles arise readily, and van der Waals forces grow. The pattern of variation of boiling points of different halides is depicted in Fig. 6.14.

Fig. 6.14

Fig. 6.14 – Boiling points of some alkyl chlorides, bromides and iodides.

For the same alkyl group, the boiling points of alkyl halides decrease in the order: RI > RBr > RCl > RF. This is because with the increase in size and mass of the halogen atom, the magnitude of van der Waals forces increases.

Q1. Chloromethane boils at a much higher temperature than methane, and iodomethane boils higher still. What is the halogen atom adding to the molecule that makes it so much harder to boil?

A. The halogen adds two things at once. First, it adds polarity: because the halogen is more electronegative than carbon, the molecule now has a permanent dipole, and neighbouring molecules attract one another through dipole–dipole forces that methane simply does not have. Second, it adds mass and electrons: a heavy, electron-rich halogen atom gives a large, easily distorted electron cloud, and van der Waals forces grow with it. Going from chlorine to iodine adds no extra polarity — iodine is in fact the least electronegative of the halogens — but it adds a great many more electrons, and that alone raises the boiling point further. Hence RI > RBr > RCl > RF.

boiling point of alkyl halides (For a fixed alkyl group, down the halogen group ↓ (RF → RI): boiling point increases, because the halogen atom gets larger and more polarisable, so van der Waals forces strengthen. Along a homologous series (CH₃X → C₂H₅X → C₃H₇X): boiling point increases, because molecular size and the number of electrons both grow. With increasing branching in an isomeric set: boiling point decreases, because a branched molecule is more spherical and its molecules touch over a smaller surface area.)

The Effect of Branching

The boiling points of isomeric haloalkanes decrease with increase in branching. For example, 2-bromo-2-methylpropane has the lowest boiling point among the three isomers, as the values in Fig. 6.15 show.

Fig. 6.15

Fig. 6.15 – Effect of branching on the boiling point of isomeric bromobutanes.

Q. Why should branching lower the boiling point when the molecular mass has not changed at all?

A. Because van der Waals forces act only where surfaces come close together. A straight chain is long and thin, so two such molecules can lie alongside each other and attract along their whole length. A branched isomer is squat and nearly spherical, and two spheres can only touch at a point. Same mass, same electrons — far less contact, so far weaker attraction, and the molecules escape into the vapour at a lower temperature.

Isomeric Dihalobenzenes

Boiling points of isomeric dihalobenzenes are very nearly the same. However, the para-isomers are high melting as compared to their ortho- and meta-isomers. It is due to the symmetry of para-isomers that fits in the crystal lattice better as compared to ortho- and meta-isomers. Melting is the breaking down of an orderly crystal lattice, so a molecule that packs neatly and closely needs more heat to be dislodged; boiling, by contrast, depends mainly on intermolecular attraction in the liquid, which is much the same for all three isomers.

The figures for the three isomeric dichlorobenzenes make the point clearly.

Boiling and melting points of the isomeric dichlorobenzenes (in K)

ortho meta para
b.p./K 453 446 448
m.p./K 256 249 323

Notice how little the boiling points differ — barely 7 K across the set — while the melting point of the para isomer stands nearly 70 K above the others.

Density

Bromo, iodo and polychloro derivatives of hydrocarbons are heavier than water. The density increases with increase in the number of carbon atoms, halogen atoms and the atomic mass of the halogen atoms (Table 6.3). All three factors work the same way: each adds mass to the molecule without adding a proportionate amount of volume.

Table 6.3: Density of Some Haloalkanes

Compound Density (g/mL) Compound Density (g/mL)
\(\\mathrm{n{-}C\_3H\_7Cl}\) 0.89 \(\\mathrm{CH\_2Cl\_2}\) 1.336
\(\\mathrm{n{-}C\_3H\_7Br}\) 1.335 \(\\mathrm{CHCl\_3}\) 1.489
\(\\mathrm{n{-}C\_3H\_7I}\) 1.747 \(\\mathrm{CCl\_4}\) 1.595

Table 6.3 and the boiling point chart of Fig. 6.14 (Read the two data sets together and answer: (a) Follow the three propyl halides in Table 6.3. What happens to density as we go from Cl to Br to I, and which property of the halogen atom is responsible? (b) Follow the chlorine series \(\\mathrm{n{-}C\_3H\_7Cl} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{CH\_2Cl\_2} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{CHCl\_3} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{CCl\_4}\). Density rises even though carbon atoms are being lost — explain. (c) In Fig. 6.14, which bars are marked “gas”, and what does that tell you about the relationship between molecular size and the physical state at room temperature? (d) Predict, with a reason, whether bromoform would float on or sink in water.)

Solubility

The haloalkanes are very slightly soluble in water. To understand why, follow the energy bookkeeping. In order to dissolve a haloalkane in water, energy is required to overcome the attractions between the haloalkane molecules and to break the hydrogen bonds between water molecules. Less energy is released when new attractions are set up between the haloalkane and the water molecules, as these are not as strong as the original hydrogen bonds in water. The books do not balance — more energy goes in than comes out — and as a result, the solubility of haloalkanes in water is low.

However, haloalkanes tend to dissolve in organic solvents. Here the bookkeeping works out, because the new intermolecular attractions between haloalkane and solvent molecules have much the same strength as the ones being broken in the separate haloalkane and solvent molecules. Nothing is lost, so mixing proceeds freely.

The weak attractions doing so much of the work in this section are named after Johannes Diderik van der Waals, the Dutch physicist who, in the 1870s, realised that real gases deviate from ideal behaviour precisely because molecules attract one another and occupy space. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1910. The forces that make iodomethane a liquid and methane a gas are the same forces he introduced to correct the ideal gas equation.

(i) Arrange \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl}\), \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Br}\) and \(\\mathrm{CH\_3I}\) in increasing order of boiling point, giving a reason.

(ii) Which has the higher boiling point: 1-chloropentane or 1-chloro-2,2-dimethylpropane? Why?

(iii) Using Table 6.3, decide which of \(\\mathrm{n{-}C\_3H\_7Cl}\) and \(\\mathrm{n{-}C\_3H\_7I}\) would form the lower layer when shaken with water.

  1. The alkyl group is the same in all three, so only the halogen changes. As we move from Cl to Br to I, the halogen atom gets larger and carries more electrons, so its electron cloud is more easily distorted and van der Waals forces grow stronger. Hence

\[\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl} < \\mathrm{CH\_3Br} < \\mathrm{CH\_3I}\]

  1. The two compounds are isomers, \(\\mathrm{C\_5H\_{11}Cl}\), so they have the same molecular mass. 1-Chloro-2,2-dimethylpropane is heavily branched and therefore nearly spherical, with a small surface area for contact; 1-chloropentane is a straight chain and can lie alongside its neighbours. Van der Waals attractions are therefore stronger in the straight-chain isomer, so 1-chloropentane has the higher boiling point.

  2. The density of water is about \(1.00\\ \\text{g mL}^{-1}\). From Table 6.3, \(\\mathrm{n{-}C\_3H\_7Cl}\) has a density of \(0.89\\ \\text{g mL}^{-1}\), which is less than that of water, so it floats and forms the upper layer. \(\\mathrm{n{-}C\_3H\_7I}\) has a density of \(1.747\\ \\text{g mL}^{-1}\), which is greater than that of water, so it sinks. Hence \(\\mathrm{n{-}C\_3H\_7I}\) forms the lower layer. (Both are only very slightly soluble in water, which is why two layers form at all.)

6.6 Arrange each set of compounds in order of increasing boiling points. (i) Bromomethane, Bromoform, Chloromethane, Dibromomethane. (ii) 1-Chloropropane, Isopropyl chloride, 1-Chlorobutane.

(question only — no solution)

(i) Explain why the boiling point of chloroethane is much higher than that of ethane, although both are of comparable size.

(ii) p-Dibromobenzene has a much higher melting point than its ortho isomer, yet the two have almost identical boiling points. Account for both observations.

(iii) A student shakes bromoethane with water in a test tube and observes two layers. Predict which layer is which, and explain why bromoethane does not dissolve appreciably in water but dissolves readily in benzene.

(iv) Arrange in decreasing order of boiling point: 2-bromo-2-methylpropane, 1-bromobutane, 2-bromobutane. Give the reason for the order you choose.

6.7 Chemical Reactions

6.7.1 Reactions of Haloalkanes

The reactions of haloalkanes may be divided into the following three categories:

  1. Nucleophilic substitution
  2. Elimination reactions
  3. Reaction with metals

All three follow from the same structural fact established in Section 6.3 — the C—X bond is polarised, leaving the carbon electron-deficient and the halogen ready to depart with the bonding electron pair.

(1) Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions

You have learnt in Class XI that nucleophiles are electron rich species. Therefore, they attack that part of the substrate molecule which is electron deficient. In a haloalkane, that part is the carbon atom bonded to the halogen, which carries a partial positive charge.

The reaction in which a nucleophile replaces an already existing nucleophile in a molecule is called a nucleophilic substitution reaction. Haloalkanes are the substrate in these reactions. In this type of reaction, a nucleophile reacts with the haloalkane (the substrate), which has a partial positive charge on the carbon atom bonded to halogen. A substitution reaction takes place, and the halogen atom — called the leaving group — departs as a halide ion. Since the substitution reaction is initiated by a nucleophile, it is called a nucleophilic substitution reaction. The general pattern is shown in Fig. 6.16.

Fig. 6.16

Fig. 6.16 – General mechanism of nucleophilic substitution.

\[\\mathrm{Nu^{-}} + \\mathrm{R{-}X} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{R{-}Nu} + \\mathrm{X^{-}}\]

NoteDefinition

A nucleophilic substitution reaction is one in which an electron-rich species (the nucleophile) attacks the electron-deficient carbon of a substrate and replaces a group already attached to it (the leaving group), which departs with the bonding electron pair.

It is one of the most useful classes of organic reactions of alkyl halides in which halogen is bonded to \(sp^3\) hybridised carbon. By choosing the nucleophile, a chemist can convert the same alkyl halide into an alcohol, an ether, an amine, a nitrile and much else — which is exactly why haloalkanes are such valuable starting materials. The products formed by the reaction of haloalkanes with some common nucleophiles are given in Table 6.4.

Table 6.4: Nucleophilic Substitution of Alkyl Halides (R–X)

\[\\mathrm{R{-}X} + \\mathrm{Nu^{-}} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{R{-}Nu} + \\mathrm{X^{-}}\]

Reagent Nucleophile (Nu⁻) Substitution product R–Nu Class of main product
NaOH (KOH) HO⁻ ROH Alcohol
H₂O H₂O ROH Alcohol
NaOR′ R′O⁻ ROR′ Ether
NaI I⁻ R—I Alkyl iodide
NH₃ NH₃ RNH₂ Primary amine
R′NH₂ R′NH₂ RNHR′ Sec. amine
R′R″NH R′R″NH RNR′R″ Tert. amine
KCN ⁻C≡N: RCN Nitrile (cyanide)
AgCN Ag–CN: RNC (isocyanide) Isonitrile (isocyanide)
KNO₂ O=N—O⁻ R—O—N=O Alkyl nitrite
AgNO₂ Ag—Ö—N=O R—NO₂ Nitroalkane
R′COOAg R′COO⁻ R′COOR Ester
LiAlH₄ H⁻ RH Hydrocarbon
R′⁻ M⁺ R′⁻ RR′ Alkane
Ambident Nucleophiles

Groups like cyanides and nitrites possess two nucleophilic centres and are called ambident nucleophiles. Actually, the cyanide group is a hybrid of two contributing structures and therefore can act as a nucleophile in two different ways, \(\[^{-}\\mathrm{C{\\equiv}N} \\leftrightarrow \\mathrm{:C{=}N^{-}}]\) — that is, linking through the carbon atom, resulting in alkyl cyanides, or through the nitrogen atom, leading to isocyanides.

