Chapter 1: Solutions

In the 1880s, chemists had a serious problem. New compounds were being made in laboratories almost every month, but there was no simple, reliable way to find out how heavy their molecules actually were. Two chemists could prepare the same substance and disagree completely about its formula, because they disagreed about its molar mass.

The answer came from an unexpected direction — not from studying the new substances themselves, but from studying what they did to an ordinary solvent when they were dissolved in it. Working at Grenoble in France, François-Marie Raoult carefully measured the freezing points and vapour pressures of one dilute solution after another. He noticed something remarkable. Water containing a dissolved substance always froze a little below 0 °C, and its vapour pressure was always a little lower than that of pure water — and the size of that “little” depended almost entirely on how many solute particles were present, not on what they were. Sugar, urea and glycerol, dissolved in equal numbers of particles, all pushed the freezing point down by the same amount.

That simple observation turned a thermometer into a molecular weighing machine. By weighing out a known mass of an unknown substance and reading how far the freezing point fell, a chemist could count the particles — and from the count, calculate the molar mass. This chapter is about the behaviour of such solutions.

Fig. 1.0

Fig. 1.0 – Depression in the freezing point of a solution.

NoteCuriosity Corner

Q1. Why does sprinkling salt on an icy road make the ice melt, even though the air is still cold? Q2. A sealed bottle of soda looks perfectly calm, but bubbles rush out the moment you open the cap. What has actually changed inside the bottle? Q3. One mole of glucose and one mole of potassium chloride are dissolved in the same amount of water. Why does the potassium chloride solution freeze at a much lower temperature? Q4. Alcohol produced by fermentation can be concentrated by distillation only up to about 95% ethanol, and no further. Why does distillation suddenly stop working? Q5. Why does a raw mango shrivel into a pickle in brine, while a wilted flower revives in fresh water?

Keep these questions in mind as you read — this chapter will give you everything you need to reason out each one.

1.1 Types of Solutions

Why Mixtures Matter

In everyday life we rarely handle pure substances. Almost everything around us — the air we breathe, the water we drink, the metal in a doorknob — is a mixture of two or more pure substances. What such a mixture can do for us depends on exactly what it contains and in what proportion.

Consider metals first. Brass is a mixture of copper and zinc, German silver is a mixture of copper, zinc and nickel, and bronze is a mixture of copper and tin. All three are built mainly from copper, yet their hardness, colour and resistance to corrosion are quite different, simply because the other components differ.

The proportion matters just as much as the identity. In drinking water, 1 part per million (ppm) of fluoride ions helps prevent tooth decay, but 1.5 ppm makes the teeth mottled, and a high concentration of fluoride ions is actually poisonous — sodium fluoride, for instance, is used in rat poison. In the same way, an intravenous injection is always dissolved in water containing salts at particular ionic concentrations that match the concentrations in blood plasma, because a mismatch would damage the blood cells.

In this Chapter we shall deal mostly with liquid solutions and how they are formed. We shall then study the properties of solutions, such as vapour pressure and the colligative properties. We begin here with the types of solutions, and then look at the various ways in which the concentration of a solute in a liquid solution can be expressed.

The words solution, solvent and solute all come from the Latin verb solvere, meaning “to loosen” or “to dissolve”. The solvent is the substance that does the loosening; the solute is the substance that gets loosened apart into individual particles.

What Exactly Is a Solution?

Solutions are homogeneous mixtures of two or more than two components. By a homogeneous mixture we mean that its composition and its properties are uniform throughout — take a sample from the top of the beaker or from the bottom, and you will find the same composition. This is why a spoonful of sugar solution tastes the same wherever you draw it from.

Generally, the component that is present in the largest quantity is known as the solvent. The solvent decides the physical state in which the solution exists: if the solvent is a liquid, the solution is a liquid, no matter whether the dissolved substance was originally a solid or a gas.

One or more components present in the solution other than the solvent are called solutes. In this Chapter we shall consider only binary solutions, that is, solutions consisting of two components — one solvent and one solute.

NoteDefinition

A solution is a homogeneous mixture of two or more components, in which the composition and properties are the same throughout. The component present in the largest amount is the solvent (it fixes the physical state of the solution); the other component(s) are the solute(s). A binary solution contains exactly two components.

Q. If ethanol and water are mixed in exactly equal amounts, which one is the solvent?

A. Strictly speaking, neither — the labels “solvent” and “solute” are useful only when one component is clearly in excess. When the amounts are comparable, chemists simply call it a mixture of the two liquids and describe its composition by mole fraction instead of naming a solvent.

The Nine Possible Combinations

In a binary solution each component may be a solid, a liquid or a gas. Since the solute can be in any of these three states and the solvent can also be in any of these three states, there are nine possible types of solution. These are summarised in Table 1.1. Notice that the solutions are grouped by the state of the solvent, because it is the solvent that decides the state of the final solution.

Table 1.1: Types of Solutions

Type of Solution Solute Solvent Common Examples
Gaseous Solutions Gas Gas Mixture of oxygen and nitrogen gases
Liquid Gas Chloroform mixed with nitrogen gas
Solid Gas Camphor in nitrogen gas
Liquid Solutions Gas Liquid Oxygen dissolved in water
Liquid Liquid Ethanol dissolved in water
Solid Liquid Glucose dissolved in water
Solid Solutions Gas Solid Solution of hydrogen in palladium
Liquid Solid Amalgam of mercury with sodium
Solid Solid Copper dissolved in gold

The classification is summarised as a scheme in FC 1.1, which is a convenient way to revise the nine cases quickly.

Flowchart

FC 1.1 – Classification of binary solutions by the state of the solvent: Binary solution → branch by solvent state → (Gaseous solvent → gas solute: O₂ + N₂; liquid solute: chloroform in N₂; solid solute: camphor in N₂) → (Liquid solvent → gas solute: O₂ in water; liquid solute: ethanol in water; solid solute: glucose in water) → (Solid solvent → gas solute: H₂ in palladium; liquid solute: sodium amalgam; solid solute: copper in gold). Note at the end: the solvent decides the physical state of the solution.

The alloys mentioned earlier — brass, bronze and German silver — belong to the last row of Table 1.1: they are solid solutions of one metal in another. Air belongs to the first row, and soda water belongs to the row “gas in liquid”, which we shall study in detail when we come to solubility.

The entry “solution of hydrogen in palladium” is not a laboratory curiosity. Palladium metal can absorb a large volume of hydrogen gas into the spaces between its atoms, holding the hydrogen as a solid solution and releasing it again when heated. This behaviour is being explored as a way of storing hydrogen fuel safely, since a metal that soaks up hydrogen like a sponge is far less hazardous to carry around than a cylinder of compressed hydrogen gas. The same absorbing ability is used in the laboratory to purify hydrogen, because palladium lets hydrogen pass through while blocking other gases.

Identify the solute and the solvent in each of the following, and state the type of solution using Table 1.1: (a) soda water, (b) sea water, (c) a dental amalgam of mercury with silver, (d) humid air (air containing water vapour).

The rule is simple: whichever component is present in the larger quantity is the solvent, and the state of the solvent gives the type of solution.

  1. Soda water — a small amount of carbon dioxide is dissolved in a large amount of water. Solute = \(\mathrm{CO_2}\) (gas); solvent = water (liquid). It is a liquid solution of a gas in a liquid.

  2. Sea water — sodium chloride and other salts are dissolved in a large amount of water. Solute = salts (solid); solvent = water (liquid). It is a liquid solution of a solid in a liquid.

  3. Dental amalgam — mercury (liquid) is dissolved in silver (solid), the silver being the major component. Solute = mercury (liquid); solvent = silver (solid). It is a solid solution of a liquid in a solid.

  4. Humid air — a small amount of water vapour is present in a large amount of air. Solute = water vapour (a liquid in its normal state, present here as vapour); solvent = air (gas). It is a gaseous solution.

(question only — no solution)

For each of the following, name the solute, name the solvent, and classify the solution as gaseous, liquid or solid: (i) camphor in nitrogen gas, (ii) iodine dissolved in carbon tetrachloride, (iii) 22-carat gold (copper in gold), (iv) oxygen dissolved in a pond, (v) chloroform vapour mixed with nitrogen gas.

1.2 Expressing Concentration of Solutions

The composition of a solution can be described by expressing its concentration. Concentration simply tells us how much solute is present in a given amount of solvent or of solution. It can be expressed either qualitatively or quantitatively.

Qualitatively, we may say that a solution is dilute, meaning that a relatively very small quantity of solute is present, or that it is concentrated, meaning that a relatively very large quantity of solute is present. Such descriptions are convenient in ordinary conversation, but in real work they add a lot of confusion — one chemist’s “dilute” may be another chemist’s “concentrated”. Hence the need for a quantitative description of the solution.

There are several ways by which we can describe the concentration of a solution quantitatively. Each of them compares the amount of one component with the amount of the whole solution (or, in one case, with the amount of solvent alone).

(i) Mass Percentage (w/w)

The mass percentage of a component of a solution is defined as:

\[\text{Mass \% of a component} = \frac{\text{Mass of the component in the solution}}{\text{Total mass of the solution}} \times 100 \qquad (1.1)\]

Notice carefully that the denominator is the mass of the solution, not of the solvent. So if a solution is described as 10% glucose in water by mass, it means that 10 g of glucose is dissolved in 90 g of water, giving a 100 g solution.

NoteDefinition

The mass percentage (w/w) of a component is the mass of that component present in 100 g of solution.

Concentration described by mass percentage is commonly used in industrial chemical applications. For example, commercial bleaching solution contains 3.62 mass percentage of sodium hypochlorite in water.

(ii) Volume Percentage (V/V)

The volume percentage is defined as:

\[\text{Volume \% of a component} = \frac{\text{Volume of the component}}{\text{Total volume of solution}} \times 100 \qquad (1.2)\]

For example, a 10% ethanol solution in water means that 10 mL of ethanol is dissolved in water such that the total volume of the solution is 100 mL. Solutions containing liquids are commonly expressed in this unit, because liquids are easier to measure by volume than by mass.

A familiar example is antifreeze. A 35% (\(v/v\)) solution of ethylene glycol is used in cars for cooling the engine. At this concentration the antifreeze lowers the freezing point of water to 255.4 K (–17.6 °C), so the coolant in the radiator does not freeze solid and crack the engine block on a winter night.

(iii) Mass by Volume Percentage (w/V)

Another unit, which is commonly used in medicine and pharmacy, is mass by volume percentage. It is the mass of solute dissolved in 100 mL of the solution. This unit is convenient in a hospital, where a drug is weighed out in grams but delivered to the patient as a measured volume of liquid.

(iv) Parts per Million

When a solute is present in trace quantities — so small that a percentage figure would be a long string of zeros after the decimal point — it is convenient to express concentration in parts per million (ppm), defined as:

\[\text{Parts per million} = \frac{\text{Number of parts of the component}}{\text{Total number of parts of all components of the solution}} \times 10^6 \qquad (1.3)\]

NoteDefinition

Parts per million (ppm) is the number of parts of a component present in one million (\(10^6\)) parts of the solution.

As in the case of percentage, concentration in parts per million can also be expressed as mass to mass, volume to volume and mass to volume. A litre of sea water (which weighs 1030 g) contains about \(6 \times 10^{-3}\) g of dissolved oxygen (\(\mathrm{O_2}\)). Such a small concentration is also expressed as 5.8 g per \(10^6\) g (5.8 ppm) of sea water. The concentration of pollutants in water or in the atmosphere is often expressed in terms of \(\mu\text{g mL}^{-1}\) or ppm.

Every drinking-water safety standard in the world is written in the language of parts per million (and its smaller cousin, parts per billion). The World Health Organization guideline value for arsenic in drinking water, for instance, is 0.01 mg per litre — that is, about 10 parts per billion. Groundwater in parts of the Ganga–Brahmaputra plain naturally exceeds this level, which is why arsenic testing and filtration units are installed in affected villages. The chemistry lesson here is worth remembering: “how much” matters as much as “what”. The same element can be harmless at one concentration and dangerous at ten times that concentration, so a chemist never quotes a substance without quoting its concentration.

(v) Mole Fraction

The commonly used symbol for mole fraction is \(x\), and the subscript used on the right hand side of \(x\) denotes the component. It is defined as:

\[\text{Mole fraction of a component} = \frac{\text{Number of moles of the component}}{\text{Total number of moles of all the components}} \qquad (1.4)\]

Recall from Class 11 that the number of moles of a substance is its mass divided by its molar mass. So before you can find a mole fraction, you must always convert the given masses into moles.

For example, in a binary mixture, if the number of moles of A and B are \(n_A\) and \(n_B\) respectively, the mole fraction of A will be

\[x_A = \frac{n_A}{n_A + n_B} \qquad (1.5)\]

For a solution containing \(i\) number of components, we have:

\[x_i = \frac{n_i}{n_1 + n_2 + \ldots\ldots + n_i} = \frac{n_i}{\sum n_i} \qquad (1.6)\]

It can be shown that in a given solution the sum of all the mole fractions is unity, i.e.

\[x_1 + x_2 + \ldots\ldots\ldots\ldots + x_i = 1 \qquad (1.7)\]

NoteDefinition

The mole fraction of a component is the number of moles of that component divided by the total number of moles of all the components in the solution. It has no unit, and the mole fractions of all the components of a solution add up to 1.

Q. Why must the mole fractions always add up to exactly 1?

A. Because every mole fraction has the same denominator — the total number of moles. Adding them all up gives \((n_1 + n_2 + \ldots)/(n_1 + n_2 + \ldots)\), which is 1. This is a useful shortcut in problems: in a binary solution, once you know \(x_1\), you get \(x_2\) for free as \(1 - x_1\).

Mole fraction is very useful in relating some physical properties of solutions, say vapour pressure, with the concentration of the solution, and is quite useful in describing calculations involving gas mixtures. We shall meet it again in Sections 1.4 and 1.6, where the entire treatment of vapour pressure is built on mole fraction.

Calculate the mole fraction of ethylene glycol (\(\mathrm{C_2H_6O_2}\)) in a solution containing 20% of \(\mathrm{C_2H_6O_2}\) by mass.

Assume that we have 100 g of solution (one can start with any amount of solution because the results obtained will be the same — the mole fraction is a ratio, so the size of the sample cancels out). The solution will contain 20 g of ethylene glycol and 80 g of water.

Molar mass of \(\mathrm{C_2H_6O_2}\) = 12 × 2 + 1 × 6 + 16 × 2 = 62 g mol\(^{-1}\).

\[\text{Moles of } \mathrm{C_2H_6O_2} = \frac{20\ \text{g}}{62\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 0.322\ \text{mol}\]

\[\text{Moles of water} = \frac{80\ \text{g}}{18\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 4.444\ \text{mol}\]

\[x_{\text{glycol}} = \frac{\text{moles of } \mathrm{C_2H_6O_2}}{\text{moles of } \mathrm{C_2H_6O_2} + \text{moles of } \mathrm{H_2O}} = \frac{0.322\ \text{mol}}{0.322\ \text{mol} + 4.444\ \text{mol}} = 0.068\]

Similarly,

\[x_{\text{water}} = \frac{4.444\ \text{mol}}{0.322\ \text{mol} + 4.444\ \text{mol}} = 0.932\]

The mole fraction of water can also be calculated as: 1 – 0.068 = 0.932.

(vi) Molarity

Molarity (\(M\)) is defined as the number of moles of solute dissolved in one litre (or one cubic decimetre) of solution,

\[\text{Molarity} = \frac{\text{Moles of solute}}{\text{Volume of solution in litre}} \qquad (1.8)\]

NoteDefinition

Molarity (\(M\)) is the number of moles of solute dissolved per litre of solution (not per litre of solvent). Its unit is mol L\(^{-1}\), also written mol dm\(^{-3}\) or simply M.

For example, a 0.25 mol L\(^{-1}\) (or 0.25 M) solution of NaOH means that 0.25 mol of NaOH has been dissolved in one litre (or one cubic decimetre) of solution.

Calculate the molarity of a solution containing 5 g of NaOH in 450 mL solution.

First convert the mass of NaOH into moles, using its molar mass of 40 g mol\(^{-1}\):

\[\text{Moles of NaOH} = \frac{5\ \text{g}}{40\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 0.125\ \text{mol}\]

Volume of the solution in litres = 450 mL / 1000 mL L\(^{-1}\)

Using equation (1.8),

\[\text{Molarity} = \frac{0.125\ \text{mol} \times 1000\ \text{mL L}^{-1}}{450\ \text{mL}} = 0.278\ \text{M}\]

\[= 0.278\ \text{mol L}^{-1}\]

\[= 0.278\ \text{mol dm}^{-3}\]

(vii) Molality

Molality (\(m\)) is defined as the number of moles of the solute per kilogram (kg) of the solvent and is expressed as:

\[\text{Molality } (m) = \frac{\text{Moles of solute}}{\text{Mass of solvent in kg}} \qquad (1.9)\]

NoteDefinition

Molality (\(m\)) is the number of moles of solute dissolved per kilogram of solvent (not of solution). Its unit is mol kg\(^{-1}\), written as m.

For example, a 1.00 mol kg\(^{-1}\) (or 1.00 m) solution of KCl means that 1 mol (74.5 g) of KCl is dissolved in 1 kg of water.

The single letter that separates molarity from molality is worth guarding: capital M is molarity (per litre of solution), small m is molality (per kilogram of solvent). Mixing them up is one of the commonest ways of losing marks in this chapter.

Calculate molality of 2.5 g of ethanoic acid (\(\mathrm{CH_3COOH}\)) in 75 g of benzene.

Molar mass of \(\mathrm{C_2H_4O_2}\): 12 × 2 + 1 × 4 + 16 × 2 = 60 g mol\(^{-1}\)

\[\text{Moles of } \mathrm{C_2H_4O_2} = \frac{2.5\ \text{g}}{60\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 0.0417\ \text{mol}\]

Benzene is the solvent here, so its mass must be converted to kilograms:

\[\text{Mass of benzene in kg} = 75\ \text{g}/1000\ \text{g kg}^{-1} = 75 \times 10^{-3}\ \text{kg}\]

\[\text{Molality of } \mathrm{C_2H_4O_2} = \frac{\text{Moles of } \mathrm{C_2H_4O_2}}{\text{kg of benzene}} = \frac{0.0417\ \text{mol} \times 1000\ \text{g kg}^{-1}}{75\ \text{g}} = 0.556\ \text{mol kg}^{-1}\]

Which Unit Should You Choose?