Similarly, the nitrite ion also represents an ambident nucleophile with two different points of linkage, \(\[^{-}\\mathrm{O{-}N{=}O}]\). The linkage through oxygen results in alkyl nitrites, while linkage through the nitrogen atom leads to nitroalkanes.

NoteDefinition

An ambident nucleophile is a nucleophile that has two different atoms bearing a lone pair, either of which can attack the substrate, so that two different products are possible depending on which end does the attacking.

KCN versus AgCN (What they do → both deliver the cyanide group to an alkyl halide, but through different atoms. The conditions they need → an alkyl halide in a suitable solvent. What they are typically used for → KCN, being predominantly ionic, supplies free cyanide ions and gives the alkyl cyanide (nitrile), R—CN, a compound that can later be hydrolysed to a carboxylic acid or reduced to an amine. AgCN, being largely covalent, gives the isocyanide, R—NC. Examination questions on this pair are common: the reagent, not the halide, decides the product.)

Haloalkanes react with KCN to form alkyl cyanides as the main product while AgCN forms isocyanides as the chief product. Explain.

KCN is predominantly ionic and provides cyanide ions in solution. Although both carbon and nitrogen atoms are in a position to donate electron pairs, the attack takes place mainly through the carbon atom and not through the nitrogen atom, since the C—C bond is more stable than the C—N bond. However, AgCN is mainly covalent in nature, and nitrogen is free to donate its electron pair, forming the isocyanide as the main product.

Mechanism

This reaction has been found to proceed by two different mechanisms, which are described below.

(a) Substitution Nucleophilic Bimolecular (\(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\))

The reaction between \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl}\) and hydroxide ion to yield methanol and chloride ion follows second order kinetics — i.e., the rate depends upon the concentration of both the reactants.

\[\\text{rate} = k\[\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl}]\[\\mathrm{OH^{-}}]\]

The rate law is the clue to the mechanism. If doubling the concentration of either reactant doubles the rate, then both species must be present in the slowest step. In other words, the nucleophile and the substrate must be colliding in the rate-determining step — the reaction is bimolecular.

\[\\mathrm{OH^{-}} + \\mathrm{CH\_3Cl} \\rightarrow \[\\text{transition state}] \\rightarrow \\mathrm{CH\_3OH} + \\mathrm{Cl^{-}}\]

The wedge-and-dash convention is used throughout what follows: the solid wedge represents the bond coming out of the paper, the dashed line a bond going down behind the paper, and a straight line a bond lying in the plane of the paper.

The reaction can be represented diagrammatically as shown in Fig. 6.17.

Fig. 6.17

Fig. 6.17 – Mechanism of the SN2 reaction.

It depicts a bimolecular nucleophilic substitution (\(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\)) reaction; the incoming nucleophile interacts with the alkyl halide, causing the carbon–halide bond to break, and a new bond is formed between carbon and the attacking nucleophile. Here it is the C—O bond formed between C and \(-\\mathrm{OH}\). These two processes take place simultaneously in a single step, and no intermediate is formed.

As the reaction progresses and the bond between the incoming nucleophile and the carbon atom starts forming, the bond between the carbon atom and the leaving group weakens. As this happens, the three carbon–hydrogen bonds of the substrate start moving away from the attacking nucleophile. In the transition state, all three C—H bonds lie in the same plane, and the attacking and leaving nucleophiles are partially attached to the carbon. As the attacking nucleophile approaches closer to the carbon, the C—H bonds still keep on moving in the same direction, till the attacking nucleophile attaches to carbon and the leaving group leaves the carbon.

As a result, the configuration is inverted: the configuration of the carbon atom under attack inverts in much the same way as an umbrella is turned inside out when caught in a strong wind. This process is called inversion of configuration.

Configuration. The spatial arrangement of functional groups around a carbon is called its configuration. Consider two structures (A) and (B) of the same compound, drawn either side of a mirror line, as in Fig. 6.18. They differ in the spatial arrangement of the functional groups attached to carbon. Structure (A) is the mirror image of structure (B); we say that the configuration of carbon in structure (A) is the mirror image of the configuration of carbon in structure (B).

Fig. 6.18

Fig. 6.18 – Two configurations of an asymmetric carbon.

In the transition state, the carbon atom is simultaneously bonded to the incoming nucleophile and the outgoing leaving group. Such structures are unstable and cannot be isolated. Thus, in the transition state, carbon is simultaneously bonded to five atoms.

In the year 1937, Edward Davies Hughes and Sir Christopher Ingold proposed a mechanism for an \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reaction. Hughes worked under Ingold and earned a D.Sc. degree from the University of London. Their achievement was not to observe a new reaction but to read an old one: by measuring how the rate changed when concentrations were changed, they deduced what could not be seen — that two molecules must be meeting in a single step, and that the carbon must be attacked from behind. The labels \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) and \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) are their vocabulary, and organic chemistry still speaks it.

Steric effects. Since this reaction requires the approach of the nucleophile to the carbon bearing the leaving group, the presence of bulky substituents on or near the carbon atom has a dramatic inhibiting effect. Of the simple alkyl halides, methyl halides react most rapidly in \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions, because there are only three small hydrogen atoms in the way. Tertiary halides are the least reactive, because bulky groups hinder the approaching nucleophile. The relative rates are shown in Fig. 6.19.

Fig. 6.19

Fig. 6.19 – Steric hindrance in the SN2 reaction.

Thus the order of reactivity followed is:

\[\\text{Primary halide} > \\text{Secondary halide} > \\text{Tertiary halide}\]

Q. Why is the tert-butyl halide given a relative \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) rate of 0 rather than simply a small number?

A. Because for practical purposes it does not react by this route at all. Three methyl groups form a wall around the carbon, and the nucleophile cannot reach the back face where it must attack. Any product that a tertiary halide does give under these conditions is arriving by a different mechanism — \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) — which is the subject of the next part.

(b) Substitution Nucleophilic Unimolecular (\(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\))

\(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) reactions are generally carried out in polar protic solvents (like water, alcohol, acetic acid, etc.). A polar protic solvent has O—H or N—H bonds, so it can both stabilise ions and hydrogen-bond to the departing halide — and, as we shall see, that is precisely the help this mechanism needs.

The reaction between tert-butyl bromide and hydroxide ion yields tert-butyl alcohol and follows first order kinetics — i.e., the rate of reaction depends upon the concentration of only one reactant, which is tert-butyl bromide.

\[\\underset{\\text{2-Bromo-2-methylpropane}}{\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CBr}} + \\mathrm{^{-}OH} \\rightarrow \\underset{\\text{2-Methylpropan-2-ol}}{\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3COH}} + \\mathrm{Br^{-}}\]

\[\\text{rate} = k\[\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CBr}]\]

It occurs in two steps. In step I, the polarised C—Br bond undergoes slow cleavage to produce a carbocation and a bromide ion. The carbocation thus formed is then attacked by the nucleophile in step II to complete the substitution reaction.

\[\\text{Step I: } \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CBr} \\rightleftharpoons \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3C^{+}} + \\mathrm{Br^{-}} \\quad (\\text{slow})\]

\[\\text{Step II: } \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3C^{+}} + \\mathrm{^{-}OH} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3COH} \\quad (\\text{fast})\]

The two-step logic is set out in FC 6.3.

Flowchart

FC 6.3 – SN1 mechanism: R–X → slow, reversible heterolysis of the C–X bond (rate-determining step) → planar carbocation R⁺ + X⁻ → fast attack by the nucleophile Nu⁻ → product R–Nu; branch: because the carbocation is planar, Nu⁻ can attack from either face → two products of opposite configuration → racemisation at a chiral centre

Step I is the slowest and reversible. It involves the C—Br bond breaking, for which the energy is obtained through solvation of the halide ion with the proton of the protic solvent. Since the rate of reaction depends upon the slowest step, the rate of reaction depends only on the concentration of the alkyl halide and not on the concentration of the hydroxide ion. This is why the hydroxide ion, though essential to the product, never appears in the rate law: it joins the party only after the rate-determining step is over.

Further, the greater the stability of the carbocation, the greater will be its ease of formation from the alkyl halide, and the faster will be the rate of reaction. In the case of alkyl halides, 3° alkyl halides undergo \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) reaction very fast because of the high stability of 3° carbocations.

We can sum up the order of reactivity of alkyl halides towards \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) and \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions as follows:

\[\\text{For } \\mathrm{S\_N}2:\\ \\mathrm{CH\_3X} > \\text{Primary halide} > \\text{Secondary halide} > \\text{Tertiary halide}\]

\[\\text{For } \\mathrm{S\_N}1:\\ \\text{Tertiary halide} > \\text{Secondary halide} > \\text{Primary halide} > \\mathrm{CH\_3X}\]

Q3. A tertiary alkyl halide is the fastest of all halides in one substitution mechanism and the slowest in the other. How can crowding around a carbon atom help one route and block the other?

A. Because the two mechanisms ask opposite questions of the same crowded carbon. In \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\), the nucleophile must physically reach the carbon and bond to it while the halide is still attached — so the three bulky alkyl groups are a wall, and the tertiary halide is the slowest. In \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\), nothing has to reach the carbon in the slow step; the halide simply leaves on its own, and the alkyl groups actually help, because they release electron density and stabilise the carbocation that forms. The same three methyl groups that block an approach also cradle a positive charge. Hence tertiary halides are fastest by \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) and slowest by \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\).

For the same reasons, allylic and benzylic halides show high reactivity towards the \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) reaction. The carbocation thus formed gets stabilised through resonance (Chapter 8, Class XI), as shown in Fig. 6.20: the positive charge is not trapped on one carbon but is spread over several, and a spread-out charge is a stabilised charge.

Fig. 6.20

Fig. 6.20 – Resonance stabilisation of allyl and benzyl carbocations.

For a given alkyl group, the reactivity of the halide, R–X, follows the same order in both the mechanisms:

\[\\mathrm{R{-}I} > \\mathrm{R{-}Br} > \\mathrm{R{-}Cl} \\gg \\mathrm{R{-}F}\]

This order simply repeats what Table 6.2 already told us: the weaker the C—X bond, the more readily the halide leaves, whichever mechanism is operating.

\(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) vs \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\)

Feature \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\)
Molecularity of the slow step Unimolecular — only the halide is involved Bimolecular — halide and nucleophile together
Kinetics First order; rate \(= k\[\\mathrm{RX}]\) Second order; rate \(= k\[\\mathrm{RX}]\[\\mathrm{Nu^{-}}]\)
Number of steps Two (slow heterolysis, then fast attack) One (concerted)
Intermediate Planar carbocation None; only a transition state with C bonded to five atoms
Order of reactivity 3° > 2° > 1° > \(\\mathrm{CH\_3X}\) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3X}\) > 1° > 2° > 3°
Deciding factor Stability of the carbocation Steric crowding at the carbon
Favoured by Polar protic solvents Polar aprotic solvents; strong nucleophiles
Stereochemical result at a chiral centre Racemisation Inversion of configuration

In the following pairs of halogen compounds, which would undergo \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reaction faster?

(i) Cyclohexyl-\(\\mathrm{CH\_2Cl}\) and cyclohexyl chloride

(ii) 1-Iodobutane and 1-chlorobutane (drawn as skeletal chains ending in I and Cl)

  1. The compound in which \(-\\mathrm{CH\_2Cl}\) is attached to the ring is a primary halide, and therefore undergoes the \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reaction faster.

  2. As iodine is a better leaving group because of its large size, it will be released at a faster rate in the presence of the incoming nucleophile.