Each method of expressing the concentration of a solution has its own merits and demerits. Mass %, ppm, mole fraction and molality are independent of temperature, whereas molarity is a function of temperature. This is because volume depends on temperature and the mass does not — warm a solution and it expands, so the same number of moles now occupies more litres, and the molarity falls slightly, even though nothing has been added or removed.

This is exactly why molality, and not molarity, is used later in the chapter for elevation of boiling point and depression of freezing point: those experiments involve heating and cooling, and a concentration unit that itself changes with temperature would be useless there.

Molarity vs Molality vs Mole fraction vs Mass percentage

Feature Molarity (\(M\)) Molality (\(m\)) Mole fraction (\(x\)) Mass % (w/w)
What is measured Moles of solute Moles of solute Moles of a component Mass of a component
Compared with Volume of solution (in L) Mass of solvent (in kg) Total moles of all components Total mass of solution
Unit mol L\(^{-1}\) mol kg\(^{-1}\) No unit No unit (%)
Depends on temperature? Yes (volume changes) No No No
Typically used for Titrations, volumetric lab work Colligative properties (elevation of b.p., depression of f.p.) Vapour pressure, Raoult’s and Henry’s laws, gas mixtures Industrial and commercial solutions

The word “mole” was brought into chemistry by the German chemist Wilhelm Ostwald around the turn of the twentieth century, from the Latin moles, meaning a heap or a mass. Every unit in this section — molarity, molality, mole fraction — is built on that single idea of counting particles by the heap rather than one at a time.

A sample of hydrochloric acid solution is 36.5% HCl by mass and has a density of 1.18 g mL\(^{-1}\). Calculate (a) its molarity and (b) its molality. (Molar mass of HCl = 36.5 g mol\(^{-1}\).)

Whenever a question gives you a mass percentage and a density, the standard route is: start with 100 g of solution, because then the mass percentage directly gives the mass of the solute.

Take 100 g of solution. It contains 36.5 g of HCl and (100 – 36.5) = 63.5 g of water.

Moles of HCl:

\[n_{\mathrm{HCl}} = \frac{36.5\ \text{g}}{36.5\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 1.00\ \text{mol}\]

(a) Molarity. Molarity needs the volume of the solution, which we get from the density:

\[V = \frac{\text{mass of solution}}{\text{density}} = \frac{100\ \text{g}}{1.18\ \text{g mL}^{-1}} = 84.7\ \text{mL} = 0.0847\ \text{L}\]

\[M = \frac{1.00\ \text{mol}}{0.0847\ \text{L}} = 11.8\ \text{mol L}^{-1}\]

(b) Molality. Molality needs the mass of the solvent only, in kilograms:

\[\text{Mass of water} = 63.5\ \text{g} = 63.5 \times 10^{-3}\ \text{kg}\]

\[m = \frac{1.00\ \text{mol}}{63.5 \times 10^{-3}\ \text{kg}} = 15.7\ \text{mol kg}^{-1}\]

Notice that the molality comes out larger than the molarity. That is a useful check: the denominator for molality (mass of solvent alone) is smaller than the denominator for molarity whenever the solution is fairly concentrated and denser than water.

(question only — no solution)

A solution is prepared by dissolving 18.0 g of glucose (\(\mathrm{C_6H_{12}O_6}\), molar mass 180 g mol\(^{-1}\)) in 178.2 g of water. Calculate (i) the mass percentage of glucose, (ii) the molality of the solution, and (iii) the mole fraction of glucose and of water.

(question only — no solution)

A 2.5 L sample of river water is found to contain 0.005 g of dissolved lead. Taking the density of the water sample as 1.00 g mL\(^{-1}\), express the concentration of lead in ppm by mass.

1.1 Calculate the mass percentage of benzene (\(\mathrm{C_6H_6}\)) and carbon tetrachloride (\(\mathrm{CCl_4}\)) if 22 g of benzene is dissolved in 122 g of carbon tetrachloride.

1.2 Calculate the mole fraction of benzene in a solution containing 30% by mass in carbon tetrachloride.

1.3 Calculate the molarity of each of the following solutions: (a) 30 g of \(\mathrm{Co(NO_3)_2 \cdot 6H_2O}\) in 4.3 L of solution (b) 30 mL of 0.5 M \(\mathrm{H_2SO_4}\) diluted to 500 mL.

1.4 Calculate the mass of urea (\(\mathrm{NH_2CONH_2}\)) required in making 2.5 kg of 0.25 molal aqueous solution.

1.5 Calculate (a) molality (b) molarity and (c) mole fraction of KI if the density of 20% (mass/mass) aqueous KI is 1.202 g mL\(^{-1}\).

1.3 Solubility

Solubility of a substance is its maximum amount that can be dissolved in a specified amount of solvent at a specified temperature. Notice how carefully this statement is worded: unless we fix the solvent, the amount of solvent and the temperature, the word “solubility” has no definite meaning at all.

NoteDefinition

The solubility of a substance is the maximum amount of it that can be dissolved in a specified amount of solvent at a specified temperature.

Solubility depends upon the nature of the solute and the solvent, as well as on temperature and pressure. Let us consider the effect of these factors in the solution of a solid or of a gas in a liquid.

1.3.1 Solubility of a Solid in a Liquid

Every solid does not dissolve in a given liquid. While sodium chloride and sugar dissolve readily in water, naphthalene and anthracene do not. On the other hand, naphthalene and anthracene dissolve readily in benzene, but sodium chloride and sugar do not.

Why should the same solvent be so welcoming to one solid and so indifferent to another? The pattern that is observed is this: polar solutes dissolve in polar solvents, and non-polar solutes dissolve in non-polar solvents. Water is a polar solvent, its molecules being held together by strong dipole–dipole attractions and hydrogen bonds, and it can pull apart the ions of sodium chloride and surround them. Benzene is non-polar, and it can only mix with molecules held by the weak dispersion forces of the naphthalene type.

In general, a solute dissolves in a solvent if the intermolecular interactions are similar in the two — or, as the working rule of the laboratory puts it, like dissolves like.

NoteDefinition

Like dissolves like: a solute dissolves appreciably in a solvent when the intermolecular forces in the solute and in the solvent are of a similar kind and strength.

Dissolution and Crystallisation

When a solid solute is added to the solvent, some solute dissolves and its concentration increases in solution. This process is known as dissolution.

Meanwhile, some solute particles already in solution collide with the solid solute particles and get separated out of solution. This reverse process is known as crystallisation.

At first, dissolution is much faster than crystallisation, simply because there is very little solute in solution to crystallise back. But as the solution gets richer in solute, crystallisation speeds up. A stage is reached when the two processes occur at the same rate. Under such conditions, the number of solute particles going into solution will be equal to the number of solute particles separating out, and a state of dynamic equilibrium is reached.

\[\text{Solute} + \text{Solvent} \rightleftharpoons \text{Solution} \qquad (1.10)\]

The word dynamic is important. Nothing has stopped at equilibrium; both processes are still going on, but at exactly equal rates, so nothing appears to change. The set-up is easiest to picture as an undissolved layer of solid sitting at the bottom of a beaker while particles constantly leave it and constantly return to it.

At this stage the concentration of solute in solution will remain constant under the given conditions, i.e., temperature and pressure. A similar process is followed when gases are dissolved in liquid solvents.

Saturated and Unsaturated Solutions

Such a solution in which no more solute can be dissolved at the same temperature and pressure is called a saturated solution. An unsaturated solution is one in which more solute can be dissolved at the same temperature.

The solution which is in dynamic equilibrium with undissolved solute is the saturated solution, and it contains the maximum amount of solute dissolved in a given amount of solvent. Thus, the concentration of solute in such a solution is its solubility. This is the link between the two ideas: solubility is nothing but the concentration of a saturated solution.

NoteDefinition

A saturated solution is one in which no more solute can be dissolved at the given temperature and pressure; it is in dynamic equilibrium with the undissolved solute. An unsaturated solution is one in which more solute can still be dissolved at the same temperature.

Q. A saturated solution of sugar is left standing with some undissolved sugar at the bottom. Is anything happening at all?

A. Yes — a great deal. Sugar molecules are constantly leaving the solid and entering the solution, and other sugar molecules are constantly leaving the solution and crystallising back onto the solid. Because the two rates are exactly equal, the amount of solid and the concentration of the solution both stay fixed. Equilibrium means “no net change”, not “no change”.

Earlier we have observed that the solubility of one substance in another depends on the nature of the substances. In addition to these variables, two other parameters, i.e., temperature and pressure, also control this phenomenon.

Effect of Temperature

The solubility of a solid in a liquid is significantly affected by temperature changes. Consider the equilibrium represented by equation (1.10). This, being a dynamic equilibrium, must follow Le Chatelier’s Principle, which you met in Class 11: if a system at equilibrium is disturbed, the equilibrium shifts in the direction that opposes the disturbance. Raising the temperature is a disturbance that the system opposes by favouring whichever direction absorbs heat.

In general, if in a nearly saturated solution the dissolution process is endothermic (\(\Delta_{\text{sol}} H > 0\)), the solubility should increase with rise in temperature; and if it is exothermic (\(\Delta_{\text{sol}} H < 0\)), the solubility should decrease. These trends are also observed experimentally.

NotePrinciple / Law

Le Chatelier’s principle (applied to dissolution): for a nearly saturated solution in dynamic equilibrium with undissolved solute, raising the temperature increases the solubility if dissolution is endothermic (\(\Delta_{\text{sol}} H > 0\)) and decreases it if dissolution is exothermic (\(\Delta_{\text{sol}} H < 0\)).

enthalpy of solution, \(\Delta_{\text{sol}} H\) (SI unit: J mol\(^{-1}\), commonly quoted in kJ mol\(^{-1}\); sign convention — \(\Delta_{\text{sol}} H\) positive means heat is absorbed when the solute dissolves, so the solution cools down and warming it will dissolve more; \(\Delta_{\text{sol}} H\) negative means heat is released, so the solution warms up and heating it will dissolve less.)

Effect of Pressure

Pressure does not have any significant effect on the solubility of solids in liquids. It is so because solids and liquids are highly incompressible and practically remain unaffected by changes in pressure. Squeezing a beaker of salt solution harder does not push the solid particles any closer together, because there is essentially no free space to squeeze out.

Gases, however, are a completely different matter — and that is where we turn next.

1.3.2 Solubility of a Gas in a Liquid

Many gases dissolve in water. Oxygen dissolves only to a small extent in water. It is this dissolved oxygen which sustains all aquatic life — every fish in a river is breathing oxygen that was once in the air above it. On the other hand, hydrogen chloride gas (HCl) is highly soluble in water.

Solubility of gases in liquids is greatly affected by pressure and temperature. The solubility of gases increases with increase of pressure.

Why Pressure Increases Gas Solubility

For a solution of a gas in a solvent, consider a system as shown in Fig. 1.1 (a). The lower part is solution and the upper part is the gaseous system at pressure \(p\) and temperature \(T\). Assume this system to be in a state of dynamic equilibrium, i.e., under these conditions the rate of gaseous particles entering and leaving the solution phase is the same.

Fig. 1.1

Fig. 1.1 – Effect of pressure on the solubility of a gas.

Now increase the pressure over the solution phase by compressing the gas to a smaller volume [Fig. 1.1 (b)]. This will increase the number of gaseous particles per unit volume over the solution, and also the rate at which the gaseous particles are striking the surface of the solution to enter it. Since more particles are entering the liquid than are leaving it, the solubility of the gas will increase until a new equilibrium is reached — resulting in an increase in the pressure of a gas above the solution, and thus its solubility increases.

Q2. A sealed bottle of soda looks perfectly calm, but bubbles rush out the moment you open the cap. What has actually changed inside the bottle?

A. The pressure of carbon dioxide above the liquid. The bottle is sealed under a high pressure of \(\mathrm{CO_2}\), and at that high pressure a large amount of \(\mathrm{CO_2}\) can stay dissolved in the liquid. Opening the cap suddenly drops the pressure of the gas above the liquid to atmospheric pressure. The dissolved gas is now far above the amount that this lower pressure can hold in solution, so the excess escapes — and it escapes as the bubbles you see and hear.

Henry’s Law

Henry was the first to give a quantitative relation between pressure and the solubility of a gas in a solvent, which is known as Henry’s law. The law states that at a constant temperature, the solubility of a gas in a liquid is directly proportional to the partial pressure of the gas present above the surface of the liquid or solution.

Dalton, a contemporary of Henry, also concluded independently that the solubility of a gas in a liquid solution is a function of the partial pressure of the gas.

If we use the mole fraction of a gas in the solution as a measure of its solubility, then it can be said that the mole fraction of gas in the solution is proportional to the partial pressure of the gas over the solution. The most commonly used form of Henry’s law states that “the partial pressure of the gas in vapour phase (\(p\)) is proportional to the mole fraction of the gas (\(x\)) in the solution” and is expressed as:

\[p = K_{\mathrm{H}}\,x \qquad (1.11)\]

Here \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) is the Henry’s law constant.

NotePrinciple / Law

Henry’s law: at a constant temperature, the solubility of a gas in a liquid is directly proportional to the partial pressure of that gas above the surface of the liquid. In its most used form, \(p = K_{\mathrm{H}}\,x\), where \(p\) is the partial pressure of the gas in the vapour phase and \(x\) is its mole fraction in the solution.

William Henry worked in Manchester in the early nineteenth century and announced this relationship in the first years of the 1800s. He was a close associate of John Dalton, who was working in the same city on the behaviour of gas mixtures and on partial pressures. The two ideas fit together neatly: Dalton’s law tells you the partial pressure of each gas in a mixture, and Henry’s law then tells you how much of each of those gases will dissolve. That is precisely why we can talk, later in this section, about oxygen and nitrogen dissolving separately from the same sample of air.

If we draw a graph between the partial pressure of the gas versus the mole fraction of the gas in solution, then we should get a plot of the type shown in Fig. 1.2 — a straight line through the origin, whose slope is \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\).

Fig. 1.2

Fig. 1.2 – Solubility of HCl gas in cyclohexane at 293 K.

the straight-line plot of \(p\) against \(x\) for HCl in cyclohexane in Fig. 1.2 (Read the graph in Fig. 1.2 and answer: (i) What does the fact that the line passes through the origin tell you physically? (ii) If a second gas were plotted on the same axes and gave a steeper line, would that gas be more soluble or less soluble in cyclohexane at the same pressure? Give your reasoning. (iii) Estimate \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) from the graph, in torr.)

Different gases have different \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) values at the same temperature (Table 1.2). This suggests that \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) is a function of the nature of the gas.

It is obvious from equation (1.11) that the higher the value of \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) at a given pressure, the lower is the solubility of the gas in the liquid. Read equation (1.11) as \(x = p/K_{\mathrm{H}}\) and this becomes plain — with \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) in the denominator, a large \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) means a small mole fraction, that is, a poorly soluble gas.

Henry’s law constant, \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) (Unit: same as pressure — bar, kbar, Pa or mm Hg, because mole fraction \(x\) has no unit. Meaning of its size: \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) is inversely related to solubility — a large \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) means the gas dissolves poorly. Its value depends on both the nature of the gas and the temperature, so a \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) value is meaningless unless the temperature is stated.)

Table 1.2: Values of Henry’s Law Constant for Some Selected Gases in Water

Gas Temperature/K \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\)/kbar Gas Temperature/K \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\)/kbar
He 293 144.97 Argon 298 40.3
\(\mathrm{H_2}\) 293 69.16 \(\mathrm{CO_2}\) 298 1.67
\(\mathrm{N_2}\) 293 76.48 Formaldehyde 298 \(1.83\times10^{-5}\)
\(\mathrm{N_2}\) 303 88.84 Methane 298 0.413
\(\mathrm{O_2}\) 293 34.86 Vinyl chloride 298 0.611
\(\mathrm{O_2}\) 303 46.82

It can be seen from Table 1.2 that \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) values for both \(\mathrm{N_2}\) and \(\mathrm{O_2}\) increase with increase of temperature, indicating that the solubility of gases increases with decrease of temperature. It is due to this reason that aquatic species are more comfortable in cold waters rather than in warm waters.

solubility of a gas in a liquid (with increasing pressure ↑: solubility increases, because more gas particles per unit volume strike and enter the liquid surface — this is Henry’s law; with increasing temperature ↑: solubility decreases, because dissolution of a gas is exothermic and, by Le Chatelier’s principle, heating shifts the equilibrium back towards the free gas; across different gases at the same temperature: the larger the \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\), the lower the solubility — compare \(\mathrm{CO_2}\), \(K_{\mathrm{H}} = 1.67\) kbar, which dissolves readily, with He, \(K_{\mathrm{H}} = 144.97\) kbar, which barely dissolves at all.)

If \(\mathrm{N_2}\) gas is bubbled through water at 293 K, how many millimoles of \(\mathrm{N_2}\) gas would dissolve in 1 litre of water? Assume that \(\mathrm{N_2}\) exerts a partial pressure of 0.987 bar. Given that Henry’s law constant for \(\mathrm{N_2}\) at 293 K is 76.48 kbar.

The solubility of the gas is related to the mole fraction in aqueous solution. The mole fraction of the gas in the solution is calculated by applying Henry’s law. Note that 76.48 kbar must first be written as 76,480 bar so that it has the same unit as the partial pressure. Thus:

\[x\ (\text{Nitrogen}) = \frac{p\ (\text{nitrogen})}{K_{\mathrm{H}}} = \frac{0.987\ \text{bar}}{76{,}480\ \text{bar}} = 1.29 \times 10^{-5}\]

As 1 litre of water contains 55.5 mol of it, therefore if \(n\) represents the number of moles of \(\mathrm{N_2}\) in solution,

\[x\ (\text{Nitrogen}) = \frac{n\ \text{mol}}{n\ \text{mol} + 55.5\ \text{mol}} = \frac{n}{55.5} = 1.29 \times 10^{-5}\]

(\(n\) in the denominator is neglected as it is \(<<\) 55.5 — the dissolved nitrogen is so little that it hardly adds to the total number of moles.)