Predict the order of reactivity of the following compounds in \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) and \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions:

(i) The four isomeric bromobutanes

(ii) \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH\_2Br}\), \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(C\_6H\_5)Br}\), \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(CH\_3)Br}\), \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5C(CH\_3)(C\_6H\_5)Br}\)

  1. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH\_2Br} < \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCH\_2Br} < \\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(Br)CH\_3} < \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CBr}\) (\(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\))

\(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH\_2Br} > \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCH\_2Br} > \\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(Br)CH\_3} > \\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CBr}\) (\(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\))

Of the two primary bromides, the carbocation intermediate derived from \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCH\_2Br}\) is more stable than that derived from \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH\_2Br}\), because of the greater electron donating inductive effect of the \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CH{-}}\) group. Therefore, \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCH\_2Br}\) is more reactive than \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH\_2Br}\) in \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) reactions. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(Br)CH\_3}\) is a secondary bromide and \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CBr}\) is a tertiary bromide. Hence the above order is followed in \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\). The reactivity in \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions follows the reverse order, as the steric hindrance around the electrophilic carbon increases in that order.

  1. \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5C(CH\_3)(C\_6H\_5)Br} > \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(C\_6H\_5)Br} > \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(CH\_3)Br} > \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH\_2Br}\) (\(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\))

\(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5C(CH\_3)(C\_6H\_5)Br} < \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(C\_6H\_5)Br} < \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(CH\_3)Br} < \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH\_2Br}\) (\(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\))

Of the two secondary bromides, the carbocation intermediate obtained from \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(C\_6H\_5)Br}\) is more stable than that obtained from \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(CH\_3)Br}\), because it is stabilised by two phenyl groups due to resonance. Therefore, the former bromide is more reactive than the latter in \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) reactions. A phenyl group is bulkier than a methyl group. Therefore, \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(C\_6H\_5)Br}\) is less reactive than \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH(CH\_3)Br}\) in \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions.

(question only — no solution)

Arrange each set in the order asked, giving a reason in each case:

(i) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Br}\), \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHBr}\), \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CBr}\) — increasing rate of \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reaction with \(\\mathrm{OH^{-}}\).

(ii) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2Cl}\), \(\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CH{-}CH\_2Cl}\), \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH\_2Cl}\) — increasing rate of \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) hydrolysis.

(iii) \(\\mathrm{C\_2H\_5F}\), \(\\mathrm{C\_2H\_5Cl}\), \(\\mathrm{C\_2H\_5Br}\), \(\\mathrm{C\_2H\_5I}\) — increasing reactivity towards any nucleophilic substitution.

(c) Stereochemical Aspects of Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions

In order to understand the stereochemical aspects of substitution reactions, we need to learn some basic stereochemical principles and notations (optical activity, chirality, retention, inversion, racemisation, etc.).

(i) Optical activity. The plane of plane polarised light — produced by passing ordinary light through a Nicol prism — is rotated when it is passed through the solutions of certain compounds. Such compounds are called optically active compounds. The angle by which the plane polarised light is rotated is measured by an instrument called a polarimeter.

If the compound rotates the plane of plane polarised light to the right, i.e., in the clockwise direction, it is called dextrorotatory (Greek for “right rotating”) or the d-form, and this is indicated by placing a positive (+) sign before the degree of rotation. If the light is rotated towards the left (anticlockwise direction), the compound is said to be laevorotatory or the l-form, and a negative (–) sign is placed before the degree of rotation. Such (+) and (–) isomers of a compound are called optical isomers, and the phenomenon is termed optical isomerism.

William Nicol (1768–1851) developed the first prism that produced plane polarised light. Ordinary light vibrates in every plane perpendicular to its direction of travel; Nicol’s prism filters out all but one of those planes. Without that single piece of apparatus, none of the stereochemistry in this section could have been observed at all — the molecules would have kept their secret.

(ii) Molecular asymmetry, chirality and enantiomers. The observation of Louis Pasteur (1848) that crystals of certain compounds exist in the form of mirror images laid the foundation of modern stereochemistry. He demonstrated that aqueous solutions of both types of crystals showed optical rotation, equal in magnitude (for solutions of equal concentration) but opposite in direction. He believed that this difference in optical activity was associated with the three dimensional arrangements of atoms in the molecules (configurations) of the two types of crystals.

Dutch scientist J. Van’t Hoff and French scientist C. Le Bel, in the same year (1874), independently argued that the spatial arrangement of four groups (valencies) around a central carbon is tetrahedral, and that if all the substituents attached to that carbon are different, the mirror image of the molecule is not superimposed (overlapped) on the molecule. Such a carbon is called an asymmetric carbon or stereocentre. The resulting molecule would lack symmetry and is referred to as an asymmetric molecule. The asymmetry of the molecule, along with the non-superimposability of mirror images, is responsible for the optical activity in such organic compounds.

Jacobus Hendricus Van’t Hoff (1852–1911) received the first Nobel Prize in Chemistry, in 1901, for his work on solutions. He was in his early twenties when he proposed the tetrahedral carbon atom — an idea that some senior chemists of the day dismissed as fantasy, since nobody could see a molecule. Within a generation it had become the foundation on which all of organic stereochemistry rests.

The symmetry and asymmetry are also observed in many day-to-day objects. A sphere, a cube and a cone are all identical to their mirror images and can be superimposed. However, many objects are non-superimposable on their mirror images. For example, your left and right hand look similar, but if you put your left hand on your right hand by moving them in the same plane, they do not coincide. The objects which are non-superimposable on their mirror image (like a pair of hands) are said to be chiral, and this property is known as chirality. Chiral molecules are optically active, while objects which are superimposable on their mirror images are called achiral. These molecules are optically inactive. Some common examples of chiral and achiral objects are shown in Fig. 6.21.

Fig. 6.21

Fig. 6.21 – Chiral and achiral objects.

NoteDefinition

A molecule is chiral if it is not superimposable on its mirror image. It is achiral if it is superimposable on its mirror image. Chiral molecules are optically active; achiral molecules are optically inactive.

The above test of molecular chirality can be applied to organic molecules by constructing models and their mirror images, or by drawing three dimensional structures and attempting to superimpose them in our minds. There are other aids, however, that can assist us in recognising chiral molecules. One such aid is the presence of a single asymmetric carbon atom.

Let us consider two simple molecules, propan-2-ol (Fig. 6.22) and butan-2-ol (Fig. 6.23), and their mirror images.

Fig. 6.22

Fig. 6.22 – Propan-2-ol is an achiral molecule.

As you can see very clearly, propan-2-ol (A) does not contain an asymmetric carbon, as all the four groups attached to the tetrahedral carbon are not different — it carries two identical methyl groups. We rotate the mirror image (B) of the molecule by 180° (structure C) and try to overlap structure (C) with structure (A); these structures completely overlap. Thus propan-2-ol is an achiral molecule.

Fig. 6.23

Fig. 6.23 – Butan-2-ol is a chiral molecule.

Butan-2-ol has four different groups attached to the tetrahedral carbon — a methyl group, an ethyl group, a hydrogen atom and a hydroxyl group — and as expected is chiral. Some common examples of chiral molecules are 2-chlorobutane, 2,3-dihydroxypropanal (\(\\mathrm{OHC{-}CHOH{-}CH\_2OH}\)), bromochloro-iodomethane (\(\\mathrm{BrClCHI}\)), 2-bromopropanoic acid (\(\\mathrm{H\_3C{-}CHBr{-}COOH}\)), etc.

Q. How can I spot an asymmetric carbon quickly in an examination?

A. Look at every \(sp^3\) carbon in turn and ask a single question: are the four groups attached to it all different? In butan-2-ol the C-2 carbon carries \(-\\mathrm{CH\_3}\), \(-\\mathrm{C\_2H\_5}\), \(-\\mathrm{H}\) and \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) — four different groups, so it is asymmetric and the molecule is chiral. In propan-2-ol the same carbon carries two methyl groups, so two of the four are identical, and the molecule is achiral. One repeated group is enough to destroy chirality at that centre.

The stereoisomers related to each other as non-superimposable mirror images are called enantiomers (Fig. 6.24). A and B in Fig. 6.22 and D and E in Fig. 6.23 are enantiomers.

Fig. 6.24

Fig. 6.24 – Non-superimposable mirror images of a chiral molecule.

Enantiomers possess identical physical properties — namely melting point, boiling point, refractive index, etc. They only differ with respect to the rotation of plane polarised light. If one of the enantiomers is dextrorotatory, the other will be laevorotatory. However, the sign of optical rotation is not necessarily related to the absolute (actual) configuration of the molecule — that is, knowing that a compound is (+) does not by itself tell you how its four groups are arranged in space.

A mixture containing two enantiomers in equal proportions will have zero optical rotation, as the rotation due to one isomer will be cancelled by the rotation due to the other isomer. Such a mixture is known as a racemic mixture or racemic modification. A racemic mixture is represented by prefixing dl or (±) before the name — for example, (±) butan-2-ol. The process of conversion of an enantiomer into a racemic mixture is known as racemisation.

NoteDefinition

A racemic mixture is an equimolar (50:50) mixture of two enantiomers. It is optically inactive, because the rotation produced by one enantiomer is exactly cancelled by that of the other.

Identify chiral and achiral molecules in each of the following pairs of compounds (wedge and dash representations according to Class XI):

(i) \(\\mathrm{H\_3C{-}CH(Br){-}OH}\) and \(\\mathrm{H\_3C{-}CH(Br){-}Br}\)

(ii) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}CH(OH){-}CH\_2{-}CH\_2{-}CH\_3}\) and \(\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}CH(OH){-}CH\_3}\)

(iii) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CHCH\_2CH\_3}\) with \(\\mathrm{Br}\) on C-2 (2-bromobutane) and \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH\_2Br}\) (1-bromobutane)

In each pair, examine the carbon carrying the functional group and count how many different groups are attached to it.

  1. In the first compound, the carbon bears \(-\\mathrm{CH\_3}\), \(-\\mathrm{Br}\), \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) and \(-\\mathrm{H}\): four different groups, so it is chiral. In the second, the same carbon bears two bromine atoms, so two of its four groups are identical: it is achiral.

  2. In the first compound, the carbon bearing \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) carries \(-\\mathrm{CH\_3}\), \(-\\mathrm{CH\_2CH\_2CH\_3}\), \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) and \(-\\mathrm{H}\): four different groups, so it is chiral. In propan-2-ol, the carbon bearing \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) carries two identical methyl groups, so it is achiral.

  3. In 2-bromobutane, C-2 carries \(-\\mathrm{CH\_3}\), \(-\\mathrm{C\_2H\_5}\), \(-\\mathrm{Br}\) and \(-\\mathrm{H}\): four different groups, so it is chiral. In 1-bromobutane, the carbon bearing bromine also carries two hydrogen atoms, so it is achiral.

(iii) Retention. Retention of configuration is the preservation of the spatial arrangement of bonds to an asymmetric centre during a chemical reaction or transformation.

In general, if during a reaction no bond to the stereocentre is broken, the product will have the same general configuration of groups around the stereocentre as that of the reactant. Such a reaction is said to proceed with retention of configuration. Consider as an example the reaction that takes place when (–)-2-methylbutan-1-ol is heated with concentrated hydrochloric acid, shown in Fig. 6.25.

Fig. 6.25

Fig. 6.25 – Reaction proceeding with retention of configuration.

It is important to note that the configuration at the asymmetric centre in the reactant and the product is the same, but the sign of optical rotation has changed in the product. This is so because two different compounds with the same configuration at the asymmetric centre may have different optical rotations. One may be dextrorotatory (plus sign of optical rotation) while the other may be laevorotatory (negative sign of optical rotation).

(iv) Inversion, retention and racemisation. There are three outcomes for a reaction at an asymmetric carbon atom, when a bond directly linked to the asymmetric carbon atom is broken. Consider the replacement of a group X by Y, as shown in Fig. 6.26.