Thus \(n = 1.29 \times 10^{-5} \times 55.5\ \text{mol} = 7.16 \times 10^{-4}\ \text{mol}\)

\[= \frac{7.16\times10^{-4}\ \text{mol} \times 1000\ \text{mmol}}{1\ \text{mol}} = 0.716\ \text{mmol}\]

Air contains oxygen at a partial pressure of about 0.21 bar at sea level. Using \(K_{\mathrm{H}} = 34.86\) kbar for \(\mathrm{O_2}\) in water at 293 K (Table 1.2), estimate the mass of oxygen dissolved in 1 litre of water in equilibrium with air at 293 K. (1 litre of water contains 55.5 mol of water; molar mass of \(\mathrm{O_2}\) = 32 g mol\(^{-1}\).)

Step 1 — Get the mole fraction from Henry’s law. Convert \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) into bar: 34.86 kbar = 34,860 bar.

\[x(\mathrm{O_2}) = \frac{p(\mathrm{O_2})}{K_{\mathrm{H}}} = \frac{0.21\ \text{bar}}{34{,}860\ \text{bar}} = 6.02 \times 10^{-6}\]

Step 2 — Convert the mole fraction into moles of \(\mathrm{O_2}\). As in Example 1.6, the dissolved gas is far too little to affect the total, so

\[n(\mathrm{O_2}) = x(\mathrm{O_2}) \times 55.5\ \text{mol} = 6.02 \times 10^{-6} \times 55.5 = 3.34 \times 10^{-4}\ \text{mol}\]

Step 3 — Convert moles into mass.

\[\text{mass} = 3.34 \times 10^{-4}\ \text{mol} \times 32\ \text{g mol}^{-1} = 1.07 \times 10^{-2}\ \text{g} \approx 10.7\ \text{mg}\]

So roughly 10 mg of oxygen is dissolved in every litre of surface water — about ten parts per million. That tiny quantity is the entire oxygen budget of a river, and it explains why a fall in dissolved oxygen of even a few milligrams per litre is enough to kill fish.

Henry’s Law in Industry and in the Body

Henry’s law finds several applications in industry and explains some biological phenomena. Notable among these are:

  • To increase the solubility of \(\mathrm{CO_2}\) in soft drinks and soda water, the bottle is sealed under high pressure. A higher partial pressure of \(\mathrm{CO_2}\) above the liquid forces more of it into solution, exactly as equation (1.11) predicts.

  • Scuba divers must cope with high concentrations of dissolved gases while breathing air at high pressure underwater. Increased pressure increases the solubility of atmospheric gases in blood. When the divers come towards the surface, the pressure gradually decreases. This releases the dissolved gases and leads to the formation of bubbles of nitrogen in the blood. This blocks capillaries and creates a medical condition known as bends, which are painful and dangerous to life.

  • To avoid bends, as well as the toxic effects of high concentrations of nitrogen in the blood, the tanks used by scuba divers are filled with air diluted with helium (11.7% helium, 56.2% nitrogen and 32.1% oxygen). Look up helium in Table 1.2: its \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) of 144.97 kbar is the largest in the table, which is precisely why it is chosen — it is the gas least willing to dissolve in blood in the first place.

  • At high altitudes the partial pressure of oxygen is less than that at the ground level. This leads to low concentrations of oxygen in the blood and tissues of people living at high altitudes or of climbers. Low blood oxygen causes climbers to become weak and unable to think clearly, symptoms of a condition known as anoxia.

The sequence of events that produces the bends is worth fixing in order, as set out in FC 1.2, because the same chain of reasoning — pressure changes, so solubility changes, so dissolved gas must go somewhere — is the key to every Henry’s law application.

Flowchart

FC 1.2 – Why divers get the bends: diver descends → pressure of breathing air rises → partial pressure of N₂ in lungs rises → (Henry’s law) solubility of N₂ in blood rises → extra N₂ dissolves in blood → diver ascends rapidly → pressure falls sharply → blood now holds more N₂ than it can → excess N₂ comes out as bubbles → bubbles block capillaries → bends. Branch: slow, staged ascent → dissolved N₂ is released gradually through the lungs → no bubbles.

(question only — no solution)

The Henry’s law constant for methane in water at 298 K is 0.413 kbar (Table 1.2). Calculate the mole fraction of methane dissolved in water when the partial pressure of methane above the water is 2.0 bar at 298 K.

Effect of Temperature

The solubility of gases in liquids decreases with rise in temperature. Why should this be so? When dissolved, the gas molecules are present in the liquid phase, and the process of dissolution can be considered similar to condensation — the gas is being “captured” into the liquid — and heat is evolved in this process.

We have learnt in the last Section that the dissolution process involves dynamic equilibrium and thus must follow Le Chatelier’s Principle. As dissolution is an exothermic process, the solubility should decrease with increase of temperature. Heating supplies the very energy that the dissolved molecules need to escape back into the gas phase.

This single fact — warm water holds less dissolved gas — sits at the heart of a serious environmental problem called thermal pollution. Power stations and many factories draw in river water as a coolant and return it several degrees warmer. The warmed water holds less dissolved oxygen than it did before, and at the same time the fish living in it become more active and need more oxygen. The two effects work in the same unfortunate direction, and stretches of river downstream of a large outfall can lose their fish life altogether. Modern plants are therefore required to use cooling towers or holding ponds so that the water is returned close to the temperature at which it was taken, which is a good example of a chemical principle written directly into environmental regulation.

(question only — no solution)

A bottle of soda water is left in a warm car through the afternoon and then opened. Predict, with reasons based on Henry’s law and Le Chatelier’s principle, whether it will fizz more violently or less violently than an identical bottle taken straight from a refrigerator.

1.6 \(\mathrm{H_2S}\), a toxic gas with a rotten-egg-like smell, is used for qualitative analysis. If the solubility of \(\mathrm{H_2S}\) in water at STP is 0.195 m, calculate Henry’s law constant.

1.7 Henry’s law constant for \(\mathrm{CO_2}\) in water is \(1.67\times10^{8}\) Pa at 298 K. Calculate the quantity of \(\mathrm{CO_2}\) in 500 mL of soda water when packed under 2.5 atm \(\mathrm{CO_2}\) pressure at 298 K.

1.4 Vapour Pressure of Liquid Solutions

Liquid solutions are formed when the solvent is a liquid. The solute can be a gas, a liquid or a solid. Solutions of gases in liquids have already been discussed in Section 1.3.2. In this Section, we shall discuss the solutions of liquids and solids in a liquid.

Such solutions may contain one or more volatile components. A volatile substance is simply one that evaporates easily — its molecules escape from the liquid surface into the space above readily at ordinary temperatures. Generally, the liquid solvent is volatile. The solute may or may not be volatile: ethanol dissolved in water is volatile, while sugar dissolved in water is not.

We shall discuss the properties of only binary solutions, that is, the solutions containing two components, namely, the solutions of (i) liquids in liquids and (ii) solids in liquids.

The word “volatile” comes from the Latin volare, meaning “to fly”. A volatile liquid is literally one whose molecules fly away from the surface. The whole of this section is about a single question: how much flying away happens, and what changes it.

1.4.1 Vapour Pressure of Liquid-Liquid Solutions

Let us consider a binary solution of two volatile liquids and denote the two components as 1 and 2. When taken in a closed vessel, both the components would evaporate, and eventually an equilibrium would be established between the vapour phase and the liquid phase — molecules leaving the liquid surface and molecules returning to it at the same rate.

Let the total vapour pressure at this stage be \(p_{\text{total}}\), and let \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) be the partial vapour pressures of the two components 1 and 2 respectively. These partial pressures are related to the mole fractions \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) of the two components 1 and 2 respectively.

The reason for this relation is easy to picture. Only the molecules sitting at the surface can escape. If component 1 makes up a larger fraction of the molecules in the liquid, it occupies a larger fraction of the surface, so a larger fraction of the escaping molecules are of component 1 — and its contribution to the vapour pressure rises in proportion.

Raoult’s Law for Volatile Liquids

The French chemist, Francois Marte Raoult (1886) gave the quantitative relationship between them. The relationship is known as the Raoult’s law, which states that for a solution of volatile liquids, the partial vapour pressure of each component of the solution is directly proportional to its mole fraction present in solution.

Thus, for component 1

\[p_1 \propto x_1\]

and

\[p_1 = p_1^{0}\,x_1 \qquad (1.12)\]

where \(p_1^{0}\) is the vapour pressure of pure component 1 at the same temperature.

Similarly, for component 2

\[p_2 = p_2^{0}\,x_2 \qquad (1.13)\]

where \(p_2^{0}\) represents the vapour pressure of the pure component 2.

NotePrinciple / Law

Raoult’s law (for a solution of volatile liquids): at a given temperature, the partial vapour pressure of each component of the solution is directly proportional to its mole fraction in the solution. For component 1, \(p_1 = p_1^{0} x_1\), where \(p_1^{0}\) is the vapour pressure of the pure component 1 at that temperature.

Note carefully what \(p_1^{0}\) means. It is not an arbitrary constant: it is the vapour pressure the component would have if it were present pure, i.e. when \(x_1 = 1\). Raoult’s law therefore says that a component in solution exerts only that fraction of its pure vapour pressure which corresponds to its share of the molecules.

Adding the Two Partial Pressures

According to Dalton’s law of partial pressures, the total pressure (\(p_{\text{total}}\)) over the solution phase in the container will be the sum of the partial pressures of the components of the solution and is given as:

\[p_{\text{total}} = p_1 + p_2 \qquad (1.14)\]

NotePrinciple / Law

Dalton’s law of partial pressures: in a mixture of gases (or vapours) that do not react, the total pressure is the sum of the partial pressures that each gas would exert if it alone occupied the container.

Substituting the values of \(p_1\) and \(p_2\), we get

\[p_{\text{total}} = x_1 p_1^{0} + x_2 p_2^{0}\]

\[= (1 - x_2)\,p_1^{0} + x_2 p_2^{0} \qquad (1.15)\]

\[= p_1^{0} + (p_2^{0} - p_1^{0})\,x_2 \qquad (1.16)\]

The step from (1.15) to (1.16) is only algebra — expand the bracket and collect the terms in \(x_2\) — but it is worth doing carefully, because it puts the equation into the form \(y = c + mx\): a straight line with intercept \(p_1^{0}\) and slope \((p_2^{0} - p_1^{0})\). Here we have used \(x_1 = 1 - x_2\), which is simply equation (1.7) for a binary solution.

The following conclusions can be drawn from equation (1.16).

  1. Total vapour pressure over the solution can be related to the mole fraction of any one component.

  2. Total vapour pressure over the solution varies linearly with the mole fraction of component 2.

  3. Depending on the vapour pressures of the pure components 1 and 2, total vapour pressure over the solution decreases or increases with the increase of the mole fraction of component 1.

A plot of \(p_1\) or \(p_2\) versus the mole fractions \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) for a solution gives a linear plot as shown in Fig. 1.3.

Fig. 1.3

Fig. 1.3 – Vapour pressure of an ideal solution.

These lines (I and II) pass through the points for which \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are equal to unity — that is, each partial-pressure line ends at the vapour pressure of that pure component. Similarly the plot (line III) of \(p_{\text{total}}\) versus \(x_2\) is also linear (Fig. 1.3). The minimum value of \(p_{\text{total}}\) is \(p_1^{0}\) and the maximum value is \(p_2^{0}\), assuming that component 1 is less volatile than component 2, i.e., \(p_1^{0} < p_2^{0}\).

the three straight lines in Fig. 1.3 (Study Fig. 1.3 and answer without calculating: (i) Which line tells you the vapour pressure of pure component 1, and at what value of \(x_1\) do you read it? (ii) Why does line III have to lie above both line I and line II everywhere except at the two ends? (iii) If a third liquid were added whose \(p^{0}\) was between \(p_1^{0}\) and \(p_2^{0}\), would the total pressure line become steeper or flatter? Justify from equation (1.16).)

Composition of the Vapour Phase

The composition of the vapour phase in equilibrium with the solution is determined by the partial pressures of the components. If \(y_1\) and \(y_2\) are the mole fractions of the components 1 and 2 respectively in the vapour phase, then, using Dalton’s law of partial pressures:

\[p_1 = y_1\,p_{\text{total}} \qquad (1.17)\]

\[p_2 = y_2\,p_{\text{total}} \qquad (1.18)\]

In general

\[p_i = y_i\,p_{\text{total}} \qquad (1.19)\]

Keep the two symbols apart: \(x\) always refers to composition in the liquid, and \(y\) always refers to composition in the vapour. They are not equal, and the difference between them is the whole basis of distillation.

Q. Why is the vapour above a solution always richer in the more volatile component?

A. Because the more volatile component has the larger \(p^{0}\), so for the same mole fraction in the liquid it contributes a larger partial pressure. And since \(y_i = p_i/p_{\text{total}}\), a larger partial pressure means a larger mole fraction in the vapour. In short: the molecules that escape most easily are over-represented in the space above the liquid.

Vapour pressure of chloroform (\(\mathrm{CHCl_3}\)) and dichloromethane (\(\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}\)) at 298 K are 200 mm Hg and 415 mm Hg respectively. (i) Calculate the vapour pressure of the solution prepared by mixing 25.5 g of \(\mathrm{CHCl_3}\) and 40 g of \(\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}\) at 298 K and, (ii) mole fractions of each component in vapour phase.

  1. Molar mass of \(\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}\) = 12 × 1 + 1 × 2 + 35.5 × 2 = 85 g mol\(^{-1}\)

Molar mass of \(\mathrm{CHCl_3}\) = 12 × 1 + 1 × 1 + 35.5 × 3 = 119.5 g mol\(^{-1}\)

\[\text{Moles of } \mathrm{CH_2Cl_2} = \frac{40\ \text{g}}{85\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 0.47\ \text{mol}\]

\[\text{Moles of } \mathrm{CHCl_3} = \frac{25.5\ \text{g}}{119.5\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 0.213\ \text{mol}\]

Total number of moles = 0.47 + 0.213 = 0.683 mol

\[x_{\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}} = \frac{0.47\ \text{mol}}{0.683\ \text{mol}} = 0.688\]

\[x_{\mathrm{CHCl_3}} = 1.00 - 0.688 = 0.312\]

Using equation (1.16), with chloroform as component 1 (the less volatile one) and dichloromethane as component 2,

\[p_{\text{total}} = p_1^{0} + (p_2^{0} - p_1^{0})\,x_2 = 200 + (415 - 200) \times 0.688\]

\[= 200 + 147.9 = 347.9\ \text{mm Hg}\]

  1. Using the relation (1.19), \(y_i = p_i/p_{\text{total}}\), we can calculate the mole fraction of the components in the gas phase (\(y_i\)).

\[p_{\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}} = 0.688 \times 415\ \text{mm Hg} = 285.5\ \text{mm Hg}\]

\[p_{\mathrm{CHCl_3}} = 0.312 \times 200\ \text{mm Hg} = 62.4\ \text{mm Hg}\]

\[y_{\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}} = 285.5\ \text{mm Hg}/347.9\ \text{mm Hg} = 0.82\]

\[y_{\mathrm{CHCl_3}} = 62.4\ \text{mm Hg}/347.9\ \text{mm Hg} = 0.18\]

Note: Since \(\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}\) is a more volatile component than \(\mathrm{CHCl_3}\) [\(p^{0}_{\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}}\) = 415 mm Hg and \(p^{0}_{\mathrm{CHCl_3}}\) = 200 mm Hg] and the vapour phase is also richer in \(\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}\) [\(y_{\mathrm{CH_2Cl_2}}\) = 0.82 and \(y_{\mathrm{CHCl_3}}\) = 0.18], it may thus be concluded that at equilibrium, the vapour phase will always be rich in the component which is more volatile.

Two volatile liquids A and B form an ideal solution. At 300 K, the vapour pressures of the pure liquids are \(p_A^{0} = 100\) mm Hg and \(p_B^{0} = 200\) mm Hg. A solution is made in which the mole fraction of A in the liquid is 0.40. Calculate (i) the total vapour pressure of the solution and (ii) the mole fraction of A in the vapour phase.

(i) Total vapour pressure. Since the solution is ideal, Raoult’s law applies to both components. First, \(x_B = 1 - x_A = 1 - 0.40 = 0.60\).

\[p_A = p_A^{0}\,x_A = 100 \times 0.40 = 40\ \text{mm Hg}\]

\[p_B = p_B^{0}\,x_B = 200 \times 0.60 = 120\ \text{mm Hg}\]

By Dalton’s law (equation 1.14),

\[p_{\text{total}} = p_A + p_B = 40 + 120 = 160\ \text{mm Hg}\]

(ii) Mole fraction of A in the vapour. Using equation (1.19),

\[y_A = \frac{p_A}{p_{\text{total}}} = \frac{40}{160} = 0.25\]

Compare the two numbers for A: its mole fraction in the liquid is 0.40, but in the vapour it is only 0.25. A is the less volatile liquid here, so the vapour is poorer in A and correspondingly richer in B (\(y_B = 0.75\)) — exactly the conclusion drawn in Example 1.8.

(question only — no solution)

At a certain temperature, the vapour pressures of pure liquids X and Y are 120 mm Hg and 60 mm Hg respectively. They form an ideal solution. If 2 mol of X are mixed with 3 mol of Y, calculate the total vapour pressure of the solution and the mole fraction of Y in the vapour phase.

Every petroleum refinery you have seen photographs of is Raoult’s law and equation (1.19) working at industrial scale. Crude oil is a mixture of many volatile hydrocarbons with different \(p^{0}\) values. When it is heated, the vapour that rises is richer in the lighter, more volatile hydrocarbons; that vapour is condensed and re-vaporised many times over as it climbs a tall fractionating column, and each cycle enriches it a little further. The lightest fractions (used in petrol) come off near the top of the column and the heaviest (bitumen) stay at the bottom. The same principle, at laboratory scale, is what a fractional distillation set-up does when you separate two miscible liquids in a practical exam.

1.4.2 Raoult’s Law as a Special Case of Henry’s Law

According to Raoult’s law, the vapour pressure of a volatile component in a given solution is given by \(p_i = x_i\,p_i^{0}\).

In the solution of a gas in a liquid, one of the components is so volatile that it exists as a gas, and we have already seen that its solubility is given by Henry’s law, which states that

\[p = K_{\mathrm{H}}\,x.\]

If we compare the equations for Raoult’s law and Henry’s law, it can be seen that in both cases the partial pressure of the volatile component or gas is directly proportional to its mole fraction in solution. The two equations have exactly the same shape — a pressure equal to a constant times a mole fraction. Only the proportionality constant \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) differs from \(p_1^{0}\).

Thus, Raoult’s law becomes a special case of Henry’s law, in which \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) becomes equal to \(p_1^{0}\).

Raoult’s law vs Henry’s law

Feature Raoult’s law Henry’s law
Equation \(p_i = x_i\,p_i^{0}\) \(p = K_{\mathrm{H}}\,x\)
Applies to Any volatile component of a solution A gas dissolved in a liquid
Meaning of the constant \(p_i^{0}\) = vapour pressure of the pure component at that temperature \(K_{\mathrm{H}}\) = Henry’s law constant, depending on the gas and the temperature
Relationship between the two A special case of Henry’s law, obtained when \(K_{\mathrm{H}} = p_1^{0}\) The more general statement
What a large constant means The component is highly volatile The gas is poorly soluble

1.4.3 Vapour Pressure of Solutions of Solids in Liquids

Another important class of solutions consists of solids dissolved in liquid — for example, sodium chloride, glucose, urea and cane sugar in water, and iodine and sulphur dissolved in carbon disulphide. Some physical properties of these solutions are quite different from those of pure solvents. Take vapour pressure, for instance.

Liquids at a given temperature vapourise, and under equilibrium conditions the pressure exerted by the vapours of the liquid over the liquid phase is called vapour pressure [Fig. 1.4 (a)].

NoteDefinition

Vapour pressure is the pressure exerted by the vapour of a liquid over the liquid surface when the vapour and the liquid are in equilibrium at a given temperature.

Fig. 1.4

Fig. 1.4 – Lowering of vapour pressure by a non-volatile solute.

Why a Non-Volatile Solute Lowers Vapour Pressure

In a pure liquid the entire surface is occupied by the molecules of the liquid. If a non-volatile solute is added to a solvent to give a solution [Fig. 1.4 (b)], the vapour pressure of the solution is solely from the solvent alone — the solute, being non-volatile, contributes nothing to the vapour.

This vapour pressure of the solution at a given temperature is found to be lower than the vapour pressure of the pure solvent at the same temperature. In the solution, the surface has both solute and solvent molecules; thereby the fraction of the surface covered by the solvent molecules gets reduced. Consequently, the number of solvent molecules escaping from the surface is correspondingly reduced, and thus the vapour pressure is also reduced.

The decrease in the vapour pressure of solvent depends on the quantity of non-volatile solute present in the solution, irrespective of its nature. It is a matter of counting particles, not of identifying them. For example, the decrease in the vapour pressure of water produced by adding 1.0 mol of sucrose to one kg of water is nearly similar to that produced by adding 1.0 mol of urea to the same quantity of water at the same temperature — even though sucrose and urea are completely different substances.

This “counting, not identifying” idea is the seed of the whole of Section 1.6, where such properties are given the name colligative properties.

Raoult’s Law in Its General Form

Raoult’s law in its general form can be stated as: for any solution the partial vapour pressure of each volatile component in the solution is directly proportional to its mole fraction.

NotePrinciple / Law

Raoult’s law (general form): for any solution, the partial vapour pressure of each volatile component is directly proportional to its mole fraction in the solution.

In a binary solution, let us denote the solvent by 1 and the solute by 2. When the solute is non-volatile, only the solvent molecules are present in the vapour phase and contribute to the vapour pressure.

Let \(p_1\) be the vapour pressure of the solvent, \(x_1\) be its mole fraction, and \(p_1^{0}\) be its vapour pressure in the pure state. Then according to Raoult’s law

\[p_1 \propto x_1\]

and

\[p_1 = x_1\,p_1^{0} \qquad (1.20)\]

The proportionality constant is equal to the vapour pressure of the pure solvent, \(p_1^{0}\). A plot between the vapour pressure and the mole fraction of the solvent is linear, as shown in Fig. 1.5: it runs from zero (when there is no solvent at all) up to \(p_1^{0}\) (when the solvent is pure, \(x_1 = 1\)).

Fig. 1.5

Fig. 1.5 – Vapour pressure versus mole fraction of solvent.

(question only — no solution)

The vapour pressure of pure water at a certain temperature is 25.0 mm Hg. A solution is prepared by dissolving 0.1 mol of a non-volatile, non-electrolyte solute in 1.9 mol of water. Using equation (1.20), calculate the vapour pressure of the solution at that temperature.

1.5 Ideal and Non-ideal Solutions

Liquid-liquid solutions can be classified into ideal and non-ideal solutions on the basis of Raoult’s law. The test is simple: does the solution actually behave the way equation (1.16) says it should, at every composition — or does it wander away from that prediction?

1.5.1 Ideal Solutions

The solutions which obey Raoult’s law over the entire range of concentration are known as ideal solutions. The words “entire range” matter. A solution that happens to fit Raoult’s law when it is very dilute but drifts away when it is concentrated is not an ideal solution.

The ideal solutions have two other important properties. The enthalpy of mixing of the pure components to form the solution is zero, and the volume of mixing is also zero, i.e.,

\[\Delta_{\text{mix}}H = 0, \qquad \Delta_{\text{mix}}V = 0 \qquad (1.21)\]

It means that no heat is absorbed or evolved when the components are mixed — the mixture neither warms up nor cools down. Also, the volume of the solution would be equal to the sum of the volumes of the two components: mix 50 mL with 50 mL and you get exactly 100 mL, with no shrinking or swelling.

NoteDefinition

An ideal solution is one which obeys Raoult’s law over the entire range of concentration, and for which \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H = 0\) and \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}V = 0\).

The Molecular Picture

At the molecular level, ideal behaviour of solutions can be explained by considering two components A and B. In the pure components, the intermolecular attractive interactions will be of types A-A and B-B. In the binary solution, in addition to these two interactions, A-B type interactions will also be present.

If the intermolecular attractive forces between the A-A and B-B are nearly equal to those between A-B, this leads to the formation of an ideal solution. In such a mixture, a molecule of A is held in the solution just as firmly as it was held in pure A, so it escapes into the vapour just as easily as before, and Raoult’s law is obeyed exactly.

This also explains the two zeros in equation (1.21). Breaking A-A and B-B contacts costs energy; forming A-B contacts releases energy. If the three kinds of interaction are of equal strength, the cost and the gain cancel, so no heat is absorbed or released and \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H = 0\). Since the molecules are packing together with the same forces as before, the total volume also stays unchanged, so \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}V = 0\).

A perfectly ideal solution is rare, but some solutions are nearly ideal in behaviour. Solutions of n-hexane and n-heptane, bromoethane and chloroethane, benzene and toluene, etc., fall into this category. Notice what these pairs have in common: in each pair the two molecules are chemically very similar, so A-B forces are naturally about the same as A-A and B-B forces.

enthalpy of mixing, \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H\) (SI unit: J mol\(^{-1}\), usually quoted in kJ mol\(^{-1}\); sign convention — \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H = 0\) for an ideal solution; \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H > 0\) means mixing absorbs heat, so the container feels cool, and this accompanies positive deviation; \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H < 0\) means mixing releases heat, so the container feels warm, and this accompanies negative deviation.)

1.5.2 Non-ideal Solutions

When a solution does not obey Raoult’s law over the entire range of concentration, then it is called a non-ideal solution. The vapour pressure of such a solution is either higher or lower than that predicted by Raoult’s law (equation 1.16).

If it is higher, the solution exhibits positive deviation, and if it is lower, it exhibits negative deviation from Raoult’s law. The plots of vapour pressure as a function of mole fractions for such solutions are shown in Fig. 1.6, where the dashed straight lines show what Raoult’s law would predict and the curved lines show what is actually measured.

Fig. 1.6

Fig. 1.6 – Deviations from Raoult’s law: (a) positive and (b) negative.

NoteDefinition

A non-ideal solution is one that does not obey Raoult’s law over the whole range of concentration. It shows positive deviation if its vapour pressure is higher than the value predicted by Raoult’s law, and negative deviation if it is lower.

Positive Deviation: Weaker A-B Forces

The cause for these deviations lies in the nature of interactions at the molecular level.

In the case of positive deviation from Raoult’s law, A-B interactions are weaker than those between A-A or B-B. That is, in this case the intermolecular attractive forces between the solute-solvent molecules are weaker than those between the solute-solute and solvent-solvent molecules.

This means that in such solutions, molecules of A (or B) will find it easier to escape than in the pure state. This will increase the vapour pressure and result in positive deviation.

Mixtures of ethanol and acetone behave in this manner. In pure ethanol, the molecules are hydrogen bonded to one another. On adding acetone, its molecules get in between the host molecules and break some of the hydrogen bonds between them. Due to the weakening of interactions, the solution shows positive deviation from Raoult’s law [Fig. 1.6 (a)].

In a solution formed by adding carbon disulphide to acetone, the dipolar interactions between solute-solvent molecules are weaker than the respective interactions among the solute-solute and solvent-solvent molecules. This solution also shows positive deviation.

Since escaping is now easier than it was in the pure liquids, the molecules must have been released from some attraction — and releasing molecules from attraction costs energy. That is why a solution showing positive deviation has \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H > 0\) (mixing is endothermic) and usually also \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}V > 0\) (the loosely held molecules take up slightly more room).

Negative Deviation: Stronger A-B Forces

In the case of negative deviations from Raoult’s law, the intermolecular attractive forces between A-A and B-B are weaker than those between A-B, and this leads to a decrease in vapour pressure, resulting in negative deviations.

An example of this type is a mixture of phenol and aniline. In this case the intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the phenolic proton and the lone pair on the nitrogen atom of aniline is stronger than the respective intermolecular hydrogen bonding between similar molecules.

Similarly, a mixture of chloroform and acetone forms a solution with negative deviation from Raoult’s law. This is because the chloroform molecule is able to form a hydrogen bond with the acetone molecule, as shown in Fig. 1.7 (c).

Fig. 1.7c

Fig. 1.7 (c) – Hydrogen bonding between acetone and chloroform.

This decreases the escaping tendency of molecules for each component, and consequently the vapour pressure decreases, resulting in negative deviation from Raoult’s law [Fig. 1.6 (b)]. Because a new, stronger attraction is being formed, energy is released on mixing: such solutions have \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H < 0\) (mixing is exothermic) and usually \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}V < 0\) (the molecules are pulled a little closer together).

Q. Two liquids are mixed and the beaker becomes noticeably warm. Will the mixture show positive or negative deviation from Raoult’s law?

A. Negative deviation. A warm beaker means heat has been released, so \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H < 0\). Heat is released when the new A-B attractions formed are stronger than the A-A and B-B attractions broken — and stronger A-B attraction is exactly what holds the molecules back from escaping, lowering the vapour pressure below the Raoult’s law value.

Ideal solution vs Positive deviation vs Negative deviation

Feature Ideal solution Positive deviation Negative deviation
Obeys Raoult’s law? Yes, at all concentrations No — observed vapour pressure is higher than predicted No — observed vapour pressure is lower than predicted
Relative strength of forces A–B ≈ A–A and B–B A–B weaker than A–A and B–B A–B stronger than A–A and B–B
\(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H\) Zero Positive (endothermic; mixture cools) Negative (exothermic; mixture warms)
\(\Delta_{\text{mix}}V\) Zero Positive Negative
Escaping tendency of molecules Same as in pure liquids Greater than in pure liquids Less than in pure liquids
Examples n-hexane + n-heptane; benzene + toluene; bromoethane + chloroethane ethanol + acetone; acetone + carbon disulphide phenol + aniline; chloroform + acetone
Azeotrope formed (for large deviation) None Minimum boiling azeotrope Maximum boiling azeotrope

the two vapour-pressure curves in Fig. 1.6 (a) and (b) (Look only at the curves in Fig. 1.6 and answer: (i) In which plot does \(p_{\text{total}}\) pass through a maximum, and in which through a minimum? (ii) A solution boils when its vapour pressure equals atmospheric pressure. Use that fact to decide which plot must correspond to a minimum boiling azeotrope and which to a maximum boiling one. (iii) At the composition where \(p_{\text{total}}\) reaches its maximum in plot (a), how do you expect the composition of the vapour to compare with that of the liquid?)

For each of the following pairs of liquids, predict whether the solution will show positive deviation, negative deviation, or nearly ideal behaviour, and give the reason in terms of intermolecular forces:

(a) benzene and toluene, (b) acetone and chloroform, (c) ethanol and acetone.

The single question to ask each time is: how does the strength of the new A-B interaction compare with the A-A and B-B interactions that existed in the pure liquids?

(a) Benzene and toluene. Both are non-polar aromatic hydrocarbons of very similar size and shape, held together only by dispersion forces. The benzene–toluene attraction is therefore about as strong as benzene–benzene and toluene–toluene. Forces are nearly equal → \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H \approx 0\) → nearly ideal solution, obeying Raoult’s law throughout.

(b) Acetone and chloroform. The C–H of chloroform is made acidic by the three electron-withdrawing chlorine atoms, and it forms a hydrogen bond with the lone pair on the carbonyl oxygen of acetone. This A-B hydrogen bond is stronger than the dipole–dipole forces within pure acetone or pure chloroform. Stronger A-B forces → molecules escape less easily → vapour pressure falls below the Raoult’s law value → negative deviation (and mixing is exothermic).

(c) Ethanol and acetone. Pure ethanol is extensively hydrogen bonded through its –OH groups. Acetone has no –OH, so when its molecules push in between the ethanol molecules they break up some of those hydrogen bonds without replacing them by anything as strong. Weaker A-B forces → molecules escape more easily → vapour pressure rises above the Raoult’s law value → positive deviation (and mixing is endothermic).

Azeotropes

Some liquids on mixing form azeotropes, which are binary mixtures having the same composition in liquid and vapour phase and boiling at a constant temperature.

This is a genuinely awkward situation for a chemist. Fractional distillation works only because the vapour is richer in one component than the liquid it came from (Section 1.4.1). At the azeotropic composition that difference vanishes: the vapour that boils off has exactly the same composition as the liquid left behind, so distilling it changes nothing. In such cases, it is not possible to separate the components by fractional distillation.

NoteDefinition

An azeotrope is a binary mixture having the same composition in the liquid and the vapour phase, which boils at a constant temperature and cannot be separated into its components by fractional distillation.

There are two types of azeotropes, called minimum boiling azeotrope and maximum boiling azeotrope.

The solutions which show a large positive deviation from Raoult’s law form a minimum boiling azeotrope at a specific composition. Their vapour pressure is abnormally high, so a lower temperature is enough to make that vapour pressure equal atmospheric pressure — hence the low boiling point.

For example, an ethanol-water mixture (obtained by fermentation of sugars) on fractional distillation gives a solution containing approximately 95% by volume of ethanol. Once this composition, known as the azeotrope composition, has been achieved, the liquid and vapour have the same composition, and no further separation occurs.

The solutions that show large negative deviation from Raoult’s law form a maximum boiling azeotrope at a specific composition. Here the vapour pressure is abnormally low, so the mixture must be heated to a higher temperature than either pure liquid before its vapour pressure reaches atmospheric pressure.

Nitric acid and water is an example of this class of azeotrope. This azeotrope has the approximate composition, 68% nitric acid and 32% water by mass, with a boiling point of 393.5 K.

The name “azeotrope” is built from Greek roots: a- meaning “not”, zeo meaning “to boil”, and tropos meaning “change” — together, “no change on boiling”. The word itself records the defining property: boil it as long as you like, and the composition will not change.

Q4. Alcohol produced by fermentation can be concentrated by distillation only up to about 95% ethanol, and no further. Why does distillation suddenly stop working?

A. Because ethanol and water show a large positive deviation from Raoult’s law and form a minimum boiling azeotrope at about 95% ethanol by volume. Distillation depends entirely on the vapour being richer in one component than the liquid. Up to 95%, the vapour is indeed richer in ethanol, so each cycle of boiling and condensing concentrates it further. But at the azeotropic composition, the vapour has exactly the same composition as the liquid — so boiling it and condensing it returns 95% ethanol again, no matter how many times you repeat the process. The distillation column has nothing left to work with. To go beyond 95%, chemists must abandon simple distillation and use another method altogether, such as removing the water with a drying agent.

The ethanol-water azeotrope is a daily problem for the fuel industry, because ethanol blended into petrol must be nearly water-free — any water present will separate out of the fuel and corrode the engine. Since distillation stalls at 95%, industry now dries the ethanol using molecular sieves: porous solids whose pores are wide enough to trap the small water molecules but too narrow to admit the larger ethanol molecules. The sieve is later regenerated by heating and used again. This has largely replaced the older practice of adding benzene to break the azeotrope, and it is a good example of green chemistry — a physical separation that reuses its material has replaced a process depending on a toxic, carcinogenic solvent.

(question only — no solution)

Arrange the following mixtures according to the sign of \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H\) (positive, zero or negative), and state in each case which type of azeotrope, if any, would form if the deviation were large: (i) n-hexane and n-heptane, (ii) carbon disulphide and acetone, (iii) phenol and aniline. Give one reason for each.

1.8 The vapour pressure of pure liquids A and B are 450 and 700 mm Hg respectively, at 350 K. Find out the composition of the liquid mixture if the total vapour pressure is 600 mm Hg. Also find the composition of the vapour phase.