Fig. 6.26

Fig. 6.26 – Retention, inversion and racemisation.

If (A) is the only compound obtained, the process is called retention of configuration. If (B) is the only compound obtained, the process is called inversion of configuration; the configuration has been inverted in B. If a 50:50 mixture of A and B is obtained, then the process is called racemisation, and the product is optically inactive, as one isomer will rotate the plane polarised light in the direction opposite to the other.

Now let us have a fresh look at \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) and \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) mechanisms by taking examples of optically active alkyl halides.

\(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) and inversion. In the case of optically active alkyl halides, the product formed as a result of the \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) mechanism has the inverted configuration as compared to the reactant. This is because the nucleophile attaches itself on the side opposite to the one where the halogen atom is present — it has no choice, since the halogen is in the way on the front side. When (–)-2-bromooctane is allowed to react with sodium hydroxide, (+)-octan-2-ol is formed, with the \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) group occupying the position opposite to what bromide had occupied, as shown in Fig. 6.27.

Fig. 6.27

Fig. 6.27 – Inversion of configuration in the SN2 reaction.

Thus, \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions of optically active halides are accompanied by inversion of configuration.

\(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) and racemisation. In the case of optically active alkyl halides, \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) reactions are accompanied by racemisation. Can you think of the reason why it happens? Actually, the carbocation formed in the slow step, being \(sp^2\) hybridised, is planar (achiral). The attack of the nucleophile may be accomplished from either side of the plane of the carbocation, resulting in a mixture of products — one having the same configuration (the \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) attaching at the same position as the halide ion had occupied) and the other having the opposite configuration (the \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) attaching on the side opposite to the halide ion). This may be illustrated by the hydrolysis of optically active 2-bromobutane, which results in the formation of (±)-butan-2-ol, as drawn in Fig. 6.28.

Fig. 6.28

Fig. 6.28 – Racemisation in the SN1 reaction.

Q4. If a single, pure, optically active alkyl halide is hydrolysed, the product sometimes shows no optical rotation at all. How can a reaction destroy optical activity?

A. It destroys it by passing through a flat intermediate. When the halide reacts by the \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) route, the first thing that happens is that the halide ion leaves, giving a carbocation whose central carbon is \(sp^2\) hybridised and therefore planar — and a planar centre has no handedness at all. The hydroxide ion can then attack that flat carbocation from above or from below with equal ease, so exactly half the molecules end up with one configuration and half with the mirror-image configuration. The result is a 50:50 racemic mixture whose rotations cancel, and the polarimeter reads zero. Note that an \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reaction does not do this: there is no flat intermediate, the nucleophile must attack from the back, and the product is a single inverted enantiomer, still optically active.

(question only — no solution)

(i) Optically active 2-bromobutane is hydrolysed by aqueous NaOH under conditions that favour \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\). State whether the product is optically active or inactive, and name the stereochemical outcome.

(ii) The same compound is hydrolysed in aqueous ethanol under conditions that favour \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\). State the stereochemical outcome and explain the difference from (i).

(iii) Identify the asymmetric carbon, if any, in each of: 2-chlorobutane, 1-chlorobutane, 3-chloropentane, 2-chloro-2-methylbutane. Which of them are chiral?

(2) Elimination Reactions

When a haloalkane with a \(\\beta\)-hydrogen atom is heated with an alcoholic solution of potassium hydroxide, there is elimination of a hydrogen atom from the \(\\beta\)-carbon and a halogen atom from the \(\\alpha\)-carbon atom.

Location of \(\\alpha\) and \(\\beta\) carbon in a molecule. The carbon on which the halogen atom is directly attached is called the \(\\alpha\)-carbon, and the carbon atom adjacent to this carbon is called the \(\\beta\)-carbon. A molecule with no \(\\beta\)-hydrogen atom at all cannot undergo this reaction — there is nothing to remove.

Fig. 6.29

Fig. 6.29 – The α and β carbon atoms in an alkyl halide.

The base removes the \(\\beta\)-hydrogen as a proton, the electrons of that C—H bond swing in to form a \(\\pi\) bond, and the halide leaves from the \(\\alpha\)-carbon, as shown in Fig. 6.30.

Fig. 6.30

Fig. 6.30 – Mechanism of β-elimination.

\[\\mathrm{H{-}C\_\\beta{-}C\_\\alpha{-}X} + \\mathrm{B^{-}} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{C{=}C} + \\mathrm{B{-}H} + \\mathrm{X^{-}}\]

As a result, an alkene is formed as the product. Since a \(\\beta\)-hydrogen atom is involved in the elimination, it is often called \(\\beta\)-elimination.

If there is a possibility of formation of more than one alkene due to the availability of more than one type of \(\\beta\)-hydrogen atom, usually one alkene is formed as the major product. These form part of a pattern first observed by the Russian chemist Alexander Zaitsev (also pronounced as Saytzeff), who in 1875 formulated a rule.

NotePrinciple / Law

Zaitsev’s rule: in dehydrohalogenation reactions, the preferred product is that alkene which has the greater number of alkyl groups attached to the doubly bonded carbon atoms.

Thus, 2-bromopentane gives pent-2-ene as the major product.

\[\\underset{\\text{Pent-2-ene (81%)}}{\\mathrm{H\_3C{-}CH\_2{-}CH{=}CH{-}CH\_3}} \\xleftarrow{\\ \\mathrm{^{-}OH}\\ } \\underset{\\text{2-Bromopentane}}{\\mathrm{H\_3C{-}CH\_2{-}CH\_2{-}CHBr{-}CH\_3}} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{^{-}OH}\\ } \\underset{\\text{Pent-1-ene (19%)}}{\\mathrm{H\_3C{-}CH\_2{-}CH\_2{-}CH{=}CH\_2}}\]

The more substituted alkene is the more stable one, because the alkyl groups release electron density into the double bond; the reaction, given a choice, takes the path that leads to the more stable product.

alcoholic KOH versus aqueous KOH (What they do → the same reagent, KOH, behaves in two different ways depending on the solvent. The conditions they need → in alcoholic solution, KOH gives alkoxide ions, which are strong, bulky bases; heating a haloalkane with alcoholic KOH therefore removes H and X and gives an alkene. In aqueous solution, KOH provides hydroxide ions, which act as nucleophiles; the haloalkane then gives an alcohol by substitution. What they are typically used for → this single distinction is one of the most heavily examined points in the chapter. Alcoholic KOH → elimination; aqueous KOH → substitution.)

Elimination versus Substitution

A chemical reaction is the result of competition; it is a race that is won by the fastest runner. A collection of molecules tends to do, by and large, what is easiest for them. An alkyl halide with \(\\beta\)-hydrogen atoms, when reacted with a base or a nucleophile, has two competing routes: substitution (\(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) and \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\)) and elimination. Which route will be taken up depends upon the nature of the alkyl halide, the strength and size of the base/nucleophile, and the reaction conditions.

Thus, a bulkier nucleophile will prefer to act as a base and abstract a proton rather than approach a tetravalent carbon atom (for steric reasons), and vice versa. Similarly, a primary alkyl halide will prefer an \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reaction; a secondary halide will undergo \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) or elimination, depending upon the strength of the base/nucleophile; and a tertiary halide will undergo \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) or elimination, depending upon the stability of the carbocation or of the more substituted alkene. The competition is pictured in Fig. 6.31.

Fig. 6.31

Fig. 6.31 – Elimination versus substitution.

Predict all the alkenes formed when 2-bromo-2-methylbutane is heated with alcoholic KOH, and identify the major product.

Step 1 — Locate the \(\\alpha\)-carbon. The bromine sits on C-2, so C-2 is the \(\\alpha\)-carbon.

Step 2 — Find the \(\\beta\)-carbons, i.e. the carbons next to C-2 that carry hydrogen atoms. These are C-1 (a \(-\\mathrm{CH\_3}\) group), C-3 (a \(-\\mathrm{CH\_2}-\) group) and the methyl branch on C-2. Removing a \(\\beta\)-hydrogen from C-1 (or from the methyl branch, which is equivalent) gives one alkene; removing one from C-3 gives another.

Step 3 — Write both alkenes.

Elimination towards C-1:

\[\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}C(CH\_3){-}CH\_2{-}CH\_3} \\qquad \\text{(2-methylbut-1-ene)}\]

Elimination towards C-3:

\[\\mathrm{CH\_3{-}C(CH\_3){=}CH{-}CH\_3} \\qquad \\text{(2-methylbut-2-ene)}\]

Step 4 — Apply Zaitsev’s rule. Count the alkyl groups on the doubly bonded carbons. 2-Methylbut-1-ene has two alkyl groups on the double bond; 2-methylbut-2-ene has three. The more substituted alkene is the more stable, so

2-Methylbut-2-ene is the major product, and 2-methylbut-1-ene is the minor product.

(3) Reaction with Metals

Most organic chlorides, bromides and iodides react with certain metals to give compounds containing carbon–metal bonds. Such compounds are known as organo-metallic compounds.

An important class of organo-metallic compounds, discovered by Victor Grignard in 1900, is alkyl magnesium halide, RMgX, referred to as Grignard Reagents. These reagents are obtained by the reaction of haloalkanes with magnesium metal in dry ether.

\[\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2Br} + \\mathrm{Mg} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{dry ether}\\ } \\underset{\\text{Grignard reagent}}{\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2MgBr}}\]

Victor Grignard had a strange start in academic life for a chemist — he took a maths degree. When he eventually switched to chemistry, it was not to the mathematical province of physical chemistry but to organic chemistry. While attempting to find an efficient catalyst for the process of methylation, he noted that Zn in diethyl ether had been used for this purpose, and wondered whether the Mg/ether combination might be successful. Grignard reagents were first reported in 1900, and Grignard used this work for his doctoral thesis in 1901. In 1910 he obtained a professorship at the University of Nancy, and in 1912 he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Chemistry, which he shared with Paul Sabatier, who had made advances in nickel catalysed hydrogenation.

In the Grignard reagent, the carbon–magnesium bond is covalent but highly polar, with carbon pulling electrons from electropositive magnesium; the magnesium–halogen bond is essentially ionic.

\[\\overset{\\delta-}{\\mathrm{R}}{-}\\overset{\\delta+}{\\mathrm{Mg}}{-}\\overset{\\delta-}{\\mathrm{X}}\]

Look carefully at that charge distribution. In every other reaction of this chapter, the carbon bonded to the halogen has been \(\\delta+\) and has been attacked by nucleophiles. In a Grignard reagent the polarity is reversed: the carbon is now \(\\delta-\), and it behaves as a powerful nucleophile — in effect, a carbanion. This reversal is why Grignard reagents are so valuable for building larger carbon skeletons.

Grignard reagents are highly reactive and react with any source of proton to give hydrocarbons. Even water, alcohols and amines are sufficiently acidic to convert them to the corresponding hydrocarbons.

\[\\mathrm{RMgX} + \\mathrm{H\_2O} \\rightarrow \\mathrm{RH} + \\mathrm{Mg(OH)X}\]

It is therefore necessary to avoid even traces of moisture from a Grignard reagent. That is why the reaction is carried out in dry ether. On the other hand, this could be considered as one of the methods for converting halides to hydrocarbons.

the Grignard reagent, RMgX (What it does → supplies a carbon that behaves as a carbanion, \(\\mathrm{R^{\\delta-}}\), ready to attack any electron-deficient centre. The conditions it needs → strictly anhydrous: dry ether as solvent, dry apparatus, no moisture in the air. Even the water vapour in a damp flask will destroy it, giving the alkane RH instead. What it is typically used for → converting a haloalkane into an alkane (by treatment with water), and, more importantly in later units, for making new carbon–carbon bonds. Whenever an examination question says “dry ether”, it is checking whether you know why.)