1.6 Colligative Properties and Determination of Molar Mass

We have learnt in Section 1.4.3 that the vapour pressure of a solution decreases when a non-volatile solute is added to a volatile solvent. There are many properties of solutions which are connected with this decrease of vapour pressure. These are:

  1. relative lowering of vapour pressure of the solvent
  2. depression of freezing point of the solvent
  3. elevation of boiling point of the solvent
  4. osmotic pressure of the solution

All these properties depend on the number of solute particles irrespective of their nature relative to the total number of particles present in the solution. Such properties are called colligative properties (colligative: from Latin — co means together, ligare means to bind).

NoteDefinition

Colligative properties are those properties of a solution which depend only on the number of solute particles present, relative to the total number of particles in the solution, and not on the chemical nature of those particles.

This “count, don’t identify” idea is what makes the whole section powerful. If a property depends only on the number of dissolved particles, then measuring that property lets us count the particles — and once we can count particles in a weighed sample, we can find the molar mass of the solute. That is why the title of this section joins colligative properties to the determination of molar mass. In the following Sections we will discuss these properties one by one.

1.6.1 Relative Lowering of Vapour Pressure

We have learnt in Section 1.4.3 that the vapour pressure of a solvent in solution is less than that of the pure solvent. Raoult established that the lowering of vapour pressure depends only on the concentration of the solute particles and it is independent of their identity.

The equation (1.20) given in Section 1.4.3 establishes a relation between the vapour pressure of the solution, the mole fraction and the vapour pressure of the solvent, i.e.,

\[p_1 = x_1\,p_1^{0} \qquad (1.22)\]

The reduction in the vapour pressure of solvent (\(\Delta p_1\)) is given as:

\[\Delta p_1 = p_1^{0} - p_1 = p_1^{0} - p_1^{0}x_1\]

\[= p_1^{0}\,(1 - x_1) \qquad (1.23)\]

Knowing that \(x_2 = 1 - x_1\), equation (1.23) reduces to

\[\Delta p_1 = x_2\,p_1^{0} \qquad (1.24)\]

Read equation (1.24) slowly: the drop in vapour pressure is fixed by \(x_2\), the mole fraction of the solute — not by what the solute is.

In a solution containing several non-volatile solutes, the lowering of the vapour pressure depends on the sum of the mole fractions of the different solutes.

Equation (1.24) can be written as

\[\frac{\Delta p_1}{p_1^{0}} = \frac{p_1^{0} - p_1}{p_1^{0}} = x_2 \qquad (1.25)\]

The expression on the left hand side of the equation as mentioned earlier is called relative lowering of vapour pressure and is equal to the mole fraction of the solute.

NotePrinciple / Law

Raoult’s law (for a non-volatile solute): the relative lowering of vapour pressure of the solvent over a solution is equal to the mole fraction of the solute present in the solution.

The above equation can be written as:

\[\frac{p_1^{0} - p_1}{p_1^{0}} = \frac{n_2}{n_1 + n_2} \qquad \left(\text{since } x_2 = \frac{n_2}{n_1 + n_2}\right) \qquad (1.26)\]

Here \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the number of moles of solvent and solute respectively present in the solution.

For dilute solutions \(n_2 << n_1\), hence neglecting \(n_2\) in the denominator we have

\[\frac{p_1^{0} - p_1}{p_1^{0}} = \frac{n_2}{n_1} \qquad (1.27)\]

This approximation is allowed only because the solution is dilute: the few moles of solute make almost no difference to the total. It is the same approximation we used in Example 1.6 for a dissolved gas.

or

\[\frac{p_1^{0} - p_1}{p_1^{0}} = \frac{w_2 \times M_1}{M_2 \times w_1} \qquad (1.28)\]

Here \(w_1\) and \(w_2\) are the masses and \(M_1\) and \(M_2\) are the molar masses of the solvent and solute respectively. Equation (1.28) simply follows from (1.27) by writing each number of moles as mass divided by molar mass: \(n_2 = w_2/M_2\) and \(n_1 = w_1/M_1\).

From this equation (1.28), knowing all other quantities, the molar mass of solute (\(M_2\)) can be calculated. This is the first of our four molar-mass “weighing machines”.

The vapour pressure of pure benzene at a certain temperature is 0.850 bar. A non-volatile, non-electrolyte solid weighing 0.5 g when added to 39.0 g of benzene (molar mass 78 g mol\(^{-1}\)). Vapour pressure of the solution, then, is 0.845 bar. What is the molar mass of the solid substance?

The various quantities known to us are as follows:

\(p_1^{0}\) = 0.850 bar; \(p\) = 0.845 bar; \(M_1\) = 78 g mol\(^{-1}\); \(w_2\) = 0.5 g; \(w_1\) = 39 g

Substituting these values in equation (1.28), we get

\[\frac{0.850\ \text{bar} - 0.845\ \text{bar}}{0.850\ \text{bar}} = \frac{0.5\ \text{g} \times 78\ \text{g mol}^{-1}}{M_2 \times 39\ \text{g}}\]

Therefore, \(M_2 = 170\) g mol\(^{-1}\)

Q. The vapour pressure fell by only 0.005 bar. How can such a tiny change tell us anything reliable?

A. Because the relative lowering, not the absolute lowering, is what carries the information. Divided by \(p_1^{0}\), that small drop becomes 0.005/0.850 = 0.0059, which is the mole fraction of the solute — a perfectly usable number. This is also why the method needs very careful pressure measurement: a small error in \(\Delta p\) becomes a large error in \(M_2\).

1.6.2 Elevation of Boiling Point

The vapour pressure of a liquid increases with increase of temperature. It boils at the temperature at which its vapour pressure is equal to the atmospheric pressure. For example, water boils at 373.15 K (100 °C) because at this temperature the vapour pressure of water is 1.013 bar (1 atmosphere).

We have also learnt in the last section that the vapour pressure of the solvent decreases in the presence of a non-volatile solute. Fig. 1.8 depicts the variation of vapour pressure of the pure solvent and of the solution as a function of temperature — the curve for the solution lies below the curve for the pure solvent at every temperature.

Fig. 1.8

Fig. 1.8 – Elevation of boiling point.

For example, the vapour pressure of an aqueous solution of sucrose is less than 1.013 bar at 373.15 K. In order to make this solution boil, its vapour pressure must be increased to 1.013 bar by raising the temperature above the boiling temperature of the pure solvent (water).

Thus, the boiling point of a solution is always higher than that of the boiling point of the pure solvent in which the solution is prepared, as shown in Fig. 1.8.

Similar to the lowering of vapour pressure, the elevation of boiling point also depends on the number of solute molecules rather than their nature. A solution of 1 mol of sucrose in 1000 g of water boils at 373.52 K at one atmospheric pressure.

Let \(T_{\mathrm{b}}^{0}\) be the boiling point of pure solvent and \(T_{\mathrm{b}}\) be the boiling point of the solution. The increase in the boiling point \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}} = T_{\mathrm{b}} - T_{\mathrm{b}}^{0}\) is known as elevation of boiling point.

NoteDefinition

Elevation of boiling point (\(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}}\)) is the increase in the boiling point of a solvent caused by dissolving a non-volatile solute in it: \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}} = T_{\mathrm{b}} - T_{\mathrm{b}}^{0}\).

The Working Equation

Experiments have shown that for dilute solutions the elevation of boiling point (\(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}}\)) is directly proportional to the molal concentration of the solute in a solution. Thus

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}} \propto m \qquad (1.29)\]

or

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}} = K_{\mathrm{b}}\,m \qquad (1.30)\]

Here \(m\) (molality) is the number of moles of solute dissolved in 1 kg of solvent, and the constant of proportionality, \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\), is called Boiling Point Elevation Constant or Molal Elevation Constant (Ebullioscopic Constant).

The unit of \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) is K kg mol\(^{-1}\). Values of \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) for some common solvents are given in Table 1.3. Notice that molality — and not molarity — is used here, for the reason given in Section 1.2: this is an experiment involving heating, and molality does not change with temperature.

molal elevation constant, \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) (Unit: K kg mol\(^{-1}\). Meaning: \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) is the elevation of boiling point produced by a 1 molal solution — put \(m = 1\) in equation (1.30) and \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}} = K_{\mathrm{b}}\). It is a property of the solvent only, never of the solute. \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}}\) is always positive: a solution always boils higher than the pure solvent.)

If \(w_2\) gram of solute of molar mass \(M_2\) is dissolved in \(w_1\) gram of solvent, then molality, \(m\), of the solution is given by the expression:

\[m = \frac{w_2/M_2}{w_1/1000} = \frac{1000 \times w_2}{M_2 \times w_1} \qquad (1.31)\]

The factor of 1000 appears only because \(w_1\) is in grams while molality demands kilograms of solvent.

Substituting the value of molality in equation (1.30) we get

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}} = \frac{K_{\mathrm{b}} \times 1000 \times w_2}{M_2 \times w_1} \qquad (1.32)\]

Rearranging to make \(M_2\) the subject,

\[M_2 = \frac{1000 \times w_2 \times K_{\mathrm{b}}}{\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}} \times w_1} \qquad (1.33)\]

Thus, in order to determine \(M_2\), the molar mass of the solute, a known mass of solute in a known mass of the solvent is taken, and \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}}\) is determined experimentally for a known solvent whose \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) value is known.

18 g of glucose, \(\mathrm{C_6H_{12}O_6}\), is dissolved in 1 kg of water in a saucepan. At what temperature will water boil at 1.013 bar? \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) for water is 0.52 K kg mol\(^{-1}\).

Moles of glucose = 18 g/ 180 g mol\(^{-1}\) = 0.1 mol

Number of kilograms of solvent = 1 kg

Thus molality of glucose solution = 0.1 mol kg\(^{-1}\)

For water, change in boiling point

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}} = K_{\mathrm{b}} \times m = 0.52\ \text{K kg mol}^{-1} \times 0.1\ \text{mol kg}^{-1} = 0.052\ \text{K}\]

Since water boils at 373.15 K at 1.013 bar pressure, therefore, the boiling point of solution will be 373.15 + 0.052 = 373.202 K.

The boiling point of benzene is 353.23 K. When 1.80 g of a non-volatile solute was dissolved in 90 g of benzene, the boiling point is raised to 354.11 K. Calculate the molar mass of the solute. \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) for benzene is 2.53 K kg mol\(^{-1}\).

The elevation (\(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}}\)) in the boiling point = 354.11 K – 353.23 K = 0.88 K

Substituting these values in expression (1.33) we get

\[M_2 = \frac{2.53\ \text{K kg mol}^{-1} \times 1.8\ \text{g} \times 1000\ \text{g kg}^{-1}}{0.88\ \text{K} \times 90\ \text{g}} = 58\ \text{g mol}^{-1}\]

Therefore, molar mass of the solute, \(M_2\) = 58 g mol\(^{-1}\)

(question only — no solution)

2.0 g of a non-volatile, non-electrolyte solute is dissolved in 100 g of water. The solution boils at 373.30 K at 1.013 bar. Taking the boiling point of pure water as 373.15 K and \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) for water as 0.52 K kg mol\(^{-1}\), calculate the molar mass of the solute.

1.6.3 Depression of Freezing Point

The lowering of vapour pressure of a solution causes a lowering of the freezing point compared to that of the pure solvent (Fig. 1.9).

We know that at the freezing point of a substance, the solid phase is in dynamic equilibrium with the liquid phase. Thus, the freezing point of a substance may be defined as the temperature at which the vapour pressure of the substance in its liquid phase is equal to its vapour pressure in the solid phase.

NoteDefinition

The freezing point of a substance is the temperature at which the vapour pressure of its liquid phase is equal to the vapour pressure of its solid phase — the temperature at which solid and liquid are in equilibrium.

A solution will freeze when its vapour pressure equals the vapour pressure of the pure solid solvent, as is clear from Fig. 1.9. It is important to realise that the solid that separates out on freezing is pure solvent (pure ice, in the case of an aqueous solution), so the relevant solid curve is that of the pure solvent.

Fig. 1.9

Fig. 1.9 – Depression of freezing point.

According to Raoult’s law, when a non-volatile solid is added to the solvent, its vapour pressure decreases, and now it would become equal to that of the solid solvent at a lower temperature. Thus, the freezing point of the solvent decreases.

Let \(T_{\mathrm{f}}^{0}\) be the freezing point of pure solvent and \(T_{\mathrm{f}}\) be its freezing point when a non-volatile solute is dissolved in it. The decrease in freezing point

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = T_{\mathrm{f}}^{0} - T_{\mathrm{f}}\]

is known as depression in freezing point. Note the order of the two terms carefully: it is the reverse of the order used for \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}}\), and it is written that way so that \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\) also comes out positive.

NoteDefinition

Depression in freezing point (\(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\)) is the decrease in the freezing point of a solvent caused by dissolving a non-volatile solute in it: \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = T_{\mathrm{f}}^{0} - T_{\mathrm{f}}\).

The Working Equation

Similar to the elevation of boiling point, the depression of freezing point (\(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\)) for a dilute solution (ideal solution) is directly proportional to the molality, \(m\), of the solution. Thus,

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} \propto m\]

or

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = K_{\mathrm{f}}\,m \qquad (1.34)\]

The proportionality constant, \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\), which depends on the nature of the solvent, is known as Freezing Point Depression Constant or Molal Depression Constant or Cryoscopic Constant. The unit of \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) is K kg mol\(^{-1}\). Values of \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) for some common solvents are listed in Table 1.3.

molal depression constant, \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) (Unit: K kg mol\(^{-1}\). Meaning: the depression of freezing point produced by a 1 molal solution. Like \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\), it is a property of the solvent alone. \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\) is defined as \(T_{\mathrm{f}}^{0} - T_{\mathrm{f}}\), so it too is a positive number even though the freezing point has gone down.)

If \(w_2\) gram of the solute having molar mass as \(M_2\), present in \(w_1\) gram of solvent, produces the depression in freezing point \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\) of the solvent, then the molality of the solute is given by the equation (1.31).

\[m = \frac{w_2/M_2}{w_1/1000} \qquad (1.31)\]

Substituting this value of molality in equation (1.34) we get:

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = \frac{K_{\mathrm{f}} \times w_2/M_2}{w_1/1000}\]

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = \frac{K_{\mathrm{f}} \times w_2 \times 1000}{M_2 \times w_1} \qquad (1.35)\]

\[M_2 = \frac{K_{\mathrm{f}} \times w_2 \times 1000}{\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} \times w_1} \qquad (1.36)\]

Thus, for determining the molar mass of the solute we should know the quantities \(w_1\), \(w_2\), \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\), along with the molal freezing point depression constant.

Where \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) and \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) Come From

The values of \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) and \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\), which depend upon the nature of the solvent, can be ascertained from the following relations.

\[K_{\mathrm{f}} = \frac{R \times M_1 \times T_{\mathrm{f}}^{2}}{1000 \times \Delta_{\text{fus}}H} \qquad (1.37)\]

\[K_{\mathrm{b}} = \frac{R \times M_1 \times T_{\mathrm{b}}^{2}}{1000 \times \Delta_{\text{vap}}H} \qquad (1.38)\]

Here the symbols \(R\) and \(M_1\) stand for the gas constant and the molar mass of the solvent, respectively, and \(T_{\mathrm{f}}\) and \(T_{\mathrm{b}}\) denote the freezing point and the boiling point of the pure solvent respectively in kelvin. Further, \(\Delta_{\text{fus}}H\) and \(\Delta_{\text{vap}}H\) represent the enthalpies for the fusion and vapourisation of the solvent, respectively.

These two equations confirm in symbols what the tables show in numbers: \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) and \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) contain nothing whatever about the solute. Every quantity on the right-hand side belongs to the solvent.

Table 1.3: Molal Boiling Point Elevation and Freezing Point Depression Constants for Some Solvents

Solvent b. p./K \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\)/K kg mol\(^{-1}\) f. p./K \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\)/K kg mol\(^{-1}\)
Water 373.15 0.52 273.0 1.86
Ethanol 351.5 1.20 155.7 1.99
Cyclohexane 353.74 2.79 279.55 20.00
Benzene 353.3 2.53 278.6 5.12
Chloroform 334.4 3.63 209.6 4.79
Carbon tetrachloride 350.0 5.03 250.5 31.8
Carbon disulphide 319.4 2.34 164.2 3.83
Diethyl ether 307.8 2.02 156.9 1.79
Acetic acid 391.1 2.93 290.0 3.90

Table 1.3, the \(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) and \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) values, read alongside Fig. 1.9 (Answer from the table: (i) Which solvent in Table 1.3 gives the largest freezing-point depression for the same molality, and how many times larger is it than water’s? (ii) If you were designing an experiment to measure the molar mass of a solute as accurately as possible, would you choose a solvent with a large \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) or a small one, and why? (iii) For every solvent in the table \(K_{\mathrm{f}} > K_{\mathrm{b}}\) — use equations (1.37) and (1.38) to suggest which enthalpy term is responsible.)

45 g of ethylene glycol (\(\mathrm{C_2H_6O_2}\)) is mixed with 600 g of water. Calculate (a) the freezing point depression and (b) the freezing point of the solution.

Depression in freezing point is related to the molality; therefore, the molality of the solution with respect to ethylene glycol

\[= \frac{\text{moles of ethylene glycol}}{\text{mass of water in kilogram}}\]

\[\text{Moles of ethylene glycol} = \frac{45\ \text{g}}{62\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 0.73\ \text{mol}\]

\[\text{Mass of water in kg} = \frac{600\ \text{g}}{1000\ \text{g kg}^{-1}} = 0.6\ \text{kg}\]

Hence molality of ethylene glycol

\[= \frac{0.73\ \text{mol}}{0.60\ \text{kg}} = 1.2\ \text{mol kg}^{-1}\]

Therefore freezing point depression,

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = 1.86\ \text{K kg mol}^{-1} \times 1.2\ \text{mol kg}^{-1} = 2.2\ \text{K}\]

Freezing point of the aqueous solution = 273.15 K – 2.2 K = 270.95 K

1.00 g of a non-electrolyte solute dissolved in 50 g of benzene lowered the freezing point of benzene by 0.40 K. The freezing point depression constant of benzene is 5.12 K kg mol\(^{-1}\). Find the molar mass of the solute.