Q. Water is not usually thought of as an acid, so why does it destroy a Grignard reagent?

A. Because “acidic enough” is relative. The carbon of RMgX carries a substantial negative charge and is an extremely strong base — far stronger than the hydroxide ion. Against such a base, even the weakly acidic O—H bond of water is easily broken, and the carbanion simply grabs the proton to become the alkane RH. The same argument explains why alcohols and amines, which also carry O—H or N—H bonds, destroy the reagent too.

Wurtz Reaction

Alkyl halides react with sodium in dry ether to give hydrocarbons containing double the number of carbon atoms present in the halide. This reaction is known as the Wurtz reaction.

\[2,\\mathrm{RX} + 2,\\mathrm{Na} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{dry ether}\\ } \\mathrm{R{-}R} + 2,\\mathrm{NaX}\]

Because the two halves of the product come from two identical halide molecules, the Wurtz reaction gives a clean product only when a single alkyl halide is used. It follows that an alkane with an odd number of carbon atoms, or an unsymmetrical alkane, cannot be made in pure form by this route — a point worth remembering when a question asks you to prepare, say, n-octane (from 1-chlorobutane, which works) as against n-heptane (which does not).

(question only — no solution)

(i) Write the equation for the preparation of n-hexane from bromoethane… and explain whether the Wurtz reaction can be used for this purpose. Justify your answer.

(ii) Bromoethane is treated with (a) aqueous KOH, (b) alcoholic KOH, (c) Mg in dry ether followed by water. Name the organic product formed in each case.

(iii) Why must a Grignard reagent never be prepared in ethanol as solvent?

6.7.2 Reactions of Haloarenes

1. Nucleophilic Substitution

Aryl halides are extremely less reactive towards nucleophilic substitution reactions, for the following four reasons.

(i) Resonance effect. In haloarenes, the electron pairs on the halogen atom are in conjugation with the \(\\pi\)-electrons of the ring, and several resonating structures are possible, as shown in Fig. 6.32.

Fig. 6.32

Fig. 6.32 – Resonance structures of chlorobenzene.

The C—Cl bond acquires a partial double bond character due to resonance. As a result, the bond cleavage in a haloarene is more difficult than in a haloalkane, and therefore haloarenes are less reactive towards nucleophilic substitution reaction. A bond that is partly double simply will not break as readily as a plain single bond.

(ii) Difference in hybridisation of the carbon atom in the C—X bond. In a haloalkane, the carbon atom attached to halogen is \(sp^3\) hybridised, while in the case of a haloarene, the carbon atom attached to halogen is \(sp^2\) hybridised.

The \(sp^2\) hybridised carbon, with a greater s-character, is more electronegative and can hold the electron pair of the C—X bond more tightly than the \(sp^3\) hybridised carbon in a haloalkane, which has less s-character. (Recall that an s orbital is closer to the nucleus than a p orbital, so the more s-character a hybrid orbital has, the more tightly it grips its electrons.) Thus, the C—Cl bond length in a haloalkane is 177 pm, while in a haloarene it is 169 pm. Since it is more difficult to break a shorter bond than a longer bond, haloarenes are less reactive than haloalkanes towards nucleophilic substitution reaction.

(iii) Instability of the phenyl cation. In the case of haloarenes, the phenyl cation formed as a result of self-ionisation will not be stabilised by resonance, and therefore the \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) mechanism is ruled out. The empty orbital of the phenyl cation lies in the plane of the ring, perpendicular to the \(\\pi\) system, so it cannot overlap with it and cannot share the charge.

(iv) Repulsion. Because of the possible repulsion, it is less likely for the electron rich nucleophile to approach an electron rich arene. The \(\\pi\) cloud of the ring pushes the incoming nucleophile away before it can reach the carbon.

Q2. Chloroethane gives up its chlorine to hot alkali quite readily, but chlorobenzene barely reacts at all under the same conditions. Both contain a C—Cl bond — so why the enormous difference?

A. For four reasons, all of which make the C—Cl bond of chlorobenzene harder to break and harder to attack. First, the lone pairs on chlorine are conjugated with the ring’s \(\\pi\) system, so the C—Cl bond acquires partial double bond character. Second, the carbon holding the chlorine is \(sp^2\) hybridised, with more s-character; it grips the bonding pair more tightly and the bond is shorter (169 pm against 177 pm in a haloalkane), and short bonds are hard to break. Third, the \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) escape route is closed, because the phenyl cation that would have to form cannot be stabilised by resonance. Fourth, an electron-rich nucleophile is repelled by the electron-rich ring. Chloroethane suffers none of these handicaps: its C—Cl bond is a plain, long, polarised single bond on an \(sp^3\) carbon, wide open to attack.

Replacement by Hydroxyl Group

Chlorobenzene can be converted into phenol by heating in aqueous sodium hydroxide solution at a temperature of 623 K and a pressure of 300 atmospheres. The severity of those conditions is itself the proof of how unreactive the aryl halide is.

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Cl} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{(ii) } \\mathrm{H^{+}}]{\\text{(i) NaOH, 623 K, 300 atm}} \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5OH}\]

The presence of an electron withdrawing group (\(-\\mathrm{NO\_2}\)) at the ortho- and para-positions increases the reactivity of haloarenes, and the conditions become progressively milder as more nitro groups are added.

\[p\\text{-}\\mathrm{O\_2N{-}C\_6H\_4{-}Cl} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{(ii) } \\mathrm{H^{+}}]{\\text{(i) NaOH, 443 K}} p\\text{-}\\mathrm{O\_2N{-}C\_6H\_4{-}OH}\]

\[2,4\\text{-}\\mathrm{(O\_2N)\_2C\_6H\_3{-}Cl} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{(ii) } \\mathrm{H^{+}}]{\\text{(i) NaOH, 368 K}} 2,4\\text{-}\\mathrm{(O\_2N)\_2C\_6H\_3{-}OH}\]

\[2,4,6\\text{-}\\mathrm{(O\_2N)\_3C\_6H\_2{-}Cl} \\xrightarrow\[\\mathrm{H\_2O}]{\\ \\text{warm}\\ } 2,4,6\\text{-}\\mathrm{(O\_2N)\_3C\_6H\_2{-}OH}\]

Notice the collapse in severity: 623 K and 300 atm for chlorobenzene, 443 K for one nitro group, 368 K for two, and merely warm water for three. The effect is pronounced when the \(-\\mathrm{NO\_2}\) group is introduced at the ortho- and para-positions. However, no effect on the reactivity of haloarenes is observed by the presence of an electron withdrawing group at the meta-position.

Mechanism. The reaction proceeds by addition of the nucleophile followed by elimination of the halide, as depicted in Fig. 6.33 and summarised in FC 6.4.

Fig. 6.33

Fig. 6.33 – Mechanism of nucleophilic substitution in p-nitrochlorobenzene.

Flowchart

FC 6.4 – Nucleophilic substitution in a nitro-substituted haloarene (addition–elimination): Ar–Cl + ⁻OH → slow step: nucleophile adds to the C bearing Cl → resonance-stabilised carbanion (negative charge delocalised to the ortho and para positions, and on to the –NO₂ group) → fast step: Cl⁻ is expelled → phenol; branch: if the –NO₂ group is meta, no resonance structure places the charge on the carbon bearing –NO₂ → carbanion not stabilised → no rate enhancement

Why does the \(\\mathrm{NO\_2}\) group show its effect only at the ortho- and para- positions and not at the meta- position? As shown, the presence of the nitro group at the ortho- and para-positions withdraws the electron density from the benzene ring and thus facilitates the attack of the nucleophile on the haloarene. The carbanion thus formed is stabilised through resonance. The negative charge that appears at the ortho- and para- positions with respect to the halogen substituent is stabilised by the \(-\\mathrm{NO\_2}\) group. But in the case of the meta-nitro compound, none of the resonating structures bears the negative charge on the carbon atom bearing the \(-\\mathrm{NO\_2}\) group. Therefore, the presence of the nitro group at the meta- position does not stabilise the negative charge, and no effect on reactivity is observed by the presence of the \(-\\mathrm{NO\_2}\) group at the meta-position.

Q. Is it the electron-withdrawing power of \(-\\mathrm{NO\_2}\) alone that speeds the reaction up?

A. No — its position matters just as much. The \(-\\mathrm{NO\_2}\) group helps only if it stands where the negative charge of the intermediate carbanion actually lands. Resonance sends that charge to the carbons ortho and para to the point of attack, so a nitro group sitting at those positions can soak it up. A meta nitro group is electron-withdrawing too, but the charge never reaches it, so it can do nothing for the rate. This is the classic assertion–reason question of the chapter.

2. Electrophilic Substitution Reactions

Haloarenes undergo the usual electrophilic reactions of the benzene ring — such as halogenation, nitration, sulphonation and Friedel-Crafts reactions. The halogen atom, besides being slightly deactivating, is o, p-directing; therefore, further substitution occurs at the ortho- and para-positions with respect to the halogen atom.

The o, p-directing influence of the halogen atom can be easily understood if we consider the resonating structures of halobenzene shown in Fig. 6.34.

Fig. 6.34

Fig. 6.34 – Resonance structures of halobenzene directing electrophilic attack.

Due to resonance, the electron density increases more at the ortho- and para-positions than at the meta-positions, so an incoming electrophile — which seeks electrons — goes where the electrons are richest. Further, the halogen atom, because of its –I effect, has some tendency to withdraw electrons from the benzene ring. As a result, the ring gets somewhat deactivated as compared to benzene, and hence electrophilic substitution reactions in haloarenes occur slowly and require more drastic conditions as compared to those in benzene.

(i) Halogenation

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Cl} + \\mathrm{Cl\_2} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{Anhyd. } \\mathrm{FeCl\_3}\\ } \\underset{\\text{1,4-Dichlorobenzene (Major)}}{p\\text{-}\\mathrm{C\_6H\_4Cl\_2}} + \\underset{\\text{1,2-Dichlorobenzene (Minor)}}{o\\text{-}\\mathrm{C\_6H\_4Cl\_2}}\]

(ii) Nitration

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Cl} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{conc. } \\mathrm{H\_2SO\_4}]{\\ \\mathrm{HNO\_3}\\ } \\underset{\\text{1-Chloro-4-nitrobenzene (Major)}}{p\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4NO\_2}} + \\underset{\\text{1-Chloro-2-nitrobenzene (Minor)}}{o\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4NO\_2}}\]

(iii) Sulphonation

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Cl} \\xrightarrow\[\\Delta]{\\ \\text{conc. } \\mathrm{H\_2SO\_4}\\ } \\underset{\\text{4-Chlorobenzenesulfonic acid (Major)}}{p\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4SO\_3H}} + \\underset{\\text{2-Chlorobenzenesulfonic acid (Minor)}}{o\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4SO\_3H}}\]

(iv) Friedel-Crafts reaction

Alkylation:

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Cl} + \\mathrm{CH\_3Cl} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{Anhyd. } \\mathrm{AlCl\_3}\\ } \\underset{\\text{1-Chloro-4-methylbenzene (Major)}}{p\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4CH\_3}} + \\underset{\\text{1-Chloro-2-methylbenzene (Minor)}}{o\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4CH\_3}}\]

Acylation:

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Cl} + \\mathrm{H\_3C{-}CO{-}Cl} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{Anhyd. } \\mathrm{AlCl\_3}\\ } \\underset{\\text{4-Chloroacetophenone (Major)}}{p\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4COCH\_3}} + \\underset{\\text{2-Chloroacetophenone (Minor)}}{o\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4COCH\_3}}\]

In every one of these four reactions, the para product dominates over the ortho — largely because the bulky electrophile finds the position next to the halogen crowded, while the position directly opposite is free.

Although chlorine is an electron withdrawing group, yet it is ortho-, para- directing in electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions. Why?

Chlorine withdraws electrons through the inductive effect and releases electrons through resonance. Through the inductive effect, chlorine destabilises the intermediate carbocation formed during the electrophilic substitution, as shown in Fig. 6.35.

Fig. 6.35

[Caption:] Fig. 6.35 – Opposing inductive and resonance effects of chlorine. [/Caption:]

Through resonance, halogen tends to stabilise the carbocation, and the effect is more pronounced at the ortho- and para- positions. The inductive effect is stronger than resonance and causes net electron withdrawal, and thus causes net deactivation. The resonance effect tends to oppose the inductive effect for attack at the ortho- and para-positions, and hence makes the deactivation less for ortho- and para-attack. Reactivity is thus controlled by the stronger inductive effect, and orientation is controlled by the resonance effect.

Q. How can one group both deactivate the ring and still direct ortho/para?

A. Because two different effects answer two different questions. “How fast?” is answered by the inductive effect, which is the stronger of the two and pulls electrons out of the ring, making every position less reactive than in benzene. “Where?” is answered by the resonance effect, which pushes a lone pair back into the ring, but only at the ortho and para positions. So the ring is slower than benzene overall, yet whatever reaction does happen happens at ortho and para. Rate and orientation are decided by different effects — that is the whole answer.

3. Reaction with Metals
Wurtz-Fittig Reaction

A mixture of an alkyl halide and an aryl halide gives an alkylarene when treated with sodium in dry ether, and this is called the Wurtz-Fittig reaction.

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5X} + 2,\\mathrm{Na} + \\mathrm{RX} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{Dry ether}\\ } \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}R} + 2,\\mathrm{NaX}\]

Fittig Reaction

Aryl halides also give analogous compounds when treated with sodium in dry ether, in which two aryl groups are joined together. It is called the Fittig reaction.

\[2,\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5X} + 2,\\mathrm{Na} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{Dry ether}\\ } \\underset{\\text{Diphenyl}}{\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}C\_6H\_5}} + 2,\\mathrm{NaX}\]

Wurtz vs Wurtz-Fittig vs Fittig reaction

Feature Wurtz Wurtz-Fittig Fittig
Halides used Two alkyl halides (R—X) One alkyl halide + one aryl halide Two aryl halides (Ar—X)
Reagent and solvent Na, dry ether Na, dry ether Na, dry ether
Product Alkane, R—R Alkylarene, Ar—R Biaryl (e.g. diphenyl), Ar—Ar
Typical use Doubling a carbon chain, e.g. 1-chlorobutane → n-octane Attaching an alkyl group to a ring, e.g. toluene from bromobenzene Joining two rings, e.g. benzene → diphenyl

How would you carry out the following conversions? Write the equations with conditions.

(i) Bromobenzene into diphenyl

(ii) Bromobenzene into toluene

(iii) Chlorobenzene into phenol

  1. Two aryl halides joined by sodium in dry ether — this is the Fittig reaction:

\[2,\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Br} + 2,\\mathrm{Na} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{Dry ether}\\ } \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}C\_6H\_5} + 2,\\mathrm{NaBr}\]

  1. An alkyl group must be attached to the ring, so an alkyl halide is used alongside the aryl halide — the Wurtz-Fittig reaction:

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Br} + 2,\\mathrm{Na} + \\mathrm{CH\_3Br} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{Dry ether}\\ } \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}CH\_3} + 2,\\mathrm{NaBr}\]

  1. The halogen of an unactivated haloarene is replaced by \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) only under drastic conditions:

\[\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Cl} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{(ii) } \\mathrm{H^{+}}]{\\text{(i) NaOH, 623 K, 300 atm}} \\mathrm{C\_6H\_5OH}\]

The high temperature and pressure are needed because the C—Cl bond of chlorobenzene has partial double bond character and sits on an \(sp^2\) carbon.

6.7 Which alkyl halide from the following pairs would you expect to react more rapidly by an \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) mechanism? Explain your answer. (i) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2CH\_2Br}\) or \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(Br)CH\_3}\) (ii) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(Br)CH\_3}\) or \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3C{-}Br}\) (iii) \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH(CH\_3)CH\_2Br}\) or \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(CH\_3)CH\_2Br}\)

6.8 In the following pairs of halogen compounds, which compound undergoes faster \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) reaction? (i) tert-Butyl chloride, \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CCl}\), or 1-chloro-2-methylpropane (drawn as skeletal structures) (ii) 2-Chlorohexane (a secondary chloride) or 1-chlorohexane (a primary chloride)

6.9 Identify A, B, C, D, E, R and R¹ in the following: Cyclohexyl bromide \(+\\ \\mathrm{Mg} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{dry ether}\\ } \\mathrm{A} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{H\_2O}\\ } \\mathrm{B}\) \(\\mathrm{R{-}Br} + \\mathrm{Mg} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{dry ether}\\ } \\mathrm{C} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{D\_2O}\\ } \\mathrm{CH\_3CH(D)CH\_3}\) \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3C{-}C(CH\_3)\_3} \\xleftarrow{\\ \\mathrm{Na}/\\text{ether}\\ } \\mathrm{R^1{-}X} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{Mg}\\ } \\mathrm{D} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{H\_2O}\\ } \\mathrm{E}\)

(question only — no solution)

(i) Chlorobenzene does not react with aqueous NaOH at room temperature, but 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene does. Explain.

(ii) Predict the major organic product when chlorobenzene is treated with \(\\mathrm{CH\_3COCl}\) in the presence of anhydrous \(\\mathrm{AlCl\_3}\), and explain the orientation.

(iii) Complete: bromobenzene \(+\\ \\mathrm{Mg}\) (dry ether) \(\\rightarrow\) ? \(\\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{H\_2O}\\ }\) ?

(iv) Assertion: Haloarenes are less reactive than haloalkanes towards nucleophilic substitution. Reason: The C—X bond in a haloarene is shorter and has partial double bond character. State whether the assertion and reason are correct, and whether the reason correctly explains the assertion.

6.8 Polyhalogen Compounds

Carbon compounds containing more than one halogen atom are usually referred to as polyhalogen compounds. Many of these compounds are useful in industry and agriculture. Some polyhalogen compounds are described in this section.

NoteDefinition

Polyhalogen compounds are carbon compounds that contain more than one halogen atom in the molecule.

Read this section with two questions in mind for every compound: what is it good for, and what is the price the environment or the human body pays for using it? The chapter opened with a compound that answered the first question brilliantly and the second one disastrously, and the same tension runs through almost every substance below.

6.8.1 Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride)

Dichloromethane, \(\\mathrm{CH\_2Cl\_2}\), is widely used as a solvent — as a paint remover, as a propellant in aerosols, and as a process solvent in the manufacture of drugs. It is also used as a metal cleaning and finishing solvent.

Methylene chloride harms the human central nervous system. Exposure to lower levels of methylene chloride in air can lead to slightly impaired hearing and vision. Higher levels of methylene chloride in air cause dizziness, nausea, tingling and numbness in the fingers and toes. In humans, direct skin contact with methylene chloride causes intense burning and mild redness of the skin. Direct contact with the eyes can burn the cornea.

6.8.2 Trichloromethane (Chloroform)

Chemically, chloroform, \(\\mathrm{CHCl\_3}\), is employed as a solvent for fats, alkaloids, iodine and other substances. The major use of chloroform today is in the production of the freon refrigerant R-22.

It was once used as a general anaesthetic in surgery but has been replaced by less toxic, safer anaesthetics, such as ether. As might be expected from its use as an anaesthetic, inhaling chloroform vapours depresses the central nervous system. Breathing about 900 parts of chloroform per million parts of air (900 parts per million) for a short time can cause dizziness, fatigue and headache. Chronic chloroform exposure may cause damage to the liver — where chloroform is metabolised to phosgene — and to the kidneys, and some people develop sores when the skin is immersed in chloroform.

Chloroform is slowly oxidised by air in the presence of light to an extremely poisonous gas, carbonyl chloride, also known as phosgene.

\[2,\\mathrm{CHCl\_3} + \\mathrm{O\_2} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{light}\\ } \\underset{\\text{Phosgene}}{2,\\mathrm{COCl\_2}} + 2,\\mathrm{HCl}\]

It is therefore stored in closed dark coloured bottles completely filled so that air is kept out.

Q. Why must a chloroform bottle be completely filled — surely a little air above the liquid can do no harm?

A. That little air is exactly the problem. The equation above needs two things: oxygen and light. A dark bottle removes the light; filling the bottle to the brim removes the oxygen, because there is no air space left for it to sit in. Leave a gap, and the oxygen trapped there will slowly convert the chloroform at the surface into phosgene — a gas so toxic that it was once used as a chemical weapon. Two simple precautions, each blocking one reactant.

This is a lesson in how a “storage instruction” is really a chemical equation in disguise. Whenever a laboratory manual tells you to keep a reagent in an amber bottle, under an inert atmosphere, in a desiccator, or filled to the neck, ask which reactant is being excluded — light, oxygen, moisture or carbon dioxide. Chloroform teaches the habit unusually well: dark glass keeps out the photons, a full bottle keeps out the oxygen, and together they keep phosgene out of the room.

6.8.3 Triiodomethane (Iodoform)

Iodoform, \(\\mathrm{CHI\_3}\), was used earlier as an antiseptic, but the antiseptic properties are due to the liberation of free iodine and not due to iodoform itself. Due to its objectionable smell, it has been replaced by other formulations containing iodine.

Q. If iodoform is not itself the antiseptic, what was it actually doing on the wound?

A. Acting as a slow-release container. On contact with tissue, iodoform gradually decomposes and sets free iodine, and it is the free iodine that kills the microorganisms. The compound was a carrier, not extreme killer. Once chemists realised this, it made far more sense to apply an iodine formulation directly — and to be spared iodoform’s persistent, unpleasant smell.

6.8.4 Tetrachloromethane (Carbon tetrachloride)

Carbon tetrachloride, \(\\mathrm{CCl\_4}\), is produced in large quantities for use in the manufacture of refrigerants and propellants for aerosol cans. It is also used as feedstock in the synthesis of chlorofluorocarbons and other chemicals, in pharmaceutical manufacturing, and for general solvent use. Until the mid 1960s, it was also widely used as a cleaning fluid — both in industry, as a degreasing agent, and in the home, as a spot remover and as a fire extinguisher.

There is some evidence that exposure to carbon tetrachloride causes liver cancer in humans. The most common effects are dizziness, light headedness, nausea and vomiting, which can cause permanent damage to nerve cells. In severe cases, these effects can lead rapidly to stupor, coma, unconsciousness or death. Exposure to \(\\mathrm{CCl\_4}\) can make the heart beat irregularly or stop. The chemical may irritate the eyes on contact.

When carbon tetrachloride is released into the air, it rises to the atmosphere and depletes the ozone layer. Depletion of the ozone layer is believed to increase human exposure to ultraviolet rays, leading to increased skin cancer, eye diseases and disorders, and possible disruption of the immune system.

6.8.5 Freons

The chlorofluorocarbon compounds of methane and ethane are collectively known as freons. They are extremely stable, unreactive, non-toxic, non-corrosive and easily liquefiable gases.

Freon 12 (\(\\mathrm{CCl\_2F\_2}\)) is one of the most common freons in industrial use. It is manufactured from tetrachloromethane by the Swarts reaction — the halogen-exchange method you met in Section 6.4.3, in which a metallic fluoride replaces chlorine by fluorine.

These are usually produced for aerosol propellants, refrigeration and air conditioning purposes. By 1974, total freon production in the world was about 2 billion pounds annually.

Most freon, even that used in refrigeration, eventually makes its way into the atmosphere, where it diffuses unchanged into the stratosphere. In the stratosphere, freon is able to initiate radical chain reactions that can upset the natural ozone balance. The sequence is set out in FC 6.5.