Substituting the values of various terms involved in equation (1.36) we get,

\[M_2 = \frac{5.12\ \text{K kg mol}^{-1} \times 1.00\ \text{g} \times 1000\ \text{g kg}^{-1}}{0.40 \times 50\ \text{g}} = 256\ \text{g mol}^{-1}\]

Thus, molar mass of the solute = 256 g mol\(^{-1}\)

Q1. Why does sprinkling salt on an icy road make the ice melt, even though the air is still cold?

A. Because dissolved particles lower the freezing point of water. When salt meets the thin film of liquid water always present on ice, it dissolves and dissociates into ions. The resulting solution now has a lower vapour pressure than pure water, so it can remain liquid at a temperature well below 273.15 K — its freezing point has been depressed. Ice in contact with that salty film is therefore above its new freezing point, and it melts. Sodium chloride is especially effective because each formula unit gives two particles, and colligative properties count particles: the effect is roughly twice what an equal number of moles of sugar would produce. Below about –20 °C, however, even salt cannot depress the freezing point far enough, and gritting stops working.

Cryoscopy — measuring freezing points — is used every day to test whether milk has been watered down. Pure milk freezes at a temperature slightly below that of water, at about –0.54 °C, because of the lactose, salts and other solutes dissolved in it. The value is remarkably consistent from one healthy cow to another, because those solute concentrations are regulated by the animal’s own physiology. Add water to the milk and you dilute the solutes; fewer particles per kilogram means a smaller depression, and the freezing point creeps back up towards 0 °C. Dairy laboratories run an instrument called a cryoscope for exactly this purpose, and it can detect the addition of only a few per cent of water — a colligative property doing the work of a policeman.

(question only — no solution)

Camphor is often used as a solvent for molar-mass determination because of its very large \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\). Using the data in Table 1.3 instead, calculate the depression in freezing point when 1.00 g of naphthalene (\(\mathrm{C_{10}H_8}\), molar mass 128 g mol\(^{-1}\)) is dissolved in 50.0 g of benzene (\(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) = 5.12 K kg mol\(^{-1}\)), and state the freezing point of the resulting solution (f.p. of pure benzene = 278.6 K).

1.6.4 Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure

There are many phenomena which we observe in nature or at home. For example, raw mangoes shrivel when pickled in brine (salt water); wilted flowers revive when placed in fresh water; blood cells collapse when suspended in saline water, and so on.

If we look into these processes we find one thing common in all — that is, all these substances are bound by membranes. These membranes can be of animal or vegetable origin, and these occur naturally, such as pig’s bladder or parchment, or can be synthetic, such as cellophane.

These membranes appear to be continuous sheets or films, yet they contain a network of submicroscopic holes or pores. Small solvent molecules, like water, can pass through these holes, but the passage of bigger molecules like solute is hindered. Membranes having this kind of properties are known as semipermeable membranes (SPM).

NoteDefinition

A semipermeable membrane is a membrane that allows the small solvent molecules to pass through it but not the larger solute particles.

Osmosis

Assume that only solvent molecules can pass through these semipermeable membranes. If this membrane is placed between the solvent and the solution as shown in Fig. 1.10, the solvent molecules will flow through the membrane from pure solvent to the solution. This process of flow of the solvent is called osmosis.

Fig. 1.10

Fig. 1.10 – Osmosis in a thistle funnel.

NoteDefinition

Osmosis is the spontaneous flow of solvent molecules through a semipermeable membrane from the pure solvent (or a more dilute solution) into a more concentrated solution.

The flow will continue till equilibrium is attained. As solvent enters the solution in Fig. 1.10, the liquid column rises, and the extra weight of that column presses down on the solution — until the pressure it exerts is just enough to stop any further net flow.

The flow of the solvent from its side to the solution side across a semipermeable membrane can be stopped if some extra pressure is applied on the solution. This pressure that just stops the flow of solvent is called osmotic pressure of the solution.

The flow of solvent from a dilute solution to the concentrated solution across a semipermeable membrane is due to osmosis. The important point to be kept in mind is that solvent molecules always flow from lower concentration to higher concentration of solution. The osmotic pressure has been found to depend on the concentration of the solution.

The osmotic pressure of a solution is the excess pressure that must be applied to a solution to prevent osmosis, i.e., to stop the passage of solvent molecules through a semipermeable membrane into the solution. This is illustrated in Fig. 1.11.

Fig. 1.11

Fig. 1.11 – Osmotic pressure stops the flow of solvent.

NoteDefinition

Osmotic pressure (\(\Pi\)) is the excess pressure that must be applied to a solution in order to just prevent osmosis of pure solvent into it through a semipermeable membrane.

The Osmotic Pressure Equation

Osmotic pressure is a colligative property, as it depends on the number of solute molecules and not on their identity.

For dilute solutions, it has been found experimentally that osmotic pressure is proportional to the molarity, \(C\), of the solution at a given temperature \(T\). Thus:

\[\Pi = C\,R\,T \qquad (1.39)\]

Here \(\Pi\) is the osmotic pressure and \(R\) is the gas constant. The resemblance of this equation to the ideal gas equation \(PV = nRT\) is striking, and not accidental: dissolved particles roaming through a solvent behave in many ways like gas particles roaming through a container.

\[\Pi = (n_2/V)\,R\,T \qquad (1.40)\]

Here \(V\) is the volume of a solution in litres containing \(n_2\) moles of solute. If \(w_2\) grams of solute, of molar mass \(M_2\), is present in the solution, then \(n_2 = w_2/M_2\) and we can write,

\[\Pi\,V = \frac{w_2\,R\,T}{M_2} \qquad (1.41)\]

or

\[M_2 = \frac{w_2\,R\,T}{\Pi\,V} \qquad (1.42)\]

Thus, knowing the quantities \(w_2\), \(T\), \(\Pi\) and \(V\) we can calculate the molar mass of the solute.

osmotic pressure, \(\Pi\) (SI unit: pascal (Pa); commonly used in bar or atm. Note that \(\Pi\) is always a positive pressure applied on the solution side. Watch the gas constant carefully: use \(R = 0.083\ \text{L bar K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}\) when \(\Pi\) is wanted in bar, and \(R = 8.314\ \text{J K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}\) when \(\Pi\) is wanted in pascals with \(V\) in m\(^3\). Temperature must always be in kelvin.)

Measurement of osmotic pressure provides another method of determining the molar masses of solutes. This method is widely used to determine molar masses of proteins, polymers and other macromolecules.

The osmotic pressure method has the advantage over other methods, as pressure measurement is done around room temperature and the molarity of the solution is used instead of molality. As compared to other colligative properties, its magnitude is large even for very dilute solutions — which is exactly what a chemist needs when the solute is a protein of enormous molar mass and only a milligram of it is available.

The technique of osmotic pressure for the determination of molar mass of solutes is particularly useful for biomolecules, as they are generally not stable at higher temperatures — a boiling-point experiment would simply destroy them — and polymers have poor solubility, so only very dilute solutions can be made in the first place.

The first careful measurements of osmotic pressure were made in the 1870s by the German plant physiologist Wilhelm Pfeffer, who was trying to understand how water rises into plant cells. Natural membranes were too fragile to hold back any real pressure, so Pfeffer built an artificial one: he deposited a film of copper ferrocyanide inside the walls of a porous clay pot, producing a membrane that let water through but held back sugar. With this apparatus he could at last put a number on the pressure that a sugar solution generates. Those numbers, published by a botanist, were later picked up by chemists and turned into equation (1.39).

200 cm\(^3\) of an aqueous solution of a protein contains 1.26 g of the protein. The osmotic pressure of such a solution at 300 K is found to be \(2.57 \times 10^{-3}\) bar. Calculate the molar mass of the protein.

The various quantities known to us are as follows: \(\Pi = 2.57 \times 10^{-3}\) bar,

\(V\) = 200 cm\(^3\) = 0.200 litre

\(T\) = 300 K

\(R\) = 0.083 L bar mol\(^{-1}\) K\(^{-1}\)

Substituting these values in equation (1.42) we get

\[M_2 = \frac{1.26\ \text{g} \times 0.083\ \text{L bar K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1} \times 300\ \text{K}}{2.57\times10^{-3}\ \text{bar} \times 0.200\ \text{L}} = 61{,}022\ \text{g mol}^{-1}\]

Isotonic, Hypertonic and Hypotonic Solutions

Two solutions having the same osmotic pressure at a given temperature are called isotonic solutions. When such solutions are separated by a semipermeable membrane, no osmosis occurs between them — neither side is “pulling” harder than the other.

For example, the osmotic pressure associated with the fluid inside the blood cell is equivalent to that of 0.9% (mass/volume) sodium chloride solution, called normal saline solution, and it is safe to inject intravenously.

On the other hand, if we place the cells in a solution containing more than 0.9% (mass/volume) sodium chloride, water will flow out of the cells and they would shrink. Such a solution is called hypertonic.

If the salt concentration is less than 0.9% (mass/volume), the solution is said to be hypotonic. In this case, water will flow into the cells if placed in this solution and they would swell.

Isotonic vs Hypertonic vs Hypotonic solutions (relative to a blood cell)

Feature Isotonic Hypertonic Hypotonic
Osmotic pressure compared with the cell contents Equal Higher Lower
Example (relative to blood) 0.9% (m/V) NaCl — normal saline More than 0.9% (m/V) NaCl Less than 0.9% (m/V) NaCl
Direction of water flow No net flow Water leaves the cell Water enters the cell
Effect on the cell Unchanged Cell shrinks Cell swells

Calculate the osmotic pressure at 300 K of a solution containing 0.05 mol of glucose per litre. (\(R = 0.083\ \text{L bar K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}\).) A second solution contains 0.05 mol of sucrose per litre at the same temperature. If the two solutions are separated by a semipermeable membrane, in which direction will the solvent flow?

Osmotic pressure of the glucose solution. Using equation (1.39), with \(C\) = 0.05 mol L\(^{-1}\):

\[\Pi = C\,R\,T = 0.05\ \text{mol L}^{-1} \times 0.083\ \text{L bar K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1} \times 300\ \text{K} = 1.245\ \text{bar}\]

Direction of flow. Glucose and sucrose are both non-electrolytes, so each dissolved molecule gives exactly one particle in solution. The sucrose solution has the same molarity, 0.05 mol L\(^{-1}\), so it produces the same number of particles per litre and therefore the same osmotic pressure, 1.245 bar — even though a sucrose molecule is roughly twice as heavy as a glucose molecule.

The two solutions are therefore isotonic, and there will be no net flow of solvent in either direction. This is the whole meaning of a colligative property: the membrane counts particles and is blind to what they are.

Q5. Why does a raw mango shrivel into a pickle in brine, while a wilted flower revives in fresh water?

A. Both are osmosis, running in opposite directions, and in each case the cell wall is acting as a semipermeable membrane. Brine is far more concentrated than the sap inside the mango’s cells, so it is hypertonic: water flows out of the cells into the brine, the cells lose their turgidity, and the mango shrivels into a pickle. Fresh water, by contrast, is hypotonic compared with the sap of the flower’s cells, so water flows into the cells, they swell and become firm again, and the stem and petals straighten up. In both cases the solvent has simply moved from the side of lower solute concentration to the side of higher solute concentration.

Osmosis in Everyday Life

The phenomena mentioned at the beginning of this section can be explained on the basis of osmosis.

A raw mango placed in concentrated salt solution loses water via osmosis and shrivels into pickle. Wilted flowers revive when placed in fresh water. A carrot that has become limp because of water loss into the atmosphere can be placed into water, making it firm once again — water will move into its cells through osmosis.

When placed in water containing less than 0.9% (mass/volume) salt, blood cells swell due to the flow of water into them by osmosis.

People taking a lot of salt or salty food experience water retention in tissue cells and intercellular spaces because of osmosis. The resulting puffiness or swelling is called edema.

Water movement from soil into plant roots, and subsequently into the upper portion of the plant, is partly due to osmosis.

The preservation of meat by salting and of fruits by adding sugar protects against bacterial action. Through the process of osmosis, a bacterium on salted meat or candied fruit loses water, shrivels and dies. This is one of the oldest food-preservation techniques known, and it is pure colligative chemistry: the salt or sugar makes the surroundings hypertonic to the microorganism.

1.6.5 Reverse Osmosis and Water Purification

The direction of osmosis can be reversed if a pressure larger than the osmotic pressure is applied to the solution side. That is, now the pure solvent flows out of the solution through the semipermeable membrane. This phenomenon is called reverse osmosis and is of great practical utility.

NoteDefinition

Reverse osmosis is the flow of pure solvent out of a solution through a semipermeable membrane, brought about by applying on the solution a pressure greater than its osmotic pressure.

Reverse osmosis is used in desalination of sea water. A schematic set-up for the process is shown in Fig. 1.12.

Fig. 1.12

Fig. 1.12 – Reverse osmosis.

When pressure more than the osmotic pressure is applied, pure water is squeezed out of the sea water through the membrane. A variety of polymer membranes are available for this purpose.

The pressure required for reverse osmosis is quite high — which stands to reason, since sea water is a concentrated solution and therefore has a large osmotic pressure that must first be overcome before anything at all happens.

A workable porous membrane is a film of cellulose acetate placed over a suitable support. Cellulose acetate is permeable to water but impermeable to the impurities and ions present in sea water. These days many countries use desalination plants to meet their potable water requirements.

The domestic “RO purifier” sitting in many Indian kitchens is exactly this apparatus, shrunk to the size of a cupboard and run on the pressure of the mains supply plus a small pump. It is worth knowing its cost, however. For every litre of purified water an RO unit delivers, it typically rejects a larger volume of concentrated waste water carrying all the salts that were removed — and at the scale of a coastal desalination plant, disposing of that hot, dense brine without harming marine life near the outfall is a genuine environmental engineering problem. A thoughtful chemistry student will also note that RO strips out the useful minerals along with the harmful ones, which is why many units add a re-mineralisation stage at the end, and why RO is unnecessary where the water is already low in dissolved solids.

1.9 Vapour pressure of pure water at 298 K is 23.8 mm Hg. 50 g of urea (\(\mathrm{NH_2CONH_2}\)) is dissolved in 850 g of water. Calculate the vapour pressure of water for this solution and its relative lowering.

1.10 Boiling point of water at 750 mm Hg is 99.63 °C. How much sucrose is to be added to 500 g of water such that it boils at 100 °C.

1.11 Calculate the mass of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C, \(\mathrm{C_6H_8O_6}\)) to be dissolved in 75 g of acetic acid to lower its melting point by 1.5 °C. \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) = 3.9 K kg mol\(^{-1}\).

1.12 Calculate the osmotic pressure in pascals exerted by a solution prepared by dissolving 1.0 g of polymer of molar mass 185,000 in 450 mL of water at 37 °C.

1.7 Abnormal Molar Masses

Every molar mass we calculated in Section 1.6 rested on one quiet assumption: that each formula unit we dissolved gave exactly one particle in solution. For many solutes that is simply not true — and when it is not true, the molar mass that comes out of a colligative-property experiment is wrong. Such a value is called an abnormal molar mass, and this section explains where it comes from and how to correct for it.

When the Solute Breaks Apart

We know that ionic compounds, when dissolved in water, dissociate into cations and anions. For example, if we dissolve one mole of KCl (74.5 g) in water, we expect one mole each of \(\mathrm{K^{+}}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl^{-}}\) ions to be released in the solution. If this happens, there would be two moles of particles in the solution.

If we ignore interionic attractions, one mole of KCl in one kg of water would be expected to increase the boiling point by 2 × 0.52 K = 1.04 K — twice the elevation that one mole of a non-electrolyte such as glucose would produce, because a colligative property counts particles.

Now, if we did not know about the degree of dissociation, we could be led to conclude that the mass of 2 mol of particles is 74.5 g, and hence that the mass of one mole of KCl would be 37.25 g — exactly half of the true value. This brings to light the rule that, when there is dissociation of solute into ions, the experimentally determined molar mass is always lower than the true value.

Q3. One mole of glucose and one mole of potassium chloride are dissolved in the same amount of water. Why does the potassium chloride solution freeze at a much lower temperature?

A. Because colligative properties depend on the number of particles, not on the number of formula units weighed out. Glucose is a non-electrolyte: one mole of glucose gives one mole of particles in solution. Potassium chloride is an ionic compound: one mole of KCl dissociates into one mole of \(\mathrm{K^{+}}\) ions and one mole of \(\mathrm{Cl^{-}}\) ions, so it releases nearly two moles of particles. Roughly twice as many particles means roughly twice the depression of freezing point, so the KCl solution freezes at a considerably lower temperature than the glucose solution of the same molality.

When the Solute Sticks Together

The opposite can also happen. Molecules of ethanoic acid (acetic acid) dimerise in benzene due to hydrogen bonding. This normally happens in solvents of low dielectric constant, which are unable to pull the polar molecules apart. In this case the number of particles is reduced due to dimerisation.

The association of molecules is depicted as follows:

\[2\,\mathrm{CH_3COOH} \rightleftharpoons (\mathrm{CH_3COOH})_2\]

The two acid molecules lock on to each other through a pair of hydrogen bonds between the –OH of one and the C=O of the other, forming a closed ring, as shown in Fig. 1.13.

Fig. 1.13

Fig. 1.13 – The cyclic dimer of ethanoic acid.

It can be undoubtedly stated here that if all the molecules of ethanoic acid associate in benzene, then \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}}\) or \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\) for ethanoic acid will be half of the normal value — because two molecules now behave as a single particle. The molar mass calculated on the basis of this \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}}\) or \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\) will, therefore, be twice the expected value: look back at equation (1.36), where \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\) sits in the denominator, and halving it must double \(M_2\).

Such a molar mass that is either lower or higher than the expected or normal value is called an abnormal molar mass.

NoteDefinition

An abnormal molar mass is a molar mass determined from a colligative property which differs from the true (normal) molar mass, because the solute dissociates into more particles (giving a lower value) or associates into fewer particles (giving a higher value) in that solvent.