Flowchart

FC 6.5 – Fate of a freon molecule: freon released from a refrigerator, air conditioner or aerosol → too unreactive to be destroyed at ground level → drifts upward, unchanged, into the stratosphere → absorbs high-energy UV radiation → C–Cl bond breaks, releasing a chlorine radical → chlorine radical attacks ozone in a radical chain reaction → natural ozone balance upset → more UV reaches the Earth’s surface → increased skin cancer, eye disease, possible immune damage

Q5. Freon was chosen precisely because it reacts with nothing on the ground. Why should a compound that is chemically “safe” turn out to be environmentally dangerous?

A. Because “unreactive” and “harmless” are not the same thing. Being unreactive means nothing at ground level destroys it — not water, not soil bacteria, not oxygen, not sunlight of ordinary energy. So instead of breaking down, the molecule simply survives and drifts. Given years, it diffuses unchanged into the stratosphere, and there it meets something it never meets below: high-energy ultraviolet radiation, powerful enough to snap the C—Cl bond. The chlorine radical released then attacks ozone in a chain reaction, so a single molecule can destroy a great many ozone molecules before it is finally removed. The very stability that made freon safe in a kitchen is what allowed it to reach the one place where it is destructive — and to arrive there intact.

Freon 12 has the formula \(\\mathrm{CCl\_2F\_2}\).

(i) Give its IUPAC name.

(ii) In the stratosphere, ultraviolet radiation breaks a C—X bond in this molecule. Using the data of Table 6.2, decide whether the C—Cl or the C—F bond breaks, and justify your answer.

  1. The parent hydrocarbon is methane, and the molecule carries two chlorine atoms and two fluorine atoms on the same carbon. Citing the substituents in alphabetical order, the IUPAC name is dichlorodifluoromethane.

  2. A bond breaks when the radiation supplies at least as much energy as the bond enthalpy. From Table 6.2:

\[\\text{C—F} = 452\\ \\text{kJ mol}^{-1}, \\qquad \\text{C—Cl} = 351\\ \\text{kJ mol}^{-1}\]

The C—Cl bond is the weaker of the two by

\[452\\ \\text{kJ mol}^{-1} - 351\\ \\text{kJ mol}^{-1} = 101\\ \\text{kJ mol}^{-1}\]

Ultraviolet radiation of a given energy will therefore break the C—Cl bond long before it can break the much stronger C—F bond. Hence the species released is a chlorine radical, and it is chlorine — not fluorine — that goes on to attack ozone. This is why chlorine-containing refrigerants were singled out for replacement.

Once the link between chlorine radicals and ozone loss was accepted, chemistry was asked to solve the problem it had created. The response was to redesign the molecule: keep the useful properties (low boiling point, non-flammability, non-toxicity) but remove the chlorine. Modern refrigerants are therefore largely chlorine-free — hydrofluorocarbons and, increasingly, simple hydrocarbons such as isobutane — and the production of the old chlorofluorocarbons has been phased out worldwide under the Montreal Protocol, agreed in 1987. This is green chemistry at its most literal: the hazard was designed out of the molecule rather than managed after the fact.

6.8.6 p,p’-Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT)

DDT, the first of the chlorinated organic insecticides, was originally prepared in 1873, but it was not until 1939 that Paul Muller of Geigy Pharmaceuticals in Switzerland discovered the effectiveness of DDT as an insecticide. Paul Muller was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology in 1948 for this discovery. Its structure is shown in Fig. 6.36.

Fig. 6.36

Fig. 6.36 – Structure of DDT.

The use of DDT increased enormously on a worldwide basis after World War II, primarily because of its effectiveness against the mosquito that spreads malaria and the lice that carry typhus.

However, problems related to the extensive use of DDT began to appear in the late 1940s. Many species of insects developed resistance to DDT, and it was also discovered to have a high toxicity towards fish.

The chemical stability of DDT and its fat solubility compounded the problem. DDT is not metabolised very rapidly by animals; instead, it is deposited and stored in the fatty tissues. If ingestion continues at a steady rate, DDT builds up within the animal over time. The use of DDT was banned in the United States in 1973, although it is still in use in some other parts of the world.

Q. Why should fat solubility make a pesticide more dangerous in the long run?

A. Because a fat-soluble compound has nowhere to go. A water-soluble substance is excreted in urine and leaves the body within days. A fat-soluble one dissolves in the animal’s fatty tissue and stays there. Every fresh dose adds to the store, so the concentration climbs steadily even if each individual exposure is tiny — and when a bird or a fish eats many contaminated organisms, it inherits all of their stored DDT at once. Combine that with DDT’s chemical stability, which means nothing breaks it down, and a compound applied to a field can end up concentrated in an animal that never went near the field.

The polyhalogen compounds of this section

Compound Formula Principal uses Main hazard
Dichloromethane \(\\mathrm{CH\_2Cl\_2}\) Paint remover, aerosol propellant, process solvent in drug manufacture, metal cleaning Harms the central nervous system; burns skin and cornea
Trichloromethane (chloroform) \(\\mathrm{CHCl\_3}\) Solvent for fats, alkaloids and iodine; making the refrigerant R-22; formerly an anaesthetic Depresses the central nervous system; liver and kidney damage; forms poisonous phosgene in air and light
Triiodomethane (iodoform) \(\\mathrm{CHI\_3}\) Formerly an antiseptic (through the free iodine it liberates) Objectionable smell; now replaced by other iodine formulations
Tetrachloromethane \(\\mathrm{CCl\_4}\) Refrigerants and aerosol propellants, CFC feedstock, solvent; formerly a cleaning fluid and fire extinguisher Liver cancer; nerve damage; irregular heartbeat; depletes the ozone layer
Freon 12 \(\\mathrm{CCl\_2F\_2}\) Aerosol propellant, refrigeration, air conditioning Reaches the stratosphere unchanged and initiates radical chain reactions that destroy ozone
DDT \(p,p'\)-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane Insecticide, against malarial mosquitoes and typhus-carrying lice Insect resistance; high toxicity to fish; stored in fatty tissue and accumulates

(question only — no solution)

(i) Write the equation for the conversion of chloroform into phosgene, and state the two precautions taken during storage that prevent it.

(ii) Give one use and one harmful effect each of carbon tetrachloride and freon 12.

(iii) Explain why iodoform, though no longer used, was once regarded as an antiseptic.

(iv) DDT is chemically stable and fat-soluble. Explain how these two properties together lead to its accumulation in animals, and name one reason, other than accumulation, why its use declined.

6.9 Summary

What these compounds are

  1. Alkyl and aryl halides may be classified as mono, di, or polyhalogen (tri-, tetra-, etc.) compounds, depending on whether they contain one, two or more halogen atoms in their structures.
  2. Since halogen atoms are more electronegative than carbon, the carbon–halogen bond of an alkyl halide is polarised: the carbon atom bears a partial positive charge and the halogen atom bears a partial negative charge. Every reaction in the chapter follows from this one fact.

\[-\\overset{\\delta+}{\\mathrm{C}}-\\overset{\\delta-}{\\mathrm{X}}\]

How they are prepared

  1. Alkyl halides are prepared by the free radical halogenation of alkanes, by the addition of halogen acids to alkenes, and by the replacement of the \(-\\mathrm{OH}\) group of alcohols with halogens using phosphorus halides, thionyl chloride or halogen acids.
  2. Aryl halides are prepared by electrophilic substitution to arenes.
  3. Fluorides and iodides are best prepared by the halogen exchange method — the Swarts and Finkelstein reactions respectively.

Physical properties

  1. The boiling points of organohalogen compounds are comparatively higher than those of the corresponding hydrocarbons, because of strong dipole–dipole and van der Waals forces of attraction.
  2. These compounds are slightly soluble in water but completely soluble in organic solvents.

Chemical behaviour

  1. The polarity of the carbon–halogen bond of alkyl halides is responsible for their nucleophilic substitution and elimination reactions, and for their reaction with metal atoms to form organometallic compounds.
  2. Nucleophilic substitution reactions are categorised into \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) and \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) on the basis of their kinetic properties: \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) is first order and goes through a carbocation, while \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) is second order and goes through a single-step transition state.
  3. Chirality has a profound role in understanding the reaction mechanisms of \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) and \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions. \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions of chiral alkyl halides are characterised by the inversion of configuration, while \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) reactions are characterised by racemisation.

\[\\text{rate}(\\mathrm{S\_N}2) = k\[\\mathrm{RX}]\[\\mathrm{Nu^{-}}] \\qquad \\text{rate}(\\mathrm{S\_N}1) = k\[\\mathrm{RX}]\]

  1. The overall pattern of reactions of a haloalkane is condensed in FC 6.6.

Flowchart

FC 6.6 – Reactions of a haloalkane R–X: R–X → with a nucleophile (aqueous KOH, KCN, NH₃, NaOR′, etc.) → nucleophilic substitution → alcohol, nitrile, amine, ether…; branch by mechanism: primary halide → SN2 → inversion of configuration; tertiary halide → SN1 → carbocation → racemisation. R–X → with alcoholic KOH (β-hydrogen needed) → β-elimination → alkene (Zaitsev product major). R–X → with Mg in dry ether → Grignard reagent RMgX → with water → alkane; R–X → with Na in dry ether → Wurtz reaction → R–R.

Polyhalogen compounds

  1. A number of polyhalogen compounds — e.g. dichloromethane, chloroform, iodoform, carbon tetrachloride, freon and DDT — have many industrial applications.
  2. However, some of these compounds cannot be easily decomposed, and even cause depletion of the ozone layer; they are proving to be environmental hazards.