Dissociation vs Association of a solute

Feature Dissociation (e.g., KCl in water) Association (e.g., ethanoic acid in benzene)
What happens to the solute One formula unit breaks into two or more ions Two or more molecules join into one larger particle
Number of particles in solution Increases Decreases
Observed colligative property (\(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}}\), \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{b}}\), \(\Pi\), \(\Delta p\)) Larger than expected Smaller than expected
Experimental (abnormal) molar mass Lower than the true value Higher than the true value
van’t Hoff factor \(i\) Greater than 1 Less than 1
Typical conditions Ionic solute in a polar solvent of high dielectric constant, such as water Polar molecule capable of hydrogen bonding, in a solvent of low dielectric constant, such as benzene
The van’t Hoff Factor

In 1880 van’t Hoff introduced a factor \(i\), known as the van’t Hoff factor, to account for the extent of dissociation or association. This factor \(i\) is defined as:

\[i = \frac{\text{Normal molar mass}}{\text{Abnormal molar mass}}\]

\[= \frac{\text{Observed colligative property}}{\text{Calculated colligative property}}\]

\[i = \frac{\text{Total number of moles of particles after association/dissociation}}{\text{Number of moles of particles before association/dissociation}}\]

All three expressions say the same thing in different currencies: \(i\) is simply the factor by which the number of particles has changed.

NoteDefinition

The van’t Hoff factor (\(i\)) is the ratio of the normal molar mass to the abnormal (experimentally determined) molar mass; equivalently, the ratio of the observed colligative property to the calculated one; equivalently, the ratio of the total number of moles of particles present after dissociation or association to the number of moles of particles taken initially.

Here the abnormal molar mass is the experimentally determined molar mass, and the calculated colligative properties are obtained by assuming that the non-volatile solute is neither associated nor dissociated.

In case of association, the value of \(i\) is less than unity, while for dissociation it is greater than unity. For example, the value of \(i\) for aqueous KCl solution is close to 2, while the value for ethanoic acid in benzene is nearly 0.5.

van’t Hoff factor, \(i\) (No unit — it is a pure ratio. \(i > 1\) → the solute has dissociated (more particles than expected); \(i = 1\) → no dissociation or association, the solute behaves normally; \(i < 1\) → the solute has associated (fewer particles than expected). Its value depends on concentration, so a value of \(i\) should always be quoted with the molality at which it was measured.)

Corrected Colligative-Property Equations

Inclusion of the van’t Hoff factor modifies the equations for colligative properties as follows:

Relative lowering of vapour pressure of solvent,

\[\frac{p_1^{o} - p_1}{p_1^{o}} = i\,.\,\frac{n_2}{n_1}\]

Elevation of Boiling point,

\[\Delta T_b = i\,K_b\,m\]

Depression of Freezing point,

\[\Delta T_f = i\,K_f\,m\]

Osmotic pressure of solution,

\[\Pi = i\,n_2\,R\,T\,/\,V\]

In every case \(i\) enters as a simple multiplier, which is exactly what you would expect: it is correcting the count of particles, and the colligative property is proportional to that count.

Q. How do I get the degree of dissociation from a measured value of \(i\)?

A. If one formula unit gives \(n\) ions on complete dissociation, and \(\alpha\) is the degree of dissociation, then starting with 1 mol you are left with \((1 - \alpha)\) mol undissociated plus \(n\alpha\) mol of ions, a total of \(1 - \alpha + n\alpha\) mol of particles. Since \(i\) is that total, \(i = 1 + (n - 1)\alpha\), which rearranges to \(\alpha = (i - 1)/(n - 1)\). For association into an \(n\)-mer, the same reasoning gives \(\alpha = (1 - i)\,n/(n - 1)\) — and you can see this being worked out from first principles in Example 1.18.

Table 1.4: Values of van’t Hoff factor, \(i\), at Various Concentrations for NaCl, KCl, \(\mathrm{MgSO_4}\) and \(\mathrm{K_2SO_4}\).

Salt *Values of \(i\): 0.1 m 0.01 m 0.001 m van’t Hoff Factor \(i\) for complete dissociation of solute
NaCl 1.87 1.94 1.97 2.00
KCl 1.85 1.94 1.98 2.00
\(\mathrm{MgSO_4}\) 1.21 1.53 1.82 2.00
\(\mathrm{K_2SO_4}\) 2.32 2.70 2.84 3.00

* represent \(i\) values for incomplete dissociation.

Table 1.4 depicts values of the factor, \(i\), for several strong electrolytes. For KCl, NaCl and \(\mathrm{MgSO_4}\), \(i\) values approach 2 as the solution becomes very dilute. As expected, the value of \(i\) gets close to 3 for \(\mathrm{K_2SO_4}\), since one formula unit of \(\mathrm{K_2SO_4}\) can give three ions — two \(\mathrm{K^{+}}\) and one \(\mathrm{SO_4^{2-}}\).

Table 1.4, the measured \(i\) values (Read across each row of Table 1.4 and answer: (i) For NaCl, \(i\) rises from 1.87 to 1.97 as the solution is diluted. Why does dilution push \(i\) closer to the ideal value of 2? (ii) At 0.1 m, \(\mathrm{MgSO_4}\) has \(i\) = 1.21, far below NaCl’s 1.87, although both should give 2 on complete dissociation. Suggest a reason, thinking about the charges on \(\mathrm{Mg^{2+}}\) and \(\mathrm{SO_4^{2-}}\). (iii) Which salt in the table would depress the freezing point of water the most at 0.001 m, and by what factor compared with a non-electrolyte of the same molality?)

Jacobus Henricus van’t Hoff, working in the Netherlands, was one of the founders of physical chemistry, and the factor \(i\) was one of several ideas he introduced in the 1880s to bring order to the behaviour of solutions. He saw that a dilute solution behaves much like a gas, with the dissolved particles playing the part of gas molecules — which is why equation (1.39) looks so much like the ideal gas equation. In 1901 he was awarded the very first Nobel Prize in Chemistry, in part for this work on solutions.

2 g of benzoic acid (\(\mathrm{C_6H_5COOH}\)) dissolved in 25 g of benzene shows a depression in freezing point equal to 1.62 K. Molal depression constant for benzene is 4.9 K kg mol\(^{-1}\). What is the percentage association of acid if it forms dimer in solution?

The given quantities are: \(w_2\) = 2 g; \(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) = 4.9 K kg mol\(^{-1}\); \(w_1\) = 25 g, \(\Delta T_f\) = 1.62 K

Substituting these values in equation (1.36) we get:

\[M_2 = \frac{4.9\ \text{K kg mol}^{-1} \times 2\ \text{g} \times 1000\ \text{g kg}^{-1}}{25\ \text{g} \times 1.62\ \text{K}} = 241.98\ \text{g mol}^{-1}\]

Thus, experimental molar mass of benzoic acid in benzene is

= 241.98 g mol\(^{-1}\)

(The normal molar mass of benzoic acid is 122 g mol\(^{-1}\), so the experimental value is nearly twice as large — the signature of association.)

Now consider the following equilibrium for the acid:

\[2\,\mathrm{C_6H_5COOH} \rightleftharpoons (\mathrm{C_6H_5COOH})_2\]

If \(x\) represents the degree of association of the solute, then we would have \((1 - x)\) mol of benzoic acid left in unassociated form and correspondingly \(\dfrac{x}{2}\) as associated moles of benzoic acid at equilibrium (two molecules make one dimer, so \(x\) moles of acid give \(x/2\) moles of dimer).

Therefore, total number of moles of particles at equilibrium is:

\[1 - x + \frac{x}{2} = 1 - \frac{x}{2}\]

Thus, the total number of moles of particles at equilibrium equals van’t Hoff factor \(i\).

But

\[i = \frac{\text{Normal molar mass}}{\text{Abnormal molar mass}}\]

\[= \frac{122\ \text{g mol}^{-1}}{241.98\ \text{g mol}^{-1}}\]

or

\[\frac{x}{2} = 1 - \frac{122}{241.98} = 1 - 0.504 = 0.496\]

or

\[x = 2 \times 0.496 = 0.992\]

Therefore, degree of association of benzoic acid in benzene is 99.2 %.

0.6 mL of acetic acid (\(\mathrm{CH_3COOH}\)), having density 1.06 g mL\(^{-1}\), is dissolved in 1 litre of water. The depression in freezing point observed for this strength of acid was 0.0205 °C. Calculate the van’t Hoff factor and the dissociation constant of acid.

\[\text{Number of moles of acetic acid} = \frac{0.6\ \text{mL} \times 1.06\ \text{g mL}^{-1}}{60\ \text{g mol}^{-1}}\]

\[= 0.0106\ \text{mol} = n\]

\[\text{Molality} = \frac{0.0106\ \text{mol}}{1000\ \text{mL} \times 1\ \text{g mL}^{-1}} = 0.0106\ \text{mol kg}^{-1}\]

(One litre of water has a mass of 1000 g, that is, 1 kg — which is why the molality here is numerically equal to the number of moles.)

Using equation (1.35)

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = 1.86\ \text{K kg mol}^{-1} \times 0.0106\ \text{mol kg}^{-1} = 0.0197\ \text{K}\]

\[\text{van't Hoff Factor } (i) = \frac{\text{Observed freezing point}}{\text{Calculated freezing point}} = \frac{0.0205\ \text{K}}{0.0197\ \text{K}} = 1.041\]

Acetic acid is a weak electrolyte and will dissociate into two ions: acetate and hydrogen ions per molecule of acetic acid. If \(x\) is the degree of dissociation of acetic acid, then we would have \(n(1 - x)\) moles of undissociated acetic acid, \(nx\) moles of \(\mathrm{CH_3COO^{-}}\) and \(nx\) moles of \(\mathrm{H^{+}}\) ions,

\[\mathrm{CH_3COOH} \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H^{+}} + \mathrm{CH_3COO^{-}}\]

| \(\mathrm{CH_3COOH}\) | \(\mathrm{H^{+}}\) | \(\mathrm{CH_3COO^{-}}\) |

|—|—|—|—|

Initially | \(n\) mol | 0 | 0 |
At equilibrium | \(n(1 - x)\) | \(nx\) mol | \(nx\) mol |

Thus total moles of particles are: \(n(1 - x + x + x) = n(1 + x)\)

\[i = \frac{n(1 + x)}{n} = 1 + x = 1.041\]

Thus degree of dissociation of acetic acid = \(x\) = 1.041 – 1.000 = 0.041

Then \([\mathrm{CH_3COOH}] = n(1 - x) = 0.0106\,(1 - 0.041)\),

\([\mathrm{CH_3COO^{-}}] = nx = 0.0106 \times 0.041\), \([\mathrm{H^{+}}] = nx = 0.0106 \times 0.041\).

\[K_{\mathrm{a}} = \frac{[\mathrm{CH_3COO^{-}}][\mathrm{H^{+}}]}{[\mathrm{CH_3COOH}]} = \frac{0.0106 \times 0.041 \times 0.0106 \times 0.041}{0.0106\,(1.00 - 0.041)}\]

\[= 1.86 \times 10^{-5}\]

Calculate the freezing point of a 0.10 molal aqueous solution of sodium chloride, given that the van’t Hoff factor for NaCl at this concentration is 1.87 (Table 1.4). Also calculate the degree of dissociation of NaCl at this concentration. (\(K_{\mathrm{f}}\) for water = 1.86 K kg mol\(^{-1}\); freezing point of pure water = 273.15 K.)

Step 1 — Depression of freezing point. Because NaCl is an electrolyte, we must use the corrected equation \(\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = i\,K_{\mathrm{f}}\,m\):

\[\Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = 1.87 \times 1.86\ \text{K kg mol}^{-1} \times 0.10\ \text{mol kg}^{-1} = 0.348\ \text{K}\]

Step 2 — Freezing point of the solution.

\[T_{\mathrm{f}} = T_{\mathrm{f}}^{0} - \Delta T_{\mathrm{f}} = 273.15\ \text{K} - 0.348\ \text{K} = 272.80\ \text{K}\]

Step 3 — Degree of dissociation. One formula unit of NaCl gives \(n = 2\) ions, so using \(i = 1 + (n - 1)\alpha\):

\[1.87 = 1 + (2 - 1)\,\alpha \qquad \Rightarrow \qquad \alpha = 0.87\]

That is, 87% of the NaCl is behaving as free ions at this concentration. The remaining 13% is accounted for by ion pairs — oppositely charged ions held close enough together by interionic attraction that the solvent counts them as a single particle. This is exactly why the measured \(i\) (1.87) falls short of the ideal value of 2, and why Table 1.4 shows \(i\) climbing towards 2 as the solution is diluted and the ions move further apart.

(question only — no solution)

Calculate the boiling point of a 0.05 molal aqueous solution of \(\mathrm{K_2SO_4}\), assuming complete dissociation. (\(K_{\mathrm{b}}\) for water = 0.52 K kg mol\(^{-1}\); boiling point of pure water = 373.15 K.)

(question only — no solution)

The osmotic pressure of a 0.010 M aqueous solution of an electrolyte \(\mathrm{AB_2}\) at 300 K is found to be 0.65 bar. Calculate the van’t Hoff factor and the degree of dissociation of \(\mathrm{AB_2}\) in this solution. (\(R = 0.083\ \text{L bar K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}\).)

The van’t Hoff factor explains why a freezing mixture — crushed ice with common salt stirred into it — gets so astonishingly cold, cold enough to churn ice cream in an old-fashioned hand freezer. As the salt dissolves in the film of water on the ice, each formula unit contributes close to two particles, so it depresses the freezing point far more sharply than an equal molality of sugar would. The ice must then melt to reach the new, lower equilibrium temperature, and melting absorbs a great deal of heat from the surroundings. A saturated sodium chloride and ice mixture can drop to roughly –21 °C by this route. Calcium chloride, which supplies three ions per formula unit, brings the temperature down further still, and it is preferred in laboratories and in road de-icing where very low temperatures are involved — a direct, practical pay-off from knowing the value of \(i\).

1.8 Summary

What a solution is

  1. A solution is a homogeneous mixture of two or more substances. The component present in the largest amount is the solvent; the rest are solutes. Solutions are classified as solid, liquid or gaseous, according to the state of the solvent.

Expressing concentration

  1. The concentration of a solution is expressed in terms of mole fraction, molarity, molality and in percentages (mass %, volume %, mass by volume %, and ppm for trace amounts).
  2. Mass %, ppm, mole fraction and molality do not change with temperature; molarity does, because volume changes with temperature.

Solubility of a gas: Henry’s law

  1. The dissolution of a gas in a liquid is governed by Henry’s law, according to which, at a given temperature, the solubility of a gas in a liquid is directly proportional to the partial pressure of the gas.

\[p = K_H\,x\]

  1. A larger \(K_H\) means a lower solubility. The solubility of a gas falls as the temperature rises, because dissolution of a gas is exothermic.

Vapour pressure: Raoult’s law

  1. The vapour pressure of the solvent is lowered by the presence of a non-volatile solute in the solution. This lowering is governed by Raoult’s law, according to which the relative lowering of vapour pressure of the solvent over a solution is equal to the mole fraction of a non-volatile solute present in the solution.

\[\frac{p_1^0 - p_1}{p_1^0} = x_2\]

  1. However, in a binary liquid solution, if both the components of the solution are volatile, then another form of Raoult’s law is used. Mathematically, this form of Raoult’s law is stated as:

\[p_{\text{total}} = p_1^0 x_1 + p_2^0 x_2\]

  1. At equilibrium, the vapour phase is always richer in the more volatile component — which is what makes distillation possible.

Ideal and non-ideal solutions

  1. Solutions which obey Raoult’s law over the entire range of concentration are called ideal solutions. For them, \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H = 0\) and \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}V = 0\).
  2. Two types of deviations from Raoult’s law, called positive and negative deviations, are observed. Positive deviation arises when A–B attractions are weaker than A–A and B–B attractions; negative deviation arises when A–B attractions are stronger.
  3. Azeotropes arise due to very large deviations from Raoult’s law. A large positive deviation gives a minimum boiling azeotrope, a large negative deviation a maximum boiling azeotrope. An azeotrope has the same composition in the liquid and vapour phases, so its components cannot be separated by fractional distillation.

Colligative properties

  1. The properties of solutions which depend on the number of solute particles and are independent of their chemical identity are called colligative properties. These are lowering of vapour pressure, elevation of boiling point, depression of freezing point and osmotic pressure.

\[\Delta T_b = K_b\,m, \qquad \Delta T_f = K_f\,m, \qquad \Pi = C R T\]

  1. The process of osmosis can be reversed if a pressure higher than the osmotic pressure is applied to the solution. This reverse osmosis is used in the desalination of sea water.
  2. Colligative properties have been used to determine the molar mass of solutes. Solutes which dissociate in solution exhibit a molar mass lower than the actual molar mass, and those which associate show a higher molar mass than their actual values.

van’t Hoff factor

  1. Quantitatively, the extent to which a solute is dissociated or associated can be expressed by the van’t Hoff factor \(i\). This factor has been defined as the ratio of normal molar mass to experimentally determined molar mass, or as the ratio of the observed colligative property to the calculated colligative property.
  2. \(i > 1\) indicates dissociation, \(i < 1\) indicates association, and \(i = 1\) means the solute neither dissociates nor associates. Including \(i\) corrects each colligative-property equation, for example \(\Delta T_f = i\,K_f\,m\) and \(\Pi = i\,n_2 R T / V\).

The chain of reasoning of this chapter

The whole chapter hangs together as one line of argument, which is worth revising as a single sequence, shown in FC 1.4.

Flowchart

FC 1.4 – The logic of the chapter: non-volatile solute added to solvent → solute particles occupy part of the surface → fewer solvent molecules escape → vapour pressure of solvent is lowered (Raoult’s law) → branch 1: solution must be heated higher to reach 1 atm → elevation of boiling point (ΔT_b = K_b m); branch 2: solution’s vapour pressure equals that of the solid only at a lower temperature → depression of freezing point (ΔT_f = K_f m); branch 3: solvent flows through a semipermeable membrane into the solution → osmosis → osmotic pressure (Π = CRT). All three branches → each depends only on the NUMBER of solute particles → colligative properties → used to find molar mass M₂ → if the solute dissociates or associates, correct with the van’t Hoff factor i → true molar mass.