6.10 NCERT Questions

  1. Name the following halides according to the IUPAC system and classify them as alkyl, allyl, benzyl (primary, secondary, tertiary), vinyl or aryl halides:
  1. \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CHCH(Cl)CH\_3}\)
  2. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH(CH\_3)CH(C\_2H\_5)Cl}\)
  3. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2C(CH\_3)\_2CH\_2I}\)
  4. \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CCH\_2CH(Br)C\_6H\_5}\)
  5. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH(CH\_3)CH(Br)CH\_3}\)
  6. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3C(C\_2H\_5)\_2CH\_2Br}\)
  7. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3C(Cl)(C\_2H\_5)CH\_2CH\_3}\)
  8. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH{=}C(Cl)CH\_2CH(CH\_3)\_2}\)
  9. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH{=}CHC(Br)(CH\_3)\_2}\)
  10. \(p\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4CH\_2CH(CH\_3)\_2}\)
  11. \(m\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClCH\_2C\_6H\_4CH\_2C(CH\_3)\_3}\)
  12. \(o\\text{-}\\mathrm{Br{-}C\_6H\_4CH(CH\_3)CH\_2CH\_3}\)
  1. Give the IUPAC names of the following compounds:
  1. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH(Cl)CH(Br)CH\_3}\)
  2. \(\\mathrm{CHF\_2CBrClF}\)
  3. \(\\mathrm{ClCH\_2C{\\equiv}CCH\_2Br}\)
  4. \(\\mathrm{(CCl\_3)\_3CCl}\)
  5. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3C}(p\\text{-}\\mathrm{ClC\_6H\_4})\_2\\mathrm{CH(Br)CH\_3}\)
  6. \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CCH{=}CClC\_6H\_4I}\\text{-}p\)
  1. Write the structures of the following organic halogen compounds.
  1. 2-Chloro-3-methylpentane
  2. p-Bromochlorobenzene
  3. 1-Chloro-4-ethylcyclohexane
  4. 2-(2-Chlorophenyl)-1-iodooctane
  5. 2-Bromobutane
  6. 4-tert-Butyl-3-iodoheptane
  7. 1-Bromo-4-sec-butyl-2-methylbenzene
  8. 1,4-Dibromobut-2-ene
  1. Which one of the following has the highest dipole moment?
  1. \(\\mathrm{CH\_2Cl\_2}\) (ii) \(\\mathrm{CHCl\_3}\) (iii) \(\\mathrm{CCl\_4}\)
  1. A hydrocarbon \(\\mathrm{C\_5H\_{10}}\) does not react with chlorine in the dark but gives a single monochloro compound \(\\mathrm{C\_5H\_9Cl}\) in bright sunlight. Identify the hydrocarbon.
  2. Write the isomers of the compound having formula \(\\mathrm{C\_4H\_9Br}\).
  3. Write the equations for the preparation of 1-iodobutane from
  1. 1-butanol (ii) 1-chlorobutane (iii) but-1-ene
  1. What are ambident nucleophiles? Explain with an example.
  2. Which compound in each of the following pairs will react faster in an \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reaction with \(\\mathrm{^{-}OH}\)?
  1. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Br}\) or \(\\mathrm{CH\_3I}\)
  2. \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CCl}\) or \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl}\)
  1. Predict all the alkenes that would be formed by dehydrohalogenation of the following halides with sodium ethoxide in ethanol, and identify the major alkene:
  1. 1-Bromo-1-methylcyclohexane
  2. 2-Chloro-2-methylbutane
  3. 2,2,3-Trimethyl-3-bromopentane
  1. How will you bring about the following conversions?
  1. Ethanol to but-1-yne
  2. Ethane to bromoethene
  3. Propene to 1-nitropropane
  4. Toluene to benzyl alcohol
  5. Propene to propyne
  6. Ethanol to ethyl fluoride
  7. Bromomethane to propanone
  8. But-1-ene to but-2-ene
  9. 1-Chlorobutane to n-octane
  10. Benzene to biphenyl
  1. Explain why
  1. the dipole moment of chlorobenzene is lower than that of cyclohexyl chloride?
  2. alkyl halides, though polar, are immiscible with water?
  3. Grignard reagents should be prepared under anhydrous conditions?
  1. Give the uses of freon 12, DDT, carbon tetrachloride and iodoform.
  2. Write the structure of the major organic product in each of the following reactions:
  1. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2Cl} + \\mathrm{NaI} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{heat}]{\\ \\text{acetone}\\ }\)
  2. \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_3CBr} + \\mathrm{KOH} \\xrightarrow\[\\text{heat}]{\\ \\text{ethanol}\\ }\)
  3. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH(Br)CH\_2CH\_3} + \\mathrm{NaOH} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{water}\\ }\)
  4. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2Br} + \\mathrm{KCN} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{aq. ethanol}\\ }\)
  5. \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5ONa} + \\mathrm{C\_2H\_5Cl} \\rightarrow\)
  6. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH\_2OH} + \\mathrm{SOCl\_2} \\rightarrow\)
  7. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH\_2CH{=}CH\_2} + \\mathrm{HBr} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\text{peroxide}\\ }\)
  8. \(\\mathrm{CH\_3CH{=}C(CH\_3)\_2} + \\mathrm{HBr} \\rightarrow\)
  1. Write the mechanism of the following reaction:

\[\\mathrm{nBuBr} + \\mathrm{KCN} \\xrightarrow{\\ \\mathrm{EtOH{-}H\_2O}\\ } \\mathrm{nBuCN}\]

  1. Arrange the compounds of each set in order of reactivity towards \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) displacement:
  1. 2-Bromo-2-methylbutane, 1-Bromopentane, 2-Bromopentane
  2. 1-Bromo-3-methylbutane, 2-Bromo-2-methylbutane, 2-Bromo-3-methylbutane
  3. 1-Bromobutane, 1-Bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane, 1-Bromo-2-methylbutane, 1-Bromo-3-methylbutane
  1. Out of \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CH\_2Cl}\) and \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5CHClC\_6H\_5}\), which is more easily hydrolysed by aqueous KOH?
  2. p-Dichlorobenzene has a higher m.p. than those of the o- and m-isomers. Discuss.
  3. How can the following conversions be carried out?
  1. Propene to propan-1-ol
  2. Ethanol to but-1-yne
  3. 1-Bromopropane to 2-bromopropane
  4. Toluene to benzyl alcohol
  5. Benzene to 4-bromonitrobenzene
  6. Benzyl alcohol to 2-phenylethanoic acid
  7. Ethanol to propanenitrile
  8. Aniline to chlorobenzene
  9. 2-Chlorobutane to 3,4-dimethylhexane
  10. 2-Methyl-1-propene to 2-chloro-2-methylpropane
  11. Ethyl chloride to propanoic acid
  12. But-1-ene to n-butyliodide
  13. 2-Chloropropane to 1-propanol
  14. Isopropyl alcohol to iodoform
  15. Chlorobenzene to p-nitrophenol p. 2-Bromopropane to 1-bromopropane
  16. Chloroethane to butane
  17. Benzene to diphenyl
  18. tert-Butyl bromide to isobutyl bromide
  19. Aniline to phenylisocyanide
  1. The treatment of alkyl chlorides with aqueous KOH leads to the formation of alcohols, but in the presence of alcoholic KOH, alkenes are major products. Explain.

*Primary alkyl halide \(\\mathrm{C\_4H\_9Br}\) (a) reacted with alcoholic KOH to give compound (b). Compound (b) is reacted with HBr to give (c), which is an isomer of (a). When (a) is reacted with sodium metal it gives compound (d), \(\\mathrm{C\_8H\_{18}}\), which is different from the compound formed when n-butyl bromide is reacted with sodium. Give the structural formula of (a) and write the equations for all the reactions.*

22. *What happens when*

a. n-butyl chloride is treated with alcoholic KOH,

b. bromobenzene is treated with Mg in the presence of dry ether,

c. chlorobenzene is subjected to hydrolysis,

d. ethyl chloride is treated with aqueous KOH,

e. methyl bromide is treated with sodium in the presence of dry ether,

f. methyl chloride is treated with KCN?

# 6.11 Check Your Concepts

1. *Classify each of the following as an alkyl (1°, 2° or 3°), allylic, benzylic, vinylic or aryl halide, stating the hybridisation of the carbon that carries the halogen: (i) \(\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CH{-}CH\_2Cl}\) (ii) \(\\mathrm{CH\_2{=}CH{-}Cl}\) (iii) \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5{-}C(CH\_3)\_2{-}Br}\) (iv) \(\\mathrm{C\_6H\_5Br}\) (v) \(\\mathrm{(CH\_3)\_2CH{-}Cl}\).*

2. *Assertion: The C—Cl bond in chlorobenzene is shorter than that in chloroethane. Reason: The carbon bearing the halogen in chlorobenzene is \(sp^2\) hybridised and the C—Cl bond has partial double bond character. State whether the assertion and the reason are correct, and whether the reason correctly explains the assertion.*

3. *Why is thionyl chloride preferred over concentrated HCl for preparing an alkyl chloride from an alcohol? Support your answer with the balanced equation.*

4. *Why are \(\\mathrm{PBr\_3}\) and \(\\mathrm{PI\_3}\) generated in situ rather than added directly from a reagent bottle?*

5. *Free radical chlorination of butane gives a mixture of products, whereas 2,2-dimethylpropane gives only one monochloro product. Explain, and state how many monochloro products butane gives.*

6. *A student is asked to prepare a pure sample of 2-bromopropane from propene. Which reagent should be used, what rule governs the outcome, and what is the minor product?*

7. *Explain why the Finkelstein reaction is carried out in dry acetone. Which principle is being exploited?*

8. *Fluorobenzene cannot be prepared by treating benzene with \(\\mathrm{F\_2}\) and \(\\mathrm{FeCl\_3}\). Give the reason, and name a method by which alkyl fluorides are prepared.*

9. *Toluene is treated with chlorine (a) in the presence of Fe in the dark, and (b) in the presence of UV light. Name the organic product in each case and explain why the two conditions give different products.*

10. *Why must the diazotisation of aniline be carried out at 273–278 K, and why must the diazonium salt be used immediately after it is prepared?*

11. *Arrange in increasing order of boiling point, with reasons: 1-bromobutane, 2-bromobutane, 2-bromo-2-methylpropane.*

12. *Bromomethane, chloromethane, dibromomethane and bromoform — arrange them in increasing order of boiling point and justify the order in terms of intermolecular forces.*

13. *Haloalkanes are only very slightly soluble in water but dissolve readily in benzene. Account for both observations in terms of the energy needed to break and the energy released on forming intermolecular attractions.*

14. *Predict the product when an alkyl halide is treated with (i) KCN and (ii) AgCN, and explain why the two reagents give different products.*

15. *Why do \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reactions show second order kinetics while \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) reactions show first order kinetics, even though a nucleophile is essential in both?*

16. *In the transition state of an \(\\mathrm{S\_N}2\) reaction, carbon is said to be bonded to five atoms. Explain how this is possible and why such a species cannot be isolated.*

17. *Complete the following statement and justify it: a tertiary alkyl halide is the fastest halide in the ______ mechanism and the slowest in the ______ mechanism.*

18. *Allyl chloride and benzyl chloride both undergo \(\\mathrm{S\_N}1\) hydrolysis much faster than 1-chloropropane, although all three are primary halides. Explain, using resonance.*

19. *An optically active sample of 2-bromobutane is hydrolysed. In one experiment the product is optically inactive, and in another it is optically active. Explain what mechanism operated in each case and name the stereochemical outcome.*

20. *Identify which of the following are chiral, giving your reason in each case: 2-chlorobutane, 1-chlorobutane, 3-chloropentane, 2-chloro-2-methylbutane, butan-2-ol.*

21. *Define a racemic mixture. Why does it show zero optical rotation, and by what process is an optically active compound converted into one?*

22. *2-Bromopentane on treatment with alcoholic KOH gives two alkenes. Write both, identify the major product, and state the rule you have applied.*

23. *A haloalkane is treated with a bulky base instead of a small nucleophile. Predict which of substitution and elimination will dominate, and explain why.*

24. *Why can a haloalkane with no \(\\beta\)-hydrogen atom not undergo a dehydrohalogenation reaction? Give one example of such a haloalkane.*

25. *Grignard reagents react with water to give alkanes. Water is a very weak acid — explain why it is nevertheless able to destroy a Grignard reagent.*

26. *The Wurtz reaction is not a good method for preparing an alkane with an odd number of carbon atoms. Explain, using 1-chlorobutane and 1-chloropropane as examples.*

27. *Give four reasons why haloarenes are far less reactive than haloalkanes towards nucleophilic substitution.*

28. *Chlorobenzene requires 623 K and 300 atm to be converted into phenol, while 2,4,6-trinitrochlorobenzene reacts merely on warming with water. Explain this dramatic difference, referring to the stability of the intermediate.*

29. *A nitro group at the meta position has no effect on the rate of nucleophilic substitution in a haloarene, although it is strongly electron-withdrawing. Explain.*

30. *Chlorine deactivates the benzene ring yet directs an incoming electrophile to the ortho and para positions. Explain how one substituent can do both, naming the effect responsible for each.*

31. *Write the major and minor products when chlorobenzene undergoes (i) nitration and (ii) Friedel-Crafts alkylation with \(\\mathrm{CH\_3Cl}\), naming the catalyst in each case.*

32. *Distinguish between the Wurtz, Wurtz-Fittig and Fittig reactions, giving one equation for each.*

33. *Why is chloroform stored in dark coloured bottles that are completely filled? Write the equation for the reaction that these precautions prevent, and name the product.*

34. *Freon 12 is described as “extremely stable, unreactive and non-toxic”, yet it is an environmental hazard. Resolve this apparent contradiction, and state which bond in the molecule breaks in the stratosphere and why.*

35. *DDT was hailed as a triumph in the 1940s and banned in the United States by 1973. Give three chemical or biological reasons for this reversal.*