1.9 NCERT Questions

  1. Define the term solution. How many types of solutions are formed? Write briefly about each type with an example.

  2. Give an example of a solid solution in which the solute is a gas.

  3. Define the following terms: (i) Mole fraction (ii) Molality (iii) Molarity (iv) Mass percentage.

  4. Concentrated nitric acid used in laboratory work is 68% nitric acid by mass in aqueous solution. What should be the molarity of such a sample of the acid if the density of the solution is 1.504 g mL\(^{-1}\)?

  5. A solution of glucose in water is labelled as 10% w/w. What would be the molality and mole fraction of each component in the solution? If the density of the solution is 1.2 g mL\(^{-1}\), then what shall be the molarity of the solution?

  6. How many mL of 0.1 M HCl are required to react completely with 1 g mixture of \(\mathrm{Na_2CO_3}\) and \(\mathrm{NaHCO_3}\) containing equimolar amounts of both?

  7. A solution is obtained by mixing 300 g of 25% solution and 400 g of 40% solution by mass. Calculate the mass percentage of the resulting solution.

  8. An antifreeze solution is prepared from 222.6 g of ethylene glycol (\(\mathrm{C_2H_6O_2}\)) and 200 g of water. Calculate the molality of the solution. If the density of the solution is 1.072 g mL\(^{-1}\), then what shall be the molarity of the solution?

  9. A sample of drinking water was found to be severely contaminated with chloroform (\(\mathrm{CHCl_3}\)) supposed to be a carcinogen. The level of contamination was 15 ppm (by mass): (i) express this in percent by mass (ii) determine the molality of chloroform in the water sample.

  10. What role does the molecular interaction play in a solution of alcohol and water?

  11. Why do gases always tend to be less soluble in liquids as the temperature is raised?

  12. State Henry’s law and mention some important applications.

  13. The partial pressure of ethane over a solution containing \(6.56 \times 10^{-3}\) g of ethane is 1 bar. If the solution contains \(5.00 \times 10^{-2}\) g of ethane, then what shall be the partial pressure of the gas?

  14. What is meant by positive and negative deviations from Raoult’s law and how is the sign of \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H\) related to positive and negative deviations from Raoult’s law?

  15. An aqueous solution of 2% non-volatile solute exerts a pressure of 1.004 bar at the normal boiling point of the solvent. What is the molar mass of the solute?

  16. Heptane and octane form an ideal solution. At 373 K, the vapour pressures of the two liquid components are 105.2 kPa and 46.8 kPa respectively. What will be the vapour pressure of a mixture of 26.0 g of heptane and 35 g of octane?

  17. The vapour pressure of water is 12.3 kPa at 300 K. Calculate vapour pressure of 1 molal solution of a non-volatile solute in it.

  18. Calculate the mass of a non-volatile solute (molar mass 40 g mol\(^{-1}\)) which should be dissolved in 114 g octane to reduce its vapour pressure to 80%.

  19. A solution containing 30 g of non-volatile solute exactly in 90 g of water has a vapour pressure of 2.8 kPa at 298 K. Further, 18 g of water is then added to the solution and the new vapour pressure becomes 2.9 kPa at 298 K. Calculate: (i) molar mass of the solute (ii) vapour pressure of water at 298 K.

  20. A 5% solution (by mass) of cane sugar in water has freezing point of 271 K. Calculate the freezing point of 5% glucose in water if freezing point of pure water is 273.15 K.

  21. Two elements A and B form compounds having formula \(\mathrm{AB_2}\) and \(\mathrm{AB_4}\). When dissolved in 20 g of benzene (\(\mathrm{C_6H_6}\)), 1 g of \(\mathrm{AB_2}\) lowers the freezing point by 2.3 K whereas 1.0 g of \(\mathrm{AB_4}\) lowers it by 1.3 K. The molar depression constant for benzene is 5.1 K kg mol\(^{-1}\). Calculate atomic masses of A and B.

  22. At 300 K, 36 g of glucose present in a litre of its solution has an osmotic pressure of 4.98 bar. If the osmotic pressure of the solution is 1.52 bars at the same temperature, what would be its concentration?

  23. Suggest the most important type of intermolecular attractive interaction in the following pairs. (i) n-hexane and n-octane (ii) \(\mathrm{I_2}\) and \(\mathrm{CCl_4}\) (iii) \(\mathrm{NaClO_4}\) and water (iv) methanol and acetone (v) acetonitrile (\(\mathrm{CH_3CN}\)) and acetone (\(\mathrm{C_3H_6O}\)).

  24. Based on solute-solvent interactions, arrange the following in order of increasing solubility in n-octane and explain. Cyclohexane, KCl, \(\mathrm{CH_3OH}\), \(\mathrm{CH_3CN}\).

  25. Amongst the following compounds, identify which are insoluble, partially soluble and highly soluble in water? (i) phenol (ii) toluene (iii) formic acid (iv) ethylene glycol (v) chloroform (vi) pentanol.

  26. If the density of some lake water is 1.25 g mL\(^{-1}\) and contains 92 g of \(\mathrm{Na^+}\) ions per kg of water, calculate the molarity of \(\mathrm{Na^+}\) ions in the lake.

  27. If the solubility product of CuS is \(6 \times 10^{-16}\), calculate the maximum molarity of CuS in aqueous solution.

  28. Calculate the mass percentage of aspirin (\(\mathrm{C_9H_8O_4}\)) in acetonitrile (\(\mathrm{CH_3CN}\)) when 6.5 g of \(\mathrm{C_9H_8O_4}\) is dissolved in 450 g of \(\mathrm{CH_3CN}\).

  29. Nalorphene (\(\mathrm{C_{19}H_{21}NO_3}\)), similar to morphine, is used to combat withdrawal symptoms in narcotic users. Dose of nalorphene generally given is 1.5 mg. Calculate the mass of \(1.5 \times 10^{-3}\) m aqueous solution required for the above dose.

  30. Calculate the amount of benzoic acid (\(\mathrm{C_6H_5COOH}\)) required for preparing 250 mL of 0.15 M solution in methanol.

  31. The depression in freezing point of water observed for the same amount of acetic acid, trichloroacetic acid and trifluoroacetic acid increases in the order given above. Explain briefly.

  32. Calculate the depression in the freezing point of water when 10 g of \(\mathrm{CH_3CH_2CHClCOOH}\) is added to 250 g of water. \(K_a = 1.4 \times 10^{-3}\), \(K_f = 1.86\) K kg mol\(^{-1}\).

  33. 19.5 g of \(\mathrm{CH_2FCOOH}\) is dissolved in 500 g of water. The depression in the freezing point of water observed is 1.0 °C. Calculate the van’t Hoff factor and dissociation constant of fluoroacetic acid.

  34. Vapour pressure of water at 293 K is 17.535 mm Hg. Calculate the vapour pressure of water at 293 K when 25 g of glucose is dissolved in 450 g of water.

  35. Henry’s law constant for the molality of methane in benzene at 298 K is \(4.27 \times 10^5\) mm Hg. Calculate the solubility of methane in benzene at 298 K under 760 mm Hg.

  36. 100 g of liquid A (molar mass 140 g mol\(^{-1}\)) was dissolved in 1000 g of liquid B (molar mass 180 g mol\(^{-1}\)). The vapour pressure of pure liquid B was found to be 500 torr. Calculate the vapour pressure of pure liquid A and its vapour pressure in the solution if the total vapour pressure of the solution is 475 torr.

  37. Vapour pressures of pure acetone and chloroform at 328 K are 741.8 mm Hg and 632.8 mm Hg respectively. Assuming that they form ideal solution over the entire range of composition, plot \(p_{\text{total}}\), \(p_{\text{chloroform}}\), and \(p_{\text{acetone}}\) as a function of \(x_{\text{acetone}}\). The experimental data observed for different compositions of mixture is:

\(100 \times x_{\text{acetone}}\) 0 11.8 23.4 36.0 50.8 58.2 64.5 72.1
\(p_{\text{acetone}}\) /mm Hg 0 54.9 110.1 202.4 322.7 405.9 454.1 521.1
\(p_{\text{chloroform}}\) /mm Hg 632.8 548.1 469.4 359.7 257.7 193.6 161.2 120.7

Plot this data also on the same graph paper. Indicate whether it has positive deviation or negative deviation from the ideal solution.

  1. Benzene and toluene form ideal solution over the entire range of composition. The vapour pressure of pure benzene and toluene at 300 K are 50.71 mm Hg and 32.06 mm Hg respectively. Calculate the mole fraction of benzene in vapour phase if 80 g of benzene is mixed with 100 g of toluene.

  2. The air is a mixture of a number of gases. The major components are oxygen and nitrogen with approximate proportion of 20% is to 79% by volume at 298 K. The water is in equilibrium with air at a pressure of 10 atm. At 298 K if the Henry’s law constants for oxygen and nitrogen at 298 K are \(3.30 \times 10^7\) mm and \(6.51 \times 10^7\) mm respectively, calculate the composition of these gases in water.

  3. Determine the amount of \(\mathrm{CaCl_2}\) (\(i\) = 2.47) dissolved in 2.5 litre of water such that its osmotic pressure is 0.75 atm at 27 °C.

  4. Determine the osmotic pressure of a solution prepared by dissolving 25 mg of \(\mathrm{K_2SO_4}\) in 2 litre of water at 25 °C, assuming that it is completely dissociated.

1.10 Check Your Concepts

  1. Explain why molarity changes when a solution is warmed, while molality does not. Which of the two would you choose for an experiment on depression of freezing point, and why?

  2. Naphthalene dissolves readily in benzene but hardly at all in water, while sodium chloride does exactly the opposite. Explain both observations using the idea of “like dissolves like”.

  3. Assertion (A): A soft drink kept in a warm room goes flat faster than one kept in a refrigerator. Reason (R): The solubility of a gas in a liquid decreases with rise in temperature because dissolution of a gas is an exothermic process. State whether A and R are true, and whether R is the correct explanation of A.

  4. Aquatic animals are said to be “more comfortable” in cold water than in warm water. Justify this statement using the Henry’s law constant values for \(\mathrm{O_2}\) at 293 K and 303 K given in Table 1.2.

  5. A gas has a very large Henry’s law constant in water at a given temperature. What does this tell you about its solubility? Between \(\mathrm{CO_2}\) and He at 298 K, which one would you expect to dissolve more in water at the same partial pressure, and why?

  6. Explain, in terms of surface molecules, why the vapour pressure of a solvent falls when a non-volatile solute is dissolved in it. Why does the identity of the solute not matter?

  7. Why is the vapour phase above a boiling liquid mixture always richer in the more volatile component? How does this fact make fractional distillation possible?

  8. Match the following mixtures with the correct behaviour:

Column A Column B
a. n-hexane + n-heptane i. negative deviation from Raoult’s law
b. ethanol + acetone ii. nearly ideal solution
c. chloroform + acetone iii. positive deviation from Raoult’s law

In each case, state the reason based on intermolecular forces.

  1. When two liquids are mixed, the beaker becomes cold and the total volume of the mixture is found to be slightly greater than the sum of the two volumes. What kind of deviation from Raoult’s law does this mixture show? What are the signs of \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}H\) and \(\Delta_{\text{mix}}V\)?

  2. Why can absolute (100%) alcohol not be obtained by fractional distillation of an ethanol-water mixture? Name the type of azeotrope involved and explain why its boiling point is lower than that of either pure component.

  3. Nitric acid and water form a maximum boiling azeotrope. What does this tell you about the sign of the deviation from Raoult’s law, and about the strength of the interactions between \(\mathrm{HNO_3}\) and \(\mathrm{H_2O}\) molecules compared with those in the pure liquids?

  4. Define colligative properties and name the four discussed in this chapter. What single change caused by the solute lies behind all four?

  5. Explain why the boiling point of a solution is always higher, and its freezing point always lower, than that of the pure solvent. Use a vapour pressure versus temperature diagram in your answer.

  6. Osmotic pressure is preferred over the other colligative properties for determining the molar masses of proteins and polymers. Give two reasons.

  7. What happens to a blood cell when it is placed in (i) pure water, (ii) 0.9% (mass/volume) sodium chloride solution, and (iii) a 5% sodium chloride solution? Name each type of solution and explain the direction of water flow.

  8. Explain, on the basis of osmosis, why (i) a raw mango shrivels when placed in brine, (ii) wilted flowers revive in fresh water, and (iii) salting preserves meat from bacterial attack.

  9. Distinguish between osmosis and reverse osmosis. What condition of pressure must be satisfied for reverse osmosis to occur, and why is cellulose acetate a suitable membrane material for desalination?

  10. A solute is found to have an experimentally determined molar mass twice its expected value in benzene. Has the solute dissociated or associated? What is the approximate value of its van’t Hoff factor? Give one example of such a solute.

  11. Assertion (A): One molal aqueous KCl depresses the freezing point of water roughly twice as much as one molal aqueous glucose. Reason (R): Colligative properties depend on the number of solute particles in the solution and not on their chemical identity. State whether A and R are true, and whether R correctly explains A.

  12. Table 1.4 shows that for NaCl, the van’t Hoff factor increases from 1.87 at 0.1 m to 1.97 at 0.001 m. Explain this trend. Why does \(\mathrm{MgSO_4}\) show a much smaller value of \(i\) than NaCl at the same concentration?

  13. Arrange 0.1 m aqueous solutions of glucose, NaCl and \(\mathrm{K_2SO_4}\) in increasing order of (i) freezing point and (ii) boiling point. Give reasons for the order, assuming complete dissociation of the electrolytes.

1.11 Practice With Numericals

  1. A solution is prepared by dissolving 25.0 g of ethylene glycol (\(\mathrm{C_2H_6O_2}\), molar mass 62 g mol\(^{-1}\)) in 375 g of water. Calculate (i) the mass percentage of ethylene glycol, (ii) the molality of the solution, and (iii) the mole fraction of each component.

  2. Calculate the molarity of a solution prepared by dissolving 4.0 g of NaOH (molar mass 40 g mol\(^{-1}\)) in enough water to make 250 mL of solution.

  3. An aqueous solution of sulphuric acid is 49% \(\mathrm{H_2SO_4}\) by mass and has a density of 1.35 g mL\(^{-1}\). Calculate its molarity and its molality. (Molar mass of \(\mathrm{H_2SO_4}\) = 98 g mol\(^{-1}\).)

  4. The Henry’s law constant for oxygen dissolved in water is 34.86 kbar at 293 K. If the partial pressure of oxygen above the water is 0.30 bar, calculate the mole fraction of oxygen in the water at 293 K.

  5. Nitrogen gas is bubbled through water at 293 K under a partial pressure of 2.0 bar. Using \(K_H\) = 76.48 kbar for \(\mathrm{N_2}\) at 293 K, calculate the number of moles of nitrogen dissolved in 1 litre of water. (1 litre of water contains 55.5 mol of water.)

  6. Two volatile liquids X and Y form an ideal solution. At 320 K, \(p_X^0\) = 160 mm Hg and \(p_Y^0\) = 320 mm Hg. A solution is made by mixing 1 mol of X with 3 mol of Y. Calculate the total vapour pressure of the solution and the mole fraction of Y in the vapour phase.

  7. The vapour pressure of pure benzene at 313 K is 160 mm Hg. When 3.0 g of a non-volatile, non-electrolyte solute is dissolved in 78 g of benzene (molar mass 78 g mol\(^{-1}\)), the vapour pressure of the solution falls to 152 mm Hg. Calculate the molar mass of the solute.

  8. Calculate the boiling point of a solution prepared by dissolving 12.0 g of urea (\(\mathrm{NH_2CONH_2}\), molar mass 60 g mol\(^{-1}\)) in 500 g of water. (\(K_b\) for water = 0.52 K kg mol\(^{-1}\); boiling point of pure water = 373.15 K.)

  9. 2.56 g of a non-volatile, non-electrolyte solute dissolved in 100 g of benzene raises the boiling point of benzene by 0.256 K. Calculate the molar mass of the solute. (\(K_b\) for benzene = 2.53 K kg mol\(^{-1}\).)

  10. Calculate the freezing point of a solution containing 6.0 g of glucose (\(\mathrm{C_6H_{12}O_6}\), molar mass 180 g mol\(^{-1}\)) in 100 g of water. (\(K_f\) for water = 1.86 K kg mol\(^{-1}\); freezing point of pure water = 273.15 K.)

  11. 0.75 g of a non-electrolyte solute dissolved in 30 g of cyclohexane lowers the freezing point of cyclohexane by 2.00 K. Calculate the molar mass of the solute. (\(K_f\) for cyclohexane = 20.00 K kg mol\(^{-1}\).)

  12. Calculate the osmotic pressure at 300 K of a solution containing 9.0 g of glucose (molar mass 180 g mol\(^{-1}\)) in 500 mL of solution. (\(R\) = 0.083 L bar K\(^{-1}\) mol\(^{-1}\).)

  13. A solution of a polymer containing 2.0 g of the polymer in 200 mL of solution has an osmotic pressure of \(4.15 \times 10^{-3}\) bar at 300 K. Calculate the molar mass of the polymer. (\(R\) = 0.083 L bar K\(^{-1}\) mol\(^{-1}\).)

  14. A 0.10 molal aqueous solution of KCl freezes at 272.79 K. Calculate the van’t Hoff factor and the degree of dissociation of KCl at this concentration. (\(K_f\) for water = 1.86 K kg mol\(^{-1}\); freezing point of pure water = 273.15 K.)

  15. Calculate the depression in freezing point of a 0.010 molal aqueous solution of \(\mathrm{K_2SO_4}\), assuming complete dissociation. (\(K_f\) for water = 1.86 K kg mol\(^{-1}\).)

  16. Calculate the osmotic pressure at 300 K of a 0.010 M aqueous solution of NaCl, taking the van’t Hoff factor as 1.94. (\(R\) = 0.083 L bar K\(^{-1}\) mol\(^{-1}\).)

  17. 2.0 g of benzoic acid (\(\mathrm{C_6H_5COOH}\), molar mass 122 g mol\(^{-1}\)) dissolved in 50 g of benzene gives a depression in freezing point of 0.80 K. Calculate the van’t Hoff factor and the percentage association of benzoic acid, assuming it forms a dimer. (\(K_f\) for benzene = 5.12 K kg mol\(^{-1}\).